CdnFox

You've really got to stop with that. King Charles doesn't have a single say in anything we do, and King Charles knows it. Harper said it pretty much to the queen's face. She didn't like it but didn't correct him. The monarchy is a symbol, not a practical reality and means nothing if we decide to do something.

Hogwash. Those orgs prey on the uneducated and weak minded. Hell a lot of albertans still think that alberta "pays into" equalization and should just stop sending cheques. but at the end of the day while they can use that kind of nonsense for political power they know damn well alberta can't make it on it's own and why - and that it's not actually getting anywhere near as raw a deal as it thinks. It's true the three major western provinces all pay more money than they get back. But none of them could survive on their own and it's not as bad as it seems. If you want to throw some numbers out that you've heard i can comment on why they're accurate or not but i think you're going to find a lot more 'not' than 'are'.

Not kings - that's completely different and isn't on the left-right spectrum. And not religious theocracies. Mussolini - kind of , hitler - meh, he was more socialist democrat so you could argue it either way but as has been mentioned when you get to the real extremes the difference between right and left is paper thin ayway

It could break into east and west and be viable, each with their own currency. And that would solve a lot of problems. Probably couldn't go smaller than that.

The system is fine. It's the voter that's the problem. If you're driving down the road and you fail to keep you hand on the wheel, you can hardly blame the car if you wind up stuck in the ditch at the next curve in the road.

ROFLMAO - wow, such vivid imagination Then she wakes up and for some strange reason her bedpost is dinted to hell

Why, did you ask one?

Awwww don't go away mad....

this is one of the reasons i keep saying we should push remote working. If it became more prevelant to work remotely then more people would be able to work in areas where it's still afforedable and take the pressure off the major metros

Sure. infrastructure planning is also critical. There's a mess of issues. Some - like that one- could actually be pretty simply resolved with a bit of planning but when you put it all together it's a complex mess that just holds us back.

Sure - russia and china and venezuela are all bastions of personal freedoms LOL - you're making it too easy this morning

Sealion?

WAY more convenient than looking up tonnes of information for lazy people who are just being bad actors It's actually a more practical system. And people who are being honest can work within it just fine - if something is obscure or hard to find you put it up yourself, or if asked you go fetch it. I do that here pretty regular, but i'm not looking up a quote that EVERYONE has seen from justin trudeau that requires no google skill to find for someone.

Its an issue but one we could beat easily. our problems lie elsewhere and unfortunately it's more of a knot of issues than a single thread. How we finance construction, how we tax properties during that process, the mechanics and costs and process just to get a project approved, and a number of other things all result in a situation where it will ALWAYS be necessary to build fewer homes than we need in a growing population, regardless of what that growth is.

ROFLMAO!!!!! Sure kid - i'm mad LOL Little girls are always hilarious when they're frustrated

Well being a right winger i have trouble lying like that. It doesn't come to me as easily as it does you. No? oh - i keep forgetting you just ramble about crap you don't know anything about. Sorry - got confused there and though i was talking to a real person. Unfortunately you'll have a problem following the ones where they 'went broke' as well then - it's about the same number. ROFL - aww muffin Denial is such a good look for you Sorry - i'm laughing behind and in front of the laughing mask And Disney just got its ASS handed to it - Desantis totally won. Disney has no where to go, they've lost a great deal of local power they really wanted to keep, and desantis remains untouched and his policies are still law. I don't know about the rest of the dwarves, but Disney is certianly grumpy and dopey! LOL! This is because everyone thinks you're a false flag because you're so dumb isn't it Well done, you've acheived the intellectual level of a parrot! There is not only a massive hunk of evidence, but you keep ignoring the BILLIONS OF DOLLLARS IN SALES it also cost them. Which arguably will hurt more. You have to be pretty bad at math to think that losing billions of dollars is 'no effect'. it ain't just the right. Sorry. Everyone is getting fed up with the woke agenda and having that crap in their face all the time. It's never too early for you to say something stupid (apperently) so if you like i suppose? But - it would be wrong. First off, Gender dysphoria is an illness. Wiping out trans people would mean curing an illness. We like to cure illnesses. If we could invent a pill tomorrow that cured them so they weren't gender dysphoric - that would be a good thing. It's like talking about the great 'cancer genocide'. Second, there is no genocide in the slighest, it doesn't meet ANY of the accepted definition. Sorry. But it sure SOUNDS cool! Right? And we all know the left is all about optics over facts!! So YAY!

Nope - it couldn't care less about any of that. It wants the power and wealth concentrated in the hands of those it sees as 'worthy' and to remake society in it's own stalinist authortarian image

UBI would radically increase poverty and become unsustainable in short order. It would plunge millions into poverty instead of pulling anyone out. In the end, leftists always hurt the people they claim to care about if given a chance.

That was an answer. I just know if i go more than two words you get confused and demand i get back there with those goal posts and i wanted to keep it simple for you

Eat the rich is a common theme but that's not going to play to the people they need to convince. Well - debates tomorrow and that will be notley's last chance to actually be interesting. So far is a completely bland platform with some basic ndp porriage that will excite no one. Does she think people hate danielle so much they'll vote for notley just because? I don't think so

Probably true, unfortunately change always has SOME negatives no matter how positive overall. Well i've always been a huge proponent of making sure a wide range of skills development options are available for people and yes, i think its one of the best ways to fight poverty. Meh. First off - costco is pretty damned packed every time i go there So they're not wiped out yet But sure - there's no doubt that online sales in general have hurt brick and mortar solutions that didn't or couldn't adapt. That's been true for ages though. Woodwards put a lot of stores out of business and so did walmart. Back in the day simpsons sears made life hard for a lot of businesses with its mail catalogues, which was a stunning revolution. There was a time when ONLY local bakeries and cookie makers existed till suddenly tech changed and they all started getting bought up and we saw the birth of the national biscuit company - or Nabisco as it's now known. this is an old and oft repeated tale. You're not wrong. Transitions always leave some behind and i'ts necessary for a healthy society to pick those people up and help them with the transition rather than just telling them to learn to code.

If you're blaming others because of your own inability to do basic simple research then you don't need a cite - you need a cookie and a nap. Please - be a grown up about it and do your own research. Nope. Those were the old rules. Then lefies started demanding cites for every single thing - only to then say no mattter what the source was that there was a problem with it, and then demand more and more and more. IT's dishonest. It's called sealioning. And as a result we have new rules - if you wish to disprove a point then you need to do the research and post proof otherwise. IT IS YOUR JOB TO DISPROVE SOMETHING YOU DISAGREE WITH. Those are the rules. Sealions aren't welcome. Those who sealion are simply liars and dishonest players . Do your own homework. You might learn something. Nothing to explain. Vice became a left wing publication over time and has been for some time - and now it died. Get woke go broke.

None of those suggest that people didn't generally support the protesters for the most part or were sympathetic. They can still very easily feel that restrictions went too far even if they feel some are necessary, and saying that they made their point and should go home is not the same as suggesting they didn't have a point to begin with. Nope, sorry but that's not true. While the incoment party may slump a little midterm, we dont' generally see leaders numbers change much due to mid term slump especially the opposition. The consistent slow rise we're seeing with PP is different, and seems pretty sustained.

Neither. Sorry - it was a completely independent businessman. No actual representation for the party at all. Nope. Sorry. Now you're just lying outright. A private person invested in a website as one of a number of investors, and that website paid for research which was NOT the steele research which was done later. The republicans didn't pay a nickle. Nope - that is also a lie. Sorry. the evidence from a number of soruces are pretty clear - the dems went to them This wasn't opposition research. This was fabricating information in a manner to make it look plausable for long enough.

Im afraid it is. Or to be more specific - the more prominent elements of it is. Which is why 'woke' is now a pejorative. Annnnd there's an example of the kind of nonsense that has caused people to be turned off by the left. FIrst off it's wrong. That's pretty easily demonstrated. If it wasn't wrong then the republicans would never win an election. Second off it dismisses anyone who's right wing in a horrible and non inclusive way. I mean you're saying anyone who disagrees with you are simply puppets for an 'oligarchy', and not free thnkers. Basically it's hate filled rhetoric and people are getting sick of having hatred pushed on them. Nope. sorry. Guns -the left wants widespread gun bans and seriously restricted ownership. the general public would like to see some fairly minor changes to background checks. Abortion - the left wants it to be ok to terminate the fetus even for a short time after birth, but definitely up to the point where it enters the birth canal. General public says - only 35 percent agree with that. The rest want some restrictions on abortion. Climate Policy: we don't actually have much about how the public reacted to that bill specifically but we do have this -and it strongly suggests that people were not happy with it one way or another : https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/24/politics/congress-approval-gallup-polling/index.html Dems are TERRIBLE at religeous liberaty and the party has been deeply anti semetic. Gay rights - meh, republicans aren't really clamoring for more 'anti gay laws'. Not really a 'democrat' thing. Sorry - but the fact is that the dem agenda is not popular, and thats just the more moderate stuff. How are the dems approval numbers if they're so strongly supported? https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/ Ruh roe. Biden's presidency is NOT popular. And a biden and desantis show down woudl be an even match. Sorry. Just not that popular.