WestCanMan

The left side of the aisle is L Anon

I'd say "The same guy that Biden votes for" but that's not a given, is it......... "We can only elect Donald Trump" "Vote for Joe Biden for Senate" Good news is that he's going to beat Joe Biden, he said it himself: This narrows it down, he's not voting for George. https://nypost.com/2020/10/25/biden-appears-to-confuse-trump-with-former-president-george-w-bush/

Lol taxme, I watch more than my share of Fox News. Any leftist here can vouch for that. Fact is that the Dems are 35% of the way to victory when they roll out of bed in the morning. There are some states that Republicans can never win, like NY and Cali, that have a ton of EC votes, plus plenty of others like Wash, Ore etc that are a solid bet to stay blue. If the Dems can hold their base then they just need to nudge a few swing states across the line and they're in. I have no doubt that the party that got caught cheating 3 times in the last election has a little sumthin' up their sleeve for this election and the Obama speech writer at the Town Hall posing as an 'undecided voter' was just an appetizer. IMO there's gotta be a really good reason why the Dems pushed so hard for mail-in fraud, I mean voting, and it wasn't their deep concern for the rights of American voters or to spare them from C19. I think the Dems have good reason to believe that some form of cheating with mail-in ballots can shore up some swing states for them. They wouldn't have fought for it otherwise.

There are people who have crippling, painful diseases who have suffered for decades with no end in sight. They see the continuation of their life as just a prolongation of their misery, and they will never experience enough "joy" of any sort to make up for it. By taking the virtue-signalling position on this issue we would basically be sentencing them to prison/torture. In 2020 humans can kill healthy fetuses at 6 months old purely for their own reasons, is that so much more noble than asking for a humane end to one's own suffering? For me this isn't that much of a moral dilemma.

It's ridiculous to make the accusation that any one nation is researching biological weapons for mainly aggressive/first-strike capabilities. Even NoKo would have cause to say that they're researching for defensive purposes. Deterrence is a huge part, if not the main part, of any modern military strategy. This isn't an age where military conquest is glorified. Also, no nation with a large military would brag about the fact that they're completely clueless about N.B.C. weapons, or about the fact that they don't possess any.

Are those numbers in thousands? If it's just 42-36 it's a useless number lol. Of those 42 ballots, how many were wasted? My advice to Republican voters who are doing a mail-in ballot - don't fly the flag outside your house if the postie who picks up your mail is a Demmie. The flag is a dead giveaway of who you're voting for.

My guess is Biden 290 Trump 248, Joe will miraculously squeak out victories in key swing states due to a decisive edge in mail-in ballots. Biden won't cross the 269 threshold until the day after the election and the full tally will come in days later. Biden will have a +20% edge in the popular vote on mail-in ballots and a 3% edge at the polling stations.

Religious beliefs are none of your concern sapper. ACB showed a long history of making precise rulings which were in line with the constitution. By rights, that's all you have to base your decision on without prejudice due to sexual orientation, race, or religion. See, you just got hoisted on your own petard re: the bias issue. So you're admitting to complete ignorance on the issue, yet you have the gall to question the integrity of sitting US Senators based on a hunch. Thanks for playing.

Humour. Ar ar. Just because you cited something funny doesn't mean you made a point. What's the truth about Trump sapper? Are you suddenly going to show an interest in it? That's just words, because you clearly aren't in favour of judges with a long history of making accurate rulings. They all have a long history of doing exactly that. It's ridiculous to assume that people will change for the worse, just like it's ridiculous to assume that Dem Senators will suddenly start doing the right things. The glee is about getting judges who don't go against the constitution just to make Pelosi and the idiots happy. The Dems are a complete debacle and they've never shown any sign of integrity at any point in the past. Can you name one area where the Dems have shown some integrity in the last 8 years? One time?

You clearly have no idea of what goes on in the US Senate in 2020 if you're calling out the GOP members for their integrity in the Senate. Did you miss the whole Kavanaugh incident? Trump looks like a rock star. Getting a person like ACB on the SC was perfect. No, the SC isn't supposed to be biased at all. They're supposed to be the weakest branch of gov't. The SC is supposed to follow the letter of the law in the constitution, regardless of whether they like those laws or not. If the GOP or the Dems want to get their way then they can't use the control of the SC as a shortcut. They have to win some elections, change some laws, and then the SC has to enforce them. What's the point of elections, and making laws in the Senate/Congress, if SC judges with lifetime appointments just run the country as they please?

When Trump decided to try to get a SCJ pushed through I thought it was going to be a huge mistake, because it wouldn't get done and it was just going to be a big, botched, tire-fire which galvanized the Dems and helped them to gin up support against the big bad GOP. In hindsight, the appointment of ACB just made Trump look like a rock star. Now the Dems are suddenly going to try to implement a bunch of laws called "Amy Coney Barrett sucks and now we have to reform the whole Supreme Court" lol. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOserrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs.

And now to top it all off he has to beat Trump, "George" (whoever that is), and Joe Biden.

Now the Dems are calling info about Hunter Biden "a smear campaign" lol. Yeah it's "a big smear campaign with a lot of actual evidence". Unlike Russian collusion, which was a big smear campaign with no evidence. "One of Joe's sons already died in the military, now they're attacking his other son! "

Every single talk about "systemic racism" and "police are killing black people" is a talk that's understood by young black kids as "school is for suckers, I need to be able to protect myself from society". Republicans talk about school choice and a land of opportunity. Which group would you want talking to your kid? The group that's making sure they have access to a good education or the group that says "STAY ANGRY!"?

LMAO. They probably wouldn't have even gotten C19 supplies if the Gov't didn't think that making soldiers walk around with C19 masks on was good for the fear-mongering effort. Decade? Lol, when he planted 2 billion trees, were they money trees? Wait a sec, those aren't even being planted. It was just a fake promise to Greta and his sycophant idiots.

1) Grow up, 2) Calling the coronavirus the Chinese virus isn't racist. China is a country that deceitfully let covid out of the bag by pretending that H2H contact wasn't possible. They invented the whole "wet market" scam to fool the world into believing that everyone who got c19 got it at the wet market. They knew that was false.

From your link: ....that moment when you're reading an article where you get to that part that says: "There's nothing intelligent to see here".

The true, damaging racism is the fear mongering that young black kids hear from the Dems every day: "Cops are out to kill black people, and society won't accept black people, even if they're educated." The socialists are hammering the point home to little black kids that they don't even need to bother going to school or trying to fit into polite society. The message that black kids take away from Hillry/Biden/Obama speeches is that they need to 'stay angry' and spend their time honing their gangsta game so that they can survive life on tha streetz. Skool is fo suckaz. This ensures the next wave of violent, uneducated criminals to keep the vicious cycle going. Angry, impoverished blacks will continue to vote for the Dems. Honestly of you wanted your kid to be successful would you tell them that school is a waste of time, and that their default option should be to show anger and hostility to people in power? "Fite the powa" is not what people tell their children if they want them to succeed.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-jim-jordan-on-reviewing-and-authenticating-purported-hunter-biden-emails The emails are all verified & authenticated by the House Intel Committee, they are also independently verified by a credible witness. The only possible thing that leftists could say now, to make that case that the emails aren't legit, is that 1) the witness isn't anonymous, and 2) the source isn't one of Hillary's trusted Russian informants. The Dems and their sycophant horde are really particular about where to get their trusted information from.

This is like a campaign ad for the Liberals. "Mo' debt, mo' votes."

I think the fact that in the US, Fauci said that a national mask mandate is necessary is going to be a big factor in getting Biden elected. He's said that "if science dictates a mask mandate is necessary blah blah blah." Trump still leaves it to individual choice. In Canada it doesn't really matter what science says. Trudeau could tell us all to lick doorknobs, 3M people could die, and the MSM here will say that he saved us all.

It's not out there at all. CNN called Trump a liar every time he denied Russian collusion. In the end, CNN just lied 30,000 times. At the end of 4 years, Trump made dozens of campaign promises and the people to whom he made those promises are the ultimate judge of whether or not he's a liar. The verdict is in, he has over a 90% approval rating among Republican voters for a reason, and it's not because "they just gobble up everything they see on Fox or CNN".

That's just a lame, unsupported comment. CNN lies 24/7. Nothing at all that they say can be taken at face value. There's literally no one and no other company on earth that can match CNN's actual level of dishonesty.

I don't know how long CNN has been harsh liars for. I stopped watching them in 2014 when they opted not to show video footage of Michael Brown committing a violent robbery, and instead opted to call him "The Gentle Giant" during the months of rioting that ensued. They could have been huge liars before that, but I only watched them once or twice a year so I wouldn't know. Re: Trump vs CNN, I don't doubt that everyone lies sometimes. You can't be married and never at least tell a white lie every now and again. No harm, no foul. But no one that I am aware of lies as brazenly and as often as CNN and their followers. There's literally no comparison between the frequency of lying between CNN and Trump. CNN was a dedicated disinformation station 24/7 during the collusion investigation farce. It would literally be impossible for one person to match CNN's pace for lying from 2016-2020. Most of the "lying" that Trump has been accused of was when he told the truth, about 15,000 times, during CNN's witch hunt. I know that pretending Trump is a liar and CNN is virtue central is popular among alt-leftists, but that's completely stupid and it doesn't fly here.

That's because you watch CNN. Of course he has lied at some point, he's a politician. But 99% of the times when you and CNN thought that he was lying he was actually telling the truth. Like the whole Russian collusion investigation, for example. Of course CNN was going to say that Trump was lying at the debate last night. They're liars. Just out of curiosity, did CNN ever catch Biden lying? Here's my reply to your answer, in advance: "Didn't think so."