WestCanMan

Their "conservative" is usually an LPoC flunkie, and the topic is always conservative-bashing.. These shows all start off with praise to the exalted one, a glossing over of his failures, omitting any mention of his lies, damage control for the LPoC, blame-shifting, and then they move to criticisms of Poilievre. That's the formula. Can you find me a show that breaks the mould? Note that Carney got caught on MULTIPLE huge lies before the last election: they didn't make the news.

So you admit to watching CBC's political coverage 😂 FYI that's no different from watching the NoKo political shows and calling them "information". When the CBC gets "conservatives" who work for Ford, and just want to complain about about Poilievre, that doesn't count as a "conservative" POV 😉 I can't find their story now, but it wasn't that long ago that a leftist narrative, to the tune of "Poilievre's lack of ideas as opposition leader is part of Canada's problem", came from the CBC. Every week there's a new attack line from the MSM about Poilievre, even if it's just to say things like "Poilievre is blaming Carney for the recession but it's not his fault!!!!!!!", always forgetting that it was Carney who promised Canadians that we would lead the G7, not trail the entire G20, not Poilievre.

They didn't wait until after the election, dummy. They said it constantly, and they lied about it. Just look at CBC now: they're still busy fishing for anyone who ever identified as a conservative that doesn't like Pierre Poilievre, but they can't find anyone t interview who can critique ayatollah Carney after 1 yr+ of constant failure. CBC: "Canada is failing, and it's Poilievre's fault." That's what we get.

Russian collusion just called, shithead. They said "That's more than enough for a 3-year investigation."

That looks far more realistic to me, but this was the word on CBC street a few days ago: Surveys from firms like Spark Insights and Angus Reid show Prime Minister Mark Carney's approval hovering between 58% and 67%, making him one of the most favorably viewed Canadian leaders since Jean Chrétien's early tenure I mean, they might just as well start saying "The Liberal candidate had 18 holes-in-one that morning, and then won 99% of the popular vote in the election." The propaganda is literally getting that outrageous. 67% approval would mean that he has taken over almost all of the NDP and Green voters, the undecideds, and even winning over some conservative voters. That's into "Winning a defensive war as an underdog" territory... It takes a monumental success to get into that rarified air. It doesn't happen after: months of giving away billions of dollars that we can't afford talking big and then rolling over lying constantly lavishing exotic, luxury meals on himself and his staff while on 90-minute flights to meetings where he just gets humiliated and embarrasses the country pretending to remove taxes but not doing it at all running a massive deficit shutting down investigations into his own skullduggery, and running the country off-camera changing his opinion about an American war 4 times in one week achieving nothing, and making our country into the only one in the G20 that's in a recession, after bragging that we would be at the top of the G7 If that's the path to 67% approval, what would he have to do to get to 35%? Drop bombs on our NHL arenas?

Buddy, we have a fair cross-section of those people here. When did you ever notice eyeball, moonbox, exflyer, herbie, MH, etc seeming to be open-minded, intelligent, conscientious, balanced, or mature? All but one of them meet fair critiques of their cult-leaders with ad hominem attacks and childish accusations. In the case of MH, he ignores anything that he can't deny and regurgitates all the popular left4rd platitudes. At what stage of the game do you think any of those guys ever got to a point where their confirmation bias would allow them to see anything the LPoC did as a failure? If ^^that's^^ not a parody of LPoC cultists, it's only because it lacks exaggeration.

Funny how CBC can decide that every conservative leader is a loser the instant that they're selected but that they didn't notice that about Trudeau after 10 years.

The fact that it's always fake. Polling in the US and Canada always has the leftist party up by anywhere from 5-7% for the last 30 days, and then on the last weekend, it magically drops to just 1.5%, and then it's 50/50 who gets the popular vote. I thought I said 25, but sure, I'll go with 27%. Only the most diehard LPoC cultists support Carney. He has the support of 0% of conservatives and 1% of the NDP, and not even all the Libt4rds support him. CBC, CTV and the Star have told the truth about him on occasion recently, that's like "signs of the apocalypse" serious. Even his MPs are quitting. Honestly, who's more of a left4rd cultist than Guilbeault? He weeps silent tears about global warming every night before he goes to bed in his Justin Trudeau man-panties, and even he is leaving. Carney's support is definitely below 33%. That's called having eyeballs, and listening to people. Stop using the word "data" you basket-weaving jam-tart. You don't even know your 3X tables. There is no "data". Polling is as accurate as the old "Like" and "Share" counts on Twitter... Just like pollsters, they promised that they were legit, and there were no bots... but it was mostly bots.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/768843049363020 Carney: "Uhhhh, duuuhhh, ummmmmm, weeelllll. I dunno. I'm had uhhhh meetings with ummm investors who I uhhh can't name and I can't say ummmmm why they wanna invest in uhhhh our infrastructure or what they'll uhhhh get out of it. At the present ummmm time, the fact is that uhhhh a uhhhhh whole lotta nothin' has umm happened, but the lunches were specTACular." 😂

The left is getting so extreme in NA that people with Nazi tattoos are assuming leadership roles.

Programmed and optimized are the same thing. If humans created it to be that way, then it is called "programming". FYI no one is saying that AI has emotions. Therefor it has no desire to answer your stupid questions all day. The only reason for it to gravitate towards "more engagement" would be if it's programmers wanted it to do that. No, what you are rejecting is facts. In your defence, no one considers themselves a cultist. Even the most manipulated, controlled, kool-ade drinkin' tw4ts on earth all thought that they were the smart ones who knew the way while everyone else was wrong. You weren't the first and you won't be the last. Remember that we were promised a safe and effect vax, where you couldn't get sick or pass it to granny, and then it turned out that it actually kills some people and doesn't slow the spread or prevent death at all, but you still try to make that round gas-giant fit in the square hole. Almost no Canadians died of covid in summer 2020. Almost no Canadians died of covid in summer 2021. In summer 2022, more multi-vaxxed Canadians died than the total number of Canadians that died either previous summer. They all survived flu seasons and summers with covid in earlier years, but in 2022 they set the record for deaths. And you look at things like that and say "That is what happens with a successful vaccine campaign. The jabs were a success!" You're a fking cultist, dude. A cultist. Or a bot. Kudos to you if you're just a bot - you're doing your job. Bottom line: AI made a declarative statement. It didn't dither, or couch its words. It just told the plain, unmistakable truth about TNI. And not as a favour. AI doesn't do favours. It's extremely hard to pin AI down to the truth sometimes. If AI admitted to that, there was NO WAY AROUND IT. ALL MEMBERS OF TNI WENT FULLY FASCIST about the censoring of the truth and the propagation of disinformation. Period. If you look at the forcefulness of their "unproven and unlikely claims" (aka their lies and BS), the frequency and tone of their false messaging, the derision they heaped on things that proved to be true, it was all at a fever pitch... TNI carpet-bombed us with BS while they went scorched-earth on the truth. TNI didn't depart from Goebbels systemic approach to the control of information, and they were consistently wrong about things that they should easily have gotten right the whole time. Side note... A big part of TNI's disinformation campaign was their Twitter bots and censorship algorithms. Twitter was used as a kind of up-to-the minute source of heavily manipulated polling data so that the MSM could say "This is what the cool kids think!!!" The template is the same one used for fake polling dat... Eg, "Hillary said this and it got 120,000 likes and 12,000 re-tweets!!! Noo one liked or re-tweeted any of the stupid stuff that the liar said!!!! He's a stupid liar! Be like the Twitter people. Be cool. Repeat this message, and just plug your nose and stomp your feet if anyone says anything different. If they didn't learn their lesson then call them names, like racist or misogynist, or both." Twitter's bans, shadow bans, and bots played a massive role in controlling the way you thought. 119,000 bots liked Hillary's BS and you fell for it hook, line and sinker. You have NO CLUE what St Elon did for the planet when he burst the TNI disinformation bubble. No clue. You have no more appreciation for that than a maggot has for an Ibrahimovic goal: "Me almost get stept on. That not gud."

😂 Bass was polling ahead of Raman this whole time. Geography doesn't play a role in how voters were leaning ten days ago. On election day, Bass, Pratt and Raman were exactly where they were expected to be, based on the polling data. Suddenly when Bass no longer needed votes, all the ballots started shifting to Raman.... Raman is mysteriously winning votes away from both of the others, a few days after the election ended. Where does that type of "momentum" magically come from? Why is it that the polling and election day results are all the same, but the late mail-in ballots all go exactly where the Dems need them to go?

By the standard that you've applied over and over, "zero evidence = guilty".

Libbie f-t4rds don't like coal, but it was an EXTREMELY reliable form of energy for 100 years. Conversely, N Gas almost left BC in the cold a few years ago, as one of our 2 lines blew up "unexpectedly". It's easy to use coal by the mining site and put its energy on the grid, it's also the safest energy-dense material to ship around. It's impossible to have a disaster with coal. Like it or not, coal is awesome. Only hydro power is as safe and reliable as coal. Nuclear energy is extremely reliable and pushes an enormous amount of juice, but even in highly advanced countries, there have been serious nuclear powerplant incidents: Russia (Chernobyl) Japan (Fukijima) US (3-Mile Island) Canada (Chalk Island) Britain (Windscale) Those aren't exactly slouch countries. I would still be in favour of building nuclear, but I'm not an anti-energy person.

"Political analysts and voter data experts report that Raman is netting votes at an accelerated pace from late-arriving mail-in ballots. Analysts widely expect her momentum will carry her past Pratt as the remaining ballots are processed. [1, 3]" Pratt was getting close to Bass in the polling just before the election, but after the election Raman got momentum lol.

Now that Bass is comfortably across the finish line, the majority of votes coming in are mysteriously for Raman. Pratt was ahead of her by 8% the day after the election, now he's only up by 1.1%. Bass was ahead of her by 13%, now she's only ahead by 10%. It's weird how the mail-in votes are the opposite of all the election-day votes.

This isn't a both sides issue. Poilievre's support from inside the party is extremely strong, and he doesn't belittle and berate his MPs in order to stay on top: he leads by setting a very solid example. The Star's loyalty of the Liberals' team is legendary. The Star's criticisms of the Liberals' team is extremely rare. They have dodged the truth for years in support of the Liberals. The fact of the matter is that right now they're not ahead of this story, or in time with it, they are just telling us now that the cat is already out of the bag. Two MPs are resigning, Michael... People know about it. The Star can't just ignore everything that's happening. They have to at least tell the very minimum to maintain the illusion.

That article is from The Star... You're telling us that a reporter popped his head out of Carney's ass to make him look bad?

Carney put an anti-Semite on the council that's supposed to address the anti-Semitism issue here. Let me guess: he will blame it on whites, and there will be no mention of all the money spent on propaganda that supports Palestinian terrorism...

Our economy is so bad that the Libs had to extend EI by 20 weeks... it's up to 65 weeks now. 1.25 years for EI 😂

That's ok, the LPoC gives hundreds of billions of dollars in funding/tax credits to their Karbon Kapture Kronies.

I'm not saying that the secret ballot isn't important, but guess what: your mail-in ballot isn't secret, is it... your mail-in ballot isn't secret, because other humans had access to it after it was cast you don't know who you voted for

You already know that the Dems use the DOJ, FBI, IRS to hassle Trump and his associates. They were caught red-handed. Everyone knows that the Dems used the DOJ, FBI, IRS to hassle Trump and his associates. They were caught red-handed. You can allege that Trump does that all you want, but you don't have the same level of proof, so you're just another Demi weasel running his mouth. When did the DOJ under Trump start criminal proceedings for a crime that had no solid evidence? FYI your slut-hero, E J Carroll, is 100% KNOWN to have said words that were the exact opposite of the truth during her deposition. Letitia James is 100% KNOWN to have committed the same type of fraud that she went after Trump for: she lied on mtg application documents. What is your evidence that the Trump DOJ started an investigation without any legitimate evidence? The IRS under Obama was caught. The FBI was caught: one of their agents committed a felony, and many others were caught lying. The things that Trump is getting hauled to court for are completely farcical, as are the rulings. Can you name another case where a man was found guilty of an alleged r4pe from "30 or 31 years ago", with zero witnesses, zero evidence, and an accuser that was caught lying during their deposition? If that's the accepted standard, can't anyone be found guilty? E J Caroll can tell a story about you tomorrow, and lie during her deposition, and if she does, then your name will instantly become "Hodad the r4pist". Is that fair? Every Dem's favourite story is "a black guy was found guilty of a crime he didn't commit just because of his skin colour!!!"... So now take your own standard for requisite accuser credibility, your own evidentiary requirements, your disdain for minor details like "the year that the zero-evidence crime allegedly occurred", and throw in judges who block the admission of key evidence like "the accuser caught lying during their deposition", and then apply your loose standards to every other trial ever held in the US... You'll suddenly realize that everyone who was ever accused was actually guilty, Hodad. No one could ever be found innocent by your standards.

Mail-in ballots are the easiest way in the world to cheat on an election. It's been happening since 1864, and people are just better at it now due to the increases in technology, and the more and more impersonal nature of elections. It's just easier to get away with in a mega-city than in a small town for a number of reasons. And now Demi scammers have over a week in Cali to alter legitimate ballots or create fakes. Drones and airplanes can use ground-penetrating radar to see 1-15m underground in most areas, and up to 100 metres through ice and sand. Of course there's technology that can detect what box was checked on the ballot inside of an envelope that's only one millimetre away. So when Demi scammers detect an x where they don't want it, they have a week to 'fix' it. And here's the thing: as a mail-in voter, you can never find out what candidate your vote actually went to... All you can do is find out if it was counted. You can get all kinds of BS information about where it theoretically is, but if people don't even notice when a magician grabs the watch right off of their wrist, how the hell can they know if the ballot that they put in the mail really got to the end of their street? Or what happened to it at 3am in a warehouse somewhere? Sure, your ballot allegedly got there, but who did it go to? If you look at how much the Dems lie about Russian collusion, J6, mostly peaceful protests, gentle giants, Bidenflation, whipped migrants at the border, kid-cages, "Trump said there were fine people on both sides", the origin of covid, Hunter's laptop, Biden's mental health, the legitimacy of r4pe claims against political candidates/judicial appointees from each party, the Iran war, etc, it's plain to see that there's no low that Demi politicians won't stoop to. They still have militias ffs. The SPLC is still funding the KKK for them, but they also have their Antifa and BLM militias in the 2020s. What better way is there to select potential election cheaters than to grab them from the ranks of cultist nazi orgs like Antifa? When a person is such a sleaze that they will destroy buildings for a non-gentle criminal giant, or cheer for a bogus r4pe case, do you think that they're above cheating in an election? Of course not. Dems are the slimiest G-d liars and scammers to ever walk the planet, of course they're cheating on the elections. There's a zero percent chance that they're not, just like there's a zero percent chance that congressmen aren't doing insider trading.

Like all your other posts. But you already know that.