WestCanMan

She might be right to make that distinction in this one instance because sadly, the fact that they are as evil as they are is what makes them undeniably 'human'. Cats are probably the 2nd-worst species on the earth when it comes to the act of needlessly torturing other animals before they kill them, but even they don't go nearly as far as MS-13 does. And I can guarantee you that if MS-13 was a 'white' gang that rotten hag would be using the word 'animals' to describe them. She could pick up a baby by the ears and they'd find a way to make it seem appropriate.

The Dems put so much effort into ensuring that voter fraud is easy, when it would be even easier to make them more secure. They could put tens of thousands of webcams live-streaming from every polling center in the country, and they'd have no shortage of internet watchdogs on there independently verifying and recording every vote that was counted across the country. Instead the Dems chose to flood the zone with bogus ballots and then sequester their ballot counters away from prying eyes, and as if no one saw it coming, the votes that emerged from the darkness miraculously carried Biden to a come-from-behind victory. The same people who said "IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO CHEAT IN THIS MAIL-IN BALLOT SCENARIO!!!!!" started saying on election night "Well, what we can say for sure right now is that this election is 100% legitimate, and there's obviously no voter fraud going on here tonight" (even though it took them all three years to admit that the 2016 election was legitimate) and they are now saying "WE DON'T NEED TO LOOK AT ANY EVIDENCE OF CHEATING, WE GAVE YOU YOUR OPINIONS ALREADY DOG!!!!!!".

1) IMO they held back the vote in these states because they didn't want to cheat unless they had to. If the Dems had enough EC votes to win without Mich and PA then Det and Philadelphia would have turned in legitimate vote counts. 2) Oddly enough, I remember Obama and the Dems going on about how elections couldn't be 'hacked', and yet there's this ballot-counting software that conveniently flips votes 180 degrees for the Dems. If that software was more subtle, and only flipped 200 votes in Antrim county, or just flipped a lower percentage per county, the Dems would likely have gotten away with it. The fact that it flipped so many votes in such a small county is what got them caught. Biden's Freudian Slip is being hidden and excused away by the MSM. Ironically the one time he told the truth the media is hiding it.

The software that 'glitched', switching thousands of votes in Biden's favour, was used in about 40 counties in Michigan, and 30 other states. It's nothing to worry about though. I'm sure that the FB fact-chuckers already determined conclusively that it only happened that one time.

This from the guy whose posts amount to a bunch of baseless allegations along with a smattering of CNN narrative. If I wanted Anderson's Cooper's opinion I'd just watch CNN dude.

You're doubling down on a lie - you're still a liar beaver.

Riiiight. So they actually showed the M Brown videos back in 2014 and they didn't call him gentle giant lol. You are a liar.

Bodies already dropped due to internal politics this year. Close to 20 iirc.

TBH CNN held off announcing Biden as the winner in Az for a few hours longer than Fox did. Their coverage of the election was quite decent.

Did you notice on election night that they were already proclaiming the authenticity of the election results, long before there was any indication of who was even winning? It was a bit of a "Methinks thou dost protest too loudly" moment considering that there was no controversy yet at that point.

I thought you meant '03 lol

Riiiight. So when you saw Trump say "MS-13 are animals" and then you saw people on CNN say "Trump referred to immigrants as animals" you didn't notice that was a complete lie? You weren't duped by the lack of access to a more reliable source, they actually showed you all the evidence that you needed in order to know that they were lying. You were just incredibly stupid if you didn't catch it. When they brought up Lisa Swetnick's accusation of "I went to ten Kavanaugh gang-rape parties" and turned Avanatti into a hero overnight, I laughed. I instantly knew it was just stupid. No one goes to ten gang-rape parties. Not unless they're rapists themselves. But CNN viewers are so god-damned stupid that they gobbled it up like pigs at the trough. Gimme a break sapper. I wasn't born yesterday.

Yeah that's a real funny quote, but you're actually just regurgitating CNN drivel when you say it. Literally the most ignorant, and I mean true dictionary-definition ignorant thing that you can do is just shut them out because CNN told you to. They also told you that Michael Brown was a gentle giant, based on what some of his elementary school teachers said, and they completely ignored his two violent incidents right before he was shot, and they also refused to show video of it. That's not just lying and misrepresentation for political purposes, people were killed and there was billions of dollars in property damage that resulted from their intentional mischaracterization of the people & events involved in that incident. The entire country was sharply divided just because CNN portrayed M Brown as a sweet, innocent victim of a genocidal & racist police force. You should ACTUALLY watch Brett Baier or Tucker Carlson or Hannity or The Five, or Greg Gutfeld, or Watters' World once and see how often you can catch them lying, just for sport.

OK so honestly, how many times per hour or per day do you catch CNN lying, or allowing guests to come on air and tell obvious lies without correcting them?

In 2020, with so much technology readily available, why don't they have 50 webcams in every polling station, live-streaming? They could make elections 100% secure and fair if that was the goal. I'm extremely suspicious of a group that says "It's just an election. We can all trust Debbie to do this herself."

You watch too much news, but you also have too many bad sources. CBC and CNN aren't actually 'news' they're propaganda outlets. Bias is one thing, lying is quite another.

Curing ballots is fine, just with proper oversight. This is an exercise in election fairness, not disenfranchisement. General rule of thumb, anything done with proper scrutiny is 100% fine. Nothing done without scrutiny is fine at all.

Depending on what channel you watch I guess.

The party that got caught 3x last election, that blocked observers, and tat pushes for voter-fraud-friendly election reforms every year, probably. I can give you the info but I can't understand it for you.

What's the difference then? If you're sick you get the runaround/wait list.

Yeah that's not exactly how it works. When someone has a track record of being right you should at least listen to them. When they have a track record of being wrong you stop listening to them, completely. You're listening to people who say things like "Trump said immigrants are animals" when anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of the language knows is a lie. Or "Antifa doesn't exist". Leftist credo: "Just keep quiet and make people guess how stupid we are."

With all of the evidence out that the Bidens were influence-peddling to the tune of tens of millions of dollars in their pockets and no interest whatsoever from the MSM and 50% of the population for an investigation I doubt that this will get far. That's still no reason for you to be rushing to judgement either way.

Sometimes the problem is things like: "They have to stay 100 feet away from the ballot counters." It's not your job to ignore problems. Just observe. See what happens. The fact is that election laws were broken when observers were not allowed to do their jobs. That doesn't mean that there was cheating involved in the ballot counting process, but there are lots of reasons to expect that it did. 1) The Dems were busted cheating 3 times during the last election. If they cheated 3 times there's a good chance that they cheated more than that, but they were caught 3 times. 2) Their supporters don't care at all about lying, and crime. They won't even look at Biden. 4) They have a habit of trying to implement voter-fraud-friendly voting rules, and mail-in ballots is one of them.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-sues-philadelphia-mail-in-ballot-offices https://www.foxnews.com/politics/detroit-chaos-republican-vote-challengers Election rules are simple: both parties get to have campaign representatives overseeing the ballot counts. Not so in places like Detroit and Philadelphia where no oversight of ballot counting has been allowed in ballot-counting rooms by Republican representatives. Not surprisingly there were just enough Dem votes mailed in to save the day for Biden. Interestingly enough, CNN was already verifying the legitimacy of this year's election on the night of the election, because somehow in their heart of hearts they just knew that everything was a-ok. But how's that even a thing? Aren't they the ones who were convinced that the whole 2016 election was illegal? In all honesty, they were kind of right, because one party caught cheating 3 times during the last election. The Dems. [Rigging a primary against Bernie, getting debate questions fed to them before the Presidential debates, and it's well-known that they were caught colluding with Russians for election dirt against Trump via Perkins Coie -> Christopher Steele -> dirty sneaky Russians] The Dems were the party of the southern states who fought for secession so that they could keep their slaves, they fought against the blacks legally gaining the right to vote, after the blacks won that right the KKK was one of the Dems' paramilitary groups that used violence to stop blacks from voting, and in 2020 they were caught working to disenfranchise voters again.

If Hannity said it exists, I have no reason to doubt it, and I don't even see where you provided a reason why I would doubt it. I'm just not personally offended by it. If you think you have some proof that it doesn't exist then show it, but Obama's word for it obviously doesn't mean Jack S. You'll have to find some other way. It's the same principal. Doctors make decisions based on time and whatever other resources they have on hand. Just because you have something that's curable doesn't mean that the guy you're talking to can or will cure you. Do you think you know for sure when you get a fatal diagnosis here that a former President or a billionaire would die of the same thing? Don't kid yourself. If you get C19 do you think that you'll have the same chance of surviving as Trump had? Go fish. You might be better off staying at home anyways though, you have a better chance of being killed by a medical mistake than you do of dying from C19 in the USA, even in 2020. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-america.html Over 20% of America's deaths are from cancer, unless you're a former President, then it's 2.5%. Just 1 out of 39 so far. There should have been around 8. Granted 4 died of gunshot wounds, so it's more like 1/35. 2.8%. You have too much faith in the medical profession BF.