User

And then you said all semi-automatics. Like I said, in the span of an hour you are already moving your call to action to ban the vast majority of all owned firearms in the country, the most commonly owned firearms. See, this is where folks like you who claim to be gun owners, start to show how little you know about actually using guns. You can very easily continue to load a shotgun, while it is still in use. Santa Fe Texas, 2018, mass shooter used a shotgun and revolver to kill 10 and wound 13. Top 10 deadliest mass shootings in a school. Thats what happens with a shotgun and revolver. He was stopped because Law Enforcement showed up to stop him. That is how most mass shootings stop, when someone armed is there to stop them, regardless of weapon types. Yes, you are dishonest. You lied repeatedly here about what Biden has said, then you pushed wanting to ban assault style weapons, then you added on all semi-automatics, and what... you think your anti-gun gun control arguments stop when a kid shows up with a shotgun and a revolver and still kills a bunch of kids? Now all of a sudden you don't support gun-control? Yeah right.

The slippery slope has already progressed in the span of less than an hour! You went from ban assault style weapons to ban all semi-automatic weapons. Then... just like all the other specious gun control folks around the world like you... when someone does show up at the school and start blasting people with the pump action shot gun, then what? Folks like you are not honest, you have already lied repeatedly in this thread, shifted your position on what guns to ban, and we all know you will then cry about pump action shot guns wanting to ban them... then when someone shows up to the school and starts blasting kids with a revolver... it will be all hand guns...

I did not post a video... What exactly makes you a gun owner, that you have the family hand-me-down single-shot 20-gauge shotgun? So, you oppose ALL semi-automatic weapons, not only "assault style?" The amount of bullets that come out of any of those guns doesn't stop mass shootings with them, most mass shootings are not done with "assault style" weapons.

More lies. He said "MAGA Movement" and you are the one trying to interject that only meant Representatives... only AFTER you just got done saying he was only talking about Trump. This was just the first example I found and you have already been caught lying 3 times now.

LOL, the typical leftist BS of espousing some ignorant gun-control argument then saying you are a gun owner... Assault style weapons are not the only guns used in mass shootings... so then what?

More lies. Not only did Biden disparage MAGA followers, he said they were a threat to democracy. In forceful condemnation of Trump, Biden warns that ‘MAGA’ backers pose grave threat to democracy ""This MAGA threat is a threat to the brick and mortar of our democratic institutions," Biden said. "It's also a threat to the character of our nation that gives our Constitution life, that binds us together as Americans, a common cause. None of this is surprising, though. They've tried to govern that way before. Thank God they failed. But they haven't given up." https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/biden-trump-describe-maga-extremist-rcna117796

So... just going to ignore how Biden and the Democrats spent the last 4 years railing against everyone they labeled as MAGA? Seriously... you are either so ignorant as to be beyond belief or are just another average left-wing liar with no shame.

Well, they can be subtle sometimes... yeah.

Well, some remnants of their Chemical warfare program were lingering around, but either way... maybe next time Saddam will comply with the demands. Oh wait... too late for that. ISIS would never have existed for a million different reasons... trying to focus only on what Bush did with the initial invasion is dishonest. ISIS did not exist during those 6 years Bush continued to be President...

This is another dishonest response. If you sit here trying to claim this is some MAGA thing to oppose this, my pointing out that this concept has been opposed on a bipartisan basis across multiple administrations, both Republican and Democrat, is entirely relevant. When you sit here trying to argue that this is an OK tax, presenting only one metric, that it applies to both US and Canadian businesses... it is entirely relevant to point out the other facts that show how unfair/egregious this tax is. Says who? You making up the rules on what is and is not valid is absurd on its face. Clearly the country you are imposing most of your taxes on disagrees. Knowing about the potential for a future tax is meaningless in light of the egregious nature of retroactive legislation. It doesn't somehow make it better to pass a retroactively applied tax because you knew folks were talking about it before. The Canadian government's budget is about 500 billion a year, I am sure they can get by without a retroactive tax grab. You also ignorantly present revenue instead of profits. Amazon still has a huge operating cost, that is not what they profit each year.

So says any objective review of what is happening...

Organized religion is not a 'middleman' It is a community of believers.

The whole notion about unity is absurd on its face. Politics is not supposed to be unifying. We have fundamentally different ideas on how best to do things and what laws to pass, there is not going to be unity there. Politics is based on some ideas winning and other ideas losing. As far as disparaging things go, that cat is long out of the bag now, and not unique to Trump.

You are being dishonest here by omission: This tax would be retroactive, estimated to cost US businesses some 2 billion dollars, and it is also estimated that 90% of this tax would be paid for by US businesses. Sitting here saying it applies to both Canadians and non-Canadians is grossly dishonest by omission with the impact it will have. This isn't a MAGA issue either, as past Presidents, both Republicans and Democrats have oppsed this when it was previously brought up.

Simple-minded leftists. Deporting illegal immigrants is just too hard a solution for them. Hurts their tiny brains. Let a pregnant illegal immigrant plop a baby out 1 foot over the border and BOOM, American citizen, so much easier. Drool.

How many illegal immigrants you have living with you? Why are you not crying to your government to open the flood gates and let more people in your own damn country?

At this point, it might be a shorter list to let us know who you don't have on ignore. Coward.

Um, no, that is not how the American government works at all. US citizenship is not defined or controlled at the state level.

Well... this is a very technical ruling in Trumps favor... he won the battle against the absurd nationwide injunctions, but the question of if the 14th Amendment really does mean a pregnant illegal immigrant who climbs the border wall and then immediately gives birth to their child 1 foot on American soil while a border patrol agent is in the process of deporting them back but didn't quite make it to the border line now means that child is BOOM American citizen!

For as wrong as the world was, hindsight is 20/20, the intelligence at that time showed Saddam was hiding his program and since we couldn't see anything, the presumption based on intelligence was that he was persuing the program. Bush demanded at the time 100% complete and total capitulation to inspections on our terms, Saddam refused. That refusal, in conjuction with the terms of his surrender from the Kuwait invasion were the groundwork for our invasion.

Within the framework of existing laws and due process, as Trump and this administration have said, Garcia is never coming back here except in a jail cell. The poor little "Maryland family man" that became the Democrats celebrity cause to rally around is little more than a gang member or affiliate that was likely involved in gang violence in El Salvador which is why his life was threatened by rival gangs there at the time and why he continued to engage in gang activity helping them in human trafficing here. Never mind, he is a wife-beater. And this is what Democrats want to protect staying in America.

Why don't you spend your time begging Canada to take in more immigrants instead of complaining about America enforcing our borders and laws? How many illegal immigrants do you have living in your home now?

LOL, so if you don't read English you are screwed? Come on man. Enough of this silly extremism. Someone's personal relationship with God is not dependent upon them being able to read English, nor must they have to use the King James version of The Bible.

This wasn’t your claim you liar. You said Iran never attacked Israel. Now, be honest, what exactly did Israel bomb in Syria? Go on coward. Let’s see if you have any decency at all here.

You called it earlier. This thread is a spectacular display of his complete dissociation from the truth.