gatomontes99

You don't speak English for a first language, do you? Is it French?

See ya!

Yes, they are but... The tariffs are an added cost. That gives the domestic businesses a cost advantage. Nope. Price elasticity. You probably need more than 2 words. Where would the domestic goods come from? Can Canada just start up massive amounts of manufacturing to adapt to the new economic climate? Probably not. Therefore, the US exporters to Canada can drive up the cost of their goods to Canadians. There will be some loss of volume, but the over all numbers will still look good for us.

Democracy at work? Right? Because Democrats thing Democracy is installing leaders without a secure vote is the Democratic process. If there is a vote that allows the people to pick a leader, that is anti-Democratic and should be met with resistance and violence.

Correction....Abilio Acosta

Can someone translate this?

Ah, but will we? Taxes are paid by the end user. But uneven taxes are bad for those that are taxed. If you tax foreign imports, the imports either become more costly and less competitive of they become less profitable. Either way, the high taxes benefit the domestic business.

Higher taxes are bad.

Just because you are afraid doesn't mean he is using fear.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2025/01/22/read-what-joe-biden-wrote-in-letter-to-donald-trump/77886464007/ This is a very nice letter. It was great of him to drop the partisan crap and write something inspirational to the next President. But doesn't that bother the left that he was nice to the guy that is literally Hitler?

My team didn't make the playoffs. But thanks for playing.

Trump raised the bedt $7T with COVID spending. Biden raised the debt $9T w/o COVID spending.

Do you know who added more?

Yeah, we know.

https://www.usdebtclock.org/ $9B saved and counting up. Here we go.

I love how liberals suddenly realize that taxes are always paid by the end user. Corporations pass on taxes. The rich pass on taxes. I pass my taxes own to my employer. Our customers pay my taxes. So the higher the taxes are, the more expensive things are.

Winning!

You guys suggest a lot of b.s. I put no stock in it. I think it's very interesting that she's literally saying there is no legal basis for with holding his client list while you guys are saying she's protecting him. Those two actions don't add up. Oh...BTW...this article is pretty extensive. NBC The article never once names Bondi. It puts most of the blame (via innuendo) on Acosta. So, no, Bondi didn't let Epstein slide.

Wow. You are firmly ensconced in that fantasy land, aren't you? What pedophile friend?

It is the left doing what the left does. We have less than two years to get shìt done. Forget her. We've got more important stuff to do like getting Pam in her office, asap.

🤪

Thank you Captain Obvious! Lol

Joe Biden (more aptly, his handlers) had the prosecutors from Georgia to the White House: So Wade went and talked to WH counsel. That's weird. And he did it twice from the time he was selected to the time he indicted Trump. Also weird. But, I'm sure the fact that he says he can't remember makes it all perfectly innocent...right? I toured the WH once and remember everything about it. It's weird that Wade had a meeting with prestigious WH Counsel and some how he just doesn't know who he talked to or what they talked about? But he did remember to get paid for it. I don't think he forgot. ‐------------------- Now, here is a man that left the #3 in charge job at the DOJ to be a prosecuter in NY. Oh...and look....he just happened to be assigned to Trump's case. Oh...and he just happened to go after Trump before. What a weird coincidence! Why, do you suppose, that a guy that has a bad as job in the federal government would leave that job for one of the lowest of low level jobs, state prosecuter? And to be clear, he wasn't fired. He quit to take the NY job. Even if you can come up with something lame excuse (and you will, you always do) how do you explain away the fact that he had gone after Trump in the past? All just inconvenient coincidences? No. K.I.S.S. that that takes the least assumption is most likely true. It is not likely that all these coincidences just happened to line up without some outside force directing these people.

Well, it is true we don't keep people from leaving. That would be prison.