QuebecOverCanada

You, no? You want to segregate them, or are you contradicting yourself?

Many Africans who are not Muslims as well. I don't think there is a policy toward Muslim immigration in the EU.

What is the line in terms of punishment you deem acceptable?

This is quite an extreme take. So, for saving lives, and being an empathetic person, you are willing to get rid of a large substract of society you deem inferior to you?

No, vaccines don't make it less likely you catch COVID. It only decreases symptoms. You don't seem to know how these vaccines work.

This is a very telling post. Thank you for your honesty. At least, we have the definitive proof you don't want to improve public health or decrease contagion; you want to punish a substract of society you deem inferior to you.

The recent spread in the United States has led the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to recommend that Americans wear masks in areas with substantial transmission "regardless of vaccination status." So, why is this particular variant spreading so rapidly? And what's the mechanism at play behind its apparent success at infecting human hosts.. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/why-delta-variant-spreads-fast-covid-1.6120982 --- It is stated the vaccine didn't help with preventing contagion for Delta. So why should you feel like we should segregate the vaccinated?

But it doesn't according to the CDC and dr Fauci. So, if the vaccines couldn't stop contagion, you would still support segregation of the unvaccinated?

Why are you implying the worst about Huckleberry Finn? Did he say he deserved to die, or that a vaccine was probably not enough to save him?

But if it didn't prevent contagion of the Delta variant as it is stated in US intelligence reports, would you still support social segregation of the unvaccinated?

Why 'Muslim'? Are they specifically targeted?

And if the vaccine doesn't prevent contagion, what is the motive behind that?

No. In Montreal, it took decades to just pay for a still broken stadium from the 1976 games. I have no trust in public authorities to carefully spend, manage and deliver the Olympics.

Don't worry. The threat is way overblown and we managed through tougher times. Just like 9/11, crises happen not because of exterior threats but because of internal panic. When everything settles down with the virus, things are going to get much clearer. I don't believe in doom at all.

Have you heard about the increases in the pesticides in your food? It may come sooner than expected. Health Canada, alongside the pesticides lobby group, are putting enormous pressure on the system to allow farmers to sell us vegetables and fruits containing up to twice the amount of already high pesticides traces in our plates. Not only is Health Canada, a government organization, is helping the corporations push that agenda, but the Minister of Agriculture has said something quite... enormous today. She said that basically, her minister won't be intervening in that case, because we should leave it to health experts on to whether or not we should increase our pesticides intake on a daily, and should not be a political matter. Is she even aware that we're having this debate - to increase or not our doses of pesticides - because of lobbying (which is political pressure) from corporations? Are our politicians that out of touch? Is the system that rigged?

Doom is upon us! Sometimes Tories are like SJWs, instead of Trump Derangement Syndrome we get Trudeau Derangement Syndrome. He is corrupt and probably not the best who could hold the position, but he not Stalin.

That the system we're living in isn't working that badly. Perfectible is the term. And yes it may have disparities, favorizing some parts of the country. It is unfair, I agree. But not working is a stretch.

So, outside of Quebec and GTA, there are no running water, no education, no roads, no infrastructure, no no nothing? Total chaos and anarchy?

The system works. Not for the taste of everyone, maybe you're not a winner you would like to be in that system, or maybe most of us aren't winners in that system, but is that a legitimate metric that a system works? Canada has been existing without civil strife since the beginning, unlike France which has 5 Republics. The system never has had a revolution against it unlike the South were the country broke in half, or it managed them so well that they have been inconsequential for the country... IMO Québec independence was the biggest threat, but the system cheated its way to win the 95 referendum, and no uprisings occured, no violent incident happened toward the system which created all the cheating, because they are effective at cheating. The rich and the elite in this system really are living well here in our beautiful neighborhoods. The poor and middle class live quite well, it is not Haiti by any stretch of the imagination. Canada is also a first world country, with running water, education, healthcare... even if it is substandard to our ideals, it is still somewhat working. Our money has decent value internationally. So yes, things to fix here and there. But throw the baby with the bathwater is somewhat dumb, and somewhat is the Tories' rallying cry since Trudeau took office in 2015 and it is really petty.

Think about it, a $500,000 can get you that far. Imagine those who give millions.

No I think charities have the tendencies to be counterproductive and/or frauds. I'd rather spend my money in useful stuff such as a new laptop which was made by child labor for instance.

I agree. But you need more than that in Canada. Justin won in parts because he's so dreamy and talks to the hearts of the mid-life crisis ladies who vote on masse. In other words, CPC need to be phony SOBs and also play the inclusive game. Ditch the niqab debate. Ditch the abortion question. Make it all about an inclusive Canadian Dream, with all kinds of diversity -male, female, poc, whites, poor, rich- in ads for photo ops and stick to the message; stable economy. Stable diplomacy. Seriousness and rigor in managing public spending. That works.

This funny ad by Pierre Poilievre had my eyes rolling, and laughing at the same time. Obviously, he is a good communicator and has energy. He seems smart and decided. I saw many of his interventions when he was questioning -sorry assassinating- Justin at We Charity hearings, and he is just like in this ad. There's just something that feels quite odd; this ad reflects exactly what is wrong with the CPC, and why they haven't taken power since 2015. The message of his advertisement was strictly economical, talking about our beloved God, money, and how he will make ourselves rich rather than credit card broke like his to-be-predecessor Trudeau leads us all to be. I think this is off a Canadian market target, but would fit more in the US. Would you vote for him? I would, because I'm a Tory, but I don't think he will suffice to convince soft Liberals to vote for him.

Switch to cigars, that's how you stop cigarettes. Sigmund Freud had the answer 100 years before you.