QuebecOverCanada

First off, go fock yourself with your monkey analogies, you Joe Rogan-watching internet-basement-dwelling-c()nt. Secondly, you're already scrapping it. You made the promise to be a bilingual country to appease us, and it was never applied. Lastly, speaking many languages is an advantage and linked to higher IQ. In a world that globalizes itself, knowing only one language is a limitation, almost a handicap.

The French language, the Civil Code, the secularism, the past grievances have not disappeared. I have experienced both the Canadians world and the Quebec world in my life and I may assure you that there is two countries in one at least. So you're trying to bully Quebec to stay in Canada? OK, message received. One more reason to stand up to Canada.

Where did Quebec abuse you? May you show us your bruise?

Many of my relatives, friends, coworkers do debate about it.

We frankly don't want unfriendly relations with Canada as a whole. There could be a free trade agreement just like with the States and a kind of a Schengen style border control in between Quebec and other Canadian provinces. It is feasible. Germany and France overcame their historical grievances. Quebec and Canada may do the same. You know, the oil era is far gone. Since 2015, Alberta has stagnated a bit.

We didn't ask permission. By the way, I understand your hatred for the independence movement of Quebec. It would mean Canada would be split in two. That would be bad for Canada's interests.

Ok then let us leave.

Thank you for acknowledging that. At least, recognizing the issue would draw a narrower path to a solution.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Zpmu1zdU8kA8n92LBT/giphy.gif?cid=82a1493b2dannvafsze9gespulnwebe9zp8nqm58ougw0orn&ep=v1_gifs_trending&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

So progressive, such liberal. Iran is 10/10, it's just the gobinment that's totally at fault, unlike all its neighbours who share the same values and stuff (let's put our heads on the sand for the sake of our argument that Iran is great). Who has access to such VPN? And actions speak louder than words. The Iranians beat the sh*t out of their wives who dare not wearing the hijab. The Iranians beat the sh*t out of their family members who are homosexuals. But hey, progressiveness! Look at that poll made by two expats using a foreign VPN saying they're like us! Wow!

1. I already showed pictures of crowds gathering around hangings in multiple posts. Do you want me to post again? 2. The study said the participants of the polls were using a certain VPN, read the pdf you posted please.

Afghanistan and Pakistan do share islamic values that are the cornerstone of the Iranian population and the regime. Both the population and the regime abide to the islamic values. When it comes to Turkey, it becomes more and more like all Iranian neighbours and Iran. There is a movement across Turkey which is becoming more and more Islamic. 1. The people did applaud the hangings, the beatings. 2. I dismiss the authors totally on this subject, and the fact they used a certain VPN to do their study.

Neighbouring countries of Iran; Iraq Afghanistan Pakistan Turkey which becomes more and more Islamic. All these countries believe in many values the Islamic Revolution holds. This revolution knows no boundaries, just like communism did in the XXth century.

Of course, of course. That's why we see the same values being replicated and exercised in all its neighbouring countries...

Ok are you kind of reta rded? What about all the Iranian women who impose the hijab on other Iranian women? What is the number when it comes to that phenomenon you completely decide to ignore to fit your Iranian-loving narrative?

Once again, your naiveté tends to blind you to obvious things. Your conclusion comes before the analysis, which bends your interpretation of what is going on even if you see the acts committed by the Iranians, including the population. In February, I posted a demonstration which involved hundreds of thousands of demonstrators. It is a widespread movement. All of them are not agents of the State, this is obvious. Oh come on. That's ridiculous to imply that I encourage the regime. I'm saying the population is just as barbaric and backward as the regime. How can it be more clear.

The poll says things. The Iranians hang enemies of Islam on cranes. The Iranians beat women who dare to show too much hair or skin. The two authors of the study are two Iranians in exile. They are not what's on the ground in Iran.

Once again, the Iranians celebrated yesterday in the streets of Tehran to support the launch of missiles and drones toward Israel. Just like the Palestinians celebrated after October 7th, before they knew what was coming to them. They are not what @CITIZEN_2015 wants you to believe.

LOL I ARGUe ON THE INTERNET with caplocks smart

You surely need those too, lDlOT.

Cynical but truthful

Like Canada, NZ has had way too many immigrants in a short span without the infrastructures required to welcome them. NZ's government has taken action, and will prevent employers from hiring foreign workers in areas as in to which there is no labour shortage. A problem New Zealand has had was also that many Kiwis were leaving the country to go to Australia as many of the well paying jobs in New Zealand were given by the employers to foreigners. They lost many of their own constituents, productive ones at that, because the elite wanted cheap labour. It's important that we start to realize that other nations face the same problems Canada is facing, and they find solutions. Why couldn't we replicate what New Zealand just did? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c25l0vxpnd8o

This foreign interference sure warrants a complete freeze on the elected Liberals' bank accounts, right? Right?

Or you have Vienna, which is composed in majority of social housing.

Yup, it's imperative that the municipal zoning laws in dense urban areas have to be reformed. In Montreal for example, the federal and provincial government paid billions for a transit station (REM) in Pierrefonds. The homeowners of Pierrefonds (QC), who live in small detached homes, voted by referendum to prevent any dense housing to be built near the station, paid by the taxpayers. That's unacceptable and that's where provincial and federal governments have to slap their dongs on the table and tell Pierrefonds that any funding to build public transit is conditional on allowing dense housing.