Goddess

Hahaha! They will just "tell" you if they plan on killing anyone. No worries! OMG - and you call ME stupid.

She will never answer that. She is more concerned with denying what's going on in Islam and if forced to admit something - she will make every excuse in the book for them.

Clearly, they "hate" Muslims.

And how are the murderous ones treated by their "Religion of Peace" community of fellow believers? Let's discuss Ahlam Tamimi, who blew up women and children in a pizzeria in Jerusalem in 2001. After her arrest, she was released as part of a prisoner exchange with Hamas. You would think that her community of Muslims, who you insist are all against violence, would want her prosecuted, but no:

Ahhh, yes, the old "fake news" argument. OK, Dia. No Islamics are attacking churches anywhere in the world. It's the most peaceful religion in the world. There I agree with you. Perfect. You can move on now.

She doesn't like that it's coming to light that Muslim attacks on Christian churches are getting more and more common: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/christian-attacks.aspx More and more people are wondering why this gets so little press and is being ignored and shouted down by people like her. The list above is only since the year 2001. Have fun scrolling to the end, Dia. Then come back and tell Dog and I and everyone else who's concerned about it that we're full of shit. But don't worry, our magical borders in Canada will prevent this from happening here, right? And as far as me "hating" Muslims - let me assure you, Dia - I have always.....ALWAYS......treated Muslims I meet with much, much more respect and dignity than they have ever treated me with. And I will continue to do so, in spite of your myriad accusations of ME and Dog being the problem in Islam.

And there you go again. You just proved my point. From Pew Research: So, according to you, 2/3 of the people in Nigeria and Lebanon who expressed concern for the spread of radical Islam are just using that to hide the fact that they "hate" Muslims. It was kind of nice here while you were on your hissy fit tantrum of refusing to post - at least these things could be discussed without you throwing histrionic fits every time someone has concerns about the spread of radical Islam and name-calling and your self-righteous "I'M SMARTER AND BETTER AND MORE MORAL THAN THE REST OF YOU BECAUSE I BELIEVE THERE IS NOTHING GOING ON IN ISLAM THAT IS WORTH WORRYING ABOUT."

You are soooooo disingenuous, slimy and deliberately underhanded. Some of us know why you bolded the part you did, instead of the part that made his point - "All Muslims subscribe to this ideology to a greater or lessor degree. " You seem to think that you are smarter than everyone else and constantly try to slip crap like that by because it totally changes what he said: All Muslims subscribe to this ideology = Slimy attempt to smear: END BOLDING SO THAT THE THOUGHT LOOKS COMPLETE. All Muslims subscribe to this ideology to a greater or lessor degree = Slimy attempt to smear: DON'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THE REST OF THE SENTENCE THAT FINISHES THE THOUGHT. Pathetic. Typical of you to throw shyte by adding your own selective bolding and interpretation. If you want to disagree with what he said, then fine - argue away!! But your pathetic attempts to follow him around and reinterpret everything he says is just..... Slimy. Really slimy.

The source is a moderately based right-wing medium "that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation." According to mediabiasfactcheck.

Given that you, and some others here, feel that Canadians are at the top the scale of violent racism (despite all the reports that say otherwise) - how do all these immigrants unlearn their own racism so quickly while being surrounded by all of us violently racist Canadians?

Oh, yes....Canada's magic borders. I've heard of that.

Oooooh, you're one of those who believe immigrants never bring their own racism with them. Haha, that's funny.

Clearly, that is untrue. The Khadr family did not come here to get away from Islamic extremism. Aqsa Parvez' family did not come here to get away from Islamic extremism. This new Islamic political party, which has many supporters in Canada, none of them came here to get away from extremism.

It seems to me that in the early days of Islamic terrorism (since 9/11) attacks were coming from Muslims who were poor, uneducated and easily led. It was often the excuse given for terrorism - the culprits were like the "hillbillies" of Islam. It seems now-a-days the cause has been taken up more and more by well-educated ones who apparently were never groomed by their parents for terrorist activities. Just an observation.

Uh-huh.

You can disagree with hijabs without resorting to attacking women with paintballs or spray cans or anything else.

New count as of this morning - 321 deaths. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/sri-lanka-easter-bombings-retaliation-for-christchurch-mosque-shootings-says-official/ar-BBWcIfO?ocid=spartandhp

Why don't you want to end up on YouTube? Aren't you proud of yourself?

Nice try. Do you wonder why Jesus' followers never went around slaying everyone who refused to be ruled by Jesus? Because it was a parable. A story about a nobleman. Not a command.

No it doesn't. Smarten up.

In a world where women can wear whatever they want to wear without fear of being beaten and killed, that would be true. That's not the world we live in.

The 2017 attack in Edmonton where a police officer was stabbed and 4 people were run over was, for some reason, not classified as a terrorist attack even though the man - Abdulahi Sharif - had an ISIS flag in his vehicle at the time of the attack. So Jacee is correct - if we simply refuse to label Islamic attacks as Islamic attacks, then VOILA!! No problem with Islamic terrorism in Canada!! See how that works?

The Queen does not wear a headscarf to show her subjugation to men, nor does she do it because she believes religiously that women are second-class citizens who must hide their sexuality in order to not incite men's lust. She wears it to protect her hairdo on windy days and is free to not wear it, as well. Smarten up.

A science denier. What a shocker.