TreeBeard

You suddenly hate business people and loopholes and love career politicians? LOL 😂 It’s like we went back in time to when Trudeau first ran, except the polar opposite!

You actually believe it’s fentanyl! 😂

PP’s parroting of Trump in the past probably will hurt his chances at winning.

You’re right and I agree. The feds absolutely should come in and override the Alberta and Saskatchewan governments. It’s not like they can lose seats over it in the election. That doesn’t excuse their behaviour. They would also shit their pants over any federal government intervention and try to create a constitutional crisis. AB and SK are literally working against Canada’s interests right now. Seems like BC has a good response too, from what I’ve read.

Biological sex isn’t a social construct. Gender expression certainly is. In either scenario, there are clearly more than 2 sexes. If there are more than 2 biological sexes (which science has shown that there are), why would gender be limited to the 2 main ones? Your eye rolling is only showing that you’ve never read anything on the topic beyond right-wing blogs who quote right-wing chuds as reliable sources of science.

They aren’t going to tariff energy. And the Conservative premiers are too spineless to stand up for Canada by using energy as a bargaining chip. So we will keep selling it to the USA Canada has already lost this trade war by having Smith and Moe as premiers.

Of course there aren’t. What kind of uninformed ignoramus thinks there are only 2 genders? https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/ According to the simple scenario, the presence or absence of a Y chromosome is what counts: with it, you are male, and without it, you are female. But doctors have long known that some people straddle the boundary—their sex chromosomes say one thing, but their gonads (ovaries or testes) or sexual anatomy say another. Parents of children with these kinds of conditions—known as intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs)—often face difficult decisions about whether to bring up their child as a boy or a girl. Some researchers now say that as many as 1 person in 100 has some form of DSD.

Carney the banker economist guy is “far-left”? 🤣 No one on the “far-left” drinks Bud! Thanks for the laugh today. I needed it.

the #1 reason to get banned on a forum like this is insulting the mods. Keep your cool when interacting with mods. “Yes Mr. Mod. I will endeavour to be a better forum member”.

It’s literally the only beer for sale there.

The topic of the election is going to be Trump, like it or not. Poilievre has been a parrot of everything Trump up to recently. Even now, he goes on about how shitty Canada is and about Trudeau who, newsflash, is gone. He’s running a losing campaign. oh the irony…. a man who has never held a private sector job…. a career politician since his 20s is the manly man.

Cons seem to be grasping at plastic straws. “Look at the beer Carney drinks”! Childish. Meanwhile….

Who is Klein and why should I care what he thinks?

What expertise does the guy who wrote that column have in climate and economics?

Who pays for it if the polluters aren’t made to pay now? You think the costs just magically disappear into the wind?

Mulroney raised expectations and increased the deficit. Swedes and Norwegians get along great. Poilievre is asexual. Singh wears a turban. Canadians = Quebecois - French.

If you believe this, you’ll believe anything.

Harper = Mulroney - legacy Carney = 0.48(Chretien) + Charest

You don’t understand Pearson’s Canada. You think too small. —— John A. Harper. Carney.

What does this mean? Who judges if it’s phoney or real? You?

You want more pollution?

I don’t remember saying that there aren’t bad films. But to pretend that there shouldn’t be social or political messages within art or film is rather silly.

Trump is sending some real estate guy to talk with Putin. That should go well. 😂

I mean, I don’t even think it will make it to Putin’s desk without Trump destroying the proposal first. The question will be if Rubio has any principles remaining once it happens.

More likely is that Trump blows it up again by saying a bunch of stupid shit.