-
Posts
4,555 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by gatomontes99
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
gatomontes99 replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I think it means he closed his eyes so he wouldn't hear something. -
Vice President for Trump
gatomontes99 replied to betsy's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Do you really want to start your time here with a racist post? -
Trump’s Most Audacious Lie Yet
gatomontes99 replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
He did the right thing. He campaigned against her overtly corrupt personality and then didn't do anything about it when she was relegated to irrelevant. Is he saying that he never said that? Meh. Ok. Biden says he was a civil rights leader when he wasn't, claims he was a professor when he wasn't, won't acknowledge his granddaughter, said he attendend like 5 different ethnic churches every Sunday (even the ones that met on saturday) and so on. Saying a politician lied is like saying a fish drank water. What I care about is actions. Trump did not resort to banana republic tactics and Biden did. Trump had a good economy, Biden doesn't. Trump didn't start any new wars, Biden can't stop wars from starting. Trump slowed illegal immigration, Biden set new records. Trump slowed regulatory growth, Biden will regulate anything. The choice is clear. Either vote for the guy that has nothing good to run on or vote for the guy that is a bombastic jackass that got the job done. -
2 weeks after the banana republic style conviction, Trump has the exact same EC map: https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/no-toss-up/electoral-college
-
Pelosi takes responsibility for J6
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
D.C. National Guard chief: Pentagon took 3 hours to greenlight troops during Capitol assault One of the military leaders who advised against deploying troops was Lt. Gen. Charles Flynn, the brother of ex-Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, the Guard chief said. Weird how the truth never favors the left. It should also be noted that this same guy testified that this was the first time he was ever ordered to get permission to respond to a threat. Why would they do that? What was the point? Flynn should tell us what his thinking was. -
Garland on Contempt
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
🫣 -
Lmao...that literally means they aren't ruling out commuting the sentence. Ruling out commuting the sentence would be "The President will not commute Hunter's sentence if he's convicted." What she said is the equivalent of no comment. BTW, you trash the NYP, but others are saying the exact same thing. The AP: The White House isn’t ruling out a potential commutation for Hunter Biden after his conviction USA Today: The White House isn’t ruling out a potential commutation for Hunter Biden after his conviction Are they trash? Or are you just a partisan hack that will never acknowledge the gravity of what Joe, Hunter, James and the rest of the family did?
-
Garland on Contempt
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Remember, "NO one (on the right) is above the law!" -
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
gatomontes99 replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
White House won’t rule out Biden commuting Hunter’s sentence if he gets prison time. This is in regards to the tax case. The tax case is a far far bigger case than the stupid gun charge. He was guilty of it, but it's a small crime in comparison. The tax case will bring up the fact that Hunter was an unregistered foreign lobbyists. That's a problematic crime, but the bigger problem is who he was lobbying. He was lobbying Joe Biden and Barack Obama. That would expose both of them to the potential to be questioned, under oath, about their interactions with Hunter. Keep in mind, there is a detailed record of every phone call Hunter made to the WH operator. Further, it would give the prosecutors a door to subpeona the call history of Joe Biden's burner phone. Couple that information with the fact that the laptop has now been confirmed as legitimate by the FBI, in court and under oath. There is no more denying (libs will still deny it) that the lap top is genuine and unaltered. The doors that open in this case are eminence, assuming the prosecuter is competent.
-
The Republican-controlled House voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress — a politically charged broadside against the Biden administration that comes a day after Garland’s Justice Department won a conviction against Biden’s son Hunter on felony gun charges. About time.
-
Fed girl slaps Joe
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Here is the full report by the St. Louis Fed. https://www.stlouisfed.org/annual-report/2023/essay Nothing about corporate greed. Instead, it is facts and data. And Here is an article that talks about replacement costs: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/replacementcost.asp -
A recent study by the Federal Reserve challenges the Biden administration's perspective on inflation, identifying economic policies and conditions rather than corporate pricing strategies as the main drivers. So let me break this down for those that don't understand retail. The easiest example I can think of is gas, but it applies to all goods. Lets say you have a 10,000 gallon tank for storing gas to sell. Now, you would never do this, but for ease of explanation, let's say you buy a full tank and then sell every last drop before you buy the next tank. If we buy the gas at $2 a gallon and we want $5000 to cover operating costs and $5000 to put in our pocket, we would charge $3 a gallon for the gas (assuming that is competitive). When the tank runs dry, we have been paid $30,000. $20,000 went to buying the gas we sold and $5000 went to operating costs. We profited $5000 and have $20,000 left to restock the tank. Follow me so far? What if the next tank is $3 a gallon to restock? I would need $30,000 to fill the tank. If I knew ahead of time, I would be able to raise my prices to have operating capital that was sufficient. So, even though I only paid $20,000 for this tank, I would charge $4 a gallon, take in $40,000 in revenue and spend $5000 on operating cost and my profit would be $15,000. But that extra $10,000 would go to restocking, so I have $5000 in my pocket and a higher tax bill, so I end up with even less. Is this making any sense? My profit increased by 200% but I have the same amount if money, if not less. Profits aren't the whole story and Joe is hoping you'll be dumb enough to fall for this lie. And most are.
-
Inside Trump’s Plan to Rig 2024
gatomontes99 replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Purging black voters? How would they do that? Look for all the Jamals, Leroys, Laquishas and so on? Tell us how you purge people by skin color on a voter registration list. I know my state doesn't ask you for skin color to vote. -
Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit. The most corrupt president is our time is being forced out by his own party. They just don't want to admit it, so they leak this info to make it seem like it's just politics moving Joe out. He will be removed at the DNC convention.
-
The fix is in for Hunter Biden
gatomontes99 replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
And the former FEC chair would have testified that had they classified the payment as an election expense (as NY claims he should have) then it would have been a crime. The FEC Chair would have said that the classification was appropriate in accordance to FEC rules.