Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Nice attempt to twist what was said The question is does he speak for all democrats everywhere? And the answer by the way is no. As leader of the gov't he speaks for the gov't. And he may speak on their behalf to the world as an elected official. But - that is not the same as saying he speaks for them and everything he says they believe, which is very clearly what we were discussing. People are individuals and just because they elect a person doesn't mean they all agree with everything he says. It's called individual free will. Maybe you've heard of it?
  2. You'd never even be able to get that put in as evidence. Sure - to the court of public opinion it would look hinky as hell, but a judge wouldn't care. For all he knows he got caught banging the pres's wife. Remember - he was the one complaining to Rupert that the reporting was clearly bullshit and they shouldn't be doing it. but in any case, we'll see what he does now and where it goes from here. That was their most watched person and he had a lot of loyalty and now he's abruptly gone. So Fox may take a bit of a ratings hit.
  3. Again not what he said. Can you point to where he suggested such people shouldnt' be hired? He said children shouldn't be exposed to dealing with it. And once again you have to lie to try desperately to make a point. Such a terribly liar.
  4. Equivalent retribution? Seems to fit here. Remember - i'm not responsible for your comprehension deficiencies. Sure - now that i've explained it to you you've figured it out No, that's literally not the definition of compromise. Lets look at the definition. compromise noun A settlement of differences in which each side makes concessions. No concessions made. IF you agree to do this, THEN we agree to do that. It's no different than 'if you give me your chicken i'll give you this pig'. It's not a concession. Sorry Wow - you're learning a lot of english today Sure kiddo LOL! You're the only one foaming at the mouth here
  5. LOL really - so i've made no posts here where i didn't say that LOLOL After that doozie sounds like you're still in front of that mirror LOL! Poor girl - it must be sooooo upsetting to have your entire identity wrapped up in the left's echo chamber and then have the truth shatter that for you.
  6. it really isn't. I'm sure you think that's the case but it IS EXTREMELY normal for people to leave or be fired between teh time when an allegation is made and when it finally gets to trial. Doesn't make you look bad at all. Sure. HE's a performer. Lying is literally their business. Sure - but neither of those things are the dominion scandal.
  7. no, that's not what a strawman would be. Sorry. If it were true then it would be a number of other possible fallacies. but not that one. So - you were wrong. Again. Sigh. It's getting so repetitive that you're wrong that it's starting to get boring. meanwhile- you're wrong A SECOND time because of course it was entirely related to what you said. A confused person WOULD say that.
  8. LOL - so where did i say that specifically? Point to me where i said "its the left" again and again I never said it was only the left, in fact i didn't even say it was ALL the left. I said thats where its coming from THESE days and as the information i posted shows it is in fact where the increases in incidents are coming from probably as a result of whats' been going on in Palestine ';) THe fact you feel the need to lie about it is pretty telling - obviously you agree but you're angry about it. So you lash out and lie. So why do you think the hatred of jews is so strong on the left right now, and why are you so ashamed of it you feel the need for dishonesty to cover it up?
  9. That couldn't be more weak So when biden says nobody needs whatever gun he speaks for all democrats everywhere then? Is that what you're saying?
  10. what is weird is you keep using words you don't understand. That is NOT what a strawman would be LOLOLOL No that is not what you said. Go back and read what you said. I understand why you get confused - nobody else really understands your posts either.
  11. What are you talking about? CNN has been sued successfully for lying before as well. i would guess both will again.
  12. LOL - mueller specifically said there was no evidence of collusion. And nothing criminal. repeating a lie doesn't make it true little guy. You can lie to your heart's content - doesn't change the facts. OK - Documents have shown the FBI invested significant resources attempting to corroborate the dossier and relied substantially on it to obtain surveillance warrants targeting the former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. But since its publication, core aspects of the dossier have been exposed as unsupported and unproven rumors. A special counsel assigned to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation charged one of Steele’s sources with lying to the FBI and charged a cybersecurity lawyer who worked for Clinton’s campaign with lying to the FBI during a 2016 meeting in which he relayed concerns about the Russia-based Alfa Bank. Trump, who has railed against the dossier for years, released a statement celebrating the agreement and once again denouncing the dossier as “a Hoax funded by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign”. Well there you go Yep . they paid over 100 grand. Everybody pays 100 grand becuase they're innocent right? LOL THey got busted - they knew they couldn't win, they paid the cash How many fines did trump pay for 'russian collusion'? Oh ... right... none And once again - your hypocrisy is plain as day for all to see
  13. 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Rambles like a bot too it would seem. Just generally dishonest.
  14. Nobody said it was just the left. But as i already posted - these days it's mostly the left. And growing strong. Stop trying to whatabout your party's activities. The hate and rhetoric of the left is what leads to events like this. And agian - on this board ONLY the left wing has anti semetic remarks to share. And they're pretty bad. So there you go, real world results.
  15. So in your mind a trans person is just someone who dresses up like the opposite sex? So you don't believe in transgender. Interesting.
  16. Nope. He said something that i repurposed to fit this circumstance. You really don't understand how english works do you Awww muffin - you're so jealous it's cute I actually do know about physics and you clearly don't and now you're butthurt because you feel stupid Don't be like that - i'm sure you know things i don't know as well. LIke the best way to take your diapers off when you're ready to try the potty or something LOLOLOL PS - physics joke for those who actually do know something:' Heisenberg gets pulled over by a cop, who says "Do you realize you were doing 97 km per hour in an 80 zone?" And Heisenberg says "Great - now i'm lost".
  17. It's. Called. The. Confidence. Deal. https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/liberals-deal-with-ndp-will-keep-trudeau-minority-in-power-for-3-more-years-1.5829116 what's wrong with you? You honestly didn't know the libs and ndp had an agreement? It's a tit for tat covering a wide range of issues. Hmmm indeed. Your feigned forgetfulness is a little silly. You mean i'm explaining that if it was his job he would do his job, but as it's NOT his job and it IS justin's job he should leave it to justin. Yeah. Not at all. You just want it to be because you're angry that the CPC won't sacrifice itself and throw their careers away to save justin like you want them to. Justin is the gov't. It is up to him to solve this. Your argument is that he's not smart enough to do that and will turn out to be a bad leader - and therefore someone ELSE should do his job for him. Nope. He has ignored the CPC's very reasonable requests to work together prior to this, he can live with his decisions. PP is absolutely correct to keep his powder dry and not commit and let justin stew on it. And if you don't like how justin deals with it then don't blame PP, blame the people who voted for justin.
  18. Well they could have pinned it on him and removed him from the equation at least.
  19. Those were documents fox didn't want released . Why would they lie and say tucker didn't want them to do what they were doing but they did it anyway? You're so weird.
  20. But not their information. SO yes - we have confirmation the dems were communicating with russian operatives but that's it. But i did do it And now we know you're the liar It proves it entirely. As expected, you just choose to ignore simple truths. Sorry kid - the rest of your rant and lies just proves the point. Trump didn't collude with the russians. Mueller proved that. Clintion did a little - and paid 100 grand for it. And you are a liar. I let you prove that several times before posting the proof that you were. So you're a liar and a leftie. But i don't need to repeat myself like that LOLOLOL!!! Better luck next time kid
  21. Then you're giving priority to the woman's rights. THere's no avoiding weighting one more than the other when they conflict. It is very much considered to be that currently. True
  22. That's just in your head dude. They easily could have. His emails very specifically were fighting back against that. It started many many months ago . Found this for you as well https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/tucker-carlson-exit-fox-news-173000613.html
  23. You're probably not using the word correctly. "Think" that is. Sure - i NEVER fight with exFlyer LOL!!!!! You know - we can actually hear you foaming at the mouth when you write like that.
  24. well not so bad up here but it's also very rare. For someone to do that they would have to have tonnes of public support anyway in their riding
×
×
  • Create New...