CdnFox

But I thought carney was different! Build baby build! Fastest in generations! Still no pipelines though I see.

Absolutely. Even shot down a conservative motion that would have kept them behind bars

Except i just posted proof i was right Awwww kiddo, i know how it must hurt to see your hero is the one behaving the way you said your hated enemy PP would behave but its true But i see you've got to keep denying the truth and defending the liberals at all costs. Tell me again how you don't support the libs

Canada stands alone among G7 with a shrinking economy We are the only country in the G7 with a shrinking economy. Another example of what we have to live with after 10 years of liberal economics

OF COURSE you are! It was probably a democrat who did it and that makes you look bad in your mind! At least if the child was a trump supporter they'd have had it coming amirite? Mostly from you. You frequently show zero care for harm done to children if it doesn't support your ideology. It's never actually the case with them or you even when it is the case.

I accept your surrender And he's been quite clear, he's been lobbying the pipeline companies (or claming to) and the oil patch to 'build baby build'. This is the simple truth, Read it and weep: This pipeline agreement is a document of betrayal | Canada's National Observer: Climate News "For months, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s courtship of Alberta and the oil patch has been the subject of conspiratorial interpretation by his friends and foes alike." Mark Carney courts oil industry in push to Trump-proof Canada’s economy I mean, there are dozens of stories on it. He's nbeen upfront about it since the get go Sorry to break your heart big guy but yeah. He's been lobbying big oil for ages now. Or - at least he claims to be.

Wow. Drinking already tonight i see. LOL you tell that mirror kiddo!!!

Sure kid

What are you talking about? It's his entire pitch. Well that part is true, carney thinks lobbyists are great You mean the voices in your head? well.....

That took longer than i thought it would. They'll probably sue now.

True. It's important to have a baseline of sanity to use as a reference to compare all the crazies like you to LOLOL

Wow i must have really upset you with the truth, you went straight to having sexual fantasies again Seriously dude look at yourself. At this point everyone's laughing at you. Everything I said was 100% true and easily verified. Nor was it some glowing review of trump at all, it just pointed out that it wasn't all that bad either. And for some reason that simple truth upset you so badly but you started having fantasies about men having oral sex with other men. Because that's what most people think of when discussing national finance reports right? Trump support card right now is not all that great but it certainly is not all that bad. That should just be a simple fact and discussion point, it shouldn't be adding to your spank bank

@Michael Hardner, you got pretty quiet when i asked what that program would look like. Why's that?

Quite true. And a natural gas pipeline is a hell of a lot easier to sell than Bitumen. I think even Quebec would have a bit of a tough time arguing why they can't possibly consider that.

Sometimes I get the time to review it sometimes I don't. If any of the big words confuse you just ask ??? Speaking of people who need to review their writing I'm not the one who got sexually excited and started making sexual comments about an emoji that most kids use from kindergarten on. Based on your emotional response I think it hit something a little close to home with the whole repressing your sexuality thing. It's not healthy, and there's nothing wrong with you fighting males attractive if that's what you're into. We're not here to judge. But I think you better deal with it and come to grips with your feelings. It's clearly interfering with your life a little.

Quite the haul, it'll be interesting to see how the charges play out from a legal point of view

Based on how excited they get you I've assumed that these are the closest you get to sex. Don't know why you're complaining "WAAAHHHH I CAN"T MAKE A CRITICAL ARGUMENT BECAUSE THERE WAS A RASPBERRY EMOJII THAT MADE ME THINK FUNNY THOUGHTS ABOUT MEN!!!! WAAAAHHH" ROFLMAO!!! Ok kiddo you go with that then I"ll try to remember not to get you worked up with an emoji that everyone above grade 1 knows isn't sexual but you it would seem

I accept your surrender If you had any idea how desperate you sound and how childish you would never be able to show your face in public again due to the embarrassment. I'm not saying I'm particularly smart. But I'm definitely smarter than you. I'm not claiming to be particularly educated. But I'm definitely vastly more educated than you. And while i lean to the right i'm NOTHING like the cult like subservience to the left and it's political ideals you represent. And the fact i'm smarter, better educated and less partisan is what allows me to tear your partisan hack arguments apart, and THAT is what makes you angry. Just make better arguments and you won't have to go crying on the internet about how mean people are to you anymore. Simple!

You're so full of shit that brown does seem like the most probable color

I did not. Again you're going to have to pick a lane there.

Well that's what carney is claiming he himself is trying to do but so far no dice Sorry did you mean carney?

Actually immigration was based largely on our economic needs. Most of harpers time. He made a number of changes to that effect. Pretty much all parties and immigrants praised him for how well he managed that and research shows that the drain caused by immigration actually changed into a small net benefit as a result. But that was for a short. Of time in our history and it all got thrown out under Trudeau so....

You lefties have to pick a lane. First you claim that Poilievre is absolutely enamored with trump and what sell us out to trump have become the 51st state tomorrow, then your argument is that poilievre actually wants to sever all ties completely with the united states and throw everything we've built and wants nothing to do with the US. Convenient how your arguments seem to flip depending on whether or not you need poilievre to be pro-american or anti-American in order for him to be the villain

??? That's not actually a terrible report. Consumer price index is down, but it looks like the producers are currently still Bearing some of that pain. So in the future they may have to raise prices which will put upward pressure on inflation unless something offsets that That's not brilliant news but it's not terrible news either. The issue at that point is wages, are wages going up to match or exceed the inflationary pressure. Currently wages went up about 3.5 perecent this month year over year. up again from December. So definitely higher than inflation. Now it's not like everyone gets a raise every month, but if wages outpace inflation it takes a lot of the bite out of inflation which ALSO doesn't affect everyone equally. His biggest problem is that the markets and the economy are still unstable due to him introducing instability. But this really isn't a bad day kind of report. I love that when you can't win against the argument presented you just rewrite the argument entirely to mean something completely different and argue against that Very left wing of you

This is why I said you can't consider it a deal. They've changed what he thought they were going to remove tariffs on and although this is better news than nothing it still leaves our farmers with a significant tariff on canola. And in exchange we gave them our car market. These are not great things for us, especially when the chinese can raise that tariff back up to 100% on meal tomorrow.