WestCanMan

Well, the answer is yes, because every single thing I said was proven. And you just acknowledged over and over again in this thread that the spoken word carries no meaning for you, so you're free to say whatever you want, with no regard whatsoever for honesty or integrity. That is 100% false, like almost everything else you say about Russia, Nazis and Ukraine. The GROUPS were National Socialists, and FYI that means Nazis. No one joins a group of Nazis and commits war crimes with them without ever figuring out that they're Nazis, aside from maybe robo. 1 person that I have encountered in my life might be that stupid. FYI these aren't college kids from Vermont who don't know fascism from fornication. They live in a country where Nazis killed people. They live in a country that had its own Nazi units that fought against Russia in WWII. They know what Naziism is and they know EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS TO CALL THEMSELVES NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, AND TO WEAR NAZI INSIGNIAS AND TATTOOS. No. They did not come from far-right groups. They were national socialists, and that's a very specific crew. You're quoting people with an agenda who are lying to the greatest extent that they can to whitewash history. Here's a specific query: So you have one group who 100% identify as National Socialists, which means Nazis and not one other f'ing other thing on this planet, and they all wear insignias that are 100% Nazi in origin, and a large number of individual members of that group don't even mince words and openly call themselves "Nazis". They are Nazis. They're as Nazi as they could possibly be without actually sticking their tongues into Hitler's rectum. Yeah they used Nazi symbols.... While calling themselves "Nazis". What a f'ing coincidence. Wrong. "Historians" do not call them that. People who refuse to acknowledge that they are Nazis call them that. Left4rd: "HE THINKS THAT HEALTHY 7 MONTH OLD BABIES SHOUDN'T BE ABORTED!! THAT MEANS THAT HE'S A NAZI!!!!" Normal person: "What about that guy: He calls himself a Nazi, wears Nazi insignias, has Nazi tattoos, he's part of a military unit that identifies as Nazis, and they commits war crimes together, like rape, torture, and murdering POW's." Leftard: "No, he's not a Nazi, because he is on my side." THAT'S A F'ING 100% LIE, YOU SCUMBAG. They had NAZI TATTOOS. N A Z I T A T T O O S There were not "random extremists tattoos", they were NAZI TATTOOS. Again, they're not college kids from Vermont. They live in the Ukraine, where Nazis marched. Ukrainians have a "proud" history of having served as Nazis in WWII, to hear them tell it. They know what f'ing Nazi symbols look like, just like you know what the Canadian flag looks like. If someone says "That's a Canadian flag", when you're both looking at a Canadian flag, you don't say "That's not a Canadian flag, it's just the flag of a country in North America" do you? Stop playing semantics you f'ing clown. The UN, HRW and the US Gov't all thought that the Azovs were committing war crimes. Look at the quote below. Don't throw in the word "systematically" just so that you can make the case that "they don't commit war crimes every day, so you can't say it." If you commit a murder, you're a murderer, and you don't have to kill someone every day to retain that title. FACT: The Azovs committed "A LOT OF VERY SERIOUS WAR CRIMES." See below, regarding the Azovs specifically: What does "documented incidents" mean to you? Fairytale stuff? That is correct. Who cares? If you invite 7 islamic state terrorists to dinner and 3 girl guides, YOU STILL INVITED THE TERRORISTS! 😂 Just because the Ukrainian gov't ALSO INVITED OTHER PEOPLE doesn't mean that they never invited Nazis, dummy. I never said that the Ukrainian gov't was only inviting Nazis. But if I did, your statement would have not have been a lie. Look, this is never going to end. You're just going to keep lying no matter what, and we both know who the Azovs are.

1. The NATO Secretary General, the Chancellor of Germany, the President of the US, the US Secretary of State, all have authority to speak on behalf of their countries, or NATO, in the case of the Sec General. 2. All that you keep saying, over and over, is that oaths, guarantees and promises mean nothing to you. It's like you're trying to prove that you're not trustworthy and you have no integrity. You can believe what you want to believe, I still know that those people lied, they broke their word, and Russia has to move forward with the full understanding that NATO, the US and Germany are not to be trusted. Knowing that NATO, the US, and Germany can't be trusted, why would they allow them into Ukraine? What are they gonna lie about next? Ukraine can go to hell for all I care. NATO is no longer a respectable organization, regardless of how you feel. There are consequences for lying that you are not inherently aware of.

Newsom, to blacks: "Me's dumm, just like all y'all. Ax me about books, an' I dunno no ansers." Newsom, to whites: "I read a 260-page book in 90 minutes." AI Overview Yes, California Governor Gavin Newsom previously claimed to have read a 260-page book in just 90 minutes

Or food stamps. If people had to choose between eating and voting, they'd all eat, but you need ID to get food stamps. Leftards: "Anything we don't like is racist! Not cheering for a genocide of Israelis is racist!"

Now you're just proving that you're a liar by saying: "It doesn't matter what words come out of your mouth, all that matters is signed contracts. FYI a verbal contract is still binding in Canadian law, just as long as you have the proof it was made. Manfred Woerner (NATO Secretary-General): In a speech on May 17, 1990, Woerner promised that NATO would not expand beyond the current borders of the Federal Republic of Germany. James Baker (U.S. Secretary of State): On February 9, 1990, in Moscow, Baker told Gorbachev that if Germany were unified in NATO, there would be "no extension of NATO's jurisdiction or NATO's forces one inch to the east". This is frequently referred to as the "not one inch" statement. Those things happened, User. There is no denying that a verbal contract was made. And these are just the things that were said in public, which we all know about, 100%. What we don't know is how many more verbal assurances were given behind closed doors. We made those PROMISES, then we went back on our word, 100%. That might not bug you, but IDGAF about your ultra-low ethical standards. Holy shit, dummy. You are really going all-out to distort the truth. But, in fairness to you, you're taking the exact same approach that this AI search took lol: The Azov unit did not generally, officially, or openly call themselves Nazis, and in recent years have vehemently denied holding Neo-Nazi ideologies. However, in its early stages (around 2014-2015), 1) the group was formed by members of far-right, ultranationalist, and neo-Nazi groups, and some members openly identified as National Socialists. [National Socialists = Nazis. It's the Nazis' official name, dummy] Al Jazeera +3 Key details regarding this history include: Early Ideology: The battalion was formed in 2014 from members of the "Patriot of Ukraine" gang and the "Social National Assembly" (SNA), 2) both of which were known for neo-Nazi ideals and xenophobia. My own replies to the above... AI just slithered like Justing f'ing Trudeau there, but they still eventually had to admit that the Azovs called themselves "National Socialists" lol. Just like the... Nazis. It was their official name. Both of which were Nazis. Did they wear Nazi symbols? Simple, declarative statement: did they or did they not...? (from AI, below) Yes, the Azov unit (initially a battalion, later a regiment/brigade) historically used insignia that are considered neo-Nazi or closely linked to Nazi symbolism. While Azov has since rebranded and tried to distance itself from its far-right origins, the following is an overview of the controversy surrounding their insignia: Wolfsangel (Wolf's Hook): From 2014 until roughly 2022, the Azov battalion used a stylized Wolfsangel (wolf trap) on a yellow background, with a "Black Sun" (Sonnenrad) behind it. The Wolfsangel was used by several SS divisions during World War II. "National Idea" Explanation: Azov members and supporters have often argued that the symbol is not a Nazi Wolfsangel but rather an intertwined "N" and "I," representing the Ukrainian words for "National Idea" (Ідея нації). "Black Sun" (Sonnenrad): The "Black Sun" is a symbol often used by neo-Nazis and white supremacists, which was present in early, unofficial Azov insignia. Rebranding: Following the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 and to combat Russian propaganda, the unit largely moved away from the controversial symbols. The newer insignia, often called the "Three Swords" or a redesigned trident, replaced the Wolfsangel. Honestly, that BS exactly mirrors your BS. They didn't wear "neo" Nazi symbols though, as the AI reply tried to say, they used actual Nazi symbols, as worn by the most devoted Nazis of WWII. In fact, the whole division of the SS was branded as war criminals, and then the Azovs started wearing their actual SS insignias. The Black Sun logo was designed by Himmler himself. FACT: Many Azov members openly called themselves Nazis. FACT: Many Azov members had Nazi tattoos. FACT: Their insignias WERE ALL NAZI INSIGNIAS FACTS: The Azovs committed war crimes (below) 2016 UN Report: The report documented incidents between November 2015 and February 2016 where the Azov battalion was accused of looting civilian properties, occupying civilian buildings, and displacing residents. Allegations of Torture: The same 2016 report accused members of the battalion of raping and torturing detainees in the Donbas region. Again, when I said that the Azovs were war criminals and Nazis when they were welcomed into the fold, I don't mean 'maybe'. It's an absolute fact, and if it wasn't, I wouldn't have said it. Their subsequent rebranding and the attempted whitewashing of their sordid history by western journalists and cult-handlers doesn't change the F A C T S. They were Nazis. N a z i s. By their tattoos, statements, actions, and insignias they were Nazis. If they call themselves Nazis, they get to be considered Nazis. End of story. If someone goes to an Antifa riot, then a BLM riot, throws a brick at the cops, loots a building, burns it down, yells at GOP members in a restaurant, calls a severed-head effigy of Trump 'comedy', cheers for genocide against Jews at a Hamas rally, cheers when a trans boxer beats up a woman boxer, cheers when they see a baby aborted, has an Obama tattoo, carries a DNC membership card, and says they're a Democrat, they're a Democrat. They're as Demi as they could possibly be, and you don't get to tell them otherwise.

Better than being a cultist like you, on your knees saying "Please, sir, may I have another?"

Leftists have been involved in thousands of violent riots since 2014, under the banners of BLM, Antifa, and now Anti-ICE. Thousands. Of VIOLENT riots. Leftist mobs have attacked the WH and several other federal buildings, burned down residential buildings, looted and burned down businesses, burned down churches, taken over churches to stage protests, taken over part of Seattle and declared their sovereignty over it, ambushed and killed police, attacked police, killed citizens, tried to assassinate the president multiple times, shot up a congressional baseball game, etc. Leftist leaders and MSM outlets fan the flames by pushing false and hateful narratives, they defend severed head effigies and calls to violence as comedy, and ALWAYS fail to condemn. It's beyond ridiculous to pretend that you guys aren't hyper-violent.

Conspiracy?

If the blackmail just came from Epstein, this would be a done deal. There's a good chance that it comes from the CIA, FBI, Mossad, and/or MI6, just like with Diddy. If Diddy wasn't caught on video beating up that girl, would he be in jail so fast?

https://nypost.com/2026/02/24/us-news/mamdani-jokes-about-snowball-attack-on-nypd-says-cops-should-be-treated-with-respect/ When Adams was the mayor, this is what was said about the Governor's power to remove him from office: Gov. Kathy Hochul has the ability to remove New York City’s mayor from office. If Hochul wanted to suspend Adams, she would serve him with charges. We don’t know exactly what that would look like because it has only happened once before, in 1932. That’s when Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the then-governor of New York, began investigating corrupt mayor Jimmy Walker and held a trial in Albany. But under pressure, Walker resigned and fled to Europe before any official steps to remove him could be taken. If Hochul brings charges, Adams would have a chance to defend himself. Then the governor would decide personally whether to remove him. This is a clear-cut case of malfeasance. The NYC Mayor can't legitimize or decriminalize attacks on LEO's. And if that wasn't an attack, what would Mamdani be saying if those were white people throwing snowballs at black people, or women with hijabs?

We all got scammed, cultist Hopefully the country will be in pieces ten years from now. It's your gov't that keeps insulting China, India, the US, Japan and Korea. You're not done. You think you had a mic drop moment but you still can't deny that Carney has failed the country totally, while he has created massive amounts of business for Brookfield.

1. Bring in millions of unskilled immigrants and give them free money 2. Insult global superpowers for a decade 3. Destroy your own energy sector 4. Waste hundreds of billions of dollars 8. Lie. Coast. Cheat. Sell out Canadians. Get your own businesses set up on foreign countries while our country sinks. 5. Notice a lack of productivity 6. Start a study about it, employing some of your most useless friends 7. Give the CBC another billion right before the next election, and call some people racists

And the Ret4rd of the Year Award goes to.... Robo. Again. Nice try though Jimmy Johnston.

Stop deflecting. It is what it is.... 1. Carney is the one who said that he could get trade deals done in 6 months, not me, so stop trying to change his timeline now, donkey. If you thought that 6 months was impossible then you shoulda called him a liar when he said it. 2. Oh yeah, the China agreement, that just set Canada/US trade relations to cold-war status. Good job??? 3. Objectively, Carney's business - the one that he lied to Canadians about - has profited mightily since he became PM, more than once, while Canada has gained nothing. Do you have any facts to counter with, or are you done here?

The lesbian in charge of those things clearly needs a raise. He didn't expect of of them to do any of the work. They're too busy with their daycare scams. People didn't vote for Mamdani just to end up working, duh. They're sitting at home waiting for the billionaire's tax to make their lives perfect. WTF, are you new here?

Here's an idea: stop getting your "news" from Onlyfans. Sick b4st4rd.

I have a problem with zero trade deals for Canada, despite all of Carney's hobnobbing with foreign officials all of Brookfield's new billion-dollar business deals that Carney has generated by hobnobbing with foreign officials

The Dems' tireless dedication to law and order will not be deterred, right John? People WILL BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE by the Dems, and bail will be set at $1,000. Then they will just let everyone out of jail again. Dang.

I'm not saying that I put partisan politics ahead of the prosecution of child molesters, I'm saying that: the child molesters will continue to put their mutual protection ahead of their partisan politics. I'm also saying that it's ridiculous for leftists to pretend that their side is really trying hard to get to the bottom of this while the GOP are stonewalling, because the Dems had all their cards in their own hand for over a decade since 2008, and did nothing with them. How is it that of all the people on that island in a span that lasted at least 2 decades, how is it that only Prince Andrew has been outed? There are pictures, a storyline, criminal charges.... But there's no similar level of evidence against anyone else? Bullshit. Justice will never be done here. There's NO chance of that ever happening. There might be a few fall guys, and some guys who are too unpopular with everyone will go down, but the dems and GOP will circle their wagons around their big players, 100%.

Manfred Woerner (NATO Secretary-General): In a speech on May 17, 1990, Woerner promised that NATO would not expand beyond the current borders of the Federal Republic of Germany. James Baker (U.S. Secretary of State): On February 9, 1990, in Moscow, Baker told Gorbachev that if Germany were unified in NATO, there would be "no extension of NATO's jurisdiction or NATO's forces one inch to the east". This is frequently referred to as the "not one inch" statement. Helmut Kohl (West German Chancellor): In a meeting with Gorbachev on February 10, 1990, Kohl stated that "naturally NATO could not expand its territory to the current territory of the GDR [East Germany]". Margaret Thatcher (British Prime Minister): In talks with Gorbachev, she expressed that the Soviet Union needed to feel secure and that the West would not threaten the USSR's interests Buddy, you've had years to get up to speed. Now you're just a f'ing liar. I get that "just saying words" might not constitute any kind of a deal to you, but some people take their own promises seriously. Apparently NATO, Germany, Britain, the US, etc do not. Correct: your statement is an outright lie. The biolabs were working on cures for known biological warfare agents, which is actually highly aggressive in nature. If everything in those labs was supposedly legitimate, then what difference would it make if the Russians got their hands on it? FYI "Oh, noooo. Now the Russians also have the cure for the common cold!" 😂 "We're worried that Russian lies are now going to contain fabricated evidence".... OMG, are they accusing Russia of being the FBI????? Maybe you think that bioweapon research doesn't constitute a justification for war, but Russia does, and they get to respond to threats as a sovereign nation, and saying "We trust the US" is just stupid, as we've already proven in #1, above. Why didn't they come to Canada in 2021 then? So, you think that the US bringing down the gov't of Ukraine was a-ok? It's their job? Just look at the country that you're describing... They can make promises out one side of their mouth and then say "I don't see no written contract" out of the other? And then in your very next breath you say "The US said that they weren't researching bioweapons, so I believe them, but keeping non-military info away from the Russians is somehow critical. Oh no, wait, we need to keep them away from there so that they don't fabricate evidence that the US was uhhhhh, lying. Again." Wrong again. Nuland was caught in a phone call saying that the US didn't want Klitchko to become president. And he didn't run. So, like I said, Ukraine was killing the people of Donbas, using artillery shells. Thanks. BS. I have eyes you f'ing weasel. I know what it means when NATO and its members oust presidents, control elections, fund and organize violent riots, and break their most critical p r o m i s e s. OMG you sound like a leftard cultist now. They called themselves Nazis They put Nazi insignias on their banners and uniforms They put nazi tattoos on their bodies They committed war crimes "But they weren't Nazis because I refuse to believe it!" lol. You guys are a riot. "I think that guy is a Nazi, because he doesn't like violent BLM riots. But the guy who says that he's a Nazi wand walks around with Nazi tattoos and insignias on his body and clothes isn't a Nazi, because I LOVE the war crimes that he is committing." Just for shits and giggs, do you wanna see some real seedy but unsuccessful attempts to gloss over the Azovs' status as Nazis? Check this out: Early Allegations: "The group's early years, particularly during the 2014-2015 conflict in Donbas, were marked by allegations of abuse against civilians and prisoners from organizations like the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights." The Azov Brigade has faced allegations of human rights abuses and links to neo-Nazi ideology since its inception in 2014, with early reports suggesting potential violations. However, since its integration into the Ukrainian National Guard, reports from international bodies like the UN have not substantiated widespread, systemic war crimes by the unit itself. 1. So the UN agreed with Russians and Ukrainian separatists that the Azovs were committing war crimes 2. Lots to unpack in this one... First, when they say "allegedly had links to Nazi ideology", they mean "they wore nazi symbols and called themselves f'ing Nazis". Looks like Google doesn't know what "allegedly means". Second, at the exact time that the Azovs were committing war crimes, 2014-2015, that's when Ukraine said "Hey, let's make these guys into a regular army unit", in 2014. Then they were still committing war crimes in 2015. Third, the Ukrainian regulars were killing POW's, and no one disputes that. So if it wasn't the Azovs, then there are more units in the Ukrainian army committing war crimes than just the Azovs. Oh SNAP! Go F yourself. Zelenski has had several opportunities to end the war, and it's not like his side has momentum. He's just sending kids to the meat grinder you f'ing tool. I don't have all day to debunk your blatant lies, 1diotic propaganda and m0r0nic bullshit, but that was a pretty good skoolin' if I do say so myself. And Russia doesnt have to believe what's blatantly false either. They are responding to what's happening in the real world right under their noses, not your coy whitewashing of it all.

You should be happy to have Trump as president. He clearly puts Americans first. Only Brookfield is doing well in Canada this year.

Says the guy with his hand in Biden's diaper. FYI there are very few people who the Dems would accuse of exhibiting flashes human decency from within their own party, and Joe's not one of them. Fetterman and Manchin are the only names that spring to mind.

You're using the word "propaganda" wrong. That word is only applicable when statements made are either entirely false or they're biased enough to be deceptive. It's 100% true to say that: NATO leaders agreed not to push forward past Germany, but they have done so in a multitude of countries since then the US and Ukraine were jointly conducting work on biological warfare agents in Ukraine, which contravenes international laws regarding biological warfare the US funded and helped organize the Euromaidan protests to oust a president that worked well with Russia the US interfered, even partly controlled, Ukraine's gov't and elections Ukraine was shelling their own people in the Donbas region Russia's red line was "NATO in Ukraine", but Zelenski and the US kept pushing for it, with Biden even openly making statements in favour of that, going all the way back to when Biden was Obama's VP the Azov brigade actually are Nazis, as advertised Those things are all 100% accurate, they're also highly pertinent because they're all central to the issue of war in Ukraine. You want to talk about the start of this war while ignoring all those key aspects regarding its start, and you also feel the need to say things which are false, or don't pass muster, like: the US didn't fund and promote Eurmaidan Ukraine wasn't at war with the people in the Donbas the US didn't run Ukraine's election this isn't just a case of the US using Ukraine for a proxy war "It's no big deal that NATO reneged on their commitment to not move east past Germany, because it wasn't in writing" Russia wasn't really dealing with "their neighbour, Ukraine". Russia was dealing with "a big, nasty bag of American BS": Zelenski is nothing more than a puppet of the US. Sure, you can make the case that "provoked" is subjective, but there's no doubt that the US pushed and pushed and pushed until there was "not one inch past Germany left to push". It's a real a-hole move for Zelenski to let so many of his people die.

FYI I don't support or justify the war. America, Ukraine and Russia all did things that they shouldn't have done, and eventually it all became too much and there was a war. But I'm not some cultist dipshit who thinks that America just wore white hats for the last 50 years while Russia was was busy working with the devil. I'm just more aware of my side's flaws than you are. That's it. So you consider this an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation, and you support the ayatollah in this upcoming war that is about to be inflicted on him by America then...? At least you're consistent, I will give you that. I personally feel like the ayatollah is 100% responsible for this war against his regime. He has supported terrorist attacks all over the world for a really long time now, and I feel like it's normal for his chickens to come home to roost.

That is correct, and America's POLICY for decades has always been to not answer the question of "Will the US use force to defend Taiwan" directly. She was simply supposed to give a non-committal answer, or even say that America's reaction is a state secret or that it's US policy to not answer that question. The fact is, it was an ice-cream-cone question and she somehow managed to fumble the ball 8 times between the 1-yard line and the goal line. Not even. America has a strict policy of not answering that question, and for even Trump or Biden (last year) to answer that question directly would have opened a huge can of worms: a definitive no = "China will invade tomorrow" a definitive yes = "Propaganda for the Chinese and Korean gov'ts to go directly to their people with a factual statement that the Americans see themselves as the boss of East Asia." That will be seen as a huge loss of face for the Chinese, which will not long go unchallenged. The whole point here is that AOC is a huge dummy that can't speak in public. She's arguably worse than Kamala. It's ok to hope to see a woman of colour as POTUS one day, but it shouldn't be your #1 priority. Your top priority should always be to "have the most capable and reliable person in the WH". Sure, you can insert a snotty comment about Trump there, but you can't argue with his track record. He has run circles around every other leader in Canada or the US of the last 40 years, aside from Stephen Harper.