WestCanMan

The leftard credo I'm not going to bother trying to explain the geopolitics of that region to you again. 2 things: Just try to remember that Biden has been trying to shove NATO up Russia's ass ever since he was VP. The US would never stand for Russia meddling like that in NA (they didn't: remember Cuba 1972, dummy?) Just know that as long as it's just people dying, but nothing happens to drive up the price of gas, Biden's really happy. Only if it was actually the presuhhdolt's fault.

Probably awww-ree lol. Too funny. Makes sense though.

Wrong. By July 2021 most of the Israelis testing positive for covid were multi-jabbed. Do you think they weren't infectious? Do you have any data that shows that young healthy people needed to be jabbed, eyeball? No, you don't. You have none, because there is none. Forcing young Canadians to take the jab or face economic ruin was an abomination. In 2020, when only 15,000 Canadians died of covid, about 90% of every news broadcast was about covid. In 2021, when only 14,000 Canadians died of covid, about 90% of every news broadcast was about covid. In 2022, when 16,000 multi-jabbed Canadians died of covid, and 19,000 Canadians total, about 10% of every news broadcast was about covid. Sometimes they didn't talk about covid at all. 30% more deaths, 80% less news coverage...

That sounds like it's from a Southpark episode lol.

Wrong. You're a religious bigot and a hypocrite. You're livid about what's happening in Israel, and quite calm and collected when you talk about Pakistan. No emotion at all. When the people were walking away from Pakistan, trying to stay ahead of the killers, and find a place to go to in India, the soldiers watching it said that women were unable to carry their babies any longer, so there were little babies crawling around abandoned everywhere, dying. People had to make a choice between moving fast enough to survive with some of their kids, or carrying their babies and probably getting slaughtered. Everyone in Gaza could have walked out by Oct 10th, no problem. Even the really old ones, and the ones with little kids. I 100% understand that there's a problem, but it's absolutely not "The jews have a ton of options, and they're just choosing the worst one because they're a-holes." Do you know that when islamic state was committing genocide in Iraq and Syria, AJ+ (Al Jazeera's FB page) wasn't even talking about it? And I don't mean like, they were barely talking about it, I mean like, you wouldn't even know that it was happening from looking at their page. Go to AJ+ now and see if they're mentioning this thing that's going on in Gaza. See if they're talking about the Israeli hostages.

What judges? What court? When the British wanted to end their 'empire thing', and get out of India, the muslims there didn't want to live under Hindu-majority rule, so they asked for a new state to be partitioned to form a new muslim-majority country. The British granted them that, but the muslims weren't happy with a simple majority, they wanted all the Sikhs and Hindus out, so they just started massacring them as soon as they got independence. They killed at least 800,000 people. Men women and children. They didn't even give them the option to run, they wanted them all dead. The murders in Pakistan are completely off the charts compared to what's happening in Israel right now. it's like comparing a day that you stubbed your toe to covid.

@Gaétan Is it really a genocide now if everyone who's there had enough time to walk out of Gaza on the first day? Why haven't the hostages been returned yet? You said: That kind of thing happened to Jews all over the ME for 1,000 years. They were legally identified as 3rd-class citizens in the ottoman empire, and they were massacred and kicked out of countries and attacked in riots and jailed, etc, all the time. Why was all of that ok up until 1947, but it's bad now, when it's happening in such a small area?

Pakistan just called. They wanna know if burning/slashing/stabbing 1 million civilians in order to ethnically cleanse a region along religious lines constitutes a genocide. Do the muslims there have to leave Pakistan now? Oh wait, there'd be no one there anymore if they left. They killed everyone else. Pakistan just called again. They wanna know if burning/slashing/stabbing 3 million civilians in a second round of burning/slashing stabbing plus sending out militias to rape 300,000 women constitutes a genocide. Should the muslims leave Pakistan, stupid? Are you angry about all those murders?

EUREKA! I FOUND A GRAIN OF TRUTH IN A MOONBOX POST!

Is the mass-mailing of unsolicited ballots not a thing anymore? It seems like something that they'd need, at least in the battleground states 😉

Of course leftists are gonna lie, at the very least they'll lie by exaggeration, and in this case Vanity Fair is saying "legal to kill migrants suspected of trespassing" lol. Farmer: "Well sonofagun. I thought that he was on my land! Turns out he was just in the ditch, taking a leak. Oh well, I did "suspect" that he was on my land, and that's close enough according to Vanity Fair's legal experts. I shot him 50 times."

To keep this in perspective, the proposed law doesn't say that you can indiscriminately kill anyone who sets foot on your property, it says "A person may use deadly physical force if they believe it immediately necessary to stop people from trespassing...". I'm not familiar with Arizona law, but it's not uncommon for words used in legalese to have a far more powerful effect than appears to be the case, and immediately necessary might be such a term. It doesn't sound like layman's English to me. When I googled it, this came up: Immediately necessary treatment is that which a patient needs promptly: to save their life; or to prevent a condition from becoming immediately life-threatening; or to prevent permanent serious damage from occurring either to themselves or, in the BMA’s view, to the wider community. In this context, immediately necessary is used to define the highest level of urgency. In the context of "immediately necessary to stop people from trespassing" that might specifically mean, in Az state legalese, that there's serious imminent danger perceived by the homeowner. For people who live in the city, where there are always lots of witnesses around, and where the cops are just a few blocks away most of the time, this might not make sense, but for anyone who's ever stayed on a farm, it's not unusual for the police to be more than half an hour away. If it's 1:00 am and there is a large group of people walking towards your house, and the nearest home is a mile away, surely there will be people who feel threatened by that. And why should that be a common occurrence? I don't think that'd good enough reason to open fire, but what if the homeowner just tells the tresspassers to steer well clear of the home but their warning goes unheeded? What if the trespassers threaten them? That kind of thing can escalate pretty quickly. It seems pretty normal by American standards to pull out a gun at that point. We've all seen the movies where the farmer grabs the double-barrel to chase people off, and I'd never f-around and find out if it happens in real life by trespassing on some Yank's farm. I don't think that the bill will survive with it's current wording, but if the wording is tightened up to describe a situation where a home was being approached, or people who are out on their property are approached, I think it will get through.

I think that smarmy loser from California, White Obama, could be enough of a media darling to allow the Dems to make the case that he'd beat Trump, then their midnight truck ballots could do the rest. I really don't think Trump has much of a chance tbh. The Dems already know that they can get away with cheating again if they have to, but they can probably find an activist judge to derail him before it even comes to that.

None of those fools was ever able to give a good reason why children and young adults were forced to vax, some of them even tried to pretend that no one was forced to vax (E-F for sure and probably eyeball as well), and none of them can say why the MSM stopped talking about covid in 2022 when we had the most covid deaths ever, by far. Its 100% obvious to everyone that vax-fascism went too far, but they're the ones who were goose-stepping, so they wanna gloss over that part. All of the leftards on this site who consider themselves SJW's, and who think that they woulda been smart enough and had enough character to stand against fascism in 1935 Germany, ran out and bought hobnailed jackboots the day that they got their own chance to be fascists.

If he was gonna be able to make it across the finish line and get elected they'd never ring him up, they'd let him run just to get their own VP into the WH, but he's running out of gas. The Dems saw Al Franken's boob shadowing pic as an opportunity to sacrifice a minor politician for the appearance of respectability of the whole party, so they ran him outta town. When the Dems saw that Gov Cuomo's covid skeletons were coming out of the closet they pretended that they had to get rid of him because he touched a couple of girls' butts: "Oh look, we're too good for that kind of nonsense." I just think that if Biden's not going to be able to run in November anyways on account of his diminishing mental faculties, they will have the opportunity to pretend to turf him for his mishandling of confidential information, thus making their own case against Trump stronger. They can say: "We got rid of our own guy because what he did was unacceptable, and we think that what Trump did was also inexcusable." The Dems will throw anyone under the bus to get what they want. If they have something to gain from doing Biden dirty, he'll get the shiv.

1) It's all on video, little boy, so just understand it and move on 2) Google search it yourself and see what the top hit is, little boy.

Trump can answer softball questions like Joe gets all day long without notes from his aides, and Trump's answers will make sense, regardless of whether the listener likes them or not. Reporter: "Joe, w h a t ' s t w o o p l u s t w o o?" Joe: " Fro-yo. Too plus to plus two is fro-yo."

OMG, you just used a 10-letter adjective incorrectly to try to describe a compound word, formed of a nine-letter word and a 10-letter word, which you also used incorrectly. That was 29 letters of pure stupidity crammed into just 3 words, back-to-back. I think you're ready for the leftard Olympics. Just dye your hair pink and wear a man-skirt or you can't get on the podium.

In the Cyrillic alphabet that's spelled ЭЛЛ. In fairness to Russians, they think it's all BS.

Best-case scenario for the Dems: They suddenly decide that Joe's classified info sharing was a crime, and advocate for impeaching/indicting him, because he's not gonna run in 2024 anyways. In so doing, the Dems can suddenly pretend to have some moral authority regarding Trump's far less serious offences.

I think this is an important topic. I feel like most of the people in the world were greatly affected by it. We both know that Fauci lied to the world dozens of times, and that his lies hurt a lot of people. Thousands. Maybe tens of thousands. No one even knows because the number of vax-injured remains a mystery that's shrouded in lies and secrecy. But you don't care. I forgot.

So why do you post here then? There's a whole world out there for you to explore. So many topics that you should actually care about. Maybe some work that you should be doing. Cut yoru toenails or trim your nosehair. Use the thighmaster. Get some lint outta your navel. Why come to this thread, that you don't care about, just to say that you don't care about it? We won't miss you here io, you have nothing of value to add here. Never have.

You're the one whose posts are mostly just name-calling io. Look back through this thread for some facts or stats that you posted, or some on-point rebuttals... There's nothing. You just say "I don't wanna talk about this no more" and make some baseless insults. Try to find something that you said at any point in time that would convince someone that you understand this topic and that you have something intelligent to say about it. In which of the posts in this thread did you hit your peak, io? What do you have here to hang your hat on?

@impartialobserver Where are all the baseless insults in my post io? Why couldn't you respond to this one: Tell me how you feel about Fauci, io... Is he a criminal? He knew that he funded GoF research on the coronavirus to make it transmissible among humans, long before he told us that the bat coronavirus became transmissible among humans from a random bat-pangolin-human transfer. He absolutely knew that his own virus was the likeliest candidate for the origin of covid and he completely sent the world off in the wrong direction. Then big tech went scorched-earth on his behalf for some strange reason: "Say BSL4 and you're toast". Then Fauci pimped the vax like a $10 crakho for years: he pimped it as a bringer of herd immunity before it came out, he lied about its safety and efficacy after it came out - even going so far as to compare it to make direct comparisons to actual vaccines like the polio vax, he pretended that kids somehow needed a vax when that wasn't the case at all, he even advocated for forcing children to take the jab if they wanted to attend public school. That vax hurt kids. That vax killed kids. How many kids did it kill, io? Why don't you care? Why can't you take that post seriously? Was something that I said about Fauci even a little bit incorrect?

Respond to a post like a man for once. Just address some facts. You've been called out son, don't just focus on the fact that I correctly identified you as a gutless sellout. You make snotty claims about people's worth as poster ALL THE TIME. It's literally your only reply to any question. I don't just call you a gutless sellout, io. I explain what it is about you that makes you a gutless sellout. Tht's not the same thing as just making a baseless accusation, like you do. "Ime wubbow, yow gloo! MAMAAAAAAA! 😭" 😂