gatomontes99

Actually, it started in 2020, during the election and ramped up while Joe's handlers were in office. While a good portion was in subscriptions, that is what we call money laundering. The handlers can tell politico "Hey, we will boost your revenue if you attack Trump." They then attack Trump while the handlers start buying subscriptions through democrat staffers.

Dude is posting from 1 am central to about noon everyday. I seriously doubt he's in North America. In a completely unrelated information, Moscow is 9 hours ahead of central time so that would be about 10am to 9 pm if he was in Moscow.

Rule #2 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/controller_staffing/

Actually, because of retirements, about 36% of controllers have been there 5 years or less.

That's a subsection of rule 2. Apparently they love gays but think using their actions and terms is derogatory. Go figure.

No. I'm willing to allow other people to make decisions for themselves. I made my decision. I won't deprive them of theirs. I didn't lie. I produced the context by posting his actual statements from the official transcripts from the interview. You are using a fragment of a sentence to define a lengthy and nuanced thought. Your assertion that the totality of his opinions on vaccinations comes down to half a sentence is disingenuous. You are projecting. Herd immunity applies to vaccines that aren't highly effective. If a vaccine was, as an example, 75% effective at preventing illness, the herd would act like Swiss cheese slices. The virus got travel in small areas and reach some people, but those that do get good protection would act like a barrier. If a vaccine is highly effective, like the Polio vaccine as an example, then herd immunity isn't relative to those that are vaccinated as they are well protected. You seem to be justifying forced immunization because people that are immunized would be at risk. At the same time, you are arguing that vaccines are so amazing you can't get sick. If the later is true then the former isn't needed.

And you are saying they have to accept risks that you approve of and not accept risks they are comfortable with. It is a very authoritarian and selfish position to take.

All you are doing is making emotional arguments for controlling people. You won't listen to reason.

Yeah, suddenly Politico got 8 million in subscriptions when Joe got in office and that was no influence at all. Have you heard of the concept of money laundering?

Rerun. Seen it.

I'm not going to go through and get mortality rates for every disease we vaccinate against. But, modern medicine is far more effective than when we started almost all of these vaccines. I don't see 1 in 200 or 1/2% as incredibly high. But, whatever. Well, I posted the full quote, in context, where you guys claimed he was saying that all vaccines are unsafe and ineffective. He clearly did not say that or believe that. But, you guys don't care about reality. All you want is the sound bite and the emotional reaction. T' hell with reality. The Polio vaccine claims a 99% rate of prevention. If you have the vaccine and that rate is true, what does herd immunity do for you? Nothing. I'm not going to force people to take risks they don't want to take. That's their business. It's not your business either. You aren't a dictator. You don't get to force people to do what you want them to.

The first 3 were hilarious. I think I am going to start calling it the Bigly Dome. Can we get one that bans the word the from being placed before Ohio State? I mean seriously. Can we?

Notice every single lib in this thread is using rules 2 and 6.

It is true that most of the vaccines we get, as kids, are for diseases that are much less deadly now than before. Take Polio for example. About 1 in 200 that get Polio become paralyzed. Of those, 5-10% die. Do the math, .05% of cases at the worst die. WHO That isn't some massive danger. It's actually less deadly than the flu. The Polio vaccine is relatively safe, but it does have potential side effects, including paralytic polio. Full disclosure, my kids are fully vaccinated. I'm not saying no one should get these vaccines. I'm saying that RFK isn't batshit crazy for wanting continuing studies into the effectiveness and the side effects of these vaccines. For example, we just introduced an mRNA vaccine into the population. How will that interact with a full set of standard vaccines? What about people that are mostly unvaccinated or maybe have some vaccines but not all? Asking the questions and getting the answers is not a bad thing. Information is a good thing. Good information is even better. I asked our Pediatrician about the effectiveness, need and side effects of each vaccine we administered. He answered, gave us his experience and we made our choice. Everyone should have that opportunity. Don't deny people the opportunity to be informed just because they view the risk differently from you. If they view the risks of a vaccine as a risk they don't want to take, that's on them. That is none of your business.

Most of the diseases vaccines attack are easily treated now. Thousands won't die.

Rule #2.

Yeah, but what else?! Lol

We have a saying, "if it floats, flies or fùcks, it is cheaper to rent than buy." Hope that helps.

Did they just eliminate the search function all together?

LMAO...no. /endthread

You guys really should do your homework: I'd say you are lying, but you just don't know any better. Rules 3 and 5.

Rule #2

No it's not. Is moving people out of here, ethnic cleansing?