WestCanMan

OMG, this is as bad as your blatant ignorance regarding Biden's lie that he didn't know his son had a $30-50K/month job in the Ukraine. You're not even at square 1 in this debate and you're acting like you're the expert. How can you know so little so late in the game? This has been known for years. It's not my job to provide links to get you up to speed on the very basic elements of this discussion Beave. Go read. Now you're lying again. Henry said they had no concrete evidence. Full stop. Imagine this in court: "We had indicators, we didn't have concrete evidence, can you please convict the accused now your honour?" Go fish Beave. FYI the DNC never gave up their actual servers. There were over 100 of them, and they just gave Crowdstrike copies of (some? or all of?) them. And fwiw, even if Russia did hack Hillary or the DNC, which is a distinct possibility, that doesn't mean that they did it at Trump's behest. Assange said the info was leaked, and right now no one can say for certain that he's lying. The FBI's credibility is 100% shot so their input is worthless.

Wrong again Beave. I was 100% correct, as usual: Raz Simone, the Warlord of CHAZ, whose CHAZIs.................. and then killed a boy. It could be that you need above average reading comprehension to get this one right. I won't hold it against you. Raz was the leader of a group that claimed sovereignty over American soil and then his cops killed a kid and the evidence was cleared from the crime scene. Pretty hilarious that the BLM were only cops in a small area for 3 weeks and yet they managed to murder a black child. When you consider that the US has 30,000 times as many cops as CHAZ did, they'd have to kill 30,000 black kids every 3 weeks to keep the pace. That's over 150,000 black kids per year. Is BLM here to commit genocide against blacks or what? Wrong again. *yawn* She said "they should not let up". Not let up means, "they should keep carrying on at the same rate". And the rate that they were going at was arson, racial violence, hundreds of assaults against police officers on a daily basis, and the murders of police officers and innocent civilians. Dude, over the course of half of 2014, all of 2015, all of 2016 and 3 months of 2020 she made a couple of minor statements, and the second one that you have there was from Oct 26th of this year, after the rioting was all over. Talk about too little, too late. When was the first quote from? She's quite the law and order skank there Beave.

Biden will have the WH stocked with young, fresh-smelling, attractive children. The one in the 3 photos at the bottom is how own granddaughter by the way. She's almost too old for him now lol.

They've been working for the POTUS for years so he does know what they're capable of Beave. Kushner, HAHAHAHA. Oh wait. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/09/16/how-jared-kushner-proved-his-critics-wrong-416527 Who has ever accomplished more for normalizing relations in the ME over the past 70 years than Jared Kushner? No one. No one has even come close. If that was the only thing that he did in FOUR YEARS it would be enough. You want some fries with that crow Beavie?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/11/02/joe_biden_on_hunter_i_didnt_know_he_was_on_the_board_of_that_company.html Two videos, both showing Joe saying that he didn't know Hunter was on the board of Burisma back when he did the QPQ. He was also extremely rude, he's always rude when someone drops a truth bomb on him. IdunnoJoe answers to no one. How is it possible for you not to know this at this late stage of the game? How could you have so many posts on this topic and not even be at square 1? Shouldn't you at least avail yourself of the facts before you start calling other people names? Here's some timing for you: https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/ What was the Prosecutor up to? In his own words: Sorry, I forgot that leftists prefer their witnesses to be anonymous. Just pretend that the video doesn't exist and that this is a rumour and you have no choice but to treat it as if it's carved in stone. I know exactly who the treasury secretary is. Mnuchin also knows what's up. Joe Biden is a tyrant and anyone who crosses him is royally screwed. The DNC gives CNN, MSNBC etc their marching orders on a daily basis. That's why they always 'coincidentally' use the same buzzwords. Yes, political parties lie. Saying that Antifa doesn't exist is a lie. Saying that the protests were mostly peaceful was a lie. Saying that Dr Ford was a credible witness was a lie. Saying that "we have new bombshell evidence coming out this weekend that will prove collusion once and for all - impeachment is imminent" 50 times was a lie. Saying that the election was stolen for 4 years was a lie. Saying that walls are racist was a lie. Saying that women were being forced to drink from toilets was a lie and CNN let that one slide. Saying that there's no need to investigate Burisma was a lie. Saying that Trump asked for a favour and then mentioned Biden was a lie - Trump's request for a favour was blatantly and directly pointed at Crowdstrike which was re: Russian collusion. This is just a sampling of the blatant lies that the Dems/CNN were running constantly over the past 4 years. They literally don't even have time for the truth because they spend so much time lying.

Left wing media gave the same story. It came right from the Seattle PD. "The scene of the shooting was cleared of evidence". Am I supposed to act like I know that they are lying? I'm reiterating credible info. That's not lying Beave. Lying is when you pretend to have exact knowledge of circumstances which have never even been reported in the media. And even if what you said was mentioned on CNN, it's actually impossible for them to know that anyways. Should we believe Steele if he says: "I never paid them and I never asked any favours of them.... Onnist injun." Of course not. It defies logic. LMAO. That's so patently false and easy to disprove it's almost that you like getting caught lying. Here's the DB elect Kamala Harris saying that she was at protests in DC and saying that they "should not let up" at a time when riots and murders were going on. This bitch didn't say that the peaceful protests need to continue but the rioting needs to stop. She said that "they should not let up". That means "keep going at the exact same level". She's a lawyer. She has a firm grasp of the language. Her meaning could not be any clearer. Colbert was doing her a favour by cutting her off before she kept up her rant.

FYI: BIDEN is the one whose son took a $30,000.00/month job at the most corrupt company in Ukraine where he had never been before, where he doesn't speak the language, in a field which he had no prior experience in, and where his father was heavily involved politically as the VPOTUS. Biden is the one who quite rudely told interviewers MULTIPLE TIMES on TV that he didn't have a clue that his son worked at Burisma. Hunter Biden said the exact same thing. All of America was just told "STFU. We are the Bidens. What we say goes. I'm saying that my son never told me about his $30K job in a foreign country and you have to believe it, no matter how ridiculous it is. The media will not question me, period." Biden is the one who admitted that he had outright lied to reporters every single time that he made that claim, and he only fessed up because a photo of him golfing with his son and Devon Archer was leaked. Hunter Biden is the one who admitted in a recorded interview that he only got the board positions that he sat on "because of who his father is". Joe Biden is the one who bragged about his quid pro quo on live TV. He admitted to withholding $1B in aid (loan guarantees) from the Ukrainian government unless they fired their top prosecutor, and then he said "I put a new guy in his place that was solid". Guess what? Burisma isn't being investigated anymore. Bobulinski isn't "Ukraine", and he's the one who dropped all the bombs on Biden. This is the Biden administration using the weight of the Presidential Seal to quell dissent. Ukraine didn't do anything to that worthless, senile piece of crap. The DNC owns the mainstream media and what you are seeing now is the beginning of a very undemocratic stage in American history.

Huh?

People like Biden and Trudeau are calling man made climate change an existential threat. Is that just consensus or is there a second round of carbon taxes getting lubed up (or not) right now for us taxpayers? We had the polar bear thing shoved down our throats because CNN and CBC can't let a tragedy go to waste. "Polar bears are drowning in the open ocean and their babies are starving because WCM drives a car!" I'm not accusing you of personally believing that she's an elite climatologist, but you gotta admit, there's nothing worse than trying to watch the news and being subjected to a pontificating, snot-nosed brat. No prob. A 49% day is manageable. I'll get a week's worth of work done (by leftist standards) at that rate

Not according the CBC and CNN. No, the polar bear thing was irrefutable proof of global warming. And what do you need a graph for? CNN's foremost expert on climatology and race relations, Great Thunberg, already addressed the issue. 1) I'm putting you in the basket that you said you belong in: the basket of 2020 born-again election believers. 2) If you think that election observers are important then why do you have no sympathy for the election observers in the states who testified that they were harassed, bullied, lied to, wrongfully removed from polling stations, and otherwise prevented from performing their election duties? If Infidel Dog, Dog on Porch and I kick you out of a polling station and you filed an affidavit and testified in court should the MSM call you a liar? I guess you'd be ok with that, right? No, I'm comparing people who loudly proclaimed for 4 years that they believe in the bogeyman with the same people who suddenly don't believe in the bogeyman less than a month later, after hundreds of people testified in court that they saw him. Oh sorry Michael, I didn't know that there was only one possible way to cheat on an election. My bad. The same reason that the DNC rigged the Primary for Hillary when the rest of the country thought that it was a democratic process. The same reason that CNN and Hillary conspired to cheat during the debates. The same reason why the Dems say that illegal immigrants can vote. (How easy is it for people with no official records to register two or tree times to vote? Or register in multiple states under different names? Who could keep track? What do people with nothing to lose have to lose if they get caught? You know damned well that their citizenship won't be revoked by Dems so don't even go there.) The same reason that the Dems say they believe that people should not need to show ID to vote. (It's got nothing to do with racism, because people need ID to buy cigarettes and take out library books too). The same reason why the Dems believe that signatures on ballots don't need to match with signatures on record at the state. The same reason why the Dems pretended that they had proof of collusion for 4 years when they were eventually found to have none at all. They're cheaters, and they like election scams, so they like voter-fraud-friendly systems. The majority of GOP voters are working class people who can't risk jailtime just for a few votes. Not so for the Dems, who sucked in the welfare voters. Do you think any of those Antifa losers have a house or car to lose if they go to jail? At best they have skateboards. That's just one example of a mail-in scam. Another is just to print ballots that get counted without any observers present. If you don't fill out the down-ballot you can check those off in a hurry. Every time the Dems open their mouths about elections they have a new voter-fraud-friendly scam to roll out. What was the last thing they ever said about elections that made sense? "Russians stole the 2016 election after our beloved Barack Obama refused to listen to warnings from Republicans on the House Intel Committee who told him 'Russia plans to interfere in our next election'"? Obama even went on to brag about how American elections were impervious to interference before the 2016 election. Then the Dems whined about outside interference for 4 years. Then at 10:07 pm on Jan 03 2020 election interference was suddenly deemed impossible again lol. The dems can't make up their minds. They are a huge joke.

As evidenced by the last 4 years of investigations into Trump, the Dems are really serious about integrity in the WH. No doubt they're going to take a serious look at the damning & credible allegations against Biden. Will they impeach him?

If you're right, and the GOP have been lying for weeks about the election being stolen (you're not), is that a bad thing? Isn't the election lying supposed to go on for years?

1) We hear things like "All climate scientists agree that blah blah blah" but we never see actual climatologists say anything of the sort. 2) Can you show me an updated version of the hockey stick graph? Are there any cute, cuddly polar bears left? 3) People like you knew that the election was 100% legit right on election night because they said it over and over on CNN, right? Don't you find it the least bit odd that the DNC and CNN told us for 4 straight years that the 2016 was definitely stolen, and then they somehow knew by 10 pm on election night that the 2020 election was guaranteed free from fraud? How did they know that MH? They were the world's foremost skeptics as of Jan 02 2020, and then suddenly within 24 hours they believed in the integrity of elections like Eric Swallwell believes in the integrity of Chinese spies. Are Dem supporters really in a position to act like it's crazy to doubt the results of an election? We're 4 months and 4 days away from May 16 2021. Seems like we still have lots of room to cast doubts. Especially when you consider how many times the Dems were caught actually cheating on recent elections, and their penchant for voter-fraud-friendly regulations. Did you know that the Dems were trying to implement the mass-mailing of ballots long before covid? And that they successfully pushed through laws which removed the need for people's signatures to match the signatures on file for them at the state? And that they think that requiring ID at the pooling boots is racist? With all of their new laws, how could they possibly believe in election integrity? What do you think prevents me from going through people's mailboxes and grabbing their ballots in a state where the signatures don't have to match? If the Dems were just some party that you never heard of before from Lithuania then you'd instantly see through all of their bogus election scams, but because you believe orange man bad you pre-emptively endorse all of the Demonrats' questionable election law changes before the ink is dry, don't you.

Not a chance simpleton. They did 'pay' Russians. Hillary and the DNC just didn't e-transfer money right from Hillary's account to Russian agents though, they were secretive about, because they're not retarded. You might choose not to secretive about buying fentanyl or human trafficking, maybe you'd even declare income from those things on your T4. Good for you. Hillary tried to cover her tracks. Ooh a hearsay case. I'm sure that the FISA court is all over those. Just kidding. That was sarcasm because I didn't want to just point out the blatant stupidity of your comment too harshly. 1) There are lots of never-Trumper in the GOP 2) Whatever you may see with hindsight, the FBI obviously didn't see with foresight. There was a high-profile claim against Hillary and they thought that they needed to open a fake investigation into it so that they could exonerate her. It backfired. That's good for America. Oooh evidence. Big deal. They couldn't say for certain though, their CEO stated that under oath in court. There are evidence of a lot of things. I'm a Trump supporter. Does that mean I have Pelosi's laptop? Most people would say that's not enough evidence, but I'd be surprised if you didn't think that it was. I typed this slowly so that you could read it: The CEO of Crowdstrike lead the remediation and forensic analysis. Do you know what that means? He said they didn't have concrete evidence. Do you know what that means? Among other things, it means that you're a liar, as usual, and I'm correct, as usual. The meeting, or possibly the attempt at entrapment, happened after the info was leaked. So what? Don't take off your tinfoil hat though Beave. CNN said that all the cool kids are wearing them. Uh, get your head out of the sand, that's old news. No one is denying it but you. Not even Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, Hillary Clinton, the DNC or Christopher Steele are denying that Hillary covertly paid Steele and Steele got some of his disinformation from Russians. If there was a law firm that got Trump's money and Trump got info through Russian sources from that transaction to influence the election, that would be collusion. I'm 100% sure that you'd piece it together if this was all based on rumours from anonymous sources, but when it's actual documented fact about Hillary it's just to hazy for you. Oooh shocker. (And like I said before, no one does any work at that level without receiving consideration in some form, be it money or favours. No one. Hillary's money ended up buying Russian disinformation and that's a fact that you need to come to grips with. Cry me a river Beave.) The Steele info was presented as partially verified and independently corroborated and that was false. Exculpatory evidence was withheld from the FISA court. An FBI lawyer lied to the FISA court. FBI bias was all over the investigation, Strzok's texts prove as much. The whole investigation was based on lies and bullshit. At the very best, some of the items in it were loosely corroborated, most notably by hearsay. At the end of the investigation there was absolutely no evidence that Trump colluded. Mueller and the Dems and their idiotic sycophants are still moping. Only you still believe.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-01/steele-dossier-was-the-fbi-a-victim-of-russian-disinformation Beave you just suck at this. I get that you don't have the whole story because you watch CNN, but at least do some homework before you run your mouth. It's been out that Steele got a lot of info from Russians for years now. Get your head out of your ass.

100%! You finally got one right! This isn't a baseless claim at all, you didn't have to reveal your passion for goat-fucking just to be wrong again. What I said is something that stands as an uncontested fact. "Hillary Clinton and the DNC tried to secretly funnel money to Christopher Steele through the law firm Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS. They initially denied it, but they got caught. Even your beloved CNN doesn't deny it. https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/fusion-gps-clinton-campaign/index.html Clinton and the DNC gave money to law firm, Perkind Coie, to pass on to Fusion GPS, who gave it to a spy (C Steele) for the purpose of obtaining disinformation from Russian sources. The false info was then passed off to the FBI, who subsequently used it (lied about it) to obtain warrants to spy on Trump's associates during the campaign, to influence the election, period. Every single shred of that is absolutely true, like everything else I say. If you ever caught me on a lie you'd bark like a mink. I assumed that Steele paid the Russians earlier, but if they didn't it's actually worse because nothing's free. If they didn't give the Russians mere dollars then they did a quid pro quo with Russians which is even worse. Would you rather believe that Hillary's guy did a quid pro quo or that she paid them? You can believe whichever one you want in your own heart of hearts, it's your call, but your declaration that Hillary's people never paid the Russians was still a lie, period. Of course they got something. Ether that or the dirty Ruskies wanted Hillary to be POTUS and that's even worse than the qpq theory. The only person who would have actually known were the people at Crowdstrike, and their owner testified that they didn't actually know for certain. Therefor, not one single person on earth did aside from the people who lifted the info and possibly Assange. It's entirely possible that a person who had access to the files that were stolen did his best to make it look like a hack to cover his tracks. What we know for certain is that Hillary's unprotected servers belched out classified information shortly after Bernie Sanders was jobbed out of the nomination. IE, there were people with access to the DNC servers whose candidate had just been jobbed by the arch-skank and were likely very motivated to act out against her. You're wrong again. I didn't contradict myself at all. People said that they had info on Hillary. That doesn't mean that they did. Grab a brain ffs. And there are a lot of people who believe that meeting was a sting operation to try to get Trump's people to ask questions that gave their bogus operation some credibility. In Mueller's own words, they had evidence that Russians offered the Trump campaign info but no info that they accepted the offer. Hillary funnelling money, influence or favours through to Russians apparently is, based on the bajillion-dollar investigation we saw protracted over 3 years to find out of there was any Russian collusion. What she did was the textbook definition of what Trump was accused of. The fact that they were caught, and that they admitted to lying to the FISA court to get Trump actually proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the FBI were hostile actors. The texts between Strzok and Page also proved that they were hostile actors. Grab a brain ffs. Every single word that I said here was true, everything that you said was a combination of stupidity, lies, and disinformation. You just got owned boyo

It's not a lie unless it's a lie, and believe me, if any of the alt-left weasels here could catch me on a lie I'd never live it down. I bust leftist weasels here daily.

FYI, this is how logic works: 1) Hillary is known to have secretly funnelled money to a guy who "got" intel from Russians. 2) In this world of ours, no one ever "got" anything for free. Ever. There's some form of a quid pro quo arrangement, or money changes hands, but skullduggery never comes cheap. 3) I can 100% guarantee you that the Russians in question received consideration of some sort for their invaluable disinformation, I just don't know what it was. Money is actually the least sleaziest option imaginable so Hillary can thank me for the kindness of assuming that the Russians only received cash.

You can't cite any lies by me sapper. You've been challenged before and you you've never risen to the occasion. Suck it down, princess.

You're the one who claimed to have knowledge that Steele never paid those Russians. Were you lying again? 1) No one on earth knows that the emails in question were hacked, and the person who released them claimed that they were leaked. Given that Assange has a clean record for telling the truth about his sources that's still the statement of record. 2) It's not a crime to agree to come and listen when someone says that they have evidence of something. It's perfectly legal. 3) The FBI was aware of that meeting (aka sting) and they couldn't manage to find any evidence of a crime there. 4) The FBI has proven themselves to be a hostile political actor and are not be trusted, and even if that wasn't the case, still no crime was committed. Go fish kiddo.

Maybe people here shouldn't be saying "Those Russians didn't get paid" unless they know it to be true. The fact that Clinton/Steele were paying Russians for what is now known to be disinformation for the purpose of influencing an election still sounds like collusion no matter how snottily you manage to say it Aristedes. Kudos for weaseling the name Putin into that sentence but you have not made a salient point, you're just re-packaging the same old bullshit.

Their mind-control is top-notch. Virtue-Signal, appeal to pathos, run a fluff story, and for the coup de grace they paint the cutest face possible on a victim that they want to capitalize on to push their twisted narratives. "Never let a good tragedy go to waste!" That's why when a bunch of Jews get killed, suddenly anti-Semitism is bad. Not that they'll throw their buddy (and Obama's buddy) Farrakhan under the bus, they don't have to. They just have to say "Orange man bad - he Jew killer!" and suddenly Israel's favourite President, and the grandfather of Adam Kushner's Jewish kids is Satanolf Hitler.

Yes, Cosmos, of course. I was just about to say that Lol. I'm not a very well read person. I read one book year, tops. This year it's Trey Gowdy's book "Doesn't Hurt to Ask".

I will actually buy that book. My dad used to read Carl Sagan all the time and I've never even opened one of his books.

You won't find a single liberal in that whole thing who won't spew the exact same disproven horsecrap that I just referred to. Once they see it on CNN or CBC it's gospel to them.