Goddess

Meanwhile, in England:

I'm really starting to think it's too many id!ot voters in Canada. "I demand to hear something that makes NO sense, to put my mind at ease!!"

Oh, are you saying you SUPPORTED the use of ivermectin during the covid years and the frontline docs who were using it? News to me. I remember you quoting the "horsepaste" lies. On the "good news" front: Who's the fringe minority now? YOU.

The most popular repurposed anti-parasitics are: Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. Repurposed anti-parasitics are now being used successfully to treat Stage 4 Cancers and Turbo Cancers. For Pancreatic Cancer, the winner is Fenbendazole. Please dont' believe the people here, like robo and eyeball that say anti-parasitics are only for parasites and are just for animals. They don't know what they're talking about because they only listen to CBC headlines and the FDA, who lied about Ivermectin during the covid years. Dr. William Makis has a cancer clinic in Edmonton that is using Fenbendazole and Ivermectin with great success. Johns Hopkins Study: Anti-Parasitic Drug Slows Pancreatic Cancer in Mice | Johns Hopkins Medicine Mebendazole Impedes the Proliferation and Migration of Pancreatic Cancer Cells through SK1 Inhibition Dependent Pathway - PMC (nih.gov) Emerging Perspectives on the Antiparasitic Mebendazole as a Repurposed Drug for the Treatment of Brain Cancers - PMC (nih.gov) Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO)—mebendazole as an anti-cancer agent - PMC (nih.gov) (PDF) The Benzimidazole-Based Anthelmintic Parbendazole: A Repurposed Drug Candidate That Synergizes with Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer (researchgate.net)

👆 Oh look, here's one of those human rocks now, trying to cause another avalanche of hysteria. 👆

Thank you, that was my point - we're going down the same road to avalanche, as we just did. It seems (judging by the people on this forum) - it's the same people, too.

Seriously, though.... A “people” version of an avalanche we call a “mass movement,” “mass hysteria,” “groupthink,” “riot,” “moral panic,” “stampede,” etc. Although there are crucial similarities between an avalanche of rocks and a mass hysteria (or one of these other variants) of people, one key difference is that people, but not rocks, have free will, and can choose not to be part of it. By refraining to “slide” despite being pressed to do so, a person not only doesn’t end up part of the mass hysteria, but also doesn’t further its spread. A small number of folks in March of 2020 were such “steady rocks.” They never got swept up into calling for lockdowns. Not for a minute, and not for two weeks. But most slid, at least for a while. Some slid for only a short stint and “woke up.” Others slid for many months before digging their heels in. And others are still sliding to this day, pressuring their neighbors on the mountainside (the social network) to continue sliding. Some will never join "Team Reality". Unlike rocks, these human sliders bear responsibility for the mass hysteria. And the “larger” the social forces the person could impart (the bigger the “boulder”), the more responsibility he or she bears. Their largest blind spot is themselves: they are among those culpable. They contributed to the very mass hysteria that bred entirely ill narratives and civil-liberties-violating interventions that it will take a generation to recover from. They are the boulders at the bottom of the mountain side who started near the top, helped ensure that the avalanche was as large as it was by their early pronouncements of fear and demands for interventions. The huge numbers of small pebbles were a bigger problem than the visible boulders here and there. I know many people who NOW say they only supported the first 2 weeks. They still don’t get it - all was lost there and then. It was a pandemic of cowardliness.

Excuse me, Sir, but you are not allowed to ask those questions. Nor are you an "expert", so you should be ignoring any datasets. Just trust your government. Trust "The Science."

It's been said that we should just change the name of Canada to "New India" and be done with it.

No, they would be a dead scientist.

This is where climate alarmism is coming from and the ultimate goal - less "breathers" (except for wealthy breathers, of course): Humans may be fueling global warming by breathing: new study (nypost.com)

I feel like women are being required (not even asked) to sacrifice themselves at the altar of Liberalism. Women must allow men into their spaces, their sports, etc. Women must allow their kindergarten children to learn about gay sex positions from men dressed as women. Women must be patient and accept that bringing in millions of immigrants from countries where women have no value, means an increase in violence and sexual assaults against women. In Canada, this is currently a 75% increase. In some Nordic countries, it's over 300%.

No. You use it to attempt to shame anyone who questions authorities because you don't believe they should be questioned. It's why you blindly accept ridiculous and unscientific statements like "There's no such thing as natural immunity" and "Ivermectin is horsepaste" and then repeat those lies for years without ever checking if it's true.

This is like your favourite type of argument right now. You use it for anything covid related, too. But it's very disingenuous. What sort of methodology did YOU use to determine giving billions of $$ to rich people is the way to solve climate change? What sort of methodology did YOU use to determine there is no such thing as natural immunity? Don't try using this lame excuse to shame people who are critical thinkers and ask questions. YOU might be too stupid to think for yourself, but lots of us aren't. And asking questions about things that affect our lives and pocketbooks is not wrong.

Are you okay?

It sounds like one of those cases where there is some kind of a deformity of the genitals at birth. This article says she was "assigned female at birth". Who is Imane Khelif? Algerian boxer facing gender outcry had modest success before Olympics (msn.com) She's from Algeria, so not a particularly progressive country. I believe nowadays, in this circumstance, it's recommended that some time is allowed for the child to develop biological or mental traits for whichever sex is dominant and THEN a decision is made on gender.

I read the actual name for that part of the routine in rehearsals was "The Last Supper on The Seine", so it's interesting how people are trying to defend it as some kind of Greek Bacchus thing now.

More men need to start calling each other out for it. I've witnessed men verbally abuse their wives or girlfriends in front of me and other men usually just silently look the other way. I always think, "If that's what they do in front of other people, imagine what goes on behind closed doors." I've said things before when it happens in front of me, but it's better if men call each other out for it.

I'm going to go with "This guy's a jerk."

Your accusation was that I invented a "story" and somehow created a screenshot of a fictitious article. Laziness. On your part. You dont' even care about the issue. You enjoy seeing women get beaten up by men, I imagine.

Here you go. Although you've already decided there is no truth to it and that I just invented a "story". Boxer leaves ring in tears after second Olympic fighter who failed gender test wins (msn.com)

$200 billion could have gone a long way to purchasing water bombers for Canada or fixing the 100 yr old sewer system in Toronto to help with flooding issues and upgrading Calgary's water system. I'd rather see the money go to actually improving infrastructure and better forest management, than into the pockets of billionaires and politicians. I'm for adapting to climate change, no matter what the cause is. It's what humans have always done - adapt.