CdnFox

True. You cannot solve the problems of the economy by taking more money away from people and then giving more money back. One of the main reasons for that is that in order to take money away and give it back it generally costs about 20% of the money collected. So inherently, you're removing money from the system that just evaporates as part of the cost of bureaucracy And when you take money away and redistribute it you usually redistributing it in such a way that people that didn't earn as much of that money get more and people that did earn more of that money get less and that always spikes inflation. Liberals don't understand that our entire system is based on the idea that in order to receive a dollar you must produce a dollar's worth of value in goods or services. That is what guarantees that generally speaking there is always as much good in services to be bought as there is money to buy it which keeps inflation under control. When you artificially dump money into that system it throws everything off and inflation can very easily run rampant It's not the only thing that drives inflation but it's update Factor

And that's what lets us look to the next couple of years and see how they will turn out. There's no chance Carney will actually get anything done. He sucks at negotiating his negotiating team has already failed. And unfortunately with trump you get one chance and then he forms an opinion about you and that's it Carney isn't going to get anything built. He's not going to bring any significant net new jobs or investment into the country. He's not going to stop food inflation, and his 'solution' about giving people back money he took from them to 'help with groceries' just fuels inflation. A year from now things will be worse. A year after that they'll be worse again. This is inevitable. We KNOW he doesn't have the skills to stop that from happening. We've seen how he thinks He's a façade. THere's no substance to him. It's just a question of how long people will take to figure that out.

What i said is quite true. You're trying to persist in the lie that somehow this is about social media. It is not. This year's report contained an extra section about social media. But the actual index has nothing to do with social media. So all you have is lies. We've fallen from 5 to 25 in happiness as a people, and our youth who traditionally are the happiest generation have fallen to 72. And all those other countries beating us also have social media The liberals have crushed the people and especially the kids of today

Yep. Or you wouldn't have replied again. You're pretty predictable kiddo You mean like facts Kid, the emotional damage you suffer when you're confronted with facts is not anyone else's fault but your own. Bother reading dalhousie yet? No? Hmmm.

Typical liberal, pretends to care about other people but in reality is just fine as long as he's got his.

Is that the name of one of the voices in your head? LOL

And the amusing thing is whether she realizes it or not her job was actually to distract from climate change. While she was screaming about how her future was being stolen and they were sitting there weeping and nodding and clapping for her everyone failed to notice that they weren't actually doing anything about climate change. She was an amazingly useful 1diot. It gave a bunch of politicians that couldn't give a Flying Fig about climate change all kinds of opportunity to prince around and look noble but do nothing

People who are driven by hatred and negative emotions always have to justify them to someone. That's why gossip exists. Your kind needs to validate your hatred and cannot tolerate anything that doesn't support that She spend all your time coming up with fake and overblown and imaginary reasons why your hatred is justified. But that's not rational. That's Emotion driven

Lying on the internet? That's not really a living. Dude you don't care about the environment. I'm 100% willing to believe that you're pretend that you care about the environment in order to line your pockets but he's been quite clear that you don't actually care

So yes. Why do you keep lying to yourself and pretending I said something I didn't? I think you've been standing too close to the lefties on the board lately, it seems to be catching

You mean you've taken time to justify it. You are frequently irrational about it

They just completely crumbled since the election, they have nothing to offer in the way of intelligent ideas were policy, they seem like they're stumbling around in the dark, they're living so many areas where they could legitimately offer an alternative you or critique of trump go by and bringing out this shit It occurs to me that there is a distinct possibility, as much as it's disappointing to admit, but these people are dumb

That's ONLY for the adults The youth happiness index isn't in 25th place. It's at 72.

Kind of yes. Like I said the Americans accepted it for a long time. So there you go And lets not forget the role the US played in reducing our expenditures. We were well on the way to developing our own military tech which was better than yours when your president came up and demanded we cancel that on the spot. The avro arrow for example was better than anything similar the us was flying. Guess you guys wanted to be the ones everyone bought from. Sooooo you forced the cancellation of that and other programs You literally told us to stop spending, now you want to be a biatch about it? Big nope. Sorry kid. THis isn't an argument you're going to win.

We don't get into any stupid wars! And our entire history we've never started a war, we're always coming running helping you or england. The last time WE needed help was when YOU attcked us and we kicked your ass back across the line and burnt down your white house. You owe us about 5 major conflicts when you help us instead of the other way around before we're even And yes you absolutely will come running if we need help because if we need help it means that Russia or China are seizing the land directly to your north and you cannot allow that to happen. Read a book kid

Kind of. Trudeau and others made the argument that they met their commitments by providing things that had extreme value other than cash spending. That was accepted by the united states for a long time. Sorry to burst your bubble And in fact if we include what is now allowed to be included under military spending we would have been very close to meeting our targets all the way along on top of that. Make no mistake, Canada has been a very powerful ally to the states. Easily one of the strongest and often first into battle. Again, what years did world war I and world war II start for you? Remember in the gulf war where a couple of American Pilots got confused and accidentally bombed a Canadian position killing several of our soldiers? Yet we forgave you almost immediately and still continue the fight You giving us a hard time about how we have taken care of you as an ally is like a dope smoking left hard pissing on a veteran and telling him how easy war is Lots of things you can pick a part about Canada. Just like there's lots of things you can pick apart about the us. But let's keep it real

People who are worried about politics. Which should have been stunningly obvious to you. I guess in your mind the political leaders of our country and the world are nothing more than fake superheroes? You don't believe they really exist perhaps or you think they're supposed to have super powers? If you're going to tell somebody that they're political person of choice is inappropriate then you need to direct them towards another person of choice who's political that is Why do I keep having to explain things to you as if I'm talking to a five-year-old? Surely to Christ you understand this simple concept

I can't tell if you're playing stupid or are actually stupid sometimes 😜 As noted above we live in a representative democracy. We choose our leaders. That prevents us having to go to a revolution if we don't like the leadership But it's very easy to have the appearance the democratic process without actually having one. And what you were saying would eliminate the democratic process. Which would make everything you've complained about a hundred times worse The test now and in the future is the public. The voter is the test. Both sides make their cases to why they would be best, both sides expose the others weaknesses, and the public is supposed to sit down and make an intelligent and informed decision to the best of its ability to do so as to which one would represent the best choice. And even before that the party is supposed to filter a number of possible contestants down to the best contestant who will represent their ideology and policy. So we already have a test, the entire system is essentially a test that the voter is supposed to score the result on. If the public doesn't do its job then nothing else you change is going to make things any better. It's that simple

For what though?

You literally have no idea what you're saying. That would be the end of democracy. All you would have to do is be in charge of the test to decide who and who wouldn't be put in front of the people. It would turn the presidency into a shell game or a card trick where the public always picked the card you wanted them to. Is already a substantial element of that in the party process You know not of what you speak. You seek authoritarianism when you make those suggestions and that's never good. You would get less intelligent candidates, they would be essentially puppets for the people behind the scenes. We're already close enough to that now. You don't want to give it to demented old man who's being controlled by somebody behind the scenes that the public doesn't know about, and that has already happened as well What you're suggesting would make that worse not better. At the end of the day the public has to be responsible for his choices in a representative democracy. And I would point out that the test. Is the leadership races we see in most democracies including the us. They chose to go with Donald Trump, and putting someone else in charge of that whole system would likely not change it for the positive and would certainly change it for the negative

Spider-Man isn't going to be running for the country or presidency anytime soon If you're going to suggest the person that he likes is the wrong person then you would have to obviously put forward a better alternative. And so far everyone the democrats have put forward make trump look good. I don't think you can blame him for that

You don't value the environment at all. You did you'd have done something meaningful about it over the last 11 years. But you decided to carbon tax was more important than the environment. Will have none of your crocodile tears for the environment.

Yes, those rascally republicans are demanding you vote by voting day and not after LOLOL How absolutely draconian of them!!!!

It obviously bothers you.

No I mean runaway like the cheesy little coward you were a few minutes ago. If all you got is lies then Canada must be a hell of a lot better place than yours. The good people here even when they have a legitimate criticism of America Aren't out there pissing on the contributions your soldiers make or the legitimately good things you've done. If you have to lower yourself to that level then you are at least as bad as the lefties and the democrats and you're a dishonest person. For 150 years we have fought by your side, Died By Your Side, often in wars we didn't start or have any need to participate in, cared for your people, shelter them smuggled them out when foreign nations wanted them dead, charged headlong to the rescue when disaster or threats put life at risk in your own borders and without and done more than our share to make sure you have the intelligence information and resources you need to protect your people Don't shit on that. That's not okay. Plenty of legitimate things to complain about with Canada same as there's plenty of legitimate things to complain about regarding the us. Stick to those