WestCanMan

1) Carney back-stabbed Harper by trying to take full credit for something that he was 3rd in command on. 2) FYI there are still 150 MPs from the last failed gov't, 9 of which colluded with China. The LPOC just added a back-stabber/serial liar/failure of an economic advisor to replace the femmy tyrant.

I'm not over it. Why should I be? And FYI the worthless loser is the one who laughs off the people who were harmed by their own complicity with gov't tyranny. I'll never have a shred of respect for you, you're only half a notch above Hamas, right on par with dogshit and tapeworms.

Carney wasn't lying about what he accomplished back then. He wasn't lying to Canadians constantly about everything. He wasn't a sellout to America and China back then. A lot has changed.

Bank accounts frozen, gas stolen, peaceful protesters beaten on the street like Rodney King, a gesundheitspass, forced vaccinations, Canadians killed by a pseudovax that they were forced to take, innocent protesters trampled by horses, a tyrannical PM calling people "racists and misogynists" for no reason and asking Canadians if should they should even be 'tolerated'... Go to hell you worthless f'ing loser.

What's worse: a $220B deficit with an economy that's been hamstrung by anti-pipeline laws which force us to sell our oil and gas to the US at heavily discounted prices a $60B deficit with a vastly expanded export economy? Don't worry, that was a rhetorical question. I know your answer is "But but but... PLASTIC STRAWS AND AN ABORTION BAN!!!!", just like your answer to "which leader has more integrity". OOOH OOOH OOOH OOOH Another question: "Which party actually got caught colluding with China?" Buh-bye Beavey. Run away now 🤣

Yet he couldn't create a self-balancing budget, like Trudeau did.

It's the same lawfare strategy that the Demis deployed down south... the legal process was the punishment and there was never a crime. They "started a peaceful protest against the fascist government", and the same thing that woulda happened if you staged a peaceful protest in Russia or China happened to them. The Chinese and Russian gov'ts wouldn't just hold a trial and find someone guilty of starting a protest there and have them put to death for it, but they'd find a way to ruin that person's life.

If so, then Trump will have won two elections in just 5 months.

Even in the age of fibre-optics and 5G, your posts are a serious waste of bandwidth.

1) Call it a day. 2) Why are they showing the "Critical Rare Minerals in Ukraine" on the map of the battle lines now? Is that something that Hegseth accidentally posted in the chat on a non-secure App?

By Olena Harmash and Yuliia Dysa KYIV (Reuters) -President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Tuesday Ukraine was ready for talks with Russia "in any format" once a ceasefire is set, while the Financial Times reported President Vladimir Putin had offered to halt Russia's invasion at the current front lines. Both sides are trying to demonstrate progress towards ending Russia's war in Ukraine, now well into its fourth year, after U.S. President Donald Trump said he could walk away from efforts to make peace if there is no breakthrough. "We are ready to record that after a ceasefire, we are ready to sit down in any format so that there are no dead ends," Zelenskiy told reporters in the presidential office in Kyiv. How effin' hard is it to stop a war? Does anyone still even want this war? Is anything even being achieved right now, or are they still just killing each other in the exact same places as last month?

*Yawn* Is there a single leftist here who can stay on topic? WTF does that have to do with Carney's laundry list of lies? Are you actually just here conceding the fact that Carney is a man of zero integrity?

It was all part of the plan to make it look like bringing in Carney was a massive change. LPOC with Trudeau: 😭🤯 LPOC with Carney: 💪🥰 "OMG, LOOK! IT'S A TOTALLY DIFFERENT PARTY NOW! 100%!!! I DON'T EVEN RECOGNIZE ANYONE!!!"

Top story about Carney right now on CBC:

A yawning opportunity for them to do what, exactly? Get ignored by the MSM outlets that got hundreds of millions of dollars from Trudeau, courtesy of the taxpayers? They don't have to falsify their data at election time, they can dial it in close for election day, as they always do. "The Libs are just a little bit ahead now in the popular vote..." is the election eve quote, followed by "Awwwww, the pollsters were so close. the CPC was up by 2%. But the pollsters really noticed how the CPC were closing in at the end there 😉😉." **The job of the pollsters that CBC chooses to give credence to is to have polls that back CBC's narratives** When it's 1 month from election time, do you think CBC wants to say: "Poilievre's campaign has all the momentum right now, his message is clearly resonating with mainstream Canadians", or "Poilievre is still only appealing to the hard-core conservatives: minorities and people in the centre are choosing the LPOC candidate because they think he is better at the thing on this other chart. Look at the gap in the polls on this subject, which voters consider the key to this election." Then they'll point to a chart that says "Everyone thinks that this guy will be better at dealing with that thing". And not one bit of it has to be true. CBC just needs to able to speak glowingly of the LPOC candidate, and their policies, and polls are the key to doing that. "The cool kids all think that our, I mean the LPOC candidate is better at this." Do you think that CBC wants to admit that Carney's constant, massive lies are having an effect on polling? Are they gonna allow a legitimate poll that actually shows "which candidate voters see as having the most integrity"? And then have a discussion about why that would be the case? They'll talk about straws, abortion, global warming, how Carney singlehandedly saved Canada in '08 while Harper and Flaherty were standing there in awe, etc. The topic of Carney's laundry list of lies never made the debates and it won't be a topic in the news either. Nor will the Chinese gov't's support, the Lib MPs who worked with China, etc, etc. That's all backburner sh1t. Straws, man. This election is about straws now. CBC News page right now: There's actually nothing at all about Carney on that page right now. Nothing. If you scroll down it's more not-so-positive stuff about Piolievre:

What I don't see is legitimate reasons to like Carney, or to trust him, and I don't see Canadians being warm to him. There are now half a dozen solid reasons to consider Carney a massive liar, he's a global elite with no track record of working for the little guy, and he's not even a Canadian. He actually calls himself a European when he's in Europe. Aside from fake polling and the CBC saying "Carney is awesome", no one here can come up with any reasons to say what's awesome about him. And they won't even try to defend his integrity. He's a total zero in that regard.

@ Left4rds: Picture a graph representing Candidate A's popularity in a 2-party race, with a line on it that stays consistent at 51-54% over the course of four months. Never really changes. Can you weave a story around that to help your candidate? Certainly. You can weave a whopper. Like this: Your own candidate, Candidate B is at 47%, and the other party's voters are highly motivated. The race isn't even close. Then your guy has a terrible debate, where his dementia can't be hidden, so he has to go. It's 4 months from the election, everyone knows your guy is leaving, so you put up poll numbers that show the other guy at 70%. HE'S SOARING. It doesn't matter because like I said, the election is 4 months away. Not one ballot is being cast. (remember, the polls are really peaking at 54%, because 45% of voters are cultists who aren't going to budge even if their leader says they need to be nuked). Then you bring in a new candidate, and she's a complete dunce with a proven track record of whorishness and failure, but you say "OMG CANDIDATE C IS SO AMAZING!" and then your fake polls come in, and lo and behold "THE POLLS SAY THAT CANDIDATE C IS AMAZING, JUST LIKE WE SAID!!! CANDIDATE C HAS TAKEN THE LEAD, WITH 55%!!! THIS IS ALSO PROOF THAT EVERYONE HATES CANDIDATE A!!!" (so the polls are at about 53% for Candidate A, but you're workin' it hard) "LOOK AT C JUST CRUSHING IT! SHE COMES FROM A MIDDLE-CLASS NEIGHBOURHOOD, DID YOU KNOW THAT? EVERYBODY LOVES THAT, BECAUSE IT SHOWS THAT SHE CARES ABOUT THEM!" Awwwwww. Now as you get closer to the election, you have to dial in your accuracy so that you still have credibility for the next election cycle, so you say 53-47 for C a week out. Then by election night you say 51-49 for C. Then the election goes like this: "Oh, wow. Our polling was just off by 1.5% for Candidate A and 3.1% for Candidate C. That's pretty good. Well within the margin of error, on average. Clearly what happened on election night is the misogynists and racists came out in force, so the really nice people were scared to go to the polling stations." The MSM got to use fake polling to back their massively false narratives and pump up Candidate C for 4 months. CBC: "You lead those dumb-ass horses to water if you want to WCM, but they ain't gonna drink it, cuz these horses only drink Kool-aid 😉."

But enough about CBC's main political correspondent lying to Canadians, here's a refresher course on Carney's main, proven lies: From Western Standard: "I do not have a connection with Brookfield Asset Management. I resigned all my positions because I am all in for Canada. The formal decision of the Board happened after I ceased to be on the Board." (Fact: Carney was the chairman of the board at Brookfield when the board voted to move to NY) The Standard goes on to say 'a December 1 letter to shareholders, signed by Carney, called the relocation “in the best interests of Brookfield Asset Management”.' Same article: "Carney also declined to clarify his claim that he personally helped balance the 1998 federal budget. At the time, he was a 33-year-old economics student at Oxford, not working for the Canadian government". Carney constantly lies about his role in helping Canada avoid the 2008 recession. He wasn't the main guy, he wasn't even close to being the number 2 guy. He was the number 3 guy, and our own laws prevented him from making the same kinds of mistakes that the US made. It's beyond revolting for him to try and take the credit for something that was obviously not his own doing Carney actually slandered the Globe and Mail in his next lie. He said that he never met with the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada, but he did meet with them, and he even had pictures taken with them. (Toronto Sun) “Well, I’m sorry, but you can’t believe everything you read in The Globe and Mail,” Carney said. Is it worse if he lied, or he met with them unwittingly? Carney is pretending that Poilievre plans to ban abortions, and Poilievre has never said that. Carney is lying again. Carney's minions showed up at a Poilievre rally with "Stop the Steal" buttons and tried to pass them around to Conservatives but they got busted and Carney had to apologize for his party's skullduggery Thanks for chiming in, Beave. So far we've got: Carney has been telling Canadians massive lies on issues of great importance on a constant basis and the Chinese gov't is trying to get him elected, vs "Why don't you like Carney? I think he's awesome."

Oh look, spurious allegations from a guy who uses cult.com as a source. Canada was a far better place to live in 2014 than it is in 2025 by every conceivable measure. Not only is Canada far worse off, it will take at least a decade to get us back to where we should already be right now.

Now the Chinese puppet is telling another huge lie: "Poilievre will ban abortion". Carney's just a shameless liar. Trudeau was smarmy, stupid, arrogant, divisive, and hated western Canadians, but not even Trudeau lied as much as Carney does. Carney doesn't give a sheeet about the truth. He just says whatever he wants to. It's bizarre.

Heya, genius. FYI almost 90% of that is fishing industry waste, with 2/3 of it coming from Japan and China. Plastic straws account for 0.0-something% of that. Grocery bags from Canada account for basically 0% of that. "BUT LET'S ELECT THE BIGGEST LIAR IN THE HISTORY OF POLITICS!!!!" - Aristedes

Jagmeet could have been a man, and a hero to millions of Canadians. Instead he chose to be a servile 'she-dog' (b...), and reviled, humiliated.

He won't acknowledge that. ExFlyer considers the opinions of CULT webpage gospel truth. Go figger. Don't tell him what "cult" means. Carney's lies are off the charts in terms of both: how directly contradictory they are to the truth, and the significance of his lies... they're not about minor topics. No lefties here will address the topic of their relative integrity.

We really needed a better performance by Jagmeet. Then again, he's preaching to the dumbest 10%, so he probably could have told poop jokes and not lost any votes.