User

This thread is based on a lie. You said they were here legally, they were not. They filed for asylum, it was denied. Now they get deported. "immediately after their asylum hearing was dismissed. " You don't agree? It is a fact: "immediately after their asylum hearing was dismissed. "

Who cares how tall you are? We already know you are a cowardly liar who runs away... by how you behave here.

You push this false talking point once, then you balk at my calling you out for it as being irrelevant, and now you so "graciously" concede that if I would like you to retract this point, you will. Just say you were wrong. It is not that hard. Except that the concept of a digital services tax is novel and also questionable as to how it applies at this point in the value chain and no, it is not purely a domestic matter when it clearly impacts the big US tech firms wildly disproportionately as compared to any business in Candada. Sure, you can do as you want in Canada, just as America can choose how to respond to your actions and how they impact US business like this. Yes, it is absurd. You are free to argue against the actions, which you did, but you don't just get to dismiss them as not being "valid" And again... Canada not collecting that is nothing as compared to their overall budget each year... You just repeated yourself over again in this whole response. Yes, it is. Because what they make in total each year has little to do with their ability to afford the cost. Let me show you why it is ignorant in simple terms: Company A makes 20 Trillion in revenue each year, but they profit only 5 billion... Company B makes 100 Billion a year in revenue, but they profit 80 Billion... Now you come along and say that Company A can easily afford 2 billion because look they made 20 Trillion in revenue! Your using that number is ignorant because it doesn't take into account margins, risk, actual net profit... BOTTOM LINE: The DST is controversial and has been controversial long before Trump or MAGA came along and your country doesn't have a god-given right to do whatever it wants free from the consequences for how other countries feel or will react to that.

The AR-15 is not a typical big game rifle... so I guess now you don't think it is an Assault Style weapon?

So... just the AR-15 then? How you people this dumb? Congratulations, this is not an Assault STYLE weapon according to you: It shoots the 7.62x39 round that is not used in an AR-15. You literally did, you are just too stupid to understand that you did. Remember when you specifically said AR-15?

You are clearly not aware of a lot of things... and yet push wildly extreme positions on gun ownership. Perhaps you should take some time to educate yourself more, listen to what others are saying here.

Yes, yes you did. You said you wanted to ban all semi-automatic firearms. That is in fact the most commonly owned firearm type. So, you are either so incredibly stupid that you don't grasp this or are just continuing to be this dishonest as to deny something you already said. Clearly not. No, just pointing out that you calling yourself a gun owner is meaningless in this discussion as you are clearly quite ignorant on how they function and even more ignorant on mass shootings. Well, when you can't defend your own stupid lies, just make up something else to argue against.

THIS, THIS RIGHT HERE IS WHY WE ACCURATELY SAY YOU ARE AN ANTI-SEMITE. Being a Jew is an ethnicity/religion, not a race like white or black. Jews can be white, black, asian... When you ask such an incredibly ignorant question, it either shows us what a complete mor0n you are or you are someone deliberately skewing the language because you are both a mor0n and an anti-semite.

I have repeatedly told you and outright linked you back to my answer to your question and you just keep playing dumb like this. I have also explained my thoughts on your wanting to see Israel destroyed, but you have finally responded to my question and said that isn't what you want. OK. Once again, the saying is that you could NOT care less... but for someone who is here trying to say you can't, why are you spending so much time caring about it here? If you did, I missed it, but if you are finally answering my question now, great. Glad to hear it. Make up your mind, you complain when I do answer your questions and then you sit here complaining that I don't. Stop posting stupid shit, I will stop calling it out.

I just gave you the link to my comment and position and you still play dumb. The saying is that you could not care less, because if you can care less, then that means you do care... either way, if you are trying to say you don't care, why did you bring it up? So... I asked: Do you want Israel to be destroyed? You keep avoiding that question. Nope, never said that. You ask me questions, I answered them. You made stupid assertions, I responded to them. Well, if it was not your concern, why make ignorant and inaccurate comments on the subject?

What was the lie? You keep throwing that around, but its just little more than the desperation of a drowning man flailing about.

And then you said all semi-automatics. Like I said, in the span of an hour you are already moving your call to action to ban the vast majority of all owned firearms in the country, the most commonly owned firearms. See, this is where folks like you who claim to be gun owners, start to show how little you know about actually using guns. You can very easily continue to load a shotgun, while it is still in use. Santa Fe Texas, 2018, mass shooter used a shotgun and revolver to kill 10 and wound 13. Top 10 deadliest mass shootings in a school. Thats what happens with a shotgun and revolver. He was stopped because Law Enforcement showed up to stop him. That is how most mass shootings stop, when someone armed is there to stop them, regardless of weapon types. Yes, you are dishonest. You lied repeatedly here about what Biden has said, then you pushed wanting to ban assault style weapons, then you added on all semi-automatics, and what... you think your anti-gun gun control arguments stop when a kid shows up with a shotgun and a revolver and still kills a bunch of kids? Now all of a sudden you don't support gun-control? Yeah right.

The slippery slope has already progressed in the span of less than an hour! You went from ban assault style weapons to ban all semi-automatic weapons. Then... just like all the other specious gun control folks around the world like you... when someone does show up at the school and start blasting people with the pump action shot gun, then what? Folks like you are not honest, you have already lied repeatedly in this thread, shifted your position on what guns to ban, and we all know you will then cry about pump action shot guns wanting to ban them... then when someone shows up to the school and starts blasting kids with a revolver... it will be all hand guns...

I did not post a video... What exactly makes you a gun owner, that you have the family hand-me-down single-shot 20-gauge shotgun? So, you oppose ALL semi-automatic weapons, not only "assault style?" The amount of bullets that come out of any of those guns doesn't stop mass shootings with them, most mass shootings are not done with "assault style" weapons.

More lies. He said "MAGA Movement" and you are the one trying to interject that only meant Representatives... only AFTER you just got done saying he was only talking about Trump. This was just the first example I found and you have already been caught lying 3 times now.

LOL, the typical leftist BS of espousing some ignorant gun-control argument then saying you are a gun owner... Assault style weapons are not the only guns used in mass shootings... so then what?

More lies. Not only did Biden disparage MAGA followers, he said they were a threat to democracy. In forceful condemnation of Trump, Biden warns that ‘MAGA’ backers pose grave threat to democracy ""This MAGA threat is a threat to the brick and mortar of our democratic institutions," Biden said. "It's also a threat to the character of our nation that gives our Constitution life, that binds us together as Americans, a common cause. None of this is surprising, though. They've tried to govern that way before. Thank God they failed. But they haven't given up." https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/biden-trump-describe-maga-extremist-rcna117796

So... just going to ignore how Biden and the Democrats spent the last 4 years railing against everyone they labeled as MAGA? Seriously... you are either so ignorant as to be beyond belief or are just another average left-wing liar with no shame.

Well, they can be subtle sometimes... yeah.

Well, some remnants of their Chemical warfare program were lingering around, but either way... maybe next time Saddam will comply with the demands. Oh wait... too late for that. ISIS would never have existed for a million different reasons... trying to focus only on what Bush did with the initial invasion is dishonest. ISIS did not exist during those 6 years Bush continued to be President...

This is another dishonest response. If you sit here trying to claim this is some MAGA thing to oppose this, my pointing out that this concept has been opposed on a bipartisan basis across multiple administrations, both Republican and Democrat, is entirely relevant. When you sit here trying to argue that this is an OK tax, presenting only one metric, that it applies to both US and Canadian businesses... it is entirely relevant to point out the other facts that show how unfair/egregious this tax is. Says who? You making up the rules on what is and is not valid is absurd on its face. Clearly the country you are imposing most of your taxes on disagrees. Knowing about the potential for a future tax is meaningless in light of the egregious nature of retroactive legislation. It doesn't somehow make it better to pass a retroactively applied tax because you knew folks were talking about it before. The Canadian government's budget is about 500 billion a year, I am sure they can get by without a retroactive tax grab. You also ignorantly present revenue instead of profits. Amazon still has a huge operating cost, that is not what they profit each year.

So says any objective review of what is happening...

Organized religion is not a 'middleman' It is a community of believers.

The whole notion about unity is absurd on its face. Politics is not supposed to be unifying. We have fundamentally different ideas on how best to do things and what laws to pass, there is not going to be unity there. Politics is based on some ideas winning and other ideas losing. As far as disparaging things go, that cat is long out of the bag now, and not unique to Trump.

You are being dishonest here by omission: This tax would be retroactive, estimated to cost US businesses some 2 billion dollars, and it is also estimated that 90% of this tax would be paid for by US businesses. Sitting here saying it applies to both Canadians and non-Canadians is grossly dishonest by omission with the impact it will have. This isn't a MAGA issue either, as past Presidents, both Republicans and Democrats have oppsed this when it was previously brought up.