WestCanMan

Did you notice that the MSM is all over Poilievre, talking about how unpopular he is right now, while Traitor Ford and the carney are still theoretically viewed as heroes? MSM: "Our main problem right now, as Canadians, is that Poilievre won't stop talking about Trudeau's crimes and Carney's lies and weakness. He should be more supportive of Ford and Carney, because those guys are awesome."

He's using the "This is what you do if you get attacked by a bear, good buddy" defence against Trump. "You just roll up in a ball and play dead" (while I run away).

There's no chance that the Sarkonak kid won't inflict himself on innocent civilians again after he gets out of prison. The judge is basically sentencing innocent Canadians to violence. It like a violent assault or death lottery for people living in his area.

The cultists here complained when Black Dog and the more recent one (???) were punted from this site, but the violent rhetoric did diminish noticeably after they left.

When weren't they? The Dems have had violent militias since before there were electric streetlights. The KKK was their hate-child, and was openly affiliated with them from its inception until the Demmies figured out a new way to "keep darkies on the plantation", so to speak, back in the '60s.

100% True. Mostly because of homelessness and drug use though. The last 10 years of LPOC misrule have set our country back generations in terms of quality of life. There's so much wrong with that statement. 1) "East Indians" is an extremely broad category, grouping together 3 main distinct groups of people who, in some instances, have almost nothing in common with each other 2) I doubt that there's a foreign group that assimilates to Canadian culture more thoroughly than Sikhs and Hindus from India do, Taxme. I lived in Surrey for 15 years, and I have been in Langley for 5 years now. These cities are teeming with Sikhs and Hindus, and the majority of their children are fully integrated: they speak flawless English, play hockey/baseball/football, dress like Canadians, etc. Their core values are indistinguishable from ours. Who cares if some of their formal wear has some cultural flair, and their weddings are outrageously long? Of course there are a few militant losers in each group, but what group doesn't have them? White people have them too, Taxme: the demonrats have always had violent militias, right from their KKK days up to now, with their BLM and Antifa militants.

... stemming from the frequency and severity of leftard cultists' calls to violence. Correct?

🤣 Of course he would be doing that. He was the biggest BLM supporter on this site. Was it really just him calling for the murder of police officers then? Doesn't it make more sense to just ban that one user? Kinda makes you wonder why the site was shut down: Did authorities shut it down because of the frequency and severity of the calls to violence? Did leftist cult-handlers shut it down themselves because the site too clearly showed the lefts' own penchant for violence and bigotry? What else could it be? 🤣 The self-proclaimed conservative who sleeps in Justin Trudeau PJ's. An internet classic.

I don't see people here advocating for murder, at least in our own countries. There are quite a few terrorist supporters here, most notably Gaetan right now, but not many leftists here do more than just support violent rioting (mandatory within the cult) and refer to other people's talk of murder as 'comedy', or 'exercising one's right to free speech', etc.

Holy moly. I guess you weren't kidding when you said that their left4rds were worse than our left4rds. I don't recall seeing any of our cultists calling for the murders of law enforcement personnel. Let me guess: was Black Dog one of the ones calling for murders? He was still on that site, right? Was there a guy there saying: "I'm a conservative, and even I think that law enforcement officials should be killed"? 😂

The other forum closed permanently?

Where did you post the screenshot?

I just explained who they're practical for, fool, and that's: no one who lives in an area where the temperature regularly drops below -15 no one who ever needs to use their car to travel more than 600km people for whom money is no object (Tesla batteries are still in the $20K range) no one who uses their vehicle to tow anything EVs are great for people who never travel more than 50K in a day, and who tend to replace their cars before they hit 150,000km.

Don't be so hard on yourself. [lying] I'm sure you'll say something intelligent one day. [/lying]

Epiphany?

Everything is relative, TB. It's true that Poilievre can't get away with anything. Nothing at all. If he makes a single statement in a month that's 20% unpopular, that 20% of his message from that one statement will be 100% of his story for several months afterwards. If Carney gets caught saying something that is 100% false, and highly important to Canadians, a CBC article about it will start off by lying about how great Carney is, and then will refer to his lie as "something the conservatives allege was a lie", and then in the 4th paragraph they will make a scant mention of his transgression. Carney: "I played no role in moving Brookfield's HQ to NY." Facts: Carney was the chairman of Brookfield's board when they unanimously voted on moving, and then he wrote a letter to shareholders advising them to vote in favour as well. Verdict: What Carney said was the exact opposite of the truth. He didn't just play a role, he probably played the biggest role of anyone on earth. CBC's actual article about Carney's lie: "Carney guided Canada through the 2008 recession. He is the best human who ever walked the earth. He was accused of lying by the conservatives." Notice how when Carney was neither the PM nor the Finance Minister, he gets all the credit for leading Canada through the '08 recession, but when he's the chairman of Brookfield's board he can lead a unanimous vote to move their HQ and write a letter to the shareholders but somehow he wan't responsible? That is the media landscape that PP operates in, TB. He's already getting compared to Hitler for just for telling the truth about our f'ing emperor's new clothes, while the emperor can grind peons under his heel and CBC will say that he turned them into rose petals.

People live in Bizarro World if they think that PP is the biggest problem with our federal gov't. That's actual Goebbels-level propaganda.

Wow. Your memes are just as dumb as you are. Thanks? I guess?

The problem with EV's is that they still aren't practical. To drive an EV in the winter here you need to heat the battery as well as the cabin, and both draw a lot of energy. Add to that the energy to accelerate a car or keep it going at hwy speeds, that's 3 large drains simultaneously and continuously. Batteries just don't do well with a high, steady output. The advantage that gas cars have is that there is a lot of excess energy created in the form of heat which can be used to warm the cabin, and you don't have to heat the gas tank either. At worst you might have to add a bit of gas-line antifreeze a few days a year. A regular car that gets 1,200km on the highway in August still gets 1,200 km on the hwy in January. An EV that theoretically gets 500km in August might get 150km in January when it's really cold. Not only that, it still just takes 2 minutes to get a car from 0% to 100%. With an EV you can only really fast-charge 55% of its capacity, because when its below 25% you can't hypercharge, and when it's above 80% you can't hypercharge either. Even if you put the vehicle on a hypercharge station, it will only draw power at the stage 2 level, or even stage 1. So, if you have an electric vehicle with a 500km range, you only get to use hypercharging when the battery has above 125km, and below 400km. Outside of that it's going to charge at the rate of stage 2 or stage 1. Hybrids are still excellent. They get the best of both worlds: ultra-quick refuelling, and when you break, the car's kinetic energy goes back into the battery instead of dissipating into the air off of your brakes. EVs suck, unless you are a local-area-only driver.

What was Down-Arrow Boy's issue with that post? It was just indisputable facts. If you said it was Oct 21st when you posted that, would he waste on of his beloved down-arrows on it?

The J6 probe, the people who had ABC alter videos to be used as evidence, are the ones with no credibility. Your support for bogus investigations and crimes by the FBI and the DNC is duly noted though.

Why? Do you wonder what Carney's wife thinks? Carney is quickly catching up to Trudeau in terms of how universally reviled he is by Canadians. No woman wants that for her family. No one actively hates the Lanstmans.

So, clearly Trump hasn't criminalized "anti_American speech", yet the thread title still stands. Is that the new normal here? We just write whatever we want in a thread title, facts be damned?

Yikes. F'n scammer. No doubt if he was arrested two days earlier, and paid any kind of price for that at all, leftards would have rioted.

I don't think a lot of this kind of information. Drunk Americans do the same things about 60x a day iirc. I think that was the stat I found back when the Rayshard story was in the news. When woke AG's decide not to lock violent offenders up and they go out and kill people, or when the Demmies decide not to inform ICE agents that they're letting a violent offender out of jail that's an illegal immigrant and then they kill someone, I think that's a real stain on illegal immigration and a huge reason to make sweeping changes. This drunk driving isn't the kind of crime that enforcing illegal immigration laws would change. It's just random that it was a foreigner driving that truck and not an illegal. Now, if he has a criminal record and was let go, that's different imo.