BeaverFever

*sigh* are you seriously that dense? Do you not know what the word evidence means? If Democrat said they had video footage of Trump turning into a bat and sucking people’s blood and on top of that nobody is allowed to see the video….would you consider that he has “evidence” that Trump is a vampire? You only would if it was Biden, right? If I told people you’re a pedophile and I have video evidence but nobody is allowed to see it so they’ll just take my word for it, would you consider that “evidence” too? So to recap for you dense skill for the hundredth time CLAIMING to have damning videos, names and addresses that you refuse to let anyone else see or verify is NOT EVIDENCE CLAIMING to have proven your accusations through secret methods that you refuse to even describe to anyone is NOT EVIDENCE CLAIMING that technology works in ways that everyone with knowledge of the technology says it doesn’t is NOT EVIDENCE The accusations in 2000 mules are made up and the supposed “evidence” he CLAIMS to exist but doesn’t let anyone examine is also made up and defies basic logic. If 2000 mules was word-for-word the exact same movie but alleging Republican ballot stuffing instead you people would not believe a word of it and you would be saying the exact thing I am saying now. That just goes to show how your rabid partisanship has hijacked your brain False. I already pointed out the words “no evidence” and “debunked” appear in the titles. Nome of the articles say there was evidence to support his claims they debunk what he claimed to be evidence as not being evidence. This has been pointed put to you many times now, you are purposely being obtuse and have resorted to simply repeating yourself. Of course it’s relevant his crime directly relates to the subject of his so-called movie and his motives. Again your hijacked brain doesn’t allow you to see obvious facts and conclusions. OMG you sound like Westcanman. I say it’s absolutely false because it is. You have chosen to live in an alternate reality where things are true simply because you want them to be convenient to your political ideology and you can’t be dissuaded by facts or reason. No, that’s what YOU see because you’re a slave to your political ideology. No rational person sees that OMFG. HOW F-ING THICK ARE YOU? HE HAS NOT SHOWN ANY DATA! HE ONLY CLAIMS TO HAVE DATA WHAT DO NOT UNDERSTAND???? The entire 2000 mules is just a web of unproven claims. Claiming that the proof for your accusations is secret and nobody is allowed to see it is just another unproven claim, can you seriously not understand that??? Simply saying you have evidence doesn’t mean there actually IS evidence The whole film and all the supposed “evidence” is just one big collection of “just take my word for it” I have not lied or exaggerated about anything, the only ad-hominem is you calling me a liar. You have completely misrepresented what the links I provided say and you admit you are absolutely ignorant on the details of the subject. I don’t think you’re a liar I think you believe every word you say but you’re so consumed with your identity politics you will honestly believe a grain of sand is a mountain and a mountain is a grain of sand and that a bullet wound is a scratch and a scratch is bullet wound when doing so fits your political narrative. You see things that aren’t there and you make claims without evidence In this whole argument you haven’t presented a single piece of evidence of your own….for example you’ve falsely claimed repeatedly that my sources say he presented evidence but you can’t provide one quote from my sources that back that up. You haven’t even listed what you think the actual evidence is. Your insistence that having been convicted of committing election fraud for Republicans is irrelevant to a video attempting to challenge the election results in favour of Republicans is also absurd. No reasonable person would agree with you. You also absurdly claim “there any many reasons” why he wouldn’t allow anyone to see his evidence even 2 years later but when asked to provide even one you refused to because there aren’t any.

Thats what Republicans already do

That is absolutely false. I clearly demonstrated the HE has no evidence for uis claims. Are you seriously claiming that I need to present evidence that he didn’t present evidence for his accusation ? You don’t understand how burden of proof works I clearly articulated how his arguments and claims are false and provided links. For example he claims he has footage of “mules” stuffing ballot boxes and dropping votes in boxes more than once but for 2 years hasn’t shown it, so you absurdly claim that I am the one who needs to present evidence he doesn’t actually have this footage otherwise we must assume his no-evidence claim is true??? Same for the addresses of the so-called Democrat “stash houses”, the names of the Democrat groups supposedly linked to them or any proof of their existence. I could go on and repeat myself for the third time but there’s no point No I think you’re just being a troll because you’re not this dense I think you don’t even know what ad hominem means Another absolute lie on your part. LOL no it is not the definition! Being convicted of felony election fraud for Republican candidates is directly relevant to his attempt to discredit the 2020 election for a Republican candidate….the one who pardoned him no less. What are you suddenly soft on convicted criminals now too? How do you not understand that being exposed as a fraud destroys your ability to credibly speak on the same subject where you committed your fraud? That’s absolutely false! One of them even says it has “gaping holes” right in the title! You didn’t read's cites. Trump’s AG Bill Barr’s criticism was then only one that pulled punches because he’s also a Republican and he was testifying before Congress, but I included it just to show you that even HE doesn’t buy it. He has also called Trump’s stolen election claims “bullshit” Absolutely false! The sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t really evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes” and they don’t mean it in the way you’re hoping. 😝 Again CLAIMING you have video footage of someone visiting a drop box multiple times but only showing them visiting one time is NO evidence, it’s not half the evidence. Claiming cellphones can be geolocated within 18 inches when NO expert agrees that is possible is NO evidence. And that is exactly what the links I posted say. NOWHERE DO ANY OF THE ARTICLES SAY IT IS PLAUSIBLE You clearly skimmed the articles with your MAGA dementia lenses on and saw what you wanted to see False. The sources I posted systematically dismantle his claims and clearly state that what D’Souza claimed to be “evidence” was nothing of the sort. As I said, the sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t actually evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes”. Seriously you can’t possibly be this deranged. You admit that you don’t even know anything about what is claimed in 2000 mules and you shamelessly completely misrepresent the criticism of him that totally dismantled his claims, in an effort to suggest the jury is still out or that he has most but not all of the evidence You know sometimes you come off as one of the more reasonable conservatives on here but sometimes you are in an alternate reality.

I guess time will tell whether it’s a quarter billion as Doug claims, or a billion but given that this same promise could be done for at least a quarter billion LESS a year from now, as at least the Beer Store subsidies wouldn’t be necessary, is this money well spent?

Doug Ford attacked over possible $1 billion price tag for liberalized booze sales Ford is defending his decision to spend hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money to liberalize alcohol sales a little more than a year earlier than scheduled. While Ford maintains it will cost $225 million to end the ”master framework agreement” this fall with The Beer Store, owned by Labatt, Molson and Sleeman, critics argue the tab could ultimately be three or four times higher. That’s due to an additional $375 million in rebates to The Beer Store as well as foregone tax revenue and a 10 per cent discount for the retailers that will buy products from the LCBO, which could cost the provincial liquor monopoly $150 million a year. ..NDP Leader Marit Stiles said “people are shaking their heads at this terrible deal” at a time when more than 2.3 million Ontarians can’t find a family doctor. “A billion dollars to get out of a deal that was going to expire in a year? Something doesn’t smell right about this. We know it, the people of Ontario know it. We’re not going to stop fighting to find out more,” said Stiles. …Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie said all Ontarians should be paying attention to Ford’s booze gambit since they are footing the bill. “Let’s be very clear what’s happening here ... taxpayers’ money is being used to expedite a deal one year,” said Crombie, adding Ford is “using your money whether you believe the numbers are $225 million (and) I think they’re closer to $1 billion ... it’s your money.” https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/terrible-deal-doug-ford-attacked-over-possible-1-billion-price-tag-for-liberalized-booze-sales/article_90b481e4-21bf-11ef-a6f2-6f0733e31613.html?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAQxIyh2P3knqIoGIGd2K_igcqguAEqDggAKgYICjDptXgw98kM&utm_content=rundown&gaa_at=g&gaa_n=ARTJ-U-KmA6vmS50aaWVstVBHSfSSrRgGy2j1rsVhyGyCGgQNMqxW8k2tBjCrPjCZtu0Tn0WTBcwRg%3D%3D&gaa_ts=665e82cf&gaa_sig=52-vRsALYKhbyA9yNqGCj09tMiwUx5IZQ_e56Z8fsUBRk4oIwE3C27fvlRNqi8FD4qLPdIvbBlKgKiHIedxgqA%3D%3D

Pfft Republicans have a truckload of activist billionaire mega donors who are richer, than boogie man George Soros and at least as powerful and politically active . Donald Trump himself is now reportedly richer than Soros, thanks to fleecing gullible suckers like you Donald Trump is now richer than George Soros — and on track to overtake Mark Cuban https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-wealth-tmtg-dwac-billionaires-stock-court-judgment-rich-list-2024-3?amp American billionaires’ political spending overwhelmingly leans Republican https://qz.com/american-billionaires-political-spending-overwhelmingl-1849751449 Beyond George Soros, Republican mega-donors represent 7 of top 10 individuals pouring into $17B midterms https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beyond-george-soros-republican-mega-donors-represent-7-top-10-individuals-pouring-17b-midterms.amp The Ultra-Rich Are Ultra-Conservative https://jacobin.com/2019/07/billionaires-and-stealth-politics The billionaires rallying behind Trump after his conviction https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckvvlv3lewxo.amp 6 GOP megadonors quietly propelling Republicans through Trump-era turbulence https://www.salon.com/2023/05/04/peter-thiel-top-megadonors-2024/

No I spelled out in detail the flaws/ errors in his argument. But like all conservatives in this forum when you hear something that’s inconvenient to your ideology you just make a blanket statement that it’s somehow not relevant. That is entirely false and none of it is wrong D’Souza is a convicted felon having previously convicted of election fraud, which is completely relevant to a “documentary” he’s made to discredit the 2020 election and demanding that we take him at his word. He is absolutely and in no uncertain terms arguing what I said he’s arguing the flaws in his claims and logic are so wide you can drive a truck between them and I described in detail what those flaws are. Ironically you’re not even able to describe how any of MY arguments are inadequate. Again typical for a conservative on this forum: you complain that detailed and specific criticism was detailed and sepecif enough, while refusing to provide ANY details or specifics yourself. But of course shameless hypocrisy has become the Republican brand. It’s not ad-hominem to state the fact that this man RECENTLY went to jail for trying to undermine free and fair elections considering this conversation is about his attempt to under the 2020 election. which statement is that? LMAO clearly you don’t understand how evidence works You are the only DERP here if you think anyone is supposed to believe his grandiose and outrageous claims and overturn the election based on secret evidence he has but won’t show anyone, even 2 years later And you admit you don’t even know if he’s provided any evidence or not but you don’t seem to even care. What would a legitimate reason be? Again more of your hypocrisy that when the accusations come from a Republican, even a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud NO EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED to believe his claims, you tak him at his word. But yet when the accusations are against any Republican suddenly your criteria for evidence is an impossibly high standard that nobody could ever realistically meet. That’s a lie it was a factual critique that you don’t want to accept so you pretend it was as you wish it was. RECAP OF FACTS: he hasn’t shown how he can locate a phone that close despite industry experts disputing his claim, he hasn’t shown how he ruled out the device of people who routinely pass by boxes located near where they live and work particularly since drop boxes are deliberately located in high traffic areas like malls and libraries, he hasn’t provided the addresses of supposed Democrat “safe houses” or even described how he knows the locations to be such, he hasn’t shown footage of anyone stuffing a box or visiting a box lore than once despite claiming 2 years ago that he has it And fact: claiming to have secret evidence that you refuse to show anyone means that for all intents and purposes you have NO evidence. Otherwise that kind of defeats the whole point of evidence in the first place. If I call the cops and say I have secret evidence that you’re a criminal but I refuse to show them or anyone, should they or anyone else believe me and come arrest you? I don’t think the technology has been invented that could help find you a friend 😝 We all have mobile phones. We’ve all experienced where it shows the device is in the backyard or the neighbours yard when in fact it is in the house and I’m not certain find my phone is even the same tech as the geolocation data anyway. And D’Souza absurdly claimed his cell phone location is accurate to 18 INCHES not 18 feet. In fact he said “12 to 18 inches” which is hilariously false. Experts said accuracy is 2-10 METRES at best under ideal lab conditions never mind real world environments Also geolocation can’t tell the difference between a moving object and a stationary object, it’s just the approximate location of the phone in the split second it was pinged. So there’s no way to tell if someone who was pinged was standing still directly at a box or speeding past the box at 100 mph on a nearby road Debunking links here: Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election? https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2XJ0OQ/ FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’ https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-covid-technology-health-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762 Conservative group tells judge it has no evidence to back its claims of Georgia ballot stuffing https://apnews.com/article/georgia-elections-true-vote-ballot-stuffing-199113b47bc2df79c63fdf007cd23115 Group featured in debunked ‘2000 Mules’ election doc admits it has no evidence https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/ Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/attorney-general-bill-barr-trump-2000-mules-voter-fraud/

The circumstances, the intent are completely different, as I explained. Because there has never been anyone as debased and compromised as Trump. Cite please False. In fact they called 2 witnesses and could have called more. Why would they need a change of venue? Crimes are usually tried in the jurisdiction where they occur. And he is a national figure, it’s not like there is a venue where nobody has heard of him or has an opinion about him. It’s not normal for a person to recuse themselves because of their child. That’s usually for spouses or where there is a direct financial interest at stake . And Republican USSC justices Alito and Thomas actually have spouses who are outspoken partisan extremists and yet they never recuse themselves. No that’s your imagination again. There’s not been any twisting of the law. He was caught on tap plotting it. His co-conspirator, his former lawyer, already was convicted for it and testified against him. As per his usual schtick, he has no defence against reality so he screams conspiracy and demands you not pay attention to the facts being presented. Like Ive said his supporters don’t even deny he committed the crime they just demand their messiah is above the law and be granted complete immunity. It’s certainly plausible that other presidential candidates committed similar or perhaps worse crimes and made the allegations go away by discretely “playing ball” or pulling strings behind the scenes but Trump is unique in the myriad ways in which he is legally compromised, he isn’t isn’t just implicated in one scandal, he has many unrelated criminal investigations into his conduct and abuse of office. Also he is uniquely unhinged and clueless nature and he instinctively makes his own situation worse with his public personal attacks, rants and lies against any authority figure scrutinizing his activity. Also interesting hypocrisy that the people who claim to admire Trump specifically because he ignores and defies norms and conventions are now complaining about an alleged convention that wasn’t followed, don’t you think?

I just used that burn on Nationalist. You’re by essentially saying “No you are that thing you just said to him”…..tsk, that is not a witty comeback it’s just lame.

I wrote a lengthy post systematically dismantling the 2000 mules idi0cy and that’s all you have to say?

Sure, dodge the point that Trump just hilariously claimed he never said “lock her up”. Second, A civil fine by the FEC is not the same as conviction on 34 criminal counts. Hillary’s campaign staff reported all their payments to their law firm as “legal fees” (go figure) while the FEC felt the one particular payment should have been reported as “opposition research” even though it was paid to their lawyer. It was reported the dispute was only over the description. It’s likely that the staff who fill out these reports have no idea what each particular legal consulting invoice is actually for, there are undoubtedly dozens and dozens of them for anything and everything under the sun. They agreed to a fine with no admission of wrongdoing. That’s nowhere near the same as Trump’s hush money and conspiracy to falsify business records in order to hide the payment. And nobody is attempting to put Trump in jail. By all accounts he is unlikely to face anything other than a fine If Republicans really abhorred politically motivated abuses of power as they claim then they would not be threatening to do the same with vigour as soon as they get into power simply for “revenge”….not even if all their accusations and conspiracies were true, which they’re not. The reality is all these false and exaggerated claims of victimization and conspiracy have been cooked up in order to justify the corruption and authoritarian abuses they are planning. Every authoritarian regime in history has done the exact same thing. What else can you expect from a party whose members openly admire thuggish autocrats like Orban and Putin and who attract the support of every openly fringe fascist and white nationalist group in the country?

What are you talking about, debunking of the ridiculous lie of a film has been articulated endlessly since the day it came out including by former Trump officials like Bill Barr. For your edification, I have just done it again in my above post. I’ll post it wherever I damn well feel like, noob.

No, none of the 2,000 mules story, created by a convicted felon election fraudster is plausible. Your attempt to argue that that just because one of his baseless accusations was proven to be a fabricated lie doesn’t mean their other unproven baseless claims are untrue. If only the brainwashed cultists would apply that same logic to their judgment of Democrats / the FBI / the media / anyone who doesn’t worship Trump as a holy man. Lets recap: The felon D’Souza said he would release all his evidence shortly but to date has not released any - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he would release evidence proving cell phone data can track people to with an accuracy of no more than 18 inches, contrary to literally every non-partisan industry technical expert, who were all smeared as being Democrat operatives simply for disagreeing with the non-expert election fraudster D’Souza. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he would release evidence showing how they had “eliminated” innocent people who appeared to make frequent trips near a ballot box from their data simply because they pass by one that is near where they live or work. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. -The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed to have video footage showing the same people making multiple drops at ballot boxes and/or “stuffing” a large number of ballots, and that he would soon release the footage So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. Every piece of video footage released only shows the person making one single visit much like the innocent man smeared by the lying felon and his cult goons who is now suing. No footage of anyone “stuffing” a box or returning multiple times has ever been shown - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he had evidence tracing the “mules” back to addresses that are known “Democrat” safe houses affiliated with DNC or left-leaning organizations. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. He has not released the addresses or explained in what way these alleged locations are connected to Democrats -The convicted election fraudster D’Souza has yet to explain how he knows said “mules” were stuffing the boxes with Biden ballots rather than Trump ballots or why no fraudulent / invalid ballots were ever detected The only way to cast a fraudulent vote is to steal the vote of another registered voter or to register someone who is not eligible to vote and neither of those occurred in any unusual numbers compared to previous elections. In summary, 2000 mules was an absurd and implausible lie from a convicted felon who previously plead guilty to election fraud, and it was sold to gullible suckers as “just take my word for it without question, I will provide the evidence later” which of course he never did because it’s all fabricated lies that couldn’t possibly be true. They couldn’t possibly be true because they defy basic logic and the reality of how cell phones and voting actually work.

So you fantasize about men and reciprocal reach-arounds. Got it. It seems Fascism has always had this strange homoerotic fetishism to it.

You are pure batshit. Do you masturbate to those sadistic fascist fantasies of yours?

The hilarious and shameless Trump gaslighting continues as convicted criminal Trump NOW absurdly claims he never said “lock her up” Now he’s soft on crime now that he’s been convicted of one Trump Denies Ever Saying ‘Lock Her Up.’ He Did… Several Times “Hillary Clinton — I didn’t say, ‘Lock her up,’ but the people would all say, ‘Lock her up, lock her up.’ OK. Then we won, and I said pretty openly, I’d say, ‘Alright, come on, just relax. Let’s go. We gotta make our country great.'” That is, of course, a lie. Trump not only beamed and nodded from the podium as his rally crowds chanted, “Lock her up,” he also said it himself, multiple times. He said it on Oct. 14, 2016, at a rally in Greensboro, N.C. As the crowd chanted the line, Trump said, “For what she’s done, they should lock her up.” In fact, he said it numerous times on the 2016 campaign trail, and he carried the line forward during his presidency. He even said it of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in October 2020. When the crowd chanted, “Lock her up!” about Whitmer, Trump responded with, “Lock them all up.” And that same month, he told a crowd of the Bidens, “You should lock them up. Lock up the Bidens, lock up Hillary.” When a crowd chanted, “Lock her up!” about Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford, the professor who accused Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh of assaulting her when both were teens, Trump gave the crowd enthusiastic nods and a thumbs-up. As recently as last August, Trump hinted he might attempt to lock up his opponents. In an interview with Glenn Beck, the host asked, “Do you regret not ‘locking her up.’ And if you’re president again, will you lock people up?” “The answer is you have no choice, because they’re doing it to us,” Trump responded. Even with his conviction, it is unlikely that Trump himself will be “locked up” for any period of time. He will almost certainly appeal, and a prison sentence is unlikely for someone convicted of falsifying business records. But even though he faces a vanishingly small chance of time behind bars, Trump is all of a sudden painting himself as soft on crime. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-denies-ever-saying-lock-151844115.html

Not to mention that despite the lie from the now-banned conservative troll who created this thread, D’Souza is not “highly respected” but rather a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud. It’s funny how all these right wing lies and fake news stories getting debunked time and again never gives these right wing dupes pause before they fall for the next one. I have a friend who is like this: somehow he’s not a MAGA supporter but he is a populist who is always falling for fake news and hoax claims on facebook from random strangers like the well-known “ farmer giving away free horses due to (x current event in the news)” , even some from satire websites that are clearly meant for humour and say so right in the web page. No matter how often they’re debunked and he admits to being fooled it doesn’t stop him from falling for the next one Its a psychological phenomenon.

OMG this dumbass argument again. Your ignorance knows no limits. Here’s the TL;DR version for your ignorant ass: The NAZI party name predates Hitler, Hitler is not the party founder (who Hitler later had murdered after he took over the party), “National Socialism” is not the same thing as socialism, and names are meaningless, North Korea’s official name is “The Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea” do think that proves NK is a democratic republic? The Nazis jailed and murdered socialists by the thousands and publicly raged about socialism the way republicans rage about illegal immigrants. LMAO you are such a whacked out internet Konspiracy Kook Krackpot it’s hilarious Oh the lighting was red 😱. Only an id1iot like you could be conned into believing that every red light you see is also a swastika Honk honk! And The floor was not a square it was the same shape as the Othala Rune (see pic below) Even if it was pure coincidence, which is likely , if you’re going to scream nazi just because of red stage lights (did the Nazis even use red stage lights or did it just look spooky to you??) then it’s ridiculous that you would ignore the MULTIPLE Republican examples I mentioned most of which you couldn’t even acknowledge in your post Republicans have been saying that for decades and that’s exactly what they did. Remember all of the made up secret rules the Republican senators cited to first block appointments under Oba and then fast track them under Trump? “Oh secret rule nobody’s ever heard of: President Obama can’t appoint anyone to the USSC during his final year so we’re blocking his nomination …oh wait we forgot to mention there’s a secret exception to the secret rule that nobody’s ever heard of: so President Trump CAN appoint someone to the USSC during his final year..Expedited Approved!”

In fact the Clinton email nothingburger was more like Biden’s little box of unreturned documents and less like Trump’s deliberate criminal actions (and the Trump family also used their personal emails for White House business BTW) After a years-long FBI investigation, it was determined that Clinton's server did not contain any information or emails that were clearly marked classified.[1] News reports by NBC and CNN indicated that the emails discussed "innocuous" matters that were already public knowledge. In July, FBI director James Comey announced that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution.[7] On June 14, 2018, the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General released its report on the FBI's and DOJ's handling of Clinton's investigation, finding no evidence of political bias and lending support for the decision to not prosecute Clinton.[14] A three-year State Department investigation concluded in September 2019 that 38 individuals were "culpable" in 91 instances of sending classified information that reached Clinton's email account, though it found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information".[15] Yet a September 2022 "Fact Checker" analysis by The Washington Post, which followed a tweet by Clinton claiming, "I had zero emails that were classified", also quotes the same 2019 State Department report as having noted, "None of the emails at issue in this review were marked as classified."[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy Westcan is the mor0n who compared Biden to nazis simply because he once spoke in front of red stage lights and his government has a military. I just showed him how Republicans have the support of ACTUAL Nazis, some of whom they retweet or hire to work for them and slip Nazi symbols into Republican communications.

Conservative distributor of 2,000 mules cancels movie and book, apologizes for spreading lies: ‘2000 Mules’ Duped Millions of Fools KLAUS MARRE 06/01/24 A right-wing media company has stopped distributing '2000 Mules,' a so-called documentary that spread lies about the 2020 election. The Salem Media Group, a conservative media company, this week made official what every expert already knew: The film, 2,000 Mules, a supposed documentary from right-wing nutj0b Dinesh D’Souza that incorrectly led supporters of Donald Trump to believe that Democrats engaged in “ballot stuffing” in 2020, was a work of fiction. The company announced Friday that it has removed the film from its platforms and will no longer distribute it or the accompanying book. Among other falsehoods, 2,000 Mules included surveillance video that showed a Georgia man, Mark Andrews, placing ballots in a drop box near Atlanta. The accompanying commentary left viewers with no doubt that Andrews had committed a crime. And there were plenty of viewers. Eager for any “evidence” that the election was “stolen” from Trump, MAGA supporters flocked to see the film, which consequently made Salem’s former publishing division Regnery Publishing millions of dollars. It didn’t hurt that the former president called 2,000 Mules the “greatest and most impactful documentary of our time,” and slammed Fox News for not broadcasting it. You know that a piece of right-wing propaganda must be truly outrageous when Rupert Murdoch’s propaganda channel refuses to air it. In this case, Fox News made a wise decision because Andrews sued D’Souza, the Salem Media Group, and two individuals associated with the right-wing group “True the Vote” for defamation. The case is still pending. Perhaps in response to that lawsuit, the company has now announced its decision to pull the film and apologized to Andrews. “In publishing the film and the book, we relied on representations made to us by Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote, Inc. (“TTV”) that the individuals depicted in the videos provided to us by TTV, including Mr. Andrews, illegally deposited ballots,” the company stated. “We have learned that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation has cleared Mr. Andrews of illegal voting activity in connection with the event depicted in 2000 Mules.” Salem Media Group added that “it was never our intent that the publication of the 2000 Mules film and book would harm Mr. Andrews. We apologize for the hurt the inclusion of Mr. Andrews’ image in the movie, book, and promotional materials have caused Mr. Andrews and his family.” https://whowhatwhy.org/elections/2000-mules-duped-millions-of-fools/

Not to mention Biden only had a small number of documents while Trump had entire rooms full of boxes.

And it did. He was found guilty on all counts by a jury.

Well I had Nationalist in mind specifically since he is particularly obsessed with sadistic revenge fantasies Republican are some of the worst cancellers out there: Disney, Bud Light, Blackrock, Liz Cheney, every Republican who spoke against Trump, even DeSantis the Floridian canceller-in-chief got canceled when he tried to run against Trump. And with Republican laws targeting on abortion rights, LGBTQ, private businesses who allegedly have “woke” policies, Republicans are just as bad if not worse when it comes to interfering in other peoples private affairs and ways of life Republicans have been called Deplorable? Aww muffin! Republicans have made it their brand to call everyone else pedophiles, communists and terrorist supporters and then invent a bunch of batshit conspiracies and lies to go along with that name calling. The new populist far right has made premeditated displays of grotesque vulgarity its brand: screaming obscenities and the N word at politicians and public employees, even while holding their small children, chasing politicians and their families down the street when the see them in public, pelting them with gravel, spray painting their offices with words like “c-nt”. Often these extremists even film themselves doing so and then post it on social media to show off their vulgarity. People talk about left wing “virtue signalling” when lefties put on a big show to try and show off how progressive they are. The new right does the same thing except to show off how vulgar and depraved they are. The righties say they like the displays of vulgarity because it shows how genuine and authentic they are, and that they don’t care who they offend and they will never apologize for it because only cowards and wimps apologize. But of course that only applies to them Call them something as innocuous as “deplorable” and the shameless hypocrites complain they’ve been victimized in the most heinous and unspeakable way possible and demand an apology The Republicans’ manufactured victim narrative is no different than that of every other authoritarian movement in history. You can tell their motives are sinister because they claim this alleged victimization entitles them to victimize others in return, which is not what real victims do. Nobody says “I was raped therefore I should be allowed to rape someone else” or “I was robbed therefore I should be allowed to rob someone else”. Real opponents of dictatorship don’t say “just wait until I become dictator and get my revenge,” they say “just wait until we create a democracy and end dictatorship forever” but of course that’s not what Trump and his supporters are saying at all. What’s funny is that few people really doubt that Trump paid Stormy the hush money and then falsified business records to cover it up, they simply don’t care if he did or not and think he should be above the law based on his political stance. Typical authoritarian thuggery.

Because his accusations against her were made up and he had no evidence. Unlike Trump’s criminal case where the crime was real and proven in a court of law. Neither the prosecutor nor the judge nor the jury are under Biden’s control.

What do you mean NOW? People have been calling the Right fascist since fascism was invented. Only before trump it was just exaggerated hyperbole, like when people call mor0ns like you retarded even though we know you don’t have Down Syndrome. Since Trump MAGAs have become ACTUAL fascists. That’s just your made up Reichstag Fire bullshit that you are using to justify your planned fascist abuses . Fascists always have a long list of outrageous lies that that they claim justify their brutality and thuggery. After your violent thugs attacked it! And now they’re filling the internet with calls for more violence in service of their Fuhrer Hilarious. Are you so clueless in your bubble that missed all the times Republicans slipped ACTUAL Nazi symbols into their programming? And of course Trumps own fascist rhetoric? Trump’s social media account shares a campaign video with a headline about a ‘unified Reich’ The 30-second video appeared Monday on Trump’s account at a time when the presumptive Republican nominee for president, while seeking to portray President Joe Biden as soft on antisemitism, has himself repeatedly faced criticism for using language and rhetoric associated with Nazi Germany. https://apnews.com/article/trump-election-2024-rhetoric-germany-antisemitism-31002afb91b642c0314223d19e51f427 DeSantis aide fired after sharing video featuring symbol used by Nazis Nate Hochman ‘no longer with the campaign’ after posting video using internet memes popular on the far right The video ended with two files of soldiers marching towards a Florida flag, the centre of which turned into a revolving red and yellow disc. The disc resembled a sonnenrad or sunwheel, which the Anti-Defamation League defines as an “ancient European symbol appropriated by the Nazis in their attempt to invent an idealised ‘Aryan/Norse’ heritage” and which has “countless variations [including] the swastika”. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/26/desantis-campaign-video-nazi-symbol-fired-aide CPAC Stage Compared To Nazi Symbol On Social Media By Saturday afternoon there had been nearly 100,000 tweets that compared the CPAC stage to the ODAL Rune, which was used by a unit of the insidious Waffen SS, the initially named the SS-Volunteer Division Prinz Eugen (SS-Freiwilligen-Division "Prinz Eugen") – later the 7th Volunteer Mountain Division. That unit was formed in 1941 and took part exclusively in action against the communist-led Yugoslavian partisans during the Second World War. Trump’s latest flirtation with Nazi symbolism draws criticism Trump has been rebuked for calling his political opponents “vermin” and for saying on multiple occasions that immigrants entering the U.S. illegally are “poisoning the blood” of the country. When pressed on the latter phrases’ connections to Hitler and Nazi Germany, Trump said he never read “Mein Kampf,” Hitler’s manifesto. Dating back further, Trump was widely criticized in 2022 for dining with Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes at Mar-a-Lago. And he triggered outrage in 2017 when he said there was blame on “both sides” and that there were “very fine people on both sides” at a Charlottesville, Va., white supremacist rally that turned violent, leading to the murder of a counterprotester in a hate crime. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4677700-trumps-latest-flirtation-with-nazi-symbolism-draws-criticism/mlite/?nxs-test=mlite Neo-Nazis Explain Why They Like Trump