Goddess

Conservatives have been trying to get the details of the national security part of the MOU with China released. Liberals are refusing. Frank Caputo has been posting this letter to the Liberals every day since the MOU.

It was all over the news, it's been posted here many times, he's just acting (?) stoopid.

It's true, though. What's pathetic is that you won't stop supporting Liberal soft on crime crap until it happens to your daughter or granddaughter. And even then, it's "iffy" with you. It's more likely you'll feel sorry for the guy who raped your granddaughter or stabbed your daughter while she is in her own yard gardening.

None of these lefties will touch the question of why giving China access to our media and national security was part of the "trade" deal, either. We got the short end of the stick, all around.

It's the only way you will stop supporting the Liberal's soft on crime, early release for rapists & pedos, bail for repeat offenders, etc. Until it happens to you and your family, other people's needless suffering at the hands of this government means nothing to you.

Why the Americans didn't like Canada trying to sneak Chinese solar panels into the US: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/what-is-chinese-kill-switch-found-in-equipment-at-us-solar-firms-trigger-national-security-fears-/articleshow/121440168.cms This is who we're getting into bed with. We're also going against everything the US is trying to do. We will never replace our US trade with Chinese trade and we're stupid to even try it. They. Will. Fuque. Us. Over.

It was so cringe to watch. This party will be going nowhere.

Beaver Brook Mine: China's Control Over Key US Supply Chain Canada's Beaver Brook antimony mine could supply the US defense industry, but there's just one problem. It's owned by China, which shut it down 2 years ago, despite high prices. And they didn't shut it down for commercial reasons. Get China out of Canada. Now. You're not fooling anybody.

Konstantin Kisin, who grew up in the Soviet Union, said something that stopped me cold. While the West teaches its children to be critical of — and often ashamed of — their own country, places like China and Russia are raising theirs to be strong, confident, and focused on science and excellence. Not equity initiatives. He put it bluntly: we’re in a real battle of civilizations. And if we keep weakening our own foundations from within, how exactly do we expect to compete? His line about bridges hit especially hard: “A bridge doesn’t work very well if it’s built on diversity instead of math.” It’s a sobering reminder from someone who’s seen ideological self-sabotage up close. What do you make of this take — is teaching national self-doubt a luxury the West can afford, or a strategic vulnerability in a competitive world?

A Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century - News - Tablet Magazine In a technical or structural sense, the censorship regime’s aim is not to censor or to oppress, but to rule. That’s why the authorities can never be labeled as guilty of disinformation. Not when they lied about Hunter Biden’s laptops, not when they claimed that the lab leak was a racist conspiracy, not when they said that vaccines stopped transmission of the novel coronavirus. Disinformation, now and for all time, is whatever they say it is. That is not a sign that the concept is being misused or corrupted; it is the precise functioning of a totalitarian system.

"The Harvard Shorenstein Center’s taxonomy of “mis-, dis-, and malinformation” became the operating system of power. Particularly chilling is Siegel’s account of “malinformation,” i.e. the official designation for factual statements that authorities find objectionable. Truth now had a clinical diagnosis. The Latin prefixes and pseudoscientific postures were poor concealment of what were, at base, political judgments of a small clique of experts empowered to diagnose any views they disagreed with as symptoms of a disorder." Drawing on Václav Havel’s analysis of terminal stage totalitarian regimes sustained by collective lies, Siegel shows how the information state’s demand for conformity hollowed out trust in every institution that enforced it. Trust collapsed to historic lows not despite the system’s sophistication but because of it. The Twitter files, consecutive to Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform, the 2024 election, all exposed that the emperor had no clothes. From Jacob Siegel's book "The Information State - Politics in the Age of total Control".

Hilarious 🤣

The best part is that scammer websites like that only show up in your feed because you've been looking at garbage information. @ExFlyer Dude, now even your computer knows you're stoopid and gullible. 🤣

Liberals getting their news from SCAM websites, while refusing to watch government committee meetings directly from CPAC accounts on X or YouTube. And constantly berating others for doing so. Classic. 🤣

You'd be better off getting news on "X" from news outlets and government entities with their own accounts. 🤣

"Put your own mask on before assisting others." Being a nationalist is common sense.

Canada is currently ruled by a cartel of ideological zealots and financial parasites who view the nation as a liquidation sale. The Liberal establishment has deliberately engineered the destruction of Canadian prosperity to secure praise from international tribunals and globalist forums. They have abandoned the fundamental duties of the state to serve foreign interests. They completely ignore the hardworking citizens who physically build our cities and harvest our resources from coast to coast. They favor a corrupt ruling class that produces absolutely nothing of tangible value while dictating how the rest of us must live. Mark Carney stands as the ultimate avatar of this managed decline. He is a rootless technocrat who floats between central banks and billionaire summits while preaching crippling austerity to the working class. Carney leverages the language of climate crisis and economic reform strictly as mechanisms of control and subjugation. His policies are designed to centralize wealth and dictate the daily lives of citizens from the comfort of insulated boardrooms. He views sovereign nations as mere financial portfolios to be managed and populations as irritating liabilities to be minimized. He demands that the men and women sweating to lay bricks, build homes, and power our industries surrender their livelihoods for his radical utopian experiments. The left heralds Carney as a visionary intellectual strictly because they are entirely bereft of actual leadership or original thought. Modern progressives worship arrogant bureaucrats who can launder their destructive social engineering through complex financial terminology. The Liberal party operates exclusively on the politics of division, resentment, and economic sabotage. They suffocate domestic innovation, tax the working citizen into complete submission, and then shamelessly present international bankers as the brilliant solution to the poverty they explicitly created. The Liberal apparatus operates entirely on deception. They mask their endless lust for absolute authority behind a pathetic facade of compassion and environmental stewardship. When Carney speaks of a sustainable future, he is explicitly detailing the controlled demolition of your living standards. They demand you own nothing, accept less, and be grateful for the meager scraps they allow you to keep. The left demands total submission to these unelected globalist architects because progressive ideology fundamentally despises the independence of a self-sustaining, strong citizen. A true republic requires leaders with the raw strength of the lion to protect its borders and the calculating cunning of the fox to navigate international threats. Canada currently suffers under the reign of weak, compliant sheep actively leading a historic nation to the slaughterhouse. The current regime commits daily treason by subordinating Canadian interests and sovereignty to hostile foreign ideologies. Carney and his liberal sycophants will ruthlessly strip-mine the nation's remaining wealth until the citizens finally awaken to the reality of this conquest and purge these globalist managers from the halls of power forever.

Conservatives put pressure on Carney to clarify his position on forced labour in China - The Globe and Mail Ma has put Carney in a tough spot. He cannot condemn China and he cannot get rid of Ma, even though that is what should happen. And now, journalists are looking into his Brookfield leadership and finding out they were fined for slave labor practices, bribes, clearing forests without permits and attempting to evict Indigenous groups in Brazil. This guy is only about the money. He's here to rape Canada.

Medical School Final Grades (first names only): Dr. Robert - 99% with honors Dr. Joseph - 97% with honors Dr. Elizabeth - 97% with honors Dr. Samuel - 74% Dr. Sarah - 64% Dr. Frank - 63% Dr. Laura - 57% Dr. Phillip - 56% Dr. Donna - 55% Dr. David - 54% You need open heart surgery. You get to pick your top 3 doctors. You can only pick women. And Dr. Elizabeth isn't available. Same with pilots. I want the one who graduated at the top of their class, I don't care what sex they are, I don't care what race they are.

Big. Fat. Baloney. You're here every day defending, supporting, excusing and justifying for the Liberal Party.

Just curious, but why is this a sticking point for you - but only with Poilievre? I mean, he's the only one who has said he doesn't agree with lobbying and would force them to make their appeals directly to citizens, which you deem "insincere". But he's the only one who has addressed lobbying. And he can't do anything about it unless he's in power. The rest of them have said nothing about it, they all allow lobbying and have no intention of stopping it. Yet they're all OK in your book. In fact, you support that - and more - from the rest of the politicians. This makes no sense to me. So your claim that if it weren't for this one thing, you'd support him, rings very hollow when you don't have a problem with it in any other politician, who have all said nothing about it.

Oh, I think we all see where you stand on things.

News to me. Every time I bring up investigations by Sam Cooper or his testimony before the US government & Canadian parliament and helping the FBI track down Chinese criminals in Canada, you're totally against it, you mock him viciously and argue that the Canadian government is completely free of Chinese influence. Also news to me. You pretty always mock any whistleblower testimony. On every subject. It doesn't seem to me you have any respect whatsoever for eyewitness testimony. 1. You're not interested in what I think Poilievre would go for or not. 2. You hate Poilievre with a burning rage that borders on insanity, so I think you've already made your mind up what he'll go for or not.