Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

gatomontes99

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,767

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

 Content Type 

Everything posted by gatomontes99

  1. gatomontes99
    I put links to all the public financial filings for these 501c3s. This isn't a MAGA says. This is a follow the money and it says.
  2. gatomontes99
    So naive.
  3. gatomontes99
    That sounds like you've given up. Maybe ten years ago this would be very hard. With the tech they have now, there can be meaningful analysis that leads to targeted cuts. Make no mistake, some of the cuts will go too far. But that is actually better than not going far enough. It is relatively easy to reinstate these people.
  4. gatomontes99
  5. gatomontes99
    Yep. Libs ignored it and tried to dismiss it. But I put a lot of links into it.
  6. gatomontes99
    Or it's a wellness check to see if anyone responds. Plus, AI can analyze all the responses to see who put something worthwhile and who didn't. So feed the returns to a computer and let the results speak for themselves. For now, this is a shake up. Break it then rebuild it better than new.
  7. gatomontes99
    Rule #2. When they can't fight us intellectually, they just resort to name calling. The irony here is that she lacked the intellectual fortitude to discuss anything of substance. But she did manage to say that stupidity should be censored. Of course, that doesn't mean her stupidity. It's only the stupidity of others that matters. But we know what she really means. She means that people she disagrees with should be censored.
  8. gatomontes99
    It's not sinking fast, it's steady and it's only lower than 50 because of an outlier that reported multiple times.
  9. gatomontes99
    When did Trump ever exceed 50% in his first term? He didn't. Despite what your poll says, Trump has a 53%: https://napolitannews.org/posts/president-trump-job-approval-53-percent-approve-44-disapprove According to that aggregate of polls he's been over 50% the whole time. If you go onto the 538 polling, only the Ipsos/Reuters poll shows Trump significantly below 50% approval. Toss that out and his average is over 50%. You are just stuck in your fantasy world.
  10. gatomontes99
    Lmao. Ok. So I use actual polls and links to back my position and all you have is a personal attack? Forgive me if I don't question my views based on your predictable use of rule #2.
  11. gatomontes99
    Rule #2. It has to be that the people that disagree with you are sexist, right? It can't be that she wanted to destroy the housing and stock markets with an insane tax on money you don't have? Her absolute lack of ability to have a coherent conversation? Her inability to even make a website without plagiarizing Joe, a senile old man that can't even tell you how to get to a website. The last month has show us that real leadership can cut costs, secure the border, bring home hostages, fight back in the long running trade wars, negotiate the end to real wars and bring back sanity to our federal institutions. Harris wouldn't have done that. Biden could not even spell or say institution. They were a joke and the people that voted against them had zero misogyny in their hearts.
  12. gatomontes99
    No. He was talking about the starting point of his drop being from a record low position and then going lower. I pointed out that Trump was at a high position. That is what is accurate. If you look at the 538 poll tracking, Trump started at 49.5% approval and has fallen all the way to 48.5%. @robosmith is just trying to cherry pick data and/or completely make shit up. Here is reality: 538 Trump Approval
  13. gatomontes99
    I don't think he knows english. I think he's using Google Translate. So I don't think he has access to the actual quote.
  14. gatomontes99
    Yeah. I don't have to lie to support my position. My position is firmly rooted in reality. Your position is based on lies and hope.
  15. gatomontes99
    Yes, but @robosmith tried to claim Trump started at a very low point and went lower. That was a lie. Actually, his amature diagnosis is spot on. This thread is the product of mental anguish that resulted in delusional rantings attempting to create a believable fantasy of discontent that is in opposition to the reality that is Trump's support.
  16. gatomontes99
    Since what you said is without context, here is the context: In other words, if you got an email by mistake you may disregard it for the reasons stated above.
  17. gatomontes99
    So this is a wellness check of sorts.
  18. gatomontes99
    Project much? You don't even know that it is the President's job to ensure laws are properly enforced.
  19. gatomontes99
    Article II, Section 3, Clause 5 (Faithful Execution Clause) holds that the President must "take care that the laws are faithfully executed". That makes him the nation's top law enforcement officer.
  20. gatomontes99
    Fascinating. You actually don't want government to be efficient? Or are you just taking that ridiculous position because Elon is making government more efficient?
  21. gatomontes99
    I love it. Actually making government workers responsible and accountable is just what we need. This stuff has been so amazing!
  22. gatomontes99
    How would we collect that evidence if we can't identify who cast the ballot? Maybe we should as the NYTs? Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises
  23. gatomontes99
    @robosmith, you are just making shit up. He was at very high ratings: Newsweek: Donald Trump's Approval Rating Breaks Records
  24. gatomontes99
    @robosmith either doesn't see how voter dilution is violating his rights or is just so over the top liberal that he just doesn't care. Of course, both could be true.
  25. gatomontes99
×
×
  • Create New...