gatomontes99

It is interesting how you say I made stuff up and then provide no evidence for any of your assertions. Why is that?

Oh good. The Banana Republic is alive and well. I was worried there for a moment.

There are three states now. Ohio Washington Alabama Who is the dumbass at the dnc that picked this date?

You are missing the point. This isn't about whether or not he is right. This is about the perception he, and others his age, have about the economy.

#truth

It's the economy stupid...right? You can try to make all the excuses in the world, but when people are feeling it in their wallets, the candidates feel it at the polls.

It's hard to find, but before that wrong way Joe approached a Marine who saluted him and tried to salute him back but started to use the wrong hand so he put it down and then tried to use the wrong hand again so he put it down and then he just stood there. So the marine finished his salute and motioned for Biden to go to the mariners left only to start to go the wrong way. Then he almost stood fscing the wrong direction before shuffling ahead early so the PM and Marine had to pretend that was on purpose and just catch up.

So what do we have here? A severed Trump head. A woman that fantasizes about making a terror attack. A congress woman that incites violence. Some nut job that can't handle the results of an election. A Trump in diapers balloon? A guy that paid people to attack him so he could blame Trump. A guy that lied about having a pee tape and still refuses to acknowledge he lied. But Trump saying we need to secure the border, lower taxes, simplify regulations and play nice internationally is unhinged.

How about a lwnj rag for a source? https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/02/ukraine-impeachment-trump-journalism-yanukovych/ Yanukovych appointed Burisma's owner to his ministry. But no, there were no ties.

"Trump will use our tactics against us!" For a Banana Republic, they sure do snowflake a lot.

Your only source is you.

I mean, you are making my point for me.

Yanukovych was still active in the company. But you keep trying to trash the source even though you can't seem to refute the material.

I like how the democratic party calls democratic debate over legislation chaos. The implications being that the democratic party would rather everyone fall in lock step with the benevolent leader like all good subjects should.

I knew he would. Let him discredit himself. I don't need to stoop to his level.

Actually, I was talking about this: "WASHINGTON — Two Russian billionaire pals of Hunter Biden were again spared from being hit by financial sanctions as President Biden announced his latest round of penalties on numerous Vladimir Putin-connected figures Friday, the Post has learned." https://nypost.com/2024/02/23/us-news/hunter-biden-linked-russian-oligarchs-spared-in-latest-500-name-sanctions-list/ How weird that the two oligarchs that Hubter knows just magically got left off the list. Meanwhile, Manafort was sent packing. But if Yanukovych is a problem if he is associated with someone, then wouldn't this be a direct problem for joe? "The hiring of Hunter Biden, 44, by Burisma Holdings Limited in April was approved by the company’s owner, a former senior minister and political ally of Viktor Yanukovych, the exiled Ukrainian president. Yanukovych fled to Russia in February after protests erupted over his efforts to establish closer economic ties with Moscow." https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-europe-business-c49555d51eb243e09a42f7577fc5937f I mean, if Yanukovych is bad news, then Hunter working with him should be really bad news, right?

I know his type. What is wrong with the information?

Remember the guy that thought Guam would tip over because we had so many aircraft and tanks there?

Remind me again, which presidential candidate has offspring that collected money from a Russian Oligarch that just happened to be exempted from sanctions?

Those aren't credible? So I assume you have information that backs that claim. Or, do you just throw that accusation around so you don't have to confront inconvenient truths?

Yes, but we can't learn from it because it is a hyperpartisan issue. Everyone has to point fingers instead of sitting back and looking at what worked and what didn't.

As it turns out, lockdowns were a bad idea: https://health.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2022-02-02/a-johns-hopkins-study-says-ill-founded-lockdowns-did-little-to-limit-covid-deaths Pretty much everything we did didn't work. Granted, this is hind sight.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-admin-dismissed-concerns-about-millions-in-palestinian-aid-potentially-being-used-for-terrorism-report/ar-AA1flPgQ "The State Department went ahead with plans to provide millions in aid to Palestinians, despite knowing there was a “high risk” that funding would be used for the terrorist group Hamas, according to a Freedom of Information Act request obtained by the Washington Free Beacon" Biden's handlers knew the consequences and they did it any way. Could it be because his office was plagued with terrorist sympathizers? https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2023/09/26/did-the-biden-administration-hire-iranian-agents-n2628970

The red flags, that no one wants to talk about, in this month's job report are that the big gains were not in areas that indicate economic growth. Three of top gainers were health care, government and social services. Health care is growing because the baby boomers are aging and needing more care. Government and social services growth were mandated. Combined, that was 165,000 of the 303,000 jobs added. The growth sectors like retail and manufacturing remained flat after losing last month. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm All this great economic news is a house of cards that will collapse soon.

Why is it that everything that isn't full on lwnj must be maga?