gatomontes99

In his mind, he did. He responded to the emotions he felt at DB identifying how to use personell to drive policy. Does it matter that DB was imploring DJT to institute such a policy rather than "prostrating himself"? No. The emotions he felt are all that mattered.

Yarvin isn't a problem. He's a solution. He's absolutely right. People are policy.

Name one that does a better job or articulating his position.

Did anyone else watch this? I almost forgot just how freaking awesome this guy is. He's absolutely the best politician that I've ever seen at articulating his position in a way that is unimpeachable. I don't see how he could be stopped in 4 years. It really feels like he will be the next President.

Yep. And its kind of funny.

I don't know, because it's entertainment?

Tha laughable part about this is he expects us to bow to his peer pressure and recite some mantra of the left to be accepted by him. It is as if thinks he's the keeper of the book of righteous souls or some nonsense.

How about the deputy fire chief saying it in a promo video?

In a democracy, one vote is no more or less valuable than another. So his opinion on DEI is every bit as valuable as those of a sociologists. Further, as you are not a sociologist, you are not qualified to tell him his opinion is wrong.

Wow. Do you really want to take that tact? Look at Joe. He's making the case to amass at the border and abuse asylum laws. And then it happened. Explain that. Tell us again how Republicans did it.

Encounters 2024: 2.9 million CBP Terrorists 2024: 410 CBP Got Aways 2024: 2.0 million (aprox) The Center Square Estimated Terrorist Got Aways: 283 (assuming the same ratio) And that is JUST in 2024. 2023 had 1.7 million gotaways for an approximate 240 terrorist gotaways House.gov

When you have an open border, guys like this think they can cross with impunity. The question becomes, is this his first crossing?

The entire point of this trial was for the process to be the punishment. The sentencing proved that.

This guy has to be high, right? It's comical. Or is someone here pretending to be a lib? Because this is so bad it can't be real, can it?

His house didn't burn down. Sorry libs. Your disgusting behavior only served to further strengthen the belief that you are, collectively, a disgusting waste of food and oxygen.

Ah, you poor thing. Point to where the mean men hurt you.

Wow. Is the left desperately delusional or delusionally desperate?

The judge all but dismissed it. He's "convicted" with zero penalty.

Crap....it was Democrats. My bad.

You would. But let's say you supposition is correct. Does that help you win? No. I'll not attack the intelligence of the American voters and take their votes for 270 and the win.

You still don't have a coherent thesis. Further, you reinforced my statements. But, I have to ask, is French your natural language?

It's not open for discussion! That's why he started a thread...on a forum...that discusses politics. The left does this all the time. They love to make declarations and claim that the declaration is unimpeachable. Of course, when you question their declaration they call you one of their pre-approved, preferred names (i.e. rrrrrrrrrrrraaaaacist!, fascist, Hitler, etc). As for the OP, I don't even have a clue what he's talking about or what set him off. There was no context, no explanation, no coherence. It was just a declaration of the right being Hitler and fascist and that he will accept no other explanation. Go figure.

That's because Humanity has basically existed in an ice age. Now, look at how quickly we transitioned from ice age to gas house. Plus, looking at such a minute data set when the transitions are measured in hundredss of thousands of years is asinine. This 1880 to today dataset is taking the valley and the peak and calling that data normalization. That isn't how it's done.

Yes. The chicken Littles love to use the 100 year chart. Why? It turns out that the temperature changes, historically, aren't a solid linear line. The temperature changes look more like the stock market. While you can normalize the trend, the data set shows peaks and valleys as it climbs and falls. The chicken Littles love to use 100 years ago because that is a valley. So take a look at this. If you go back about 1000 years, you will see that the global temperature was about .8 degree C cooler. Meanwhile, chicken Littles are trying to tell you we have gained 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years. It sounds scarey, but it isn't the truth. The truth is CO2 is a by product of increased temperatures and it is because CO2 is produced by increasing temperatures that the planet is able to produce more vegetation and thus more life. It's called science.