gatomontes99

Well, Bradbury v Ohio tells us that speech can incite violence and still be protected. Unless she actually said she was going to use the Bible as justification to kill the mayor, then it falls into the realm of conspiracy to committ murder. But it still isn't terrorism.

If you want to know what a Democrat will do in office e, just listen to what they accuse others of doing. That's what the Democrat is doing.

It was a bad bill that normalized massive illegal immigration rates and did nothing to actually secure the border. It had to be killed.

OMG! She asked a question! Oh sh1t! What do we do? It was a question? HANG THE TERRORIST!!! Why is it only democrats are against securing elections?

That's not what happened. Just stop. You are endorsing the Banana Republic lic b.s. Just own it. Don't try to hide from it while you openly do it.

Right, because Honeland Security investigating people for having controversial options is aok? How about when the FBI does it? FBI whistleblowers say pro-life groups, Catholics were 'target of the government' You made two statements claiming your side isn't radical. You got proven wrong. Are you going to renounce their actions or try to cover for them?

I posted it because it changes nothing. If it is alive enough to resuscitate, then it is being killed.

No, I was absolutely correct and no that was not the set of circumstances. There was no definitive statement that it can't live. Even still, there was an implications that it would be killed. If you shoot a man having a heart attack, is that murder or natural causes?

Well look at that. That windmill is a giant after all: Homeland Security listed pro-life moms as ‘radicalization suspects’ docs reveal

Here “[Third trimester abortions are] done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam, a pediatric neurosurgeon, told Washington radio station WTOP. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” There. Nothing changes. Baby is born alive and yes, it can be killed. That's what he said.

The problem they have with Newsom is that that would be perceived as a slight to Kamala. Either she would be relegated to a second term as the second to a white man or dumped all together. Either way, they already have a problem with black men flipping to Trump. Any slight to Kamala would exacerbate that problem. If Kamala runs, it will be an even bigger disaster.

Oh please. Don't act like this is some extreme example. He didn't give an extreme example. He was asked if the abortion should happen after birth and he said yes, that is an option.

Ask him. I said all people are equal. He said there are inequalities.

Not inequities...inequalities. he's saying there is a difference in recession, sexes, religions, etc. He also implied that it is ok to treat people differently based on those inequalities.

“If Trump and [John] Roberts and Alito and [Neil] Gorsuch and [Clarence] Thomas and Leonard Leo and the Heritage Foundation, if they get a hold, there will be no government left, there will be no rights left, you will live under theocracy, you’ll end up with Christian nationalism. But that’s all right, you little f[edited] 26-year-old, you don’t feel like ‘the election’s important to me. They’re not addressing the issues that I care about,'” said Carville. Clearly Carville believes that Trump will win or he wouldn't be freaking out over younger voters not wanting to vote for Joe. Anecdotally: a good friend of mine has a very liberal daughter. She got into teaching and just graduated last year. She's a councilor in Chicago right now. She was all in D. Now she's not. She's not voting for Trump. Let's make that clear. This is no full conversion story. But she is done with Democrats. She is quitting after this school year to move back to Texas and she is sitting out the election. That is an example of what James is addressing. But that leads to another discussion, will Democrats replace Joe. I believe they will. I actually stated that (on a different forum) when the boxes where found at Penn-Biden, that that was the first step in getting Joe removed. Do not be surprised if he is forced out. They will either get enough damning info on him, his son and his brother to blackmail him into quitting, get his family indicted or use a doctor to say he is to senile to continue. In any case, something will drive Joe out of the race.

If it is comfortable and viable enough to resuscitate, it is a post birth abortion. Make all the justifications you want, but you are supporting people that are ok with killing a post birth child. “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam says in a video from the 2019 interview being shared online. “The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

Ralph Northam said that if a baby was born they would make it comfortable and discuss with the mother what to do. That was regarding their abortion bill in Virginia.

Tell that to Ralph.

No you didn't. Prove he said it. You can't, because he didn't. All there is for "evidence" is unnamed sources. However, the Secret Service called it off because ceilings were to low to fly the helicopters and the drive was to far to be secure. “The helicopter could not fly,” he said, because of the rain and fog. “The Secret Service told me you can’t do it. ... They would never have been able to get the police and everybody else in line to have a president go through a very crowded, very congested area.”

https://rumble.com/v4rk67w-nyc-construction-worker-has-epic-two-word-message-for-joe-biden.html SPOILER: "F!_!(k you"

The border of what sanity and senility?

Case in point on the X today:

Aren't you the one that wines whenever someone posts a link you deamed biased? Then you post that? Come on man. If you are going to be demanding, try to meet your own standards. Since biased opinions are now acceptable to you, her is the Hill's reporting on the tax cuts: A careful analysis of the IRS tax data, one that includes the effects of tax credits and other reforms to the tax code, shows that filers with an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $15,000 to $50,000 enjoyed an average tax cut of 16 percent to 26 percent in 2018, the first year Republicans’ Tax Cuts and Jobs Act went into effect and the most recent year for which data is available. ADVERTISING  Filers who earned $50,000 to $100,000 received a tax break of about 15 percent to 17 percent, and those earning $100,000 to $500,000 in adjusted gross income saw their personal income taxes cut by around 11 percent to 13 percent.  By comparison, no income group with an AGI of at least $500,000 received an average tax cut exceeding 9 percent, and the average tax cut for brackets starting at $1 million was less than 6 percent. (For more detailed data, see my table published here.)  That means most middle-income and working-class earners enjoyed a tax cut that was at least double the size of tax cuts received by households earning $1 million or more. Looks there. Your report was

Equality of process means the law neither favors nor henders based on superficial characteristics. Rights are not meaningless if you are incapable of executing them. They don't exist of the government regulates them. Dude, come on. First, she absolutely said Trump and his cronies. So she wasnt just talking about his cronies. Second, no one ever called Trump racist before he was a politician. In fact, the Clinton's invited gin to Chelsea's wedding. Are you saying the Clintons invited a known racist to a wedding? Second, the Central Park 5 were convicted of rape when he talked about them and he never made any mention of race. He only said that NY should bring back the death penalty, in light of that act, as a tough on crime stance. As for renting, Trump says that they tried to eliminate welfare cases..aka if you can't pay, there is nothing available. It is possible that a manager took that differently. However the case was settled with nothing more than some policies added to their renting procedures.

Oh that is an interesting topic. You see, he defines Chistian Nationalists as these radicals that want the nation to be a theocracy. Of course, virtually no one wants that. He also ignored the black nationalists, the Muslim nationalists and everyone else that wants to be dictator for life. It's the christians that worry him. Ok, so, it doesn't sound so bad to stop a theocracy. Never mind that that is in no way a plan of any seriousness any where. The point is to create a boogeyman. Someone you can blame for everything and Noone will defend him because he's not real. Then the creep can start. You add a belief here and a belief there. Something fringe that most won't agree with like polygamy and virgin sacrifices. Then you start adding more and more mainstream views and one day we all wake up and if you've ever owned a Bible, you are a Christian Nationalist.