Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Ahhh back to repeating yourself. Yup, you're really demonstrating how you're a mature adult for sure
  2. Shit brown i'd suspect
  3. I always have a valid point. Anybody who thinks differently can make a counterpoint or show where the errors in my logic and you've never been able to achieve that. And the Emojis are me laughing at you, it's a reflex, I actually do it when I'm actually chuckling. Watching you squirm is hilarious Ummm..... Carney spent over $772K on in-flight catering and hotels last year | National Post And he wasn't even here a year. Trudeau was famous for spending well over a million a year on airline food alone. Have you thought about looking this stuff up before saying anything so you don't look so uninformed? ROFLMAO!!! You can't understand a simple paragraph in plain english or the concept that carney is better off winning an election now, and you think I'M the one with a thinking problem? LOLOLOL Ok kid, seeing as you're having trouble with adult english i'll try to dumb it down for you. I was responding to a post that suggested that the outcome of the cusma negotiations may very well affect carney's political future. this is because a failure there would reflect badly on him. (with me so far? good lad!) I pointed out that this is NOT accurate IF... IF he goes to an election now and potentially secures a majority. (a majority is where he has more than 50 percent of the seats. I'll explain percentages to you if necessary later) If he goes to an election now and secures a majority, the cusma negotiations won't make a difference to him politically because nobody can force an election, AND the general public will have forgotten about it 4-5 years from now when the next election is held. (a majority gov't can't be forced to go to an election you see). So this is what's driving the liberal thinking right now, if they can find a way to go to an election now while they're very popular then they might be better off than risking being forced to an election later when they're not popular. And even IF they come back with a minority, the opposition will be reluctant to force an election again within a year so cusma will be over and they'll have time to try something else to look good. DId you get all that? I can order some crayons if you need it explained more simply than that
  4. But you don't though do you. For example carney has been caught lying numerous times and you don't call that out. He's also been blasted by the ethics committee for meeting with people from Brooksfield when he was told not to and I've never heard you mention that. You'll call out anybody Without morals except those on the left. That seems to be your go-to
  5. Attorney said he won't go into provinces that don't agree. Quebec does not agree. Carney could force them but he won't
  6. LOL more of your 'mature dialogue' i take it? Say hi to your teacher for me when you go to class today kiddo
  7. You are the absolute worst for letting left-wing bias stick in your brain like super glue. What you mean to say is that you dismiss everything that isn't part of your confirmation bias as being right-wing bias because it doesn't agree with you and you just simply don't pay attention to anything that doesn't agree with you Maybe you should try focusing on facts and reason
  8. LOL that's what you say when you know you're losing and can't refute the point I accept your surrender and hope your therapist can help you get over it Amusingly, it would leave me MORE qualified than Carney, who has done neither in his life (you don't bargain or go through drive-thrus when you've got million-dollar expense accounts after all). Fact is you know i'm right and you're frustrated. You should learn to deal with it better. Unless he manages to get an election in. If he goes to the polls now before CUSMA becomes a thing then even if he loses horribly he'll still be in power for 4 years with a majority. By then people will forgot. That is the current liberal thinking
  9. Jews don't kill kids, hamas kills kids either directly or when they hide behind them in times of war. But you out and out support hamas doing so. You called it their "human right". And once again here you demonstrate that children or anyone else can suffer if they're in the way of your ideology That's the kind of guy you are
  10. That's not the way this deal is going to work. Carney has already been on the program where we give a bit, then we give a bit more, then we give some stuff. We get nothing This deal is going to be very similar. It's going to be a question of what we give up. We probably won't get a single thing. The best we can hope for is he doesn't take everything and Carney will claim that that's a victory. It is not.
  11. If they were Jewish you would say they should just be shot right? Like all those other kids that were shot that you approve of Nothing's blowing back against me, and you have a long history of approving of children being killed as long as they're Jewish. Although I admit that's not entirely fair, you're okay with anybody being killed if they're Jewish child or not
  12. OH NO!! A ZUCHINNI SUCKING YANK WITH NO EDUCATION is "feeling butthurt" because it's DESPERATE to LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING TRUMP DOES to excuse it's echo chamber fantasies!
  13. Never tried to have an adult conversation with me even once. And every time I try and give honest answers to your questions the moment you realize you were wrong you break down and decide that 3 weeks of ass porn or the like is your best choice. They don't bother me in the slightest, but they are a sign of your mental health problems. Normal adult people don't get up in the morning and then go hunt on the internet for somebody's posts that they don't like only to mark them with little passive aggressive down arrows, even for content that should very obviously not be downvoted. You'll download comments I make where I say women should be respected or the like, like stuff that very obviously shouldn't the objected to Here's the thing kid. Nobody who really doesn't care spends as much time and energy as you do attacking someone else. The amount of energy you spend trying to convince me you don't care and attacking me personally is unbelievable. So i know you're lying. You care deeply. I have no idea why other than you must have some pretty massive daddy issues. You care about Goddess and a few others as well, anyone i think that you perceive as being more 'alpha' than you. And no doubt you'll just go back to your usual ways immediately. LOL there it is Your mental health problems couldn't even make it through one single post before flaring up Let me guess. You got Chatgpt to write the first part because you're not educated enough yet to sound like an adult, and then added the last bit yourself LOLOLOL
  14. Why don't you care about the lives of my kids? Did you think they were jewish or something? That WOULD explain it You don't care about any kid if they get in the way of your narrative.
  15. You're being very weird, normal people that are having intelligent rational thoughts are able to clearly articulate what they're talking about so that the people they're talking to can understand their point of view and reflect on it Weirdos who have no firm grip on reality talking strange cryptic platitudes that don't actually say anything.It would be great if you could be more of the former and less of the latter
  16. No, the economy is quite real. When people don't have a job because the liberal's policies killed the economy, that's real. When 25 percent of canadians have to visit the food bank in a year, that's real. when people can't afford to feed their kids properly that's real. The only people who think it's 'pie in the sky' are left wing heartless losers who really don't give a crap about kids or the like, they just care about their ideology.
  17. He does. He doesn't have enough floor crossers and at this point anyone who hasn't probably won't. Even the latest one was actually a retred from last year. And ne knows that as he fails to deliver, his approval will go down. It has already gone down every single month since he got elected. Sure he got a bump after davos but this won't last long as the problems continue. By the fall he'll be facing increased pressure and by next spring he will probably be underwater in the polls. So he wants an election now while he's still popular. He won't get the chance to give a speech at davos every month
  18. No everything you just mentioned is federal. about the only thing will be the route and even that's largely federal. That's the most ridiculous statement to date
  19. Says the guy who hasn't made it argument in two posts Are you sure your nickname shouldn't be hypocrisydad?
  20. I'm sure the voices in your head tell you that You're a liberal, you HAVE to believe strongly in self deception But i love that you sit around dreaming up these little fantasies about me Honestly i don't think about you at all.
  21. This has been posted here a hundred times at least a dozen by me . Enbridge came out and very clearly stated that they had money to invest but they would not be putting it into Canada under the regulatory environment that we have right now. They said that the no tanker ban means they won't even begin to look at the possibility. And that they would be putting their money in the united states for pipelines there. As I have told you many times if you feel the need to lie to make your point then you haven't got a very good point. Let's not pretend ignorance. At least I hope you're pretending No no actually it isn't. That's actually Carney's job. It's a federal responsibility not an Alberta responsibility. But long before smith got involved in the discussion carney deliberately entered into negotiations with Alberta and even brought in Saskatchewan that has absolutely nothing to do with it and left the first nations out in the cold. When they complained he basically said why would I invite you? You couldn't pee them off more if you slap them Well there's a lot of reasons why it benefits him to pretend there's a pipeline and then not actually deliver.
  22. you have to say it because you feel like a loser and you want to Make yourself feel better But I appreciate you suggesting that the liberal victories weren't moral. Certainly I think most people would agree they are somewhat underhanded However I wasn't referring to the victories or not. You suggested that I was alone in my support of the CPC. I pointed out to you that this wasn't true and now you are for some reason having a bit of an emotional crisis. And in fact conservative popularity has been high since harper's day. One election it was lower but for the rest of the time going back to about 2004 it's been at or above liberals. So you can't blame all that on Trudeau And in fact it's been just about even with Carneys for his entire time in office. Soooooo.... yeah. Not just me kiddo
  23. Trump has been firm about the fact that there will have to be tariffs and that he doesn't like supply management. I understand that you like to pretend you know about subjects where you're obviously blissfully but the fact of the matter is we may have to sign a bad deal and that may be better than no deal . If I had a choice between signing a mortgage that was 6% instead of 4% we're losing my house, I would go with the 6%. Any sane person would. Which is why you're struggling with the concept The simple fact is we need America more than they need us. They do need us, trump is lying about that of course but not as much as we need them. And thanks to Carney's bumbling we're already watching our economy go into the tank while the American economy is actually doing fairly well. So we're going to be starting from a place of weakness And what you don't understand is that no deal is actually a deal. Right now we have to deal with trump under his terms and he has made it clear that we pay tariffs on a variety of things, and he can decide tomorrow to change that. So even with no deal we've agreed to a bad deal I get that you enjoy living in denial rather than facing facts but the simple truth is that Canada has already bungled its negotiations with the united states and we're going to be set to lose even more ground than the negotiation starts Carney will come back with his pants down around his knees trying to say that he's glad we held out because we managed to get a bottle of Vaseline out of the deal. But we're not getting a good deal I'm curious, how long did it take you to stop lying to yourself that Trudeau was a great leader who was doing awesome for Canada? I'm just trying to get an idea of the timeline for you before you realize Carney is no different
  24. He has, and he's doing everything in his power to prevent it while pretending that he's all for it The industry was clear where they want and then they'll build a pipeline and he absolutely did exactly the opposite. Any deliberately stirred up a fight between Alberta and British Columbia and picked a fight with the first nations and got them so worked out they'll never green light it There isn't going to be a single new pipeline when carney leaves office then when he got to office. We aren't going to build any major projects that we weren't going to build anyway. The guy doesn't care and he doesn't want to look like he's against the environment
  25. "Far right" now means anyone right of castro as near as i can tell.
×
×
  • Create New...