CdnFox

Keep in mind i know CONSIDERABLY more than you and am actually extremely well versed on the issue. I believe i said they wanted to ban guns, which isn't the same thing, They might be ok with people owning single shot rifles. Or flintlocks i suppose. Hard to say. Did you have reason to believe otherwise? Certainly not the link you provided.

What isn't? human sexuality and relationships are complex. Like i said we don't teach kids about sexual fetishes or furries. We don't really even teach them about hetero relationships - we just don't go our of our way to hide them. WE don't have 'straight story time". SO you'd be happy with that? If teachers mentioned that once and that was the end of it? Nope - you want to have drag story time, you want to have discussions about gay relationships and couples, you want to discuss gender and have them make decisions about their own gender and whether they need surgery before their age even reaches double digits. Fact is - they'll learn that some kids have two moms or dads on their own. If that's all you wanted there would be no need to discuss this. Well then their parents can mention that to them and we're done here right? Right? Antifa? WE're done right? Uhhh ohhhh - looks like you lied. You want more than that. And you know it's a lie. Kids have follow up questions. "Why do they do that?" well. because they love each other. "but - why do you love daddy then and not another mommie" well... Some people are just like that "But why? I love my daddy don't they want to have a daddy?" Look kid ... it's complicated... hey, want to watch frozen again? You obviously don't have children. If you think for a moment that it's simple or that it stops at a single sentence you're very wrong. Well not a prince - two dads is fine but nobody has two kings LOL Probably would bomb in the box office if it was for children, for the reason i mentioned. Parents don't take their kids to a disney movie so that they can spend the next 4 hours explaining human relationships and sexuality - they take them for easy to digest simple entertainment. But sure - i'm sure disney could make a slightly more adult movie about gay relationships, IF i'ts a good story. If it makes the story work well. If it's just shoe horning it in for the SAKE of making a movie about gay people then it pisses people off. THat's what happened to star wars and has hurt other franchises. When you make something woke for the sake of being woke, it pisses people off. When you tell a good story for the sake of telling a good story, people don't care if it's got gays in it or how many actors are women or black or whatever. Bullshit. They haven't leaned on 'trans' at all and that had nothing to do with the midterms. None - because there isn't one. That's just the voices in your head again. And i wouldn't expect it would do well. People are DONE with this discussion. They're fed up. They don't want to talk about trans people anymore. THey're sick of them. If someone proposes a law that they have to SHUT UP they might get some traction. As bud how the whole 'talking about trans issues' thing is going for them.

Yep - denial isn't healthy. The majority of people who ger rich come from low to middle class backgrounds. Repeating a lie just makes you look stupid. Again yet - the data shows that of the people who are rich - the poor and middle class are the MAJORITY I've addressed that point a dozen times now. Again - if all you have to bring to the table is lies, why would anyone take you seriously. Sure it is. Certainly the way you mean it. THere's no running. People all have the same amount of opportunity period. Not necessarily the same opportunities, but the same number of paths to success - anyone in America can make it to at least high middle class. Period. Every single time if they do the right things. I might by that poor people don't realize this or don't know what the rigth things are and have said i'm all over seeing them mentored and educated in that, but that's the fact. Your problem is you need everyone to be a victim except the people you don't like. But its a lie.

The kid is autistic. Depending on how far along the spectrum they may have felt he'd be an easy target that would have a more difficult time saying who did it. If they jumped him from behind in the washroom or change room he probably didn't see.

Relax - it's not possilbe they could have used a banned gun so we just have to check the registry for restricteds and we'll find out who did it. Of course we'll also let them out 10 mins later but still we'll know who it was, so .... closure!

No, that's just stupid. They're not making it any harder to vote by you having to show id. That's just as easy. Seriously - how is that "harder"? It isn't. Everyone can carry ID. In canada we've had that requirement for decades. I mean - how would it make it harder? "Cant,,, walk... to ... voting .... station.. with the extra.... weight.... of ... this ...id! (passes out). What they're doing is trying to shut down avenues of voter fraud. You don't give a flying fig about democracy and have complained about it here every time it's inconvenient for you. It's "Bad" for you because "republican". I could have a note from god saying it's a great thing and you'd still say it was bad.

The amount the NRA actually donates is pretty small in american terms. The voters are the real issue, republican voters and even some 'red liberals' (in the states) consider it to be a very serious voting matter.

Of course it is. And lying about it just makes your motive seem suspect, which isn't helping your case. Well then there you go. As to the rest of your nonsense the right wing is reacting to the lefts unreasonable attitudes and grooming. Leave them alone and they'll leave you alone. And kids will grow up seeing that some parents have two mommies and that some girls used to be boys, and nobody will care much. I have tried to tell you many times, the evidence is pretty clear that this isn't just some far right republicans - this is a major backlash that is considerably larger than what polls suggest the number of transphobic people would be. This is a backlash against the politics, and it only gets worse.

I'm so sorry. i would never do that intentionally

I know - i hear they won't even CONSIDER letting you shoot your three year old either, EVEN IF HE DREW ON THE WALL! Screw the states and human rights a;ways wanting to penalize people for murder, amirite? There's a number of problems with your statement. The first is If it really is a baby (ie a human) then we don't kill it. We don't kill human beings, period. We don't kill them in the womb we don't kill them out of the womb. Once it's a baby, a little human being, then you're not allowed to kill it even if you really want to. We can discuss when it goes from a fetus to a human, but once that happens you're basically crying that we don't allow child murder. Not much of an argument. So if the state has determined a point where it's a child, then so be it. Second - you can always go to another state where they arrived at a different conclusion. Sure you may have to drive for a few hours but presumably you won't be doing that very often. If you are then you have other issues to consider. Third - the state can't tell you anything that the people didn't first tell the state. If you don't like the laws vote in a different gov't who's willing to look at it differently. If the public won't do that, then you have to respect the democratic process a little and realize i'ts not the state, its the people. Now i happen to disagree with this law as noted but lets not pretend that there isn't some legitimacy to determining a date where you wont' allow abortions after.

Honestly it's just hard to beat that combo. My neighbour comes over for a coffee just about every day because i make it that way and he can't stand his wife's coffee

Truth and facts aren't their thing. They run on fear and anger. Those two things are incredibly motivating for humans and fear and anger have been tools for manipulating the public for millenia. Get the public mad about something or afraid of something and it's EASY to get them to either take action or to give you unprecedented power to take action. ANd then they will claim YOU are the one who's afraid and angry - because then they can dismiss any argument you make as just being the fear and anger talking. They are the ultimate snake oil peddlers and holy relic sellers.

Also obstructed the police. That was part of the sentencing too.

No no - we should just ignore all crimes. That makes more sense. Why have laws in the first place? What's the point of a constitution? Why should anyone have rights? Do away with it all - lets see how that goes for us. You're retarded.

So you haven't heard of this 'constitution' thing? Putin is smiling at you - he doesn't think people have rights either, just as you demand they don't.

He committed real acts. Obstructing a police officer is a real act. Sedition is a real act. What's next? If you're argument is that we shoudn't punish criminals then you can try to make that, but good luck. Well you seem to be more like putin than me so you'll have to tell me. But - the fact is that if you committ a crime in Canada you face punishment. ANd you still haven't explained why he shouldn't other than to repeat faleshoods and to try a few insults. Now - do you have a real argument or are you just a m0ron?

judge did - now its' up to you to explain why you feel he's wrong. This is sedition. Sedition is a very serious crime and deserves severe punishment. Saying that the judges SHOULDN"T have power is dissent.

Yes - in the face of your stupidity all i can do is laugh Only a child thinks i did. you think you get a real education at college? No wonder you're wrong so often When you grow up and graduate from high school, your mommy will help you pick something better unless you want to do a trade, which is fine too.

So private. Entirely. So there you go. And i note you ignored clinton ALSO talked to the russians and shared info when it suited her. Thats' where the supposed 'steele' dossier came from. Of course the russians lied to her as later investigations discovered but she still talked to them through her people. Sure they did. It's right in the mueller report. I'd post it but it's been posted so many times i'm tired of it. You can find it yourself. But that is what they said - no evidence or indication of it. Then he tried to say "but - trump was so bad during the investigation that the investigation itself represents a crime on his part. but that failed as well. 3 years and 69 special agents and god knows how much money .... all just to prove there's no reason to believe he did anything wrong. What a waste.

I"m not sure the average teacher wants to touch on ANY subjects any more. When math can turn out to be racist there are no safe havens.

Hoooowwww.... DAAAARRE you!!!!! That's SO sexist! - the left, probably.

And i think that's the answer right there. It's fine to say a trans woman is different than a man. And it's fine to say trans women are a type of woman. (ish). But to say they are the same as a biological woman is false, and basing your laws and policies on lies rarely works out well (trudeau, i'm looking at you. Staaaaaaaaare )

He is saying people demand they're equivalent. And people are demanding that. Further - "trans women are real women" is a very popular battlecry right now. So you appear to be wrong on the face of it. Sure - ask bud lite about that. Hell - the lefties on this board spend half their time complaining about the blowback trans are facing - blaming republicans of course but it's wider than that. LOL - begging someone to stop talking? "tell me you know you lost without telling me" It's the battle cry of everyone who knows they don't have a valid point.

And what are you basing your opinion that the man was mentally incompetent on? That kind of smaks of the whole 'perp is really the victim' mentality that got us trudeau's 'Parole for everyone' law that's worked out so well.

This guy had been released on bail. Sooooo.... Your point? That means other people need to be locked up longer - not that this guy was locked up too long.