CdnFox

Unfortunately we've had to live with that for the last 10 years and we are looking like we're probably going to be a couple more at least so....

carney said he wasn't going to call an election in 2026. Are you saying Carney's a liar?

They haven't. But i love your new "think never talk like a twat" model, its' a good look for you Still wrong kiddo. Sorry. Car manufacturers do pass on the costs of tariffs to the consumer but so far that really hasn't affected canadian buyers. In fact, new car prices went DOWN in 2025. If there's any increase in price it's on very select vehicles and circumstances and amounts to next to nothing. It's not hard to understand it's just wrong. Prices went down. Oooopsie, maybe should have checked that before talking The tariffs affect the americans more than us, the american consumers pay. IT's either no difference or so close as to be irrelevant in canada. But i appreciate your willingness to look stupid for my amusement

Pretty childish kiddo. What's next, your patented 'i know you are but what am i" defense? LOLOL Wheee look at you go!!!!

I literally posted evidence But as usual when the evidence doesn't meet your personal view of the universe you just ignore it. It's people like you that sell out our military every time. Exactly. And while they look like they're canceling the rest of the tree program the rolling what has been spent into military spending. And anything they spend further will be part of that $2 billion dollar program which they'd already allocated funds for So no new military spending there, they just slap a military label on the spending that was already budgeted and carry on.

And? we don't pay tariffs on them either way. We allow a large number of cars to be imported from the us tariff free, and in fact hat was recently expanded. We don't pay tariffs on cars made in canada, that's the americans. Did you forget? Only americans pay tariffs on vehicles from canada to the us. Soooo ---- no not really. You're entirely wrong. Yes, i know. We make most of the cars we buy here in canada. That's what i said. And we STILL don't pay tariffs on them so not only are you still wrong, you're wrong twice and took the time to prove i'm right LOLOL well done! You're pretty close to peak stupid It's the americans not the canadians who pay the us tariffs on cars. we allow a certain number of cars to be imported for free and the automakers tend to make the rest in canada. IN the us they pay tariffs.

That wouldn't make sense. If he assumes that someone understands something then obviously it wouldn't refer to him sigh. I'm going to wind up having to explain how english works to you again aren't i. I've got to start charging tutor lessons to you

Says the guy who's just fine with Carney's hundred billion dollar deficits. At least we can prove the deficits are real

Carney's one of the supporters, he steals all his ideas. Oh you're right that has cost us quite a bit Sure, he doesn't know you guys as well as I do and didn't realize it was completely over your head No, that's exactly what I said to begin with. He probably assumed it was obvious to people on the left. Who did you think he assumed it was obvious to? I accept your admission of defeat It wouldn't be a Sunday night if you didn't take the time and energy to make yourself look like a complete twat 😂😂😂😂

Nobody claims climate science was a lie. We can't, you haven't shown us any. But we're claiming is that there is no scientific studies that demonstrate the climate change isn't a crisis more than anything we can do will have a meaningful impact. And you know that's true. Which is why you had to pretend we were arguing something different Whenever you're backed into a corner, your default is to lie

You didn't read what I posted did you. They're old part of trudeau's tree planting program into it And your lies are obviously an attempt to avoid having to answer the very basic Point I raised. A lot of our so-called military spending is not going to actual military things Never mind. Obviously you're not interested in honest discussion about the issue. This is how the Canadian military gets sold out. People like you who want to pretend funding tree planting is somehow improving our military standing. It reminded a bunch of the other things on that list

No, I meant obvious to those on the left and therefore not worth mentioning. And the fact that you were intellectually incapable of figuring out that that's what I meant when it was obviously what I meant suggests that your side is prone to missing the obvious and he's probably overestimating your intelligence

I clearly do and I wish you'd start thinking No it isn't and this is starting to get sad. IT's literally "Where is everybody?" Given the universe's age and billions of stars, it suggests intelligent life should be common, yet we have found no contact. That is precisely what for me asked and what he proposed. He never mentioned any great filter when he put the question out there and people began to work on it. Nor is it a primary component in today's thinking of it, the idea of there being a filter is definitely something that is one of the possible solutions but there are millions of others including we were wrong in our calculations and we are the only intelligent life. Or we are one of the first to make it to this level of technology and everyone else simply hasn't evolved that far. And even that Interstellar travel is impossible or undesirable for that they have visited us, took one look and decided they never ever wanted to talk to us and have taken steps to make sure we don't realize they exist The idea of there being a great filter is a teeny tiny part of a huge body of answers You obviously are Googling this on the fly and have never ever actually heard the term or looked into it prior. You had any idea what you sound like to somebody who actually has it would shrivel up and die of embarrassment. Well, if lefties had such a thing as embarrassment anyway

No you made that claim because you knew that you were wrong and couldn't argue with what I said so as is your standard practice you made up something I didn't say and then argued with that. And we know you're lying because if you weren't you'd be able to produce that document and say here you go it exists. Hahaha But you can't. Because it doesn't. Because you're lying Climate change is not a crisis. It's mildly serious but you don't take it seriously, there's no evidence for it being an urgent or crisis situation, and there's no serious research as to show that anything we could do would actually make a substantial difference Complete hoax That sounds like what AI is for But what you seem to be saying is that in all of that data there isn't a single thing you can point to that makes your case That pretty much proves you're wrong

We have a pretty reasonable number of them already currently installed Many already equipped with tactical squirrels.

He probably assumes it's obvious

He understood it just fine But he had already asked the question. It is the question we are talking about not the term Neither are up against the reality of anything. The question of "where is everybody" was a response to, not something being challenged by, the fact we haven't seen anyone else yet. And there are MANY equally accepted possible solutions. You were probably supposed to delete that before pasting from whatever website you found it on when you realized you were wrong and looking stupid again You very clearly have no idea about this issue other than what you read in the 10 seconds you scanned your google search results. Nope. Not that kind.

But you're trying to dodge the issue and it's painfully obvious. Nobody said that they did anything illegal. What they said is that obviously it's not actually just had spending If carney says we need to spend more money on our defense and then blows 2 billion on trees for the environment then even if that's perfectly legal it's got nothing to do with actual defense. It's money he would have spent on environmental issues that he tries to pretend his defense spending So cut with the bullshit i'll get real. A lot of the new defense spending has absolutely nothing to do with defense.

I never actually made that claim, but Whether I did or I didn't isn't relevant, if there's one there that I didn't see but you feel proves your point post it You can't because there isn't one. Remember each post it becomes more and more obvious you're a liar to everyone reading this

You don't even understand what the Fermi Paradox is By the way bright guy, how many electronic emissions was earth transmitting out to the universe 100,000 years ago? So why would you think other planets had life that did. And it still has nothing at all to do with seti. The question came about when scientists began to come up with models to suggest how many planets out there were likely to have been able to support and create life as it did here on earth. By our estimates it should be a large number. So if it is where is everyone. But there's no shock that even if there ARE a bunch of them that we haven't heard them. Even if they are there, and even if they were transmitting 100,000 years before us. you STILL have to be listening to that specific point in space which is far worse than a needle in a haystack, and that point in space is where they were 100,000 years ago, not where their planet is now. Yeash.

Well he's not doing bad in Florida anyway but sure, I would imagine he would see a potential political benefit. That's true of almost every president the country has ever had. Biden was, Obama was massively, clinton was, take your pick. and they say the same of the republicans for the most part. Some work harder than others to try and satisfy their interests in a way that benefits the country the most and some work less hard. There's little doubt that trump wants to be seen as a guy who really benefited the country. Bringing Cuba out of communism and bringing it into the American fold would certainly be beneficial for the country I would tend to agree with that assessment. I don't think he intends to bring them on his part of America just under American control. And that will make cubans Living in America very happy, it makes America safer, and will probably lead to a higher quality of life for the Cubans in short order. The fact that it's also a political win is kind of the way politics are done so I'm not sure I see a problem with it He been so many loses some. Frankly people seem to like him best when he's not doing anything at all but that's pretty rare

It's been very confusing for me so I spent a bit of time recently thinking about it and as near as I can tell as far as the left is concerned when it comes to the middle east they're only consistent policy is that it's okay to slaughter children and innocence as long as you meant to, but if you do it by accident or necessity then you're evil. Hamas: kills over a thousand innocent civvies in unprovoked surprise attack, many of whom are women and children = good Isreal, defends itself kills innocents only by accident and without intent while hamas hides behind them using them as meat shields = bad Ayatollah kills 50,000 civvies women and children intentionally to silence people he disagrees with = good USA kills members or corrupt regime and targets their military in order to prevent them threatening civvie pops with nukes and from killing tens of thousands of their own people = bad. If we could convince them that the iranian leaders and military were ACTUALLY jewish citizens and mostly women and children in disguise, we'd have full buy in from the left

Just give him a minute, it takes a little bit for him to get his mittens off to count that high

Oh well by all means then find out the one I missed!! You can't can you. Cuz it doesn't exist LOL you work so hard at making yourself look like a twat WHEEE LOOK AT HIM GO!!!!!

Kid you've already demonstrated you got it wrong. I understand that makes you feel bad but asking me to do your homework for you because you're not smart enough is pretty amusing 🤣🤣🤣