Goddess

Do you ever stop pushing CBC propaganda?

In case you're wondering about the incest videos referred to in the above post: Hafiz wins Scarborough Southwest Liberal nomination despite surfacing of disturbing decade-old posts

LOL He's not wrong.

"Quiet on the set!!"

Maybe. But it's mainly younger generations voting Conservative right now. The older my son gets, the more he's aligning with me, politically.

Boomers 🙄 Nothing is going to get better in this country until they die off. I was watching an interview today, part of it was on media influence. The last 5 years, the only people getting their news from MSM is boomers, so all they feed on is propaganda. They talked about how people 50 and younger now watch MSM and go, "What is this BS?" Last election, it was mainly boomers that voted in the liberals again. And now Canada is a subsidiary of Brookfield Corporation.

OK, dude. You made your point 2 pages ago. I don't want this to turn into another covid fiasco and YOU SAY - neither do you. So what is your f*cking problem? I know you have a extreme hate-on for me, so you follow me around the board, coming up with inane arguments to simple things, but geez. Take a chill pill, already, before you have a heart attack.

You keep doing this. The Centurion Project is a separate entity from the Alberta Prosperity Project. The Centurion Project advocated for separatism, but COLLECTED NO SIGNATURES. The group has entirely different leadership. The signatures were NOT collected by the Centurion people. They were collected by legally, trained by Elections Alberta volunteers.

If you REALLY didn't agree with everything that went on last time, like you CLAIM - you would have just replied to thread, "Hey, thanks for that info on hanta. Ya, we should pay attention so the covid thing doesn't happen again." Instead, you're FURIOUS that someone else is saying, "Hey, this is getting a lot of media attention, maybe we should pay attention so it doesn't turn into another covid fiasco." I mean, seriously - you're absolutely f*cking IRATE at me for saying, "Hey, let's not do that again." Is it because you REALLY REALLY REALLY......want to do it again? Your take on this thread is one of the most inane things I've seen lately and WHY you're reacting with such FURY to a simple warning.....well, I have my guesses why but really, you need to figure that out for yourself.

You do remember that covid started out as "no big deal" until the media went wild and told you to poop your pants, right? And then you filled your diapers every day for YEARS. After what you ding-dongs did the last time, it's a warning. Not fear-mongering. It's like if you invite someone into your house and they rob you, vandalize and destroy it. Is it "fear-mongering" to warn others of that person? "Fear-mongering" to suspect......they'll likely do it again if you let them into your house? Don't be so obtuse, you donkey. You're so desperate to cover up your cowardice, you're making inane arguments. 🤡

CIA whistleblower claims the agency “took back 40 boxes of JFK and MK-Ultra files” that Tulsi Gabbard was reviewing for declassification. The whistleblower also alleges the CIA “illegally monitored the computer and phone usage” of Gabbard’s investigators during the probe into the COVID-19 origins cover-up. “These were Americans being spied on illegally while carrying out duties directed by the President and under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence.”

Career CIA officer and whistleblower James Erdman III testified that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s role in the COVID origins cover-up was deliberate and intentional: —— Fauci leveraged his position to stack the IC’s analysis with conflicted scientists funded by NIAID (his own agency) who had authored papers pushing the “natural origin” theory, had ties to gain-of-function research, and collaborated with Chinese researchers. —— These same scientists participated in Event 201 pandemic simulations, helped rewrite gain-of-function research definitions, and had clear conflicts of interest — yet were used to downplay and obfuscate evidence pointing to a lab leak from Wuhan’s Institute of Virology. —— Despite an initial IC assessment that leaned heavily toward the lab-leak hypothesis (reportedly 5-1 or 6-1 among analysts), CIA managers overruled dissenting voices, conducted a middle-of-the-night rewrite of the report, and buried the lab-leak conclusion to favor the natural-origin narrative. —— Analysts who refused to go along with the rewrite faced retaliation, including career threats and other forms of pressure. —— Erdman also accused the CIA of broader failures: refusing to comply with lawful congressional oversight, illegally monitoring investigators and whistleblowers, and failing to maintain proper separation between public health and biodefense programs. —— He called for sweeping reforms, including a full independent review of all U.S. government-funded life-science and gain-of-function research, stronger oversight mechanisms, and better protections for whistleblowers.

CIA whistleblower testifies on US Capitol Hill this morning: Career CIA Operations Officer just testified under oath: The COVID lab leak was a deliberate COVER-UP, and Dr. Fauci was in the middle of it. “I am a career CIA Operations officer… The Intelligence Community’s actions resulted in a cover-up.” - IC leaders downplayed the lab leak on purpose. - Fauci intentionally rigged the process by stacking the deck with his conflicted buddies, the same “Proximal Origin” clowns who pushed the natural origin lie. - They knew it came from Wuhan. They hid it. - That lie was used to ram through emergency use mandates on experimental shots while crushing anyone who told the truth. Millions of lives destroyed. Trillions wasted. Small businesses gutted. Kids masked and isolated. All because the “experts” and deep state didn’t want to admit China cooked this thing up and Fauci helped cover their rear end. "Dr. Fauci's role in the cover-up was intentional. Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject matter experts, public health officials, and scientists." "Intentional or not, the IC's actions resulted in a cover-up, wasted resources, and a failure to properly inform policymakers." "Public health policy would have been very different had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency use authorization mRNA products being mandated by the former administration."

I'm literally here saying "We don't have to panic over this" and to the radical left that's "fearmongering". 🤣 The same people who were glued to their TV's over case counts for years, supporting YEARS of shutting down businesses, the economy, schools, restaurants.....demanding people be fired from decades-long careers over a virus with a 99+% survival rate, cheering while their fellow citizens were shunned from society. I'm literally here saying, "Please don't do this again." And they're f*cking INFURIATED. 🤣

OK, thanks.

Parliamentary documents prove the Trudeau Government deliberately gutted Canada’s worker safety laws to ram through a COVID vaccine that could never pass health and safety standards. Zero hazard risk assessments. Zero consultations with workplace health and safety committees. Zero approvals for a biological preventive measure. The government intentionally bypassed the full OHS framework to avoid triggering employee rights to refuse dangerous work, know hazards, etc.

The Information Commissioner emphasizes the importance of properly documenting government decision-making. Remember folks: the government couldn’t justify why the unjabbed weren’t allowed on planes and trains. Access to information in extraordinary times This is the epic moment when the government’s expert witness who was relied upon to justify vax mandates for travel-Director General at Transport Canada’s “Covid Recovery Team”-is stunned into silence and has to admit there was no document supporting a recommendation for mandates.

Frédéric Bastiat’s essay “That Which Is Seen and That Which Is Not Seen” (1850) contains one of the clearest and most powerful insights in economics. Bastiat observed that people - including policymakers - focus almost exclusively on immediate, visible results (the “seen”) while ignoring the hidden, long-term consequences (the “unseen”). Take his famous broken-window parable: a shopkeeper’s window is smashed; the glazier is hired, earns money, and as he spends it elsewhere, onlookers declare the economy stimulated. What is seen is the new job and spending, but what is unseen is what the shopkeeper could have done with that same money - buying a new suit, repairing his roof or investing in his business. Society ends up with one window instead of a window plus a suit. Destruction does not create net wealth; it merely redirects it and conceals the loss. Bastiat applied the same logic to government spending, public works, subsidies, and even war. Every franc taken in taxes or borrowed is a franc that cannot be used by individuals for their own purposes. The jobs “created” by the state are visible; the jobs, innovations, and goods never produced because resources were diverted are invisible. This single insight exposes why so many well-intentioned policies fail. Real prosperity grows from the unseen choices of free individuals, not from the visible hand of the state.

“Consumers don't produce inflation. Producers don't produce inflation. Inflation is produced only by too much government spending and too much government creation of money, and nothing else.” — Milton Friedman

You haven't presented any here. Look, I hope you're right and this doesn't become Covid 2.0 on steroids. I'm providing facts and data to prevent that. And you are, apparently, very much against that. So....... **shrug** If someone is holding a gun to your head, forcing you to be on this thread, blink twice and we can send help.

From the thread: UN agencies systematically facilitated mass migration into America and Europe, even as citizens of these nations called for restrictions on migration. Now the Global Compact’s latest report urges nations to expand migration pathways and pursue “regularization” of migrants. UN agencies – working with the NGOs they fund – established a migration corridor through Central America and to the U.S. border. As the American people suffered under an unprecedented wave of mass migration, the UN was on the ground pipelining migrants to our southern border. UN officials greeted migrants along the route through the deadly Darien Gap. UN-funded NGOs handed out maps to migrants in route to the U.S. After facilitating mass migration to the United States, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants. As Europe endured sustained migratory pressure, UN officials staffed all ends of the Mediterranean migration route – from the coast of Libya to the shores of the Aegean to the islands of Greece. Then UN agencies condemned frontline states who refused to open their borders. While the United Kingdom faced unprecedented illegal boat crossings, UN agencies condemned plans for deportations. UN officials lobbied aviation regulators to prevent the deportation of migrants – an appalling violation of the UK’s national sovereignty. The Global Compact on Migration claims to support “safe” migration. For the citizens of Western nations, mass migration was never safe. It introduced new security threats, imposed financial strains, and undermined the cohesion of our societies. The United States will not legitimize global compacts that enable mass migration into America or Western nations. Under President Trump, the State Department will facilitate remigration – not replacement migration. Meanwhile in Canada: We got the lady who bullied every country into taking in massive amounts of migrants, with no thought to the effects.

Look, I know it sucks when you have a track record for being a braindead zombie coward and someone calls you out for it. Suck it up, buttercup.

Baloney. You stick up for everything that was done. The most you've said is that you didn't agree with mandates, but when I asked you what you did about it, you did nothing. So maybe sit this one out, you're either stoopid or a coward.