CdnFox

The scoops happened because the people of the day felt the first nations couldn't care for their children in those cases. And they were right. The first nations have not done a very good job of managing their own communities. I'm the first to admit that removing the children and putting them in better homes was not the correct answer Even if it seemed expedient. But it certainly wasn't an attempt at genocide. And the schools in the 60's and late 70's weren't bad places In fact trudeau ( the first one) was still building more of them. And by that time in history, the church was no longer in charge. That happened in 1969 officially, and even before then, the churches had been largely pushed aside, and the government had full scrutiny and control over the facilities. And while there were individual abuses the same as there is in the school system today the vast majority of the problems and abuse have been brought to a halt No that is an extremely common popular refrain that the left uses today. But slavery was one of the irritants, the real issue was self-determination. Who gets to make the laws and who has to respect the laws. I will remind you that even after the war a number of slave owning states that did not participate in the conflict kept their slaves for the better part of a decade afterwards. The southern states believed that the states should have equal power under confederation and this was in fact a major issue when confederation took place and these states had received assurances that they wouldn't suddenly become the holden to a central authority. Now that Central Authority wanted control. One of the largest areas where that manifested itself was in regards to slaves but the war was not about slavery. The war was about control Biden was a racist. Obama was a horrible racist. None of that's relevant The problem is not that history shouldn't be taught, the problem is people like you seem to enjoy rewriting history to fit a current narrative. " America was built on slavery!" No, it wasn't, less than 5 percent of people owned slaves and they only had a major impact in the south's agricultural success. That's not nothing, but they sure as hell didn't build america. Etc etc. VOTER ID IS JIM CROW!!!!! MIT ROMNEY WILL PUT YOU ALL BACK IN CHAINS!!! IF I HAD A SON HE"D LOOK LIKE TRAVON MARTIN!" But you were fine with that? Can only think of republican examples? LOL it's not that i disagree with your statement it's just that you're so stunningly one sided and bias that it's hard to take you seriously. The challenge is that there will always be people who grab these issues and turn them into a career opportunity. And there will always be those who enjoy being professionally offended on behalf of someone else. I mean this kind of crap goes back to the crusades Just don't buy into it. The first nations were definitely mishandled and there were elements about the residential school system that Were bad. But it was not genocide, nor was it the horror show that many first nations now like to try and present. It wasn't the mass slaughter of innocent children. Wasn't inflicted upon the first nations, it literally was out there request. So if you want to look at the bad things and have an honest discussion about them, sure. Honestly the medical experiments are still in my mind the most absolutely insane and shocking thing about the whole program and yet it's the thing that never gets talked about, but whatever. We can discuss what happened But that's not what that side wants to do. They want to attribute malice where malice is non-existent. They want to be victims we're victimhood isn't appropriate. And they want that victimization to last for at least another 100 years or more.

Ahhh... so you're saying your bipolar then So two weeks before she admitted she'd lied under oath. So you admit she committed a crime. Confessing to the crime doesn't mean you didn't commit a crime. They just randomly funded her out of the blue without even knowing where to send the money She already admitted to lying. So really it's just a matter of determining how much. Good luck with that. Bet trump gets to pick the venue the way they did with his trial. Not only is lt likely to go somewhere, even if it doesn't he'll break her with legal fees. punishment by process You think he wasn't paying attention when the dems did all this to him?

So you're saying Carrol is guilty and deserves to be in jail? Agreed.

I get that you feel the need to lie and distract, given the fact you basically just made yourself look like the worlds biggest dung ball. But nothing changes the fact that even if canada stopped ALL it's extracting and burning together it would make no difference. The world would be less than a hundredth of a degree cooler even by the end of the century. Whereas if we adapt it will cost less than the carbon tax and be hugely successful and even beneficial to us. the "Climate Crisis' is a hoax. You and your losers are exposed.

Interesting to watch but I think it's likely grandstanding

We saw the same thing with brexit. When discussion gets out there these things have a horrible habit of taking on a life of their own. It has to be taken seriously. That is 100 percent even more true if this referendum proceeds to the next referendum. But honestly i think one of the things that may wind up driving this is people's reaction. When it was quebec everyone back east was "oh we love quebec we don't want to see them leave they have legit concerns that need to be addressed", but with alberta its "you whiny brats should be thankful we don't milk you dry, you have NO valid complaints." That kind of gets under their skin.

I have never heard anybody anywhere tout the rules as a simple majority. Well many numbers have been bandied about it seems to be universally accepted that it's got to be clear. In fact the legislation that would govern it is literally The Clarity Act

My assertion has remained the same since the very beginning and remains the same now. There hasn't been even the tiniest tiniest bit of change or variation. The government did not substantially warn people about the risks in any meaningful way. They went on to fail to stand behind people who were hurt taking the vaccine they demanded people take Completely simple. Easily verified. That's it. Now let's recap your argument:

well. the other day Robosmith said it was Thursday according to his calendar. I looked it up.... it was indeed Thursday! So far that's one

That's not a bottom line, that's an irrelevant fact that doesn't make a single bit of difference to what I just posted If every single scrap of emissions in Canada today stopped tomorrow it would make no difference. That's the science and we're spending close to 15 billion dollars a year directly I'm probably another 30 to 50 billion a year indirectly through associated lost revenues to try and achieve that Or we could spend $5 billion a year and with a little bit of proactive work reduce that substantially and actually resolve the issue Now I know mathing is hard for you. But it turns out that 5 billion is way less than 15 to 65 billion. and it actually achieves something And once again you literally begged for me to make you look like a complete twat. Maybe next time do your homework first

@BeaverFever knows he's full of shit. Our economy is not struggling to grow, it has failed. And when you look at the GDP per capita our economy is shrinking in relation to our population. We're doing terribly and you cannot blame it on trump because this problem started at least a full two years ago and carney was a trusted advisor to the liberals at that time This reeks of the Trudeau liberal era all over again. Oh it's not a REAAAAAAALL recession.. it's a VIBEcession!!!! Yeah!" remember that? Remember when inflation was 'transient"? Now it's all "we're the most affordable we've been in decades" and "it's not a REAAAAAALL recession again".

Nope. OECD predicts Canadian economy will avoid recession, but will see flat growth in 2025 Carney gets a little help from his international banking friends | National Post Carney rallied everybody and did all kinds of speeches saying we're doing great, no recession, we're the strongest positioned to do well if we do the right things So the liar here would be you But most agree it's a recession. And if you read that another articles what you'll find is they agree it's a recession but they're not so sure it's a really bad recession. They say there's a chance we could bounce back a little bit next quarter. If we don't then they'll admit it's a really bad recession But the reality is many economists have been saying we are in a recession for the last year and a half due to the reduced GDP per capita ratio And when that was widely commented on the liberal said "But we're not in a technical recession technically" Well now we are in a technical recession technically and our GDP per capita is still in the tank. Your liberals are doing horribly. Canada is suffering badly at a time when other countries are doing quite well. Moreover this mess started before trump showed up. You're choosing your ideology over your fellow Canadians because you don't care if people suffer as long as you're beloved liberals don't look bad

So they all agree the economy stalled And you found some propaganda That tries to argue that somehow this is a good thing . Well there you go. Our economy is the shit*, our government is the shit*

Oh? It isn't? we DID get large amounts of new gear? What gear did we actually get that wasn't already scheduled for delivery? what new gear was delivered? new tanks? new planes? new boats? New rucksacks so that we don't have to borrow from some soldiers to cover other soldiers? New firearms perhaps? New AA systems? You're a lying sack of shit

I very clearly do. Well lets use our brains abit here. Sorry... lets use my brain a bit here, i forgot you're 'brain challenged' So, first question, if we eliminate all of canada's GHG what difference does it make The Bottom Line If Canada completely eliminated all of its greenhouse gas emissions today, it would avert approximately \(0.008^{\circ }\text{C}\) to \(0.012^{\circ }\text{C}\) of global warming by the year 2100. https://www.google.com/search?q=If+Canada's+emissions+are+entirely+eliminated+what+difference+would+it+make+to+global+warming+specifically&oq=If+Canada's+emissions+are+entirely+eliminated+what+difference+would+it+make+to+global+warming+specifically&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgYIABBFGDkyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQ6wcYQNIBCTI2ODY1ajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&source=chrome.ob Just to be clear, that's nothing. In other words, EVERY SINGLE PENNY SPENT ON IT IS WASTED. So in our first case because no matter how much we spend it's a complete waste unless the same is true of adaption then adaptation will be the winner. Now, we know every dollar is wasted trying to fight climate change but how much does it cost? The federal government has committed over $160 billion to fight climate change and build a clean economy since 2015 How much money has Canada spent trying to fight climate change - Google Search WAAAAT!?!? THat's 16 billion a year and we got NOTHING FOR IT. And that does NOT include the damage to our economy and the losses of revenue!!!! So. Adaption Adapting to global warming will cost Canadian municipalities an estimated $5.3 billion annually. How much will it cost Canada to adapt to global warming - Google Search Holy shit that's cheap in comparison!!! So to successfully adapt to climate change, we need only spend 5.3 billion year. And that actually works! Further: The Return on Investment (ROI) While the upfront costs are substantial, the economic benefits of climate adaptation are significant. Research shows that investing in resilient infrastructure provides a return on investment of $6 to $15 for every single dollar spent. Proactive adaptation in vulnerable regions like the North can reduce annual climate-induced costs by 74% to 88%. [1, 2, 3] WOAH!!! Holy shit, not only does it cost less but... it actually works AND MAKES US MOEY IN THE LONGER RUN!!!!!!!! And by being proactive we can reduce the costs by a huge percent!!!!! You are comfortably one of the dumbest people here. You know that I know my crap, you know that I don't open my mouth unless I know I'm right and you still say something as stupid as 'derp!!! Look it up!!' ROFLMAO!!!! It is a SMALL FRACTION of the cost to adapt and adapting actually works, You lose kid

The word is perfectly fine you lying sack of shit Oh dear. You seem to be having a mental breakdown. Now you're imagining weird little things in your head and can't even address the point. Go ahead and run like a coward little boy.

Fact-based decision making is only of interest to the left when the facts say what they want them to

I have said the same thing repetitively every single post for about three pages now. There is no jumping in the slightest Let's do it again. Your own source shows that they indicated it was the same level of threat as any other vaccine, at the time they were aware that this was not supported by the evidence they had and it misled the public It is bad to miss the public but compounding this they did not stand behind people who believed them and then were hurt by the vaccines That is a bad thing to do. That is the same message in every single post I have made since the very beginning, there is no jumping, there's no goal post moving, there is no deviation, that's what I have said Answered it every single time, just getting sick of it. What a pathetic little liberal twat you're turning out to be Yes I'm speaking about it and you're doing it. Did you want to cry a little more, did you want to go and take the time to change your diapers and come back and try again? You're going to lose any respect you had from anybody on this forum. Robo smith is a better debater than you are right now

Robo is like our own little forum glow stick, most of the time you just want to snap him in half and shake him till he sees the light And that is the left today. It is perfectly acceptable on the left to hope and pray for and applaud the death of people they don't like including violent death. We had the "We got charlie in the neck" songs, we had all manner of slow clapping and fist pumping when that medical insurance exec got killed, every attempt at trump gets full approval and rounds of applause here and elsewhere....

Sure i do. Although honestly just disagreeing with you gives people about a 99.3 percent chance of being right Adoption is vastly cheaper and not only that it's a great way to take lemons and make lemonade by leveraging climate change where possible. There will be benefits to Canada

Been over that a trillion times. I'm not repeating myself again and again and again. If you're too much of a coward to address what i've already clearly said on that subject then go change your diapers and find someone to debate about whether cyclops or wolverine would win ffs. Been answered 100 times now, you're in full on coward mode, running and hiding from what i said and just repeating yourself. far /fär/ "Far" is a versatile word used primarily as an adverb or adjective to indicate a significant distance in space or time, or a high degree of measurement. [1, 2] Common Meanings & Examples 1. Distance in Space or Time (Adverb / Adjective) [1] Meaning: At, to, or from a great distance. Examples: We didn't hike far. We live far from the city center. The far side of the moon. [1, 2, 3, 4] 2. Extent or Degree (Adverb) Meaning: To an advanced point, or "much" and "considerably". Examples: This approach is far better than the old one. She will go far in her career. [1, 2, 3] Common Idioms and Phrases So far: Up to this point. ("So far, everything is going well.") By far: By a large margin or amount. ("She is by far the best student.") As far as: To the extent that. ("As far as I know, the store is closed.") [1, 2] Related Grammar Forms When comparing distances, "far" has irregular forms: [1, 2] Further / Farther: Used to indicate a greater distance (e.g., "We need to drive farther.") Furthest / Farthest: The maximum distance (e.g., "Who ran the farthest?") [1, 2, 3] far /fär/ "Far" is a versatile word used primarily as an adverb or adjective to indicate a significant distance in space or time, or a high degree of measurement. [1, 2] Common Meanings & Examples 1. Distance in Space or Time (Adverb / Adjective) [1] Meaning: At, to, or from a great distance. Examples: We didn't hike far. We live far from the city center. The far side of the moon. [1, 2, 3, 4] 2. Extent or Degree (Adverb) Meaning: To an advanced point, or "much" and "considerably". Examples: This approach is far better than the old one. She will go far in her career. [1, 2, 3] Common Idioms and Phrases So far: Up to this point. ("So far, everything is going well.") By far: By a large margin or amount. ("She is by far the best student.") As far as: To the extent that. ("As far as I know, the store is closed.") [1, 2] Related Grammar Forms When comparing distances, "far" has irregular forms: [1, 2] Further / Farther: Used to indicate a greater distance (e.g., "We need to drive farther.") Furthest / Farthest: The maximum distance (e.g., "Who ran the farthest?") [1, 2, 3] ' It's a three letter word and you needed it explained to you. Shameful.

Sorry, but trump Always Chickens out. That's why he hates our poultry supply management Gone full maple maga today too, said Canada can help 'Make america great again". When he's in europe it's all about 'rupture' but in new york he's a full on maga

You mean uncle Santiago? I hear he likes Tacos....

Don't Use words if you don't know what they mean I'm not anti-vax. It appears to be an assumption on your part. In fact I am vaxed and double boosted. I'm in a high-risk group I took a look at the information that was available and determined that in my opinion my risk of covid injury was higher than the unknown risks of the vaccine but I was well aware that I could turn out to be wrong. Even with the new information that we have i would probably get vaxxed again in the same circumstances ,as i'm more likely to suffer serious harm from covid due to preexisitng conditions such as diabetes. And I was aware of the fact the gov't wasn't being honest because I did my own research and realized the government wasn't being honest at the time. But came to the conclusion that of the two risks covid was the greater for me. My angle here as everywhere is the truth. I explore the truth regardless of political agenda. It is a true statement that the risks of the vaccine were not properly explained to the public both in Canada and in America. I suspect everywhere else as well but to be honest I haven't fully looked at what the public was told in other countries so I can only speak to those two. It is also a true statement that the government is failing to live up to its duty to care for those who were negatively affected by the vaccine who took it believing it was safe. And we still have people suffering 'long covid'. And the whole point here was that is extremely bad. When you lie about the dangers and then double down by not taking care of those who were harmed as a result of the dangers then the next time you want people to believe you and get vaccines you run the risk of a much higher lack of cooperation So my point isn't anything about being vaxxed or unvaxed, my point is that the government should have been more honest with people about the vaccine and it's dangers and they should be far more aggressive to stand beside those people financially who were harmed by taking a drug that the government told them to. That would likely prevent problems in the future. That is my angle I am not here to judge or make statement on goddesses position. It is absolutely true that the vaccine turned out to be far more risky than originally thought. That is not a shock or a surprise, and even I who took the vaccine expected as much. All i'm saying is they should have been more honest about it and let people make decisions with more complete knowledge. Not everyone is as adept or inclined to do their own research as i am

When we look at Real gdp per capita we see the same sort of pictures And obviously we've been in a serious economic downturn for some time Which is why the libs have to borrow so heavily now, we just don't have the gdp per capita to raise the funds necessary to provide services to the population. And it's getting worse.