WestCanMan

This version of "all people experience police brutality, blacks just moreso" is a greatly toned-down version from your original crap about how "So you think segregation laws in the Jim Crow South weren’t at the forefront of daily life? Even after the civil rights era, it was and always has been at the forefront of daily life if you are black. And riots were frequent enough Just because people like you have spent your entire life blind and oblivious to the racism and racial tension all around you doesn’t mean it didn’t exist. " People of colour get treated the same as white people in Canada. I can show you a video of a white guy who was only armed with a bicycle chain, surrounded by cops, who was shot 'til he fell, and then a few seconds after he fell on the ground he was shot point-blank about 6 more times. Or a video of a polish visitor who was killed by a bunch of police using a taser and their collective body weight, just because they were too lazy to bother finding someone who could speak polish (or probably Russian as well). LMAO. Now you've gone from trying to make salient points with a bit of lying to just spouting pure drivel. Brionna was shot because she didn't subjugate herself? Is the bar for the occupants of a house subjugating themselves drawn at firing less than two bullets at the cops now Beaver? That's beeeeeeeyonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd stupid. That makes normal stupidity look brilliant. It's like stupid and stupid had a baby and then sent it to Berkeley. How do you know what Trayvon did or didn't do? Were you there? No you weren't, so you don't actually have a clue wtf you're talking about. That's normal for you though, so of course it doesn't stop you from acting like your opinion on the matter is gold. Who said that Republicans support Ruby Ridge, Waco or the Bundys? Republicans support the constitution. Floyd passed a counterfeit $20. He wasn't necessarily even committing an offence. The cops most likely weren't even coming to arrest him, they were just in a position where they just needed to ask him some questions. FYI no one on earth ever said that he made the $20, or that he was going to jail for using it. The police just needed to say "Where did you get the $20?" at that point. The police approached his vehicle, and asked him to show his hands (which they always do regardless of the race of the vehicle's occupants) and Floyd started rummaging under the passenger seat. He kept doing it after the officers told him to show them his hands multiple times. It was a hectic few moments which forced the police to draw their guns. Then he resisted arrest, and then pretended that he couldn't breathe even when no one was touching him. It's all in the video, but you don't know that because you feel like you don't need to watch it - BLM already told you your opinion. What happened to him could easily have been avoided if he just acted properly when the police approached him. He's not in the same boat as Brionna and Rayshard imo, because police had a chance to take the time and make better decisions after a few minutes had passed, but he did put himself in imminent danger when he didn't have to. If I was black I'd tell my son never to put the police in a situation where they have to do something. I don't know what the KKK newspaper is, or if that's really it, but it's sad (yet somehow not surprising) to see that they make better judgements than CNN on occasion. Even a broken clock is right twice a day but CNN is not.

Eventually that info won't be there anymore. Side note: They say that every new "age" has a shorter span of time. IE, the Stone Age was tens of thousand of years, the bronze age was 2,000 years, stone age was approximately the same, the Rennaisance was a few hundred years, the industrial age was 100 years, the Atomic age less, Space Age even less, the disinformation age was less again... They also say that history is constantly being re-written, and it seems to me as though the length of time that it takes for history to be rewritten is also changing. There aren't many changes to be made to what we believe about earth's pre-history, but any changes made would take a long time to be agreed upon, by a consensus of a lot of anthropologists. What we believe about the stone age through the bronze age changes a bit more quickly because we have more info from there, but still not very much. From the iron age there are a lot of conflicting histories, like what is believed about Jesus, the various hadiths, and what we believe we know about the lives of a lot of famous people seems to change from year to year. When we get to 1900 it's a shit-show. Things of a massive scale like the Armenian genocide are apparently up for debate. Even the Holocaust is denied by many. Ffwd to 2020, no one can even agree on what happened this morning. News agencies and political parties all vie to refute each other's 'truths', sometimes pre-emptively, like the Dems are doing with the new and yet-to-be-released Hunter Biden emails. By 2021 I think that no one will believe anything anymore, I think that integrity will no longer be considered a virtue. I know that for a large percentage of the population that's the case right now.

Fake news outlets like CNN and MSNBC are scrambling to make the claim that Russians are responsible for the leaked information from Hunter Biden's laptops, but according to America's most reliable and most-watched cable news outlet, Fox News, the source of the leaked emails is a computer repair shop owner who actually did have access to Hunter's emails. Originally we were being told that Hunter was making $30K/mo at Burisma, now it's said that he was actually making over $80,000/month from Burisma. Hunter admitted that he only got the Burisma job because of who his dad is and the video is here. Now there may be proof that Joe Biden made the famous trip to the Ukraine to fire the prosecutor after he was summoned by Burisma's owner. (actually a board member, my bad, and I can't fix the link) Keep in mind that Joe Biden used to claim that he was never even aware of Hunter's job at Burisma. Joe was forced to admit that was a lie after a photo of the Bidens with Devon Archer, another Burisma board member, was released. It drastically changes the whole landscape of the quid pro quo allegation against Joe if he was actually asked to come to Ukraine to drop the hammer on the prosecutor. I didn't even mention China yet....

Yeah, and we all believe that they really like him lol.

TBH, not many people know much about the Proud Boys. I personally don't, even after a Google search. I found out that they hate Antifa, and they've fought with them on at least one occasion, but that just means they're not members of the alt-left. The alt-left media describes them as "violent white supremacists" because of their fight with Antifa, but a lot of the Proud Boys are black and latino - and blacks and latinos aren't typically white supremacists. Believe it or not you need to explain that to some people. What can I say - leftists are extremely stupid for the most part. FYI cannuckle, Trump didn't just blurt out that the Proud Boys should stand down. Chris Wallace specifically asked Trump to tell them to stand down, and he did it, assuming that Wallace knew wtf he was talking about. This is as side story. The biggest story in US politics right now is the emerging evidence that Hunter Biden's involvement with China and Burisma is just as bad as it was originally thought to be.

"This is absolute proof that Antifa doesn't exist, and it's also proof that if they do exist, they're not fascists." - Joe "coal miner turned Valedictorian" Biden.

This forms the basis of a very good "letter to the editor" imo. If you flesh that out with some cites and go into greater detail then you'll have written something that all Canadians should see. Not a lot of people who write about native issues do it with much common sense, understanding or accuracy. There's always a political agenda and a side of guilt to go with it.

You are being racially divisive by advancing a racially divisive and false message. You're actually fear-mongering against police. That's a fact. FYI police are not committing genocide against blacks, they're not even in the top 20 killers of black people. Black people, even criminals who are black, are completely safe when they're being arrested if they're just polite. Sharks and murderers are still dangerous if you're polite with them. Police are not. Therefor, police are not dangerous. It's just your own stupidity that gets you killed. Eg, if Brionna's boyfriend hadn't shot at cops she'd still be alive. If Rayshard hadn't shot a taser at a cop's head, he'd still be alive. If Michael Brown hadn't tried to wrestle a cop's gun away from him, he'd still be alive. If you're not like those idiots, you've got no more to worry about than a white person who gets arrested. Cite. That's an extremely serious claim to make without proof, and it's a lie. Cite required, again. FYI the KKK can endorse anyone they want, and I'm sure that by doing so they know that they're actually damaging that party's chances of winning. It's an absolute certainty that every islamic terrorist group wanting to gain entry into the US prefers the Dems and their open borders, defunding police, abolishing ICE, etc, but Al Qaeda isn't doing a press release to that effect because their leaders know the effect it will have. It's no crackpot theory. Just watch the Floyd Bodycam video yourself and you'll see exactly what I'm talking about. Leftist theory: Floyd didn't resist arrest and the police should have known he was having respiratory trouble... Video: Floyd most certainly was resisting arrest, and he said that he was having respiratory trouble when no one was even touching him. Like I said, no theories, just absolute proof that you are 100% wrong again. That's not what I said at all. Your reading comprehension sucks. Saul Alinsky did something. I can't say exactly what everyone else's motivation was when they did similar things. I am not pretending to know exactly why every single human on earth makes their individual choices. FYI the KKK was a branch of the Dem party. That's an absolute historical fact. Black people still fare far worse in Dem-controlled areas than in Republican-controlled areas. That's another fact. Dems pander to black people with their words, but not by their actions. Fear-mongering against the police and defunding police in majority-black neighbourhoods is not actually good for black people at all. That's atrocious and utterly pathetic. You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that. I have no clue what you get out of saying something like that, but it's disgusting. Listen to yourself. They were a bunch of racists, then for some reason all the racists suddenly embraced black people in the world's greatest hallelujah/kumbaya moment ever lol. FYI a larger percent of Republicans than Demonrats, both in the Senate and Congress, voted in favour of the Civil Rights Act. Go look it up. In the whole history of the United States, this is the only example of a Bill getting more support from across the aisle than from the party that presented it. The stats for homicide rates, homelessness & poverty levels. Trump has disavowed and condemned white supremacists over a dozen times. You made a false claim and I correctly labelled you as a liar. You've now dialled your claim back to: "at a few exact moments", my initial claim that you're a liar was still correct. You're referencing common CNN lies. Shocker. 1) Trump correctly said that there were good people on both sides OF THE STATUE DEBATE. 2) Trump correctly said that there were people on both sides FIGHTING. 3) The Proud Boys aren't white supremacists. A lot of them are Mexican-American and African-American. There are areas where Dem mayor and governors refuse to stop Antifa and BLM's terrorist activities (murders, beatings, looting and billions of dollars in property damage) and the Proud Boys feel like it's up to them to stop it. 4) Trump was asked to say "Proud boys stand down" and he did. The reason for this is simple - what Antifa is doing is 100% wrong, and they are domestic terrorists, but vigilanteism is illegal and the Proud Boys are actually not allowed to take it upon themselves to counter Antifa or BLM with physical force. There was no "Proud Boys gaffe". Trump was asked a question in the form of a trap. Wallace: "Will you condemn white supremacists?" Trump: "Sure. Name the group you want me to condemn." Wallace: "Will you tell the Proud Boys to stand down?" Trump: "Proud Boys stand down." And then Trump said something which correctly identified Antifa as the most violent and destructive group in North America. Like I said it was a trap, framed like a question. He had two options: 1) don't tell the proud boys to stand down and then the likes of you will say that he's encouraging the Proud Boys or 2) tell them to stand down, and then be accused of being their de facto leader. Grow up. If there's something you don't understand, just ask next time.

OMG, how old are you, honestly? Your petulance far outweighs your common sense. Colin Kaepernick has free speech. But the SC ruled that "you don't have free speech at work". If you invest $100,000 to start BeaverFever Coffee can your employee wear a T-Shirt to work there that says "I hate Jews"? When people are outside your store protesting and customers can't get in, and when your store is being constantly vandalized and you're losing a ton of money every month, do you have to keep letting that girl wear her free speech shirts? Of course not, that's just stupid. The NFL doesn't belong to Kaepernick. He can't exercise his freedom of speech in a manner that damages the NFL's business, period. FYI Gillette exercised their free speech when they made their commercial. It offended people, and those people have the right to not buy Gillette products anymore. That's so simple and basic that it's completely idiotic to try to make any other claim. FYI politicians pander to people all the time and it's not just religious groups. The Dems are acting like the biggest killer of black people in America is racist police. It's not even 1%. Of all the black people who get killed by police, very few of thse instances are even questionable. Basic fact, polite people get killed by lightning far more often than police, and that includes criminals. This pure idiocy. Obama completely divided the country between 2013 and 2016. The rift was visible from space, in the form of burning cities across America. Relations were getting quite a bit better under Trump from 2017-2019, until the Obamas went back on their racial division tour after GFloyd was killed (in a Dem controlled city, in a Dem-controlled state, with a Dem AG). Trump's foreign policy in the ME has shown the most success since before Israel and Pakistan were created. Just when I thought your post couldn't get any dumber you said this...... You're aware of how partisan CNN is and how many lies they've been caught telling right? Before Trump was even elected, CNN had a Presidential debate where they gave Hillary the questions in advance. This year they had a town hall for Biden that was supposedly for undecided voters, and they had a former Obama speech writer in there "asking questions" in the form of pro-Biden political speeches. CNN made a kid into the poster child for bigotry just for wearing a MAGA hat. CNN lied about the Russian collusion investigation for 4 years. Van Jones caught admitting that Russian collusion was a joke over a year before CNN finally took a brief respite in their 24/7 fake news sessions re: collusion. CNN cited the fact that Manafort was in jail as evidence that people were being busted for collusion when he was just in the clink for tax evasion from 20 years before the campaign even started. They even said that he was offered a reduced sentence for info regarding Russian collusion, which is alarming because the FBI knew at the beginning of 2017 that it was fake. They had already tried to close the investigation when they discovered it's flimsy/slimy origins. When Trump called MS-13 animals, CNN said "Trump referred to immigrants as animals". Trump was absolutely, positively, 10,000% correct to label CNN fake news, because CNN actually is fake news. I stopped watching CNN instantly back in 2014 when they opted not to show the Michael Brown videos. They pushed the gentle giant theory even though they had access to evidence that he committed a violent robbery moments before the police arrived. At the time I thought that they did it for profit. The explosion of chaos and violence turned CNN into must-watch TV 24/7 for months. I had no idea back then that it was politically-motivated, I just knew it was extremely pathetic. Make no mistake Beaver - you literally have no excuse whatsoever for not completely understanding that CNN is fake news. I get that you love the fake news right now, because you hate Trump so much that their lies about him tickle your funny bone, but by allowing CNN to be so utterly fake you're setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of "News". If you want to rise to the challenge of defending CNN's integrity, I'm happy to do a comparison of the accuracy of Fox's news coverage vs CNN's any day of the week. I fully expect you to run from this like a coward, just like Michael Hardner, eyeball, dialamah, Argus, camper, bubber, boges and every other CNN junkie has done. CNN is pure filth, and anyone who doesn't know it is an idiot, anyone who doesn't acknowledge it is a liar. Period.

I'm hoping for an election because TBH I still don't believe in polling data that has liberals ahead so comfortably. If it's really true, then Canadians truly are the dumbest sheeple on the planet.

I Googled it. Apparently the FN people used to spear and gaffe lobster close to shore. That's not a thing anymore, there aren't any lobster close enough to shore these days.

1) It's not racism. It's fish schism. 2) Did they even fish for lobster before Columbus came? I'm not really a big believer that the FN should suddenly have new rights to do things that they never did traditionally. I'm not saying that they shouldn't be allowed to fish for lobster if they never did it before, they should just face the same restrictions as others if they just started in 1800. Side note: I'm still not down with them using canons to hunt whales either. If they wanna be badass and kill whales old skool, maybe. They can even produce a tv show that will make fishing for crab off the coast of Alaska look cute. And even this is a compromise from me, my actual position is F- all whale hunters.

"I will take my ball and go home if you keep calling me a cheater!" - a bunch of 7 yr olds and the PM of Canada.

Too funny. At least someone said that about you lol. Not even my own mom would say that about me.

My pleasure

That was a pretty severe accusation that was just levelled against you b_c. I wouldn't take it so lightly if I was you.

You're accusing someone of harbouring a desire to commit genocide. That's not kosher here camper, but we'll see what the mod has to say about that I guess, won't we?

Don't put words in my mouth camper. I said CBC was state-owned, just like the media in China and NoKo is state-owned. Still waiting for your comparison of Fox News and CNN, or do you admit that you're chickening out on that front?

More accurately, like in NoKo or China. I can't even be that critical of China's state-owned media to be honest, because when our PM said "In Canada the government doesn't interfere in court proceedings" it was China's media that said: "JWR says "Hi" Justin, you little weasel".

Fox is far more accurate than CBC, CNN, and CTV. The last 3 are more accurately described as opinion shows than actual news outlets. I get the feeling that you watch a lot of infowars. I don't actually watch it at all, but I wouldn't doubt that they are more accurate than CNN. Did they ever get sued for slandering a child? When Avanatti came out of the woodwork with a girl named Lisa Swetnick who claimed to have been to "ten Kavanaugh gang-rape parties" did the talking heads on infowars proclaim him as the next Dem nominee for POTUS lol? CNN is a joke. CBC and CTV are jokes. Everything you believe is a joke camper. Like I said, when you want to compare the accuracy of Fox News with CNN I'm here for ya little buddy. We both know you don't want to go that route so slink away.

I get the vast bulk of my US news from Fox. Anytime that you want to compare the accuracy of Fox's news coverage with that of CNN I'll be here camper. Now run off like a little coward again.

You're lying again camper. Trump didn't get the AG to draw up charges against Hillary although it's known that at the very least she destroyed subpoenaed evidence, obstructed justice of an actual crime, and was criminally negligent with the handling of classified emails. We all know that Hillary did her best to get Trump jailed. Stop relying on CNN for your source.

The last time an election loser in the US tried to jail their opponent was 2016.

You're full of unsubstantiated/bogus claims and I have to explain even basic facts to you like a you're a small child. This is completely exhausting. 1) Your Saudi claim is idiotic and unsupported by any known facts. Provide a cite for that. 2) FYI "news coverage" is not a binary matter. It's not as if saying something once and saying it 11,000 times is the exact same thing. 3) For sure Trump had reasons to not want to be spied on. FYI the FBI was caught spying on his campaign and lying about the 'evidence' gathered. 4) FYI, the National Post article cites a completely crime from what Trudeau briefly summed up, and the mainstream media here just lets Trudeau's bogus misinterpretation of the claims made against him stand unchallenged. Did CBC and CTV let Trump's comment of "This is a witch hunt" just stand as the official version of the RC story or did they [wrongly] say that he was incorrect?

It's not fake at all. It's 100% legit. Your left wing news just refuses to acknowledge it.