CdnFox

The fact that this threat exists makes a mockery of the idea that humans are earth's "Only intelligent life"

They rolled a 2 billion dollar tree planting program into it "While some reports indicate the 2-billion-tree program has faced cancellations or shifts in funding, the inclusion of environmental or community projects in the military budget is being used to bolster the total, officially reported defence spending, according to these sources. " CBC +4

Nobody said crap to me about it so lie number one. And it does seem that they're actually talking about a lot of tree planting. I'm sorry but you don't spend billions of dollars planting trees on military housing sites. Trees cost about $150 to plant perjury with any decent professional landscaping service. Which is all you would use if you were doing it on a base, we're not talking about in the wilderness or something This is 2 billion in trees. Are you telling me we need a 13,300,000 trees planted to make housing look nice for the military? Give your head a shake you liar

Nonsense, he's been to many formal debates. Here he is cornering his opponent at his last formal debate

I wouldn't be wealthy and famous in the slightest. And you wouldn't believe me even if I did, i've already provided proof from numerous sources that this is not a crisis and you are still filling your diapers every time it gets brought up. You're claiming stuff is there, it's up to you to prove it. The last time you provided a link to that site I pointed out after going through everything there that there wasn't a single thing that supported your argument. You're a liar and the climate change crisis theory is a complete hoax

There's nothing there dipshit. If there was you to posted it long ago. But it's just more propaganda. You can't find one single document and never have That is an absolute bullshit lie. First off you're not talking about seti you're talking about the Fermi paradox. One possible solution to the Fermi paradox is that civilizations wipe themselves out at a certain level of technology but it is by far in a way not the only one nor does it even the most preferred one You just make shit up at this point. You're about as well informed as a guy who's primary source of information is fortune cookies

For American Vehicles primarily. That's who the end consumer is for most of our production and who will pay the price. Still struggling with that whole thinking thing I guess huh? Do you? Cuz you seem confused They're not only shrinking but Automotive manufacturers are moving away from them. There is a niche market, there will be a need to fill that niche market and that's great, but at no point in time are ev Vehicles as we know them today Going to be replacing ice

We could. I'm not sure why we would but we certainly could Or to like build a dam or something. Or to irrigate our crops which is a lot of what we use water for and why there is a Columbia River treaty to begin with. Or just to drink as our population grows .I don't know where the spite thing came from but that was just really weird. You may be a spiteful person but that doesn't mean anyone else is. But there's always a use for water No, my version is actually the correct one and the one that 80% of the population uses. The warped and twisted one is yours where you seem to feel that if a fact doesn't fit your fancy then it must be false. Everything I said is 100% accurate Sorry to hear that the truth upsets you so much.

Sales are falling, manufacturers are abandoning it. 1.3 million motorcycles and scooters are sold in North America annually, but nobody be stupid enough to suggest they're a replacement for cars or trucks About 20% of people are interested in eVS. And it's just not going to get much higher. Even the liberals have realized that they're mandatory EV sales targets were completely unattainable A small niche market are interested, and more power to them. But it's a tiny percentage of the market and it's largely been filled. The technology just isn't there and the sales prove it

That would be the American Consumer not us You're poor English skills and inability to comprehend what you're saying is not a reflection on my intelligence kiddo Yes yes, go ask your mother to change your diapers for you if you're going to cry that much. kid it is not my fault that you have no facts, you don't understand how logic or debate works, or that you wind up making yourself look stupid by your own comments. That's on you.

So what you're saying is you have no friends and you didn't either in high school? That tracks.

Yeah. I work with buildings and I see this every day, somebody goes out and buys an EV and then realizes that for whatever reason they're building will not allow them to charge it on site or install a fast charger, and now they're stuck sitting there with their kids for 45 minutes a day a fast charger off site and they're furious There is a niche market that really enjoys and benefits from this kind of vehicle, but it is in no way shape or form even close to half of the vehicle drivers. And a lot of people that have one are actually two car households where the second car is a nice vehicle just in case the battery vehicle is not Appropriate that day. The technology just isn't there. And the fire risk is outrageous. Not that they catch on fire anymore often than any other vehicle but if another vehicle catches on fire and it spreads to the EV the results are disastrous. The local fire marshals tell me that the one hour rated firewall in townhomes in the garage will burn through in less than 15 minutes from an AV fire and the smoke is insanely toxic. We're on the right track but we ain't there yet

So your claim is that you were deliberately lying rather than just uneducated? Odd flex but fair enough That's actually AI generated synopsis of the opinions of most in the auto industry and auto manufacturers. It's not my opinion at all Once again you're giving absolute facts from absolute authorities who site specific information and records which are easily verifiable but because it doesn't conform with what you want the world to look like you poop your pants and start crying. You these will not be the way of the future, at least not the version that we have available today. The technology isn't there. I do believe that someday we will come across some technology that will allow us to move completely away from petroleum based fuels and even hydrocarbons. But that day is not today. The best we can probably do for wide scale adoption is hybrids

So in other words you admit you were wrong Well there you go. That's what happens when you don't actually look up the science That's literally just propaganda. There's no science attached to that at all I'm beginning to realize that the problem here is you don't actually know what science looks like. You think everything you read that you agree with is science. That's not how it works ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!! holy shit kid if you project any harder you'll need to pay the cinema unions

A rolling stone gathers no moss! So there you go I win. Have you considered the possibility of trying to make a point? So what you're saying is you don't even understand history when you made your comment. Well fair enough. It takes a strong man to and made his own lack of intelligence and education. I won't mock you for it

It's probably not coming down until the war is resolved and the security of that straight can be guaranteed. Blame it on who you like but that's almost certainly what will happen

Major vehicle manufacturers have significantly scaled back, delayed, or abandoned30several electric vehicle (EV) projects, largely due to slower-than-expected consumer demand, high production costs, and shifting market conditions. While not a complete abandonment of all electric efforts, the industry is shifting toward hybrids and more flexible, cost-effective strategies in response to a "cooling" market Vehicle makers abandoned eVS due to lack of interest - Google Search Carmakers Took a $50 Billion Loss on EVs All The Automakers That Have Backpedaled Or Pushed Back EV Production "Sorry, We Were Wrong" Also I hear there's a new law coming down the pipe in BC that will forbid parking of EVS in underground park AIDS. If they catch on fire it's too hard to put them out in the smoke is supremely toxic They're already not letting them on BC fairies if they need repairs BC Ferries Prohibiting Damaged Electric Vehicles From Boarding EV's will likely be in decline. They are not the future. The tech just isn't there. Hybrids will likely be the most common 'bridge' technology till efficient EV technology comes about.

You must know that's a complete falsehood. We control the flow of MOST of our major waterways. We have dams, we control how much water we draw out for irrigation and such, the whole columbia river treaty is based on all of that. Please tell us you're not that stupid.

That's what you're mom says when she does your laundry But yeah, i'm well aware you consider anyone who disagrees with you to be subhuman. It's the only way you can justify your positions and hatred, never mind your frequent calls for violence. But hey, at least i'm not JEWISH, amirite? Then you'd REAAAAALY want me dead

I'm not representative of anything. I'm just me. But you can't cope with reality so you have to turn everybody that disagrees with you into some sort of monolithic villain figure. That is not a sign of good mental health

Oh look guys, a lefty is losing an argument and is now suddenly having weird homosexual fantasies about men again 🙄🙄🙄🙄 Every. Single. Time. Why are you like this? That's more of a left-wing thing. Ask Trudeau

Should you said it constantly for months. I DEMAND YOU DO THIS THING!! ok, trump is doing this thing. WHAT?!?! TRUMP?!?! THIS THING I DEMANDED IS NOW ABYSMALLY STUPID!!! LOL the only thing around here that's stupid is you little guy Keep chasing that tail, you'll catch it someday!

Yeah I'm actually just one person. I realize this may be confusing for you because with all the voices in your head you assume that everyone else is actually many people as well but no, just one of me Which means they are dishonest unintelligent and easily swayed by emotion. You are kind of making my point for me

Yes. Sorry the truth is painful for you. That's the kind of thing a scumbag would say to defend their own bad behavior LOL Well it seems you feel that "Competence" is promising to do one thing then doing another, stealing from the people and peeing on democratic principles policy and history while corruptly controlling the media and gaslighting the public Fair enough, we'll just have to become more 'competent' ourselves. Carney promised to get rid of the carbon tax then jacked it on industrial users which the public pays for anyway. We'll promise to love and cherish the cbc then legislate it out of existence and give it's assets free of charge to the national post and toronto sun newspaper with special advertising budgets for juno news Replace judges with 'friendlies', expand the senate and stuff it with our people if necessary. make sure the GG is only loyal to us and of course let business know if they give one cent to the libs then wont' get jobs in canada. Massive omnibus bills that change dozens of unrelated laws all at once to get things done faster, and of course everyone willing to cross the floor gets double pay, a pension and a free set of steak knives. That appears to be your definition of competence. We just have to learn to do better don't we

Yes. And that's not an unreasonable assumption. In fact that would be the point. Whether it would be successful or not would be another matter, but the whole point would be to remove Cuba from Russia's influence and bring it in line with the United States and its models in keeping with the Monroe Doctrine. Do things can be true. Job couldn't see this as an opportunity and he could still want to remove the Communist Regime. In fact you won't get the one without the other I suspect. That would be the purpose of military action Maybe but in a case like that there won't be an invasion.