WestCanMan

We have no idea where this is all really going as of right now. I think that Trump would love to see some kind of forward momentum inside of Iran, against the regime, but there doesn't even seem to be a spark of life in any kind of rebellion. Trump can't just use the military to give Iran to the Shah on a silver platter. The guy has to get some kind of momentum going himself to prove that he can hold whatever territory he gets there. You know what people think of American forces killing Middle Easterners. Trump can't add "80,000 more people killed" on a war that accomplishes nothing.

Who is "Iran's Fars news ⁠agency" speaking for? The cardboartollah? 😂 Is he really still alive? CNN: "The carbdoartollah is still hiding in a cave somewhere, sending messages by a collection of secret couriers, while he wins this war!"

Global warming just called. So did global cooling. They just wanted to remind you that "Being late by a couple of weeks is considered 'at least 80 ahead of schedule'."

Canada's energy struggles are no laughing matter. We had our energy needs completely handled until the LPoC and the NDP gov'ts in Alberta and Ont screwed everyone. But, as usual, when you should be hanging your head in shame you're running your Energizer Dummy mouth.

Beave, your new name is The Energizer Dummy, on account of your dogged defence of long-debunked cultist narratives. FYI the pangolin theory is no longer law. You are allowed to talk about the BSL4 lab in Wuhan online now. Awwwwww. And shadow-bans, and bans, etc, etc.... Do you still think that "You can't get covid, and you can't pass it along to granny if you're jabbed" is the truth, Beavey-boy? Where are you at with that? Did you think that the jabs lowered hospitalizations and deaths in 2022, Beavey? Did you have to find out from me that they were both up by a very large margin? Why is that? Why didn't CBC or CNN tell you that? And FYI there were bioweapons still in the Ukrainian labs back when the war started, no one's even denying that. They just tried to say there was "a bit of stuff that they were studying, that they never got rid of". What did Victoria Nuland think the Russians might get there if they seized a lab, if not bioweapons, dummy? There was nothing bad there, right, cultist? The "dumbest" conservative poster still runs circles around you Beave... Compared to you, Biden was still a high-functioning, capable adult with sharp mental focus. That's why it was only conservatives who considered him to be mentally unfit. The fact that you'd even admit to being an Obama/Trudeau/Biden/Clitnon/Kamala cultist after all this time is all that anyone needs to know about you. I never dropped out of school, but I read somewhere that you failed your way of grade 7 because you were still insisting that "3+3 = 6" was Russian disinformation. "If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed by Beave and everyone else with an IQ under 70." Just remember that "There's new bombshell evidence coming out this weekend" was also said many times, Beavey. And you believed it every time, you poor little sap. Just like Charlie Brown trying to kick that football. At the end of the witch hunt, there was how much "evidence of collusion", Beavey? None. Not any. Learn this, stupid: just because CNN and theur cultists said something "many times" doesn't make it any more true. In fact, the more often CNN says something, the less likely it is to be true. Remember the "Gentle Giant", and GG V2.0? If Iran wasn't bombed, people would be dying in nuclear blasts within the decade. Everything that you say is stupid, at a pre-juvenile level. FYI Trump talked about being tough against Iran all the time, but of course he wasn't going to tip off Tlaib, Jeffries, Omar, etc before he executed a surprise attack against the ayatollah. Would you have told those guys? Are you really that stupid? Do you really have no clue what would have happened if those guys had a ten-minute warning? Hell, Schumer and Pelosi would have helped the ayatollah escape if they could have. CNN would have broadcast that plan if they knew about it in time. You're just the dumbest of the dumb, Beave. A class "A" clown that failed out of school in grade 7.

Be real, Beave. At this point we both know that it's absurd for you to be calling me a dummy. If? Beave... Pretend that you were taking a course that you needed to pass in order to graduate, and your final assignment was to do a report about Iran's government. You had to describe every major aspect of their foreign and domestic policy, rate the country's various freedoms, atc... You'd have to admit that they have been plotting, funding, and openly advocating for actual genocide against Israel for almost 50 years now. Their MAIN goal is not the safety or advancement of the people, it's genocide against Jews. In fact, their goal for their own people is the exact opposite of advancement... It's for them to live like bugs, in support of religion. Their only goal for their people is that they're all islamic f-heads. That's it. They don't even care if they live or die, just as long as they spend ever second of their lives as muslims. Those a-holes gave the Houthis, a city-sized group of terrorists, ballistic missiles. What other group of people on this planet, with 200,000 people or less, has ballistic missiles? Does Windsor Ontario have them? Does Djibouti have them? Does Timmins have them? Does Iceland have them? Why the F do the Houthis have ballistis missiles? As a people, the goal of the Houthis is just to kill people. That's their only goal. Iran gives Hamas and Hezbollah hundreds of thousands of missiles, just to shoot at Jewish citizens, in an eventual genocide. They want nukes, so that they can destroy Israel. And they've completely hijacked the tiny minds of Canadians who think that they're humanitarians. Yeah, Gaetan and eyeball think of themselves as humanitarians, and as such, they feel like a genocide against Jews is necessary. Wrap your head around that festering pile of shit if you can... The Iranian gov't employs snipers to use on freedom protesters. Was the Iranian gov't intent on getting nukes, Beave? Were they? Was their wall of ballistic missiles, drones, anti-air defences, attack boats, and all their highly armed proxies in place just to protect their nuclear program? Just remember, a critical component of the JCPOA was 'adhering to the restrictions on their ballistic missile program' and they started violating that like mohammed on an 8-yr-old girl on day 1. They were building and advancing BMs this whole time. And their drones. They were coming to a point where they were unassailable... then what, Beave? If you have to tell the truth about all of those things above, or at least admit it all to yourself, what conclusion do you come to Beave? Maybe Obama did his level best when he got the JCPOA signed, Beave. Maybe the US didn't have sufficient reason to attack Iran back then, maybe it would have backfired. But the fact of the matter is that, after all these years and all these different presidencies, Iran got to the point where they were on the verge of having nuclear weapons. Think of that as an event horizon for the planet earth. We were coming to a precipice where the next inevitable step was cities full of humans once again being subjected to nuclear blasts. Whole neighbourhoods and cultures being wiped out under mushroom clouds. And you're whining about paying a few extra bucks for a tank of gas to prevent that from happening? Buddy, we've been paying and extra $20-40 a tank for 11 years under the LPoC, and what's the trade-off? What did we get in return? NOTHING. The extra money that we're paying because of Trump was to save the planet from - not another BS climate scam, like shaman pulled on our ancestors for 20,000 years, but an actual apocalypse. Don't compare that to "Trudeau and Carney have some cronies with startup companies and they wanna funnel hundreds of billions worth of taxpayer dollars to them." Dude: fossil fuel consumption across the planet has gone up every year since 2005, and yet global warming catastrophe deadlines have come and gone without a single gloomy prediction coming true for several decades now. Even the UN is dialling back all their doomsday claims again this year. It's the climate alarmism version of the fking covid jab efficacy backpeddling. 1) BS. 2) Trudeau and Carney do that while accomplishing NOTHING for Canadians. That's not what he said. He made a long, complex statement and you have reduced it something that it simply does not mean. Why do I care what Carney says? It all lies, dipshit. Carney never tells the truth about anything important. Did he really have his elbows up? Did he negotiate a trade deal with the US? Did he really "play no role" in moving Brookfield's HQ? Remember the transparency promised by Trudeau and the LPoC this whole time? What do they plot there, with no cameras? What secret deal did they make with the Chinese police? The Carney you voted for is not the Carney you got. He lied about everything. Our country gets further behind every day and there's no end in sight... just more and more secrecy, and more control over our speech. 2026 onwards...: Censorship in Canada is rising, media corporations not controlled by the LPoC are increasingly under attack, so no one can talk about what the gov't is doing, but that last part is kinda ok, because we really don't know what the gov't is doing anyways... they do everything in total secrecy now. The state of Canada's democracy under the LPoC summed up in one sentence: "Every day is a little better than the next."

😂

Beave, you lying m0r0n... That comment was quite clearly over your head. Trump was saying that "he's not concerned about how much the Iran war is costing Americans - when the other alternative is a nuclear-armed Iran". Get it? FYI by removing the question, and then omitting half the answer, you completely changed the meaning of his comment, you worthless POS. This is an adult topic, Beave. It's nuanced. It's complicated. It's based on a whole range of issues which are all over your head. You should just go back to talking about collusion, doofus. At least you were just belching Demi propaganda back then, not the more sinister IRGC/LPoC stuff.

FIFY

Wrong. Not that you care though. The truth has never mattered to you. After you drink a shot-glass of orange juice, your blood alcohol level tops your IQ.

Why do we have to go through airport security, stupid? Is it because of all our Hindus? Buddhists? Christians? Atheists? FYI "Hamas, Hamas, Hamas" is the side that's dedicated to killing, killing, killing. They kill and r4pe and murder in every country they go to... Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon... kill, kill, kill. They aren't victims, eyeball. They're a-holes. That's why you like them so much. Stick your platitude where the sun doesn't shine, m0r0n.

Just to end up with more braindead pieces of shit like you?

What's with the LPoC and all their top-secret BS now? Now that they have a majority they just run everything in our country in full secrecy... It's like the Libs just finally stopped pretending that this is "some kind of a democracy where one party controls the media", at the same time as they signed a secret policing deal with Beijing. Are we gonna get China's citizen surveillance technology, for help implementing our social credit system? Is that what this was about? Is Beijing gonna provide the security at protests here now? Couldn't the Libs get the IRGC's snipers for that? At what point will our God-damned left4rds finally look around and say "Wait a sec, what's the difference between our democracy and NoKo's democracy?"

That's a new low for anyone here not named eyeball or Gaetan.

"...the areas that he has failed to exceed expectations in...." 😂 ...tell me you're in a cult without actually saying that you're in a cult... If the Maple Leafs are looking for a new PR director to pay tribute to the Leafs' dynasty from 1970-2025, they'll be calling you.

There's a very good reason why the US has backed out of the joint defence board with us, and we will probably be out of the 5 eyes soon too.

Robo will never miss an opportunity to be a loser, or to slander a conservative politician. Out of 47 people that worked for Kamala Harris, 43 of them quit, and robo had nothing at all to say about that. And it obviously wasn't because they were overworked... Kamala didn't do enough for one person, let alone a person with a staff of 47 people. But when T Gabbard quits to take care of her husband, while he's fighting cancer, it's somehow Trump's fault 😂

Palestinians have been killing Jews and Christians for 100 years now. Of course we've heard of them. Palestinians r4pe and murder women. Palestinians torture and murder children. Palestinians hold "spit on naked corpses" celebrations. Palestinians fire tens of thousands of bombs at civilian targets and then cry, and call it a war crime, when they get bombed themselves. Palestinians started a civil war in Jordan, got kicked out, and then started another civil war in Lebanon, where they also slaughtered Christians. More Christians were killed by Palestinians, in Lebanon alone, than the number of Palestinians killed in the so-called "nabka".

Full marks. I knew about them on the day that they started saying that chiefs would have all this power. We are talking about hundreds of billions of dollars worth of dollars worth of oil either staying in the ground or competing with foreign markets. Our PMs would take the fishing boat, they do that kind of thing all the time. Of course at least 1 in 40 chiefs would do it. There's about a 1/100,000 chance that zero out of any group of 40 would take a bribe.

Stupid fking propagandist.

If Al Jazeera funds a show, do you think it's gonna make Hindus look good? Is it gonna make Jews look good? Of course not. The answer is "nard no" to both. AJ will only fund people who have a shitty agenda, and a plan to make someone look bad. If BLM funds a show, do you think it's gonna make police look good? Is it gonna make any white people in the community look decent? Of course not. The answer is "hard no" to both. BLM will only fund people who have a shitty agenda, and a plan to make someone look bad. If the SPLC funds a show, do you think it's gonna make Republicans look good? Is it gonna portray a community with a white mayor as racially harmonious? Of course not. The answer is "hard no" to both. The SPLC will only fund people who have a shitty agenda, and a plan to make Republicans and white communities look bad. CBC's blatant bias and lies were reflected by the people who they gave funding to. If anyone has an idea for a fair and balanced show with political undertones, there might as well be a sign on the door at CBC that says "Decent people need not apply". But it's not there, people just have to apply and get rejected. Think of these types of productions as the minor leagues of the CBC... They fund shitty people to do disreputable projects, and if the propaganda they produce is slick enough then some of those shitty people will be offered jobs at CBC. Did you think that CBC was gonna be looking to hire intelligent, promising young journalists who are dedicated to fairness? 😂 Of course not. CBC will never hire anyone like that. That person is guaranteed to become a whistleblower. CBC is actively looking for the kinds of people that worked on that show. So, no, CBC didn't need to do the editing themselves. They might have had people check in and see how the show was going, and make some technical/content "suggestions", but they're not gonna advertise that, and now that the show has been exposed, you're never gonna find out. Just remember that CBC is one of the main orgs that helped cover up Trudeau's scandals. Do you think they can't hide their own? Do you think the Libs won't protect them? The last 20 years of CBC's lies and deception is evidence. They're vile, so they fund vile people. That's how that works. I'm not retracting the only intelligent statements that you looked at today. 😂 CBC: "Sorry for the last 20 years, suckers." 😉

It's weird to assume that I wouldn't practice what I preach after all this time. The CBC are a bunch of liars and propagandists, 24/7/365. Come on, Michael... ffs. Would CNN fund a series on the Iran war and have it hosted by a neutral or conservative-leaning production company? Would Fox fund a series on the Iran war and have it hosted by a neutral or left-leaning production company? CBC funded the program specifically because it is being run by a bunch of blue-hairs and anti-Christian propagandists. Bottom line: People came to CBC with an idea to belch out vile left4rd propaganda, and that's the only reason why the funding got approved. Oh, man. FYI the "other side" isn't allowed to speak on this issue, Michael. Not at all. Have you not been paying attention to what happens to people who bring unwanted facts to this debate? Dude... When the story about the 215 tree roots initially came out, did anyone - ANYONE AT ALL - ever go on CBC and say something like: "If there even are bones there, the most likely culprit isn't "a murder cult"; it's Spanish flu, TB, smallpox, or the cumulative effect of all those diseases. There's actually no good reason at all to assume that even 1 child was murdered and buried there." What's your honest opinion, Mike? I'll just play devils advocate for a second and say: If there actually are bones from 215 children there, what is the most likely cause of death? diseases like Spanish flu, TB, smallpox, etc that ran rampant in the school a child-murdering cult that somehow went unnoticed? CBC only allowed people to talk about #2. And I truly mean "ONLY ALLOWED...." No one ever said "Spanish flu" on the CBC in conjunction with that story. No one was allowed to challenge that narrative anywhere in this country or they were accused of hate speech. CBC also went all-in on the "The one and only reason for the Res Schools was to destroy native culture" narrative. They tell Canadians that there was never any good reason for trying to give those kids a 20th-century education. It was only important to racists who wanted those kids put into schools." That's fkin stupid, MH. Racists would have said "Don't spend good money trying to educate those brain-dead savages! *puuuh-tingggg*" The majority of people who wanted to educate those children in Northern Canada would be the exact same type of people who truly want to see black children in the US get access to a good education today. There was a realistic attempt made to CRIMINALIZE the truth about the res schools: NDP Member of Parliament Leah Gazan introduced a private member's bill (Bill C-413) to amend the Criminal Code. It proposes making it an offense to "willfully promote hatred against" Indigenous peoples by condoning, denying, downplaying, or justifying the Indian residential school system in public. Look at the thoroughly evil wording of that. C-word Gazan tried to equate "sharing facts about the res schools" with "willfully promoting hatred". That's literally what's at stake there. If you downplay, by saying something like "The schools weren't created just so that priests could r4pe and abuse children", even that's hate speech to a lot of people. That's how fking stupid Canadians are in the 21st century. You can't say "Some people thought that they should have a chance to come into the 20th century, as a people" because that challenges the new narrative, and is therefor hate speech. Etc, etc. So you're not gonna hear "another side", Michael. Not in this fkin communist shithole. You're gonna hear 1) ayatollah Trudeau's version and 2) you're gonna nod your head like a good little cultist, or 3) MH is gonna get fking cancelled, bigtime by the left4rds here. MH, I can promise you that there are fully 10M people in Canada who feel like they thoroughly understand the res school topic, who actually have no knowledge and understanding of that issue whatsoever. None. They have been fed nothing but lies for their entire lives, and they lack the common sense to think for themselves. There's not a single person talking about this issue on CBC that I wouldn't spit on if they came at me with their stream of lies and BS. "Liars only need apply here at the CBC."

Wow. You're going to quite great lengths to pretend that my commentary on the CBC scam show is the main problem. FYI I never claimed that "CBC themselves would be editing the footage", but this is a CBC-funded program, so they're responsible for the final product, which would absolutely be edited to the point of being unrecognizable. That's how the CBC works. It's still CBC-funded. Our gov't is paying for that disgusting garbage, as usual.

Carney has a plan to buy some Toyota Priuses that identify as tanks. For a couple billion dollars, there's a company called Brookfield that can outfit them with fake guns to make them faux battle-ready. Enemies that don't play dead are considered racist, and asked to turn themselves in for DEI training, where they're given citizenship and free medical & dental.

You have no room to laugh, cultist. Remember when Rittenhouse was taking out the garbage in Waukesha? 100% of the losers that Rittenhouse shot were convicted of pedophilia and/or beating up women. Did 100% of the partygoers from the J6 Almost Entirely Peaceful and Joyous Celebration of Democracy have rap sheets like that?