User

Nice to see that you accept your name as a Dumocrat.

You just keep moving those goalposts... first you tried to claim the risks were not told... now you claim, well, no one read them. This stuff was reported on. I already gave you a link. No, this is not complicated at all. The risks were reported on. To the point, you said, and you were wrong that: "but I think a big part of the problem was that the government was unwilling to admit that there was a possible risk in any meaningful way" What is not true? Be specific. LOL, the point was that the media did report on this. Now you are playing hindsight. More risks were uncovered later, yeah. At the time, that was what was known about the risk. Nothing was severely downplayed. What are you even talking about? Once again... hindsight. One again, your argument was that they were unwilling to admit there was a risk in any possible way. I have shown you the government said there was risk, the media said there was risk, it was clearly talked about, that there was risk. Now you just keep changing your argument to saying they did not know future risk that would be discovered. Duh. No, it doesn't. You have yet to show or explain what this risk is that existed at that time that they failed to report on or speak about. I asked you. You have ignored me. Here was my question to you that you ignored: OK, please elaborate on what the actual risk is you think existed then and how they downplayed that. I can't argue against an imaginary standard.

So interesting that for all the shit talk you sit here doing, it never seemed to have crossed your mind that you are still responding to me... which makes you just as much my b1tch as you think I am yours. The fact that it takes you so long only shows how much I am living in your head rent-free as you dwell on that. I don't need you to respond; hell, I am not even asking you to anymore. I am just calling you out for what you are.

Thank you! Thank you also for your sacrifices and for those of your fellow countrymen who served.

You: "and his approval being required for the multi-billion media merger. " Also You: "Nobody said Trump explicitly ordered the FCC to do anything." Go jerk yourself off some more. So... no evidence. Just your BS speculations. Another full of shit comment. "regularly." You can probably come up with maybe 3 examples and they will all be your contorted BS twisting of facts and drawing specious conclusions if not outright false claims. Yes, of course... the FCC has all this power to force leftists off the air because Trump doesn't like them... and yet here we are into the 2nd year of Trump and Colbert is all they got? There are literally hundreds of lefists across network TV, and Colbert isn't even near the top for insufferable tools and had abysmal ratings... but yeah, sure, lets go with your conspiratorial BS that somehow he was fired because Trump wanted him fired while ignoring the fact that his shit show was costing CBS something like 40 million dollars a year with their shit ratings. DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR bUt It WaS tRuMp!!!! dURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

No way. What we do is, we ship all the coal and industrial base over to China, where they don't give a shit, and then we can brag about how amazing we are and what we did to stop climate change!

I literally provided you a link to what was said in December 2020. I even quoted the part that said it was from December 2020. Another article from 2020 talking about the risks from the CBC: ""You do have to communicate out that there may be risks, and rightfully so, and also communicate about the magnitude of that risk and get people to really understand what that means," he said. "The risk of an allergy happening is probably beyond winning the lottery — that's not to say it's not going to happen, but it's something we need to watch for, it's something we're equipped for."" ... "Chagla also stressed that health officials will be monitoring for other reactions to COVID-19 vaccines that may show up over time. He said communication and transparency are the best ways to assuage vaccine hesitancy — as well as clearly stating to those who are eligible the risks of not getting the vaccine." https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/pfizer-vaccine-allergy-risk-canada-1.5839397 Back to the point, you originally asserted: "but I think a big part of the problem was that the government was unwilling to admit that there was a possible risk in any meaningful way" I have given you links to the government website, public health statements, and media coverage now. You are attempting to whitewash history here with your revisionism and the facts show you are wrong. I read up some more on this and yeah, looks like Canada screwed this up, giving out the contract to a 3rd party who spent most of the money on their administrative costs and only in the last few months has the government taken it back over themselves. Pretty shitty. Typical government stupidity. OK, please elaborate on what the actual risk is you think existed then and how they downplayed that. I can't argue against an imaginary standard. I have given you ample links and quotes now to show you they did in fact discuss risk. Your original assertion was not that they downplayed, but that again: "but I think a big part of the problem was that the government was unwilling to admit that there was a possible risk in any meaningful way" That was wrong, so now your claim is they downplayed the risk. So... lets hear it, what is the risk, what is you based that on? I figured that much out, it is on you to provide the source when you copy paste.

Where are you getting this from? Canada has maintained this page as well as has had this position from the beginning, outlining risks: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/vaccines/safety-side-effects.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com Here is official statement early on: Statement December 13, 2020 Ottawa, ON Public Health Agency of Canada Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, issued the following statement today: "Like any medication, vaccines can cause side effects and reactions. After being vaccinated, it's common to have mild side effects, such as redness and swelling at the injection site — this is the body's natural response, as it's working to build immunity against a disease. In most instances, these effects resolve quickly and completely. However, it is also possible for someone to have a serious adverse reaction to a vaccine. " https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/news/2020/12/statement-from-the-chief-public-health-officer-of-canada-on-december-13-2020.html Do you have any statistics to show how much vs how little support was provided for those injured? You have one example... that shows it may not be perfect, but... say, the government did provide assistance to the vast majority of folks... then what is your point? They were honest about risk. I gave you two examples. Can you provide any examples where they said there was no risk as you sit here claiming?

What exactly are you just saying? You are conflating distrust of the COVID vaccine with the government's management of compensation for those injured. Those are two different things.

You ignoring my data and your seeing the flaws with it are two separate things that can both be true at the same time. I provide data, you ignore it. IF you think there are flaws, then let's see it. If you are going to copy and paste, provide the source. What point do you think this copy-and-paste job makes that you are trying to make?

I literally quoted you. You say something, you get called out, you act like you didn't say it, deny it, deflect, lie, run away... "drawing the connection" ROFL, you mean, you jumped from one vague comment to the conclusion? No real argument or evidence given. Shortly before... what? What is the exact date of the merger approval? Do you realize it is the Democrats who are actively opposing the FCC approving the merger right now? Once again, you are a clown.

Yeah... it is a naval blockade of IRANIAN ports, not the entire Strait. Notice your deceptive language? So... now you want Iran to be able to trade freely while they block everyone else that doesn't pay them? You do little more than talk shit on the US all the time here... but now you are crying they are not going to do enough to protect Taiwan? Where is the rest of the world you love so much? Where do you live? Why are they not doing anything?

Racists find a lot of things welcoming. They go to McDonalds, Walmart, the movies... You better hide in your basement! Almost anything you do, a racist likely does too! It is the dumb dishonest game the left plays. They start with the presumption that everyone on the right is a racist, then any little thing is proof of that! While anytime a leftist does anything, it was an innocent mistake... nothing to see, move along.

Reminder of what a cowardly, lying, POS @BeaverFever is:

Just to be clear here... you are quoting yourself with "less evolved" as I don't believe he ever said that. You did.

I swear, can you ever come up with something intelligent to say?

Still pushing your pathetic lies.

Oh no, the crybaby coward is going to ignore another poster! LOL

Reminder of what a cowardly, lying, POS @BeaverFever is:

Tell me, are the racists all around you? Do you see them in your sleep? Are they hiding in your closet? ROFL

Reminder of what a cowardly, pathetic, lying POS @BeaverFever is:

Speaking from personal experience?

1) Ignoring all the destruction of Iranian military infrastructure, the death of numerous amounts of leadership... depletion and destruction of vast amounts of their underground inventories of munitions... 2) What exactly was the promise? <- You are making shit up as usual 3) "Massive" as in 1% almost completely associated with fuel costs 4) *GASP* Those are estimates, and so what? Maybe Canada can help us with some more shade trees? 5) Conflating fiscal policy with wartime consequences from Iran threatening the Strait. Why do you sit here covering for Iran? Because you must hate Trump.

Oh man! Maybe if you deployed some shade trees! LOL, always shifting those goal posts. So, there was a plan! Now it doesn't matter! Now its the classic Beaver throw more mud at the wall move. Oh... so you think Iran never had a plan now? They just decided after this attack, oh hey, I have an idea, lets deploy our military forces to threaten the Strait! How convenient we just happened to have been building a fleet of speedboats equipped with mines for asymmetric warfare, other missiles, and hardened underground bunkers all along there, with everything we need! So, Trump was supposed to have planned for something Iran was never threatening to do? You are trying to have it both ways now. Keep crying, plant some more trees.

Oh look, the cowardly liar is back to irrationally hate on Trump and America again. What is Canadas big plan to defend Taiwan?