CdnFox

So provide the actual original source information for that. Not an opinion piece that claims it but the original source documents and research. It may well be true but you NEVER provide sources and with you there's a better than average chance it's full of shit, so lets see the source. Not someone who told you something that someone told them, the source

Well considering you didn't even know that they proposed it till 5 seconds ago when I told you that's some pretty deep analysis One post ago you were denying this ever happened or that they said anything LOLOL The other major companies are saying the same thing and it's no surprise. There's no excuses there's no rhetoric. And taking one look at the situation and saying the Canadian government can't be trusted and the laws in place prevent any building Enbridge, and every other for profit company, are going to build projects that make money. And they know that with the liberals and the liberal laws in power that's not possible Bottom line - Canada's economy is Fcuked, far worse than around the rest of the world, and carney is making it worse. He only cares about lining his own pockets, and weak minded folk keep cheering for him anyway

That appears to be exactly what happened, and that's probably the most neutral I've heard it put.

Sure, because calling everyone who disagreed with you a 'nazi' did SO WELL for you guys during the election Some people learn from their mistakes. Robo just learns to mistake HARDER!!!

Anita is pondscum. She's just not AS pondscum as 'ms disney plus' over here.

I thought he misspelled that and you were going to make us something to eat. I'm a little disappointed now

J F kennedy famously said : "If you make peaceful Revolution impossible you make violent revolution inevitable" There's nothing to do with conservatives. In fact there are more revolutions from the loony left than there are from the right

Nothing nonsensical about it. I understand that some of the words may be big but it's pretty straightforward. You can't just dismiss everything as anybody looking into it is trump's boy or girl But it's very much like you to completely ignore the rest because you know I'm right and cannot actually argue against it LOL an observation on my part isn't really a 'gotcha',on your part, but i'm told it's important to encourage the mentally underprivlidged so ... good job little guy!

Yeah. Honestly i feel this is over the line even for trump, and that republicans should push back. But - i absolutely agree with you that it's hard to work up a sense of indignation about it considering the lefties were all over this exact same thing just a year and change ago. I would say the difference is the banker here is not a political figure and had nothing to do with any of that. If this was a democrat they were going after i'd tend to be a hell of a lot less sympathetic.

The first known doxxing was the great usenet dox of the late 90's where 'suspected neo nazis' had their information published by a left wing group, Of course, turns out a lot weren't nazis but hey. Usenet Incidents: One of the earliest documented online instances occurred in the late 1990s on the Usenet forum, where users circulated a detailed list of suspected neo-Nazis, including their names, phone numbers, and home addresses. We know. we can. You're the one with the animal fetish kiddo

And not police shootings as I said. Which is why they investigated George Floyd but not this. There's nothing excessive about this shooting. Either it was justified or it wasn't but it's not excessive But you can't just throw it out there and claim that nothing that anybody investigates is valid because trump apparently controls the world. Sorry. And you same people swore up and down when biden was in and misusing the justice system that it was 'unpossible!" So if a cop raped a woman, beat her, cut off her fingers, broke her bones and then shot her... that's the same thing as if he just shot her. You're a twat sometimes.

He didn't. It was to one side of the vehicle until she backed up and turned and pointed her vehicle at him, Once again you have to try and lie to make your point it's just a little sad

Pretty much all of that is untrue The left is so desperate for another George Floyd But all they're getting is Laverne and Shirley

it most certainly is. For example, they investigated the killing of George Floyd. George floyd was not shot you 1diot LOLOLOL Wow, apparently trump controls virtually everybody! Amazing! You absolutely can. Beating someone in nearly torturing them to that is vastly more excessive. Running over to the car after it had crashed and doing a MAG dump would have been more excessive. In fact as far as police shootings go this one was pretty damn tame Actually what I said is if it was politically motivated they would have sent the person you mentioned. The fact that they didn't prove it wasn't politically motivated. You got this weird habit recently where if somebody says something to you you reply claiming that they claim the exact opposite of what they claimed. Pay attention Of course not. She was shot before she got the chance. But she did hit him.

Oh and just for MORE fun.... No 'business case' for pipelines because Liberals want it that way | National Post LOL 😜

You mean that illegal immigrants whom the democrats let in are being forced to leave? Yep. Interesting. So you can't read. He equated hate with being unmanly. And yet you are unable to understand that and said the opposite Tell me, what drugs did your mother take during pregnancy?

Yeah but we ALL have days like that

Sorry, but those are opinions. The last time we did this you said pick any one and prove that I'm wrong. And I picked one and proved you were wrong You're just big mad because you were wrong about the pipeline thing Nothing actually changed. Trade figures are expected to be the same or worse for the final quarter of 2025 as they were before. Carney is failed and you are aware of that. That's why you're trying to post massive long word salads Desperately nobody actually reads them and everybody thinks there must be something to them. Carney is failing hard and if he wasn't you would be able to present specific things that had gotten better and you can't.

Enbridge CEO urges tanker ban end, says no company will build 'pipeline to nowhere' - Business in Vancouver Release Details - Enbridge Inc. Google AI Enbridge's CEO, Greg Ebel, has clearly stated the company will not build a new major export pipeline to the West Coast under current Canadian regulatory conditions. Key barriers cited by Enbridge include: The Federal Tanker Ban: The current federal ban on oil tanker traffic on the northern coast of British Columbia makes building an export pipeline to that region unfeasible (a "pipeline to nowhere"), as the oil cannot be legally exported via that route. Regulatory Uncertainty/Delays: Ebel points to the "competitiveness disaster" of the last decade for Canadian projects, referencing significant financial losses incurred when the previous Northern Gateway project was initially approved, then later canceled by the federal government after years of regulatory and legal challenges. Investment Climate: The company is hesitant to commit the substantial private capital required for such projects without significant changes to the regulatory environment, preferring to invest in opportunities within the United States where conditions are perceived as more favorable. LOL whoooops!!! Wasn't that long a wait after all LOLOL Sorry kid, you were wrong. And the funny thing is I posted all this stuff here before. And there's more where that came from Enbridge was in the last stages of starting construction on a pipeline to the west coast when trudeau cancelled it. Carne kept those cancellations in place. Pretty simple.

So in other words the CPC has your vote provided they're as strongly left-wing party That's pure genius

Because you were voting liberal anyway

Those words don't really mean anything to you. You're saying that because you think it's hard for people to argue with things being fair without defining what fair actually means. Same with justice Sure. They probably refuse to investigate cases of tax fraud as well. That is not the body that investigates police shootings. The group that does that would be the FBI. Guess who's investigating? The FBI. This isn't a case of excessive force. Either he was justified in firing the shot or he wasn't and the group that investigates that is the FBI You just blew your own argument out of the water. This guy's controlled by trump then he is exactly who they would want doing the investigation. If what you're saying is true this guy would be the first guy trump would send in and make sure that the report favored him and what he wanted There are tons of protections for civil rights in America. It is not a civil right to run over police officers with your car

We know. If we do you'll just demand the liberals freeze our accounts LOL

because you extend the definition of 'civil rights' to mean 'criminals should be allowed in whenever they want'. Which is deeply disturbing, Your version of 'civil rights' is that there must be no law and order. Except in severe cases like if someone assumes a pronoun.

We already know that. There's no need to state the obvious Kid, we're all about 5 steps ahead of you here You're so far behind you THINK you're in front, but in reality we lapped you