gatomontes99

You guys understand that Myata is not an English speaker, right? He is posting diatribes from what he's run through Google Translate. That's why he rarely responds directly. He's just copying and pasting. He doesn't fully understand what is going on here. He also posts from about midnight to one or two pm every day. Add 6 or 7 hours and that starts to sound like normal businesses in Europe.

You are telling me that the report that was designed to see if Trump had connections to Russia wouldn't look at financial connections to Russia? Are you kidding me?

And yet, none of that made it into the Mueller report. Now, why do you think the report that was designed to find Russian connections didn't report a single loan? You need to drop the emotion and see reality.

You are being way to emotional about this. You need to think in terms of net positive and net negative. That needs to be coupled with what is realistic and what isn't realistic. It is a net positive to end the fighting in Ukraine and net negative to escalate or maintain the status quo. It is realistic to expect that the old borders are gone and new borders will be in place. You are talking about the rumor, spread by a sports reporter for the time frame before more than three years before Trump announced he was running for office. It was investigated by Mueller and no connections were found.

You know the left has lost when they can only reply with memes. Anyone want to do a hypothetical? Let's say you were getting a divorce and you walk into the courtroom to find the judge is your spouse's best friend. Are you going to expect a fair outcome? Why would Russia expect the USA to be a fair negotiator if we are expressing that we want Ukraine to win? Trump wants to negotiate a deal. He can't do that if he's on one side of the fence.

Well, we are against the sexual assault, rape and human trafficking of illegal immigrants invading our southern border so we shut down the border. You were against that. So my only conclusion can be that you are OK with sexual assault, rape and trafficking of women that try to cross our border illegally. Anytime you guys are against something, we should be for it. If we do that, 99.995% of the time we will be right.

So you think the democrat chicken hawks need troops in Ukraine to profit from it? Ha. Don't be naive. But, yes some democrats, like Chris Coons, wanted troops deployed:

Do we have anything to gain by keeping Taiwan free?

It's the permanent swamp that they embrace. It is part of the Marxist/socialist/communist ideology. They love total control. They want to be told what to do and they want to trust their overlords implicitly. We, mistakenly, Thought the hippies were against government. They were not. They were against any type of government that isn't totalitarian. That is what we see today.

They did embrace the Cheneys. Jus' saying.

The left is going apeshit. It must be a good thing he did. Zelensky is delusional. He just is. He thinks the world will save him from Russia. The truth is, the world doesn't have enough to gain by saving Ukraine. Everyone outside of Ukraine is better off negotiating a deal and moving forward. It won't be an ideal deal. It will ne better than fighting a war though. So let the chicken hawk democrats squak about needing more war. Trump is talking about ending it.

Did it ever occur to you that you get the same feedback from everyone because you aren't comprehending well? You are, after all, the one that posted the list of total active SSNs and claimed it was the total number people receiving benefits.

I'm not making anything up. I'm listening to what he says. You are hearing what he says. You aren't listening.

You aren't listening you are only hearing. The thing about Trump is that he doesn't speak precisely. He speaks in generalities and he skips the parts that he thinks are obvious. That is why you will see him cut off his sentences and skip to the next thought. He does that here. He skips the part about not restricting who could be in that area and talks about how the area would be rejuvenated and how they will have more acceptable living areas near by. They aren't going to be able to live there if the there is a series of resorts.

Here is the list. Sorry I didn't get it posted yesterday but Thursday nights are golf league. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-pamela-bondi-releases-first-phase-declassified-epstein-files

Try again. What did he actually say? He said they can't return right now because there is nothing left. So they will build permanent housing nearby and then develop certain areas to be resort areas. Brett asked if they'd be allowed back, Trump balked at the idea because it is flattened and uninhabitable so he talked about how there is going to be a better place to go.

Google translate doesn't work that way. Lol

What are you talking about?

Prove it.

No one has supported, suggested or otherwise insinuated such a ridiculous act.

I didn't say there was no alternative. I said that he used rhetoric to incite violence and/or war. I can see why X would censor that. I can also see why they reinstated it after it was appealed. Free speech isn't unlimited speech. I suggest you invest some time in learning the distinctions.

He's calling for a revolution. Is he not? He used the word.