impartialobserver

Yawn... he is doing this to get a reaction from folks like the OP

Your self righteousness and zealousness gets in the way of you having a rational discussion. "inefficient some processes". I put that word, "some" in there for a reason. Some is not the same as all... your disapproval of this reality is not necessary. I agree that we can handle less federal employment. However, one should be discerning and not just do it blindly. If not for name-calling and blanket assumptions, his type would have nothing to say.

I think that they will discover how inefficient some processes will be when you have a skeleton crew. There are a lot of things that city/county/state govts depend on that will be severely lagged. and then the know-it-alls will chime in about lazy public sector workers when in all reality.. they know nothing about the processes that they complain about.

I live 250 yards from a methodist church. It has been in continuous operation since 1972. Interesting how there is an assault on religious freedom and yet the churchgoers have not changed their ways since I moved into the neighborhood in jan 2013. There are just as many who attend the church today as in Jan 2013.. It would seem as if the OP is a tad oversensitive.

this site is pretty tame when it comes to those types.

GroundskeeperWilly, political smash... those are textbook white supremacists. Taxme is not too far off that.

not so sure about the claim in the OP. However, one dirty little secret about Tesla. If not for a very high amount of govt subsidies, they would have been bankrupt years ago.

I would suggest that some folks simply get a life. Yeah.. trump will say X or do X... its ok. Believe it or not.. complaining on a online forum does not change what a politician does. I get that you have an itch to scratch but it has no long lasting impact.

Just because something starts or happens during your time in office.. does not mean that you caused it.

You also have no idea what percent of it is caused by environmental factors? It could be 1%, 2%, or less. If it is 1% then you are wasting your time. Also.. being that it presents itself differently in each person.. the unknown environmental impacts are going to vary wildly.

So then you could understand that it is complex and simplifying it to someone taking SSRI's is intellectually lazy. If that was the only factor.. this would have been uncovered years ago. Second, it does not present the same in each person... unlike Tay-Sachs (for example). https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928

If I said the cause was folks watching CNN... my guess is that you would agree with me and tell me that I am the smartest person ever. Most have came to the data-driven conclusion that it is genetic in cause. It is not like having a cold, flu, or lung cancer where you can reasonably who is going to contract it and so on. As to why person X is autistic and not person Y... that is complex. Far too complex for internet know-it-alls and politicians with agendas.

Yes there is. You would be shocked at the volume of it. And yet how is it there if it is being "Automatically targeted by the corporate world as "disinformation""? Website after website... hmmm these corporate types are very lazy. Folks do not have to seek the services of licensed clinicians. However, if you want a diagnosis that will be recognized then it is necessary. Lots of folks on the internet are supposed experts at topic XYZ and yet know nothing and have no training. Best one is that drinking lemon juice dissolves gall stones within hours. Any knowledge of the human gastrointestinal system tells you that is not how it works. If you had actual clinical knowledge.. you would be presenting it as a means to win this meaningless debate.

Now we are jumping to vaccines... wow. The difference is that I do not go online to search for "answers". We had him tested and then have adapted our life around that. Has it helped? Yes. No need to converse with strangers who most likely have no clinical knowledge (much like you).

I have a son with autism.. This bullying that you speak of must be something that you cherry pick from the internet. As for answers, blaming meds that one takes at minimum 8 years after being born and thinking that explains the condition... that is simply special. So you admit to viewing propaganda as objective fact that can be trusted.. That tells me a lot about you. In short, you seek affirmation not information.

Well.. unlike you, I can be a grown up and hold off on forming strong opinions until the sufficient evidence is produced. Two people walk into a room and three days later one of them does something... that is not evidence that the meeting made the event happen. Not even close to being enough. However, you do not come off as someone who can be objective. A theory that fits your ideology is put out there and you unquestioningly buy into it. Its a good thing that you are not a lawyer, judge, or on a jury.

Autism is not the topic of my posts... Conspiracy theories.. are 99.9% of the time just folks being intellectually lazy. Can't actually explain something and give concrete evidence so they fill in the blanks. In this case, assuming that the only reason that a shooting happens is that the shooter (which not all do) takes SSRI's is just simply laziness.

If it was me.. I would look at ALL of the possible factors. Basing all of my theories on one of hundreds of possible factors is lazy.. But that is your wheelhouse. Believe it or not.. there is more to the story than the SSRI's ingested by some (not all) of the shooters. But that demands that you expand your focus... which you routinely demonstrate that you are incapable of.

Well if the research is that profound.. it can wait until 2028 when Trump is out.

Your post is purely about how correlation is the same as causality. Again. .. I am very thankful that you are not the one who makes meaningful decisions. Always find the silver lining.

Its a good thing that you are not in a role that affects anyone's well being. What is vile is that you spout off and have no concrete evidence. If you were really that smart.. you would know that correlation is not the same as causality.

circumstantial evidence is not causal. Just because two things happen in synchrony once or twice does not mean that one causes the other. It is likely that SSRI are a factor in school shootings but not even close to being the most impactful variable.

The table in the OP simply gives a count of folks in the SSN database that are aiive and could possibly collect benefits today, tomorrow, next week... Musk puts a spin on it so I can see how one misconstrues it.

As always, context is key. Free speech in Hilter-era Germany was not a universal right. Some had it and some did not. We can all guess as to who was given the right to free speech.

one less person... not exactly earth shaking