Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. It's already proven and it's proven you're a liar. So TWO wins for me You've got BUPKIS!!!!!!! Also what kind of loser pretends i'm on 'ignore' and then replies to me? Twat
  2. You'll be voting for the liberals as you always do. That's who you support You're not here everyday standing up for the NDP
  3. Both of those statements are largely inaccurate. While price increases during covid were crazy that has been happening and more and more in an escalating fashion since the recovery from the recession, so around 2014-2015. And it's gotten worse and worse and worse in the liberals just refuse to deal with it even though justin Trudeau ran on getting house prices under control in 2015 as one of his platforms An immigration increased the day he took over and has been growing substantially ever since. In fact one report showed that since 2016 we've been building 100,000 homes fewer than we need to give it our level of immigration, and that's every year since 2016. And that report came out 3 years ago or so. As you can see from this chart immigration spikes sharply as soon as the liberals took over and was already growing at an unsustainable rate
  4. It's everybody's mortgage for the most part. as well as the costs of living. Most people geared their lives and budgets around one interest rate and it doubled and then some, and that has a powerful impact. But on top of that the cost of living has shot up, often also with additional costs based on new gov't regulation which we're still seeing being added even this year in bc for example. Costs her way up and wages are not and people just can't afford to get by anymore
  5. I could only make it halfway through before the nausea set in but I didn't hear him mention productivity once. You're trying to include cost of living which is no part of this discussion because you know that I'm right and he's dropping the ball on productivity and you're desperately trying to change the channel Worse he's trying to blame the pandemic and saying that inflation isn't bad at all right now, except our food inflation is over 7%. Food is the number one thing you can't go without, you can cancel your Disney plus but you can't cancel food. He desperately wants the problems of today to be the previous government's fault but the previous government is the current government and the problems of today are still happening today A 15-year study is not a reasonable response to a productivity problem that we're having today and it's his only response
  6. Well that's easy. You lie about it You're like Herbie who managed to triple the value of his home with his credit card You know you can't rely on the actual numbers, anything that comes from stack can or any legitimate source shows that if anything Canadians are suffering worse than ever. 25% of Canadians have to use a food bank last year at least once. So you come up with a lie about how it must all be wrong because you're doing really really great! Honest! Super duper great! The problem is we know you lie about just about everything else so it's pretty easy to accept that you're lying here. Almost as easy to accept is the idea that what you mean is you are unemployed but your wife finally got a second job So your household income doubles
  7. LOL thanks, i was trying to explain it at a level you could understand so 6 year old is what i was shooting for You just get stupider every time we talk. So... old lady i know is on a fixed retirement income. She's now a ' millionare' because the property she bought in 73 for 60 thousand has gone up and is worth about 2.5 million today. So... she's rich right? According to you she just has to borrow on her equity and she'll have all kinds of money!!! WHOOOO But nope. First off if she couldn't defer her property taxes she couldn't even afford to live in her home. And that actually wiped out a LOT of elderly people in vancouver before the deferral program kicked in, people who'd lived in their homes for decades and paid off their mortgages suddenly couldn't afford the property taxes as the value of their properties shot up. Now. If she were to borrow money on that property to buy another property she would now still have to have a mortgage on both properties. If you do the math, she would not be albe to rent out the second property in MOST cases for enough to cover the mortgages these days, she'd fall a little short. SO where's that money come from to pay that? In time, over say the next 10 years, that property will PROBABLY go up in value and the mortgage will come down and rents will likely go up but there's no way she can afford to get to that point. you must be like 18 years old not to understand this shit. You are comfortably one of the stupidest people on this forum and that's going up against people like Robo Smith and Exflyer. The vast majority of people cannot touch the equity in their home. And I do mean the vast majority not just a majority. The only way they can is through things like reverse mortgages which gives up a huge hunk of that equity but they then can't pass on to their family and all of a sudden they're not millionaires anymore You really shouldn't talk about things you don't understand and you very clearly have no understanding of this. You are legitimately dumber than a rock
  8. Funny, it was 5 minutes ago when we were discussing trump making it mandatory
  9. That just sets him up for a hell of a crash when he can't deliver. Davos was played by the media as if he was some sort of hero and achieved something against Donald Trump and he's riding a little bit of a bump from that. But I know today that trump's people are saying that even kusma goods are going to be tariffed moving forward as part of any new deal. When carney fails to deliver against trump people's disappointment in him will be a significant backlash. That's why he's considering a spring election. He's giving away free money, he's doing speeches and flying all over the world, he's doing everything he can to boost his popularity at this moment In the hopes that he can force an election and get a majority because within a year or so people are going to realize he can't deliver and they will turn on him and he wants to avoid having to go to the polls then.
  10. Nope. We were actually growing and doing just fine right up until about 2015. Canada was far better off in 2014 than it was in 2006. I know you like to lie to yourself and pretend that the disaster that the liberals have brought on us is somehow not their fault and is just part of a larger picture but it's not. This is 100 percent on the liberals.
  11. LOL no, i said an irate badger could teach you how to be less miserable and insulting, never mind her. I'm sorry, everyone else got that but i forgot about your comprehension issues. I should have included pictures. That's my bad
  12. So what you're saying is it was you that had the reading comprehension problem Those negotiations take quite some time. While the deal may have been struck after Carney's visit it means they were looking to buy those things and negotiate them well beforehand. There's absolutely nothing in the story that suggests that they bought it as a result of the deal other than the final order was placed right afterwards. China was buying canola all along. They didn't stop because of the tariffs. And considering that some of these deliveries will be made while the tariffs are still in place it is pretty obvious that that's not what motivated though I tried to explain this to you but you were just too thick to get it. Can you explain why somebody would take delivery of a product in February when if they waited till March it would be literally 50% cheaper? China needs Canada's canola. Always has, the tariffs were always a bit of a bluff. And you couldn't put together that if the tariffs are in place until March somebody ordering a delivery in February wasn't thinking about the tariffs at the time when they placed the order LOL Well you are the special kind of stupid aren't you. Next time pay attention to what I'm telling you and maybe you won't look so dumb
  13. I didn't watch the whole thing as I had something else I had to do but sounds like it went well and is generally well received. Not a lot in the way of Rance and he got to yell at some democrats which he always likes Longest one in recorded history though Perhaps not shocking
  14. Pretty hard to take you seriously when you can't even tell what you're talking about. What files are missing?
  15. LOL sure you eff up and claim we're shipping massive amounts of something due to a non existent trade agreement that won't even be in force till march and that somehow it's my reading ability that's the problem One thing we can always count on you leftie losers for is that when you say something stupid, no matter how stupid it is you'll find a way to double down on it
  16. If your point was you were a liar and dumber than a stump then happy to assist Although you certainly don't need my help proving that. Seriously, don't you get tired of looking like a twat? I never get tired of watching it but I can't imagine what's in it for you
  17. The china thing isn't any kind of trade deal, it's basically a verbal agreement between the two countries that china does not have to love to and can arbitrarily just ignore at any time. It is made no commitment. It didn't even commit to exactly how much it was going to reduce the tariffs
  18. And before it even gets there is sold and spoken for. Do you honestly think they've got canola piled up in silos that they haven't already been out selling? They're already bidding on next year's crop. You don't understand any of this do you? You are not a person integrated in the industry that's quite obvious
  19. Says the guy coming up with little fantasies about how I would react to various things I guess that's your way of admitting you were wrong No you didn't, Liar I pointed out that was an example where people crossed for eithical rather than personal greed reasons. But i never said it was a good or bad thing. I didn't defend it at all. In fact just above here i pointed out that ALL floor crossers should be subject to a recall option by the constituents who should have the final decision LOLOL LOLOL you look like a twat again and you're big mad as usual about it Every single time you just make crap up and wind up looking the fool At any rate, there you go. These guys crossed the floor for personal gain and benefit, it has nothing to do with the leaders, and at the end of the day floor crossing should be allowed but should be subject to a recall process if the constituents are not convinced by their reason for crossing. I do so love it when you drop by to make me laugh like this tho! Appreciate ya!
  20. So in other words everything I said was correct and you're angry about it so you're going to concoct some narrative about me as a person to try and make yourself feel better. Well I appreciate you at least admitting I was right. Not that there's much you could have argued with there. And if you'll notice I didn't actually say that there was anything wrong with the floor crossings. I just said the motivation was personal interest not leadership concerns If the roles were reversed, I would be saying the exact same thing that I'm saying right now and have said since this floor crossing business started this time. Floor crossing is a necessary tool that has to be in the pocket of every MP to prevent them from becoming rubber stamps for the party, But there should be some species of recall legislation in place that reasonably allows the constituents of that riding force a by-election if enough of them are willing to sign that they don't agree with what they did. That would make it necessary for the floor Crosser to explain to their constituents why they did what they did and if their constituents don't agree they can hold them to account. And in fact I've made several posts even in the last week arguing that very point. And once again within one reply you've managed to look stupid. I can't say much for your intelligence but I certainly can commend you for your consistency
  21. Sadly if it happened it would all be harper's fault. Or they would blame society Or they would claim that there would have been even more attacks if the conservatives have been in power and we're lucky that their daughter was only groomed beaten and raped because if the conservatives were around it would have been twice as bad The left wing ability for self-delusion has grown in the last 20 years to the point that there is absolutely nothing that could happen that they can't dismiss an excuse rather than take ownership of
  22. It has nothing to do with credibility and even you whose knowledge of politics is extremely limited know damn well that has everything to do with the fact that Crossing the floor to the party in power means personal gain. If the roles were reversed you can bet there are liberals that will be crossing the floor to the CPC. I would certainly seen that kind of thing many times in history including with the actual CPC, not just other conservative parties This is nothing to do with credibility or leaders or anything. This has to do with the fact that if they cross the floor they get vastly more money, perks in positions and power that they wouldn't have had otherwise, and considering the deals that carney seems to be offering now that's even more true than normal If you want to be extremely charitable you could argue that being in power allows them to do more for the communities that they serve and that's their reason for doing it, but I think we both know that's probably not the driving force. But it's got crap all to do with the leaders
  23. It was the democrats that made trump look good. So regardless of how you feel simple fact of the matter is the democrats were worse and people reacted to that. What the left should be doing is reflecting on that and going through a. Of honest self evaluation to take a look at how they let things get so bad that someone like trump look like a much better option. Otherwise you just destined to see the same thing repeat again and again and not just in America
  24. I think it's horrible but the problem is the very first line that you said. This is what he ran on and people voted for it. As is often said people get the government they deserve. I think it was absolutely criminal that they chose to vote for this guy but they did and that's democracy
×
×
  • Create New...