User

Another lie. You are so damn dishonest. Israel did not have the attack plans for October 7th. They had a vague intelligence report that they were planning something.

Facts are facts. You are the lowest of the lowlifes on a forum. A dishonest slug.

You cowards, you come on here and push your warped ideology but then have to run and hide when you get called out and then act all big.

@Gaétan One of the most dishonest, despicable things you can do on a forum like this is to attribute something to someone they didn't say by abusing the quote feature, as you just did. Be better.

No, we are seeing Israel completely own Iran as we speak. Seems things are going pretty well for them.

What bill is being snuck through? You just push baseless BS on here and run away when challenged.

No, it doesn't. If you are so concerned about lies... why don't you stop doing it so much here? Medicare. Medicaid is for low income people... Medicare is what old people use. Come back when you are smart enough to talk about this subject.

Nothing you posted here supports showing he lied. The fact that there are prominent folks on the right who were involved with Project 2025 and then later Trump has some of them in the administration doesn't prove he lied. Project 2025 was something like 1000 pages long. Define "much" here? Again, the fact that some things in Project 2025 have some overlap with other traditional Conservative/Republican positions on things and are implemented or discussed or partly considered and implemented doesn't mean Trump is working off of Project 2025. Shows how little you know. Project 2025 doesn't call to abolish FEMA, it calls for reforms.

Once again... the biggest shit talker while being the biggest coward all at the same time...

Read my response, if you are brave enough.

Yeah @robosmith, you know why they do it like that? Because he is likely to win on the merits and they disagree with the lower courts reasoning. So... you hold on to hope! In the end, Trump is going to win this one.

That district judges arguments and reasoning were so out there is was absurd in the first place. Then you have folks like @robosmith who pretend it was a great legal ruling, but then run away when asked to support that or when it is pointed out to them how awful it was.

I already made my comment earlier here that if you had read would answer this question. The answer is no. My view is that if lawlessness is going to be supported by authorities, then expec to see similar levels of lawlessness to counter it with people driving through crowds slowly or around them or moving them out of the way. I support passing laws like Florida did that give civil and criminal liability protections to drivers who fear for their safety to flee.

Well, that is certainly what you are saying now, but not what you said before. I will take this as your clarification, though, that you do in fact condemn the police for their abuse. Thanks

Did you have any commentary you wanted to discuss here or just spamming the forum with other peoples opinions?

So... you sit here arguing America should be overrun by mass illegal immigration that is hammering our economy, hammering our businesses, hammering our economic systems... while you then turn around and argue your own damn country should have protective barriers in place?

You are so dishonest. Netanyahu was trying to keep peace, Qutar money was going towards humanitarian aid, was supposed to go to those purposes and mostly did. These were all efforts to help keep the peace with Hamas. There is no real evidence Israel had any exact plans for any attack, it was vague intelligence that something was being planned at some point in the future, not that Netanyahu somehow knew that on October 7th this was what was exactly going to happen. You frame your comments up purposefully vague so you can dishonestly frame them as you did with no real context.

A person would have to be a complete fool just to believe whatever media headlines they read... He has had this entire time to apply for asylum or permanent legal status based on any work he did with the US, and he has not done so. He will have due process now to present his case if there is any merit to it.

This is another lie as you have repeatedly argued against deporting illegal immigrants even with due process here.

LOL, listen a lot... from the person who has me on ignore because I called you out for being a liar and you can't own up to that. Then you are going to spam this forum with threads about how narrowly defined Chrisitanity is and if no one does it just the way you say, they are not Christians. What does your Bible say about being such a pathological liar?

Yeah, he obfuscates in plenty of threads, too!

Sigh... so dishonest. That was a study focused only on girls. I guess you don't care about boys? There is a reason the pro Trans-Madness link you cited included that little statement last. "Lots" huh? How many do you define as "lots" You must have me on ignore again after I tore apart all your bogus trans madness arguments the last time.

No, the law was about more than just puberty blockers. It outlined surgical "transition" procedures as well. The fact that YOU have to abuse language shows your point is weak. No, they most certainly are not free to approve mutilation. Be more specific.

Do you think it is OK to block roadways illegally?

Two-tier justice system. Left-wing politicians get away with breaking the law...