Goddess

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/8/19-0011_article The CDC says it does. The FDA was just sued by frontline doctors for demonizing ivermectin and were forced to recant and remove all their posts online and their website that called it horsepaste. I posted about this months ago. You are way behind. Get educated and stop spreading misinformation.

I provided proof on the trickle thread that this is incorrect. IVM was recognized, pre-covid, as a strong contender against coronaviruses. If you won't read the papers, then you will just continue to lie.

He just quickly googled something that sorta agreed with his already views. He didn't read the study or compare it to anything else. Prime example of gullibility and ignorance.

There's over 80 independent, peer-reviewed papers and datasets from many countries (like Uttar Pradesh, Ecuador, Mexico, etc) that show otherwise. The fact that you quickly Google one study that (barely) confirms your own bias and ignore the other 80 studies and real world data, and are still calling IVM "horsepaste", and you don't accept or understand off-label prescribing, is just........well, you're not very intelligent and unable to think for yourself.

Stay home if you're afraid then.

An offering:

Sorry, Foxy, one last time. @Rebound As I said, I posted the peer reviewed studies and the datasets on the trickle thread. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Or get their medical information from the CBC.

HHS Secretary Becerra just issued a PREP Act declaration for bird flu. This allows the FDA Commissioner to issue EUAs for bird flu vaccines, with no liability. The US government has ordered 4.8 million doses of bird flu from the CSL Sequirus company, produced in dog kidney cells and using a dangerous squalene-containing adjuvant. The AMA issued CPT codes for this vaccine last Friday, so doctors will be incentivized for administering it. There have been a total of 11 cases of bird flu in the US since 2022, all mild, most involving just conjunctivitis. None were shown to have been transmitted human-to-human. Why would you need this vaccine, unless you expected a much more virulent virus to appear which had mysteriously gained the ability to spread between humans?

You are incorrect. Start with the video here:

I covered all this in the trickle thread. There's studies and datasets there you can read. Until you read them, your opinion is misinformation.

You should stop getting your medical advice from the CBC.

Interview clip of author of "Fisman's Fraud - The Rise of Canadian Hate Science" 4 mins This is where eyeball and the others got their lies from, which they are still repeating. And it was the basis of vax mandates. The actual data showed that the vaccinated were getting covid far more than the unvaxxed. Trudeau paid Fisman to flip the data.

Our passport has be cheapened to the point of coming out of a Crackerjack box. In related news: 18 convicted of 150 offences of violent home invasions and carjackings in Peel.

YOU are responsible for what you post, not anyone else. When you say things like the above, you're just admitting you have zero self-control or maturity. Rapists use similar reasoning - "she was wearing a short skirt" or "she had too much to drink", so she deserved it. I really doubt you are an adult.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98qp79gj4no I guess we are allowed to talk about geo-engineering now that it's no longer a conspiracy theory, but is a $135 billion dollar industry.

@Moonlight Graham Here's another reason why it's important to be cautious about gov't or pharma paid for studies and datasets, besides important info being relegated to the small print. The children's trials for Pfizer reported no injuries, but a tiny, one sentence footnote said one participant experienced "minor stomach issues. It turned out that participant was Maddie de Garay, a 13 yr old girl who is now in a wheelchair, on a feeding tube and disabled for life. Does that sound like like tummy troubles to you? Now reason for yourself: there were 1100 kids in that trial and this is what happened to one of them. The odds for devastating injury to children are thus, at best, 1 out of 1100. Is that good odds to you? And this was before they finally admitted to the myocarditis issue. In the fine print of that trial it also showed a large portion of parents pulled their kids from the trial after the first dose. No explanation is given as to why. And like Maddie, whatever happened to those kids was not tracked by the study. It was just "You dropped out, we don't want or need to hear from you ever again." Read for yourself. Think critically. The multi-billion dollar pharma industry that has a record of fines for falsifying data and rubber-stamping dangerous drugs with terrible profiles, did not suddenly grow a conscience. There's a reason why N. America, the heart of big pharma, is the only one still pushing the jabs on kids. Unless you're like eyeball who outright said he doesn't care what happens to kids as long as he "feels" safer.

Has anyone seen the videos of all the damage left behind by these encampments? It's disgusting. They dug trenches to take their p!ss and shit all over and apparently the whole place reeks of human waste. Someone has to clean it all up.

It's nice that you're finally admitting that you just blindly believe and obey and are not intelligent enough to think critically on your own. The first step is admitting. 😊 Maybe next time they tell you there's no such thing as natural immunity and that ivermectin is horsepaste, you'll check that out.

This post is older now but I'll go back to the data and the x-space discussion of it to confirm. If you're truly interested. There's a group of researchers who analyze the ONS data weekly and discuss on x-space but I don't always have time to listen weekly. Be aware that very often, important data is "tucked away" in footnotes, appendices and indexes in the official reports- much like the Pfizer trials which stated outright in the main body of the report that the vax was efficacious but in the additional small-print information, it was revealed that more people died in the vaccine arm than in the placebo arm. I'll see what I have time for on this but I'm on holidays this week and am landscaping my back yard.

"This constant lying is not aimed at making people believe the lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything any more. A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies, cannot distinguish between right and wrong. And such a people, deprived of the power to think and judge is, without knowing and willing it, completely subjected to the rule of lies. With such people, you can do whatever you want. " ~~Hannah Arendt ~~

Everyone knows the climate changes naturally, on its own. Everyone knows population and pollution likely influence. The question is How much? How much influence does 8 billion humans on one planet in an entire solar system of influence, have on the weather on this planet? The problem is climate alarmists have exaggerated weather conditions to the point that +22 days are now accompanied by maps showing waves of lava washing over the land and include death warnings. Manipulated data. Used the "crisis" to scam billions of dollars from working people into the pockets of billionaires. Climate is no longer a science, it's a billion dollar industry. If there is a crisis that is going to cause the earth to spontaneously combust any second now, as they claim, the climate alarmists have lost credibility due to all the above.

I post mainly peer-reviewed scientific studies and datasets, and often include the authors' credentials and achievements and conflicts of interests. You mainly post personal insults about me without addressing the studies. Perhaps it's just that some people see the difference?