WestCanMan

Just "over 30,000", right robo? Meh. A mere 30,000+ plus protesters killed, hey? Not "30,000 protesters who hit Iranian police with cars" though. If they hit police with cars then it would be a crime to kill them. You have to kill the protesetrs who aren't violent, right, robo?

Would you like to know what's racist, EF? Britain created TWO sovereign countries that never existed in several centuries before, by partition. The UN ratified the decision to create those countries. The two countries created were Pakistan and Israel: Pakistan was created first, in 1947, and they slaughtered 800,000 to 1.5M Sikhs and Hindus by burning, lynching, hanging, chopping, and shooting, and they drove an estimated 8M people out forever, with no right to return. Pakistan was instantly accepted as a welcome neighbour by most of the countries in the ME. As in, on that very first day, while most of the Pakistanis were still out killing their old neighbours. They committed a second genocide of abut 3M people in 1971, but that didn't affect the amount of love they get from their neighbours either.... Support for Pakistan never faltered. Israel was created in 1948, and on the day they were created, 8 of the countries who LOVED the genocide in Pakistan just 8 months earlier came to attack Israel. You can ask yourself "Were they going to Israel to get in on another ethnic cleansing/genocide?" and the answer is probably yes, but we will never know because they got their bigoted asses kicked. The Israelis killed between 400 and 500 people via firing squads, drove 700,000 people out of Israel, and in total, 30,000 people were killed in that war. If you question any of those facts feel free to google them. In the end you will find that IN ALL OF THE WARS THAT THE MODERN-DAY ITERATION OF ISRAEL HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED IN, THEY HAVE STILL KILLED A SMALL FRACTION OF THE PEOPLE KILLED BY PAKISTAN DURING PARTITION. So, if your side aren't f'ing bigots, then why have they ALWAYS been friends with the country that did almost TWO THOUSAND TIMES AS MUCH KILLING? If you took all of the people that Israel killed in "genocide", and multiplied it by 100, to go from 400 to 40,000, you would still have to kill that number of people 20 times to equal the number of people killed by Pakistan in their first genocide. 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000- loved by islamists for 80 years vs 400 - hated by islamists for 80 years To this day, Pakistan is 97% muslim. They have an ethnically cleansed country and muslims love that. To this day, Israel is 20% muslim. Is that an ethnically cleansed state? Are the Israelis 'all about genocide' like the Pakistanis are? Now tell me, EF, where are the actual bigots in this equation? Is it "the people who love it when their religion kills millions of people but then goes raging-genocidal when 400 of their own are killed", or is it "the person who notices that"?

Hahaha, EF. So funny. But you can't debate any of it, so it's actually not funny, it's pathetic.

Your confirmation bias is what makes you immune to "facts about Trump that you don't like". (Do you finally know what that term means or do I have to explain it to you again?) That's literally what your confirmation bias does is prevents you from considering information that clashes with your cultist beliefs. I guess you could say that confirmation bias is at the heart of your cultist belief system. FYI it's not "education and exposure" that makes people like you believe that Biden's inflation was low, when statistics show that America had the highest inflation ever, outside of the great depression, under Biden. FYI it's not "education and exposure" that made left4rds believe that "Trump's economy losing 13M jobs in late 2020 had nothing to do with the covid lockdowns" or that "Biden's economy gaining those jobs back in 2022 had nothing to do with the end of the lockdowns". Those are BLATANT lies and transparent propaganda that you latched onto like a baby on its momma's teat. Are you really stupid enough to believe the two points above? And if you aren't, then why did you go along with those narratives? That's TRUTHFULLY cultist-level bullchit right there. No sane person walks around regurgitating stuff like that. You don't have an example of conservatives getting sucked in by any such blatant propaganda, because it doesn't exist. The things that you say are just STUUUUUPID beyond belief.

There's the title, dingus.

Canada is a breeding ground for terrorists. The payout to Khadr was like a red carpet, but it's not just jihadi mosques and the pampering of returning islamic state terrorists that we're famous for, we even let Khalistani terrorists plot all they want from here. Then the carney wonders why Trump left him on the back porch when he started this fight against Iran. Canada is a f'ing joke. Future generations will refer us as "The Patsy Generation", if our culture even survives.

Ask eyeball yourself whether or not he supports Hamas. He will tell you. He has been unwavering in his support of Hamas. Ask robo yourself whether or not he called the US "terrorists" yesterday. Ask yourself why wouldn't the Dems fund DHS at a time like this when islamic terrorist attacks are occurring more frequently than normal? Ask yourself if the Dems' rhetoric about "an illegal war" is helping to incite terrorist attacks against the US, and if that statement protects the ayatollah or helps the US? Ask yourself "What would happen in 5 years, when Iran has an overwhelming stockpile of ballistic missiles and ICBMs, and nukes"? Or ask yourself how much the US should flirt with that possibility? Ask yourself who was responsible for 150+ attacks against US bases when Biden was president... (I'll save you the trouble) Between October 17, 2023, and early 2024, Iran-backed militias launched over 170 to 180 drone, rocket, and missile attacks against US military bases and personnel in Iraq, Syria, and Jordan. These attacks resulted in dozens of injuries, and a January 2024 drone attack in Jordan resulted in the deaths of three US soldiers. Ask yourself why no leftists here can talk about the fact that Mamdani's wife clicked "like" on a whole bunch of posts about the Oct 7th attack.... On the day that the news of her terrorist-loving came out, Beave started a thread about Trump forgetting to take off his hat while he was saluting, and posted there TWELVE times, but couldn't find it in him to talk about Mamdani's wife's posts. Now try to find a leftist here who can be critical of people like Omar and Tlaib. Look back at clips of Hillary talking about Iran: she was far more hawkish than Trump on Iran, and leftists ADORED her. None of them said words like "illegal", and she wasn't talking about "waiting until Iran launched a strike against the US to attack". EF, you're on one side or the other, whether you like it or not. "Switzerland" is not an option this time. The people on your side of the aisle are all engaging in at least some form of trying to make Iran's path to being a nuclear threat easier.

You can't find it in you to criticize Hamas supporters here, so like it or not, you are at least giving tacit support Stop acting like it's ridiculous to ask leftists if they support Hamas, because even mainstream leftists here, like eyeball and robo, support Hamas and Iran. Not only that, most leftists support Dem politicians who fully support Hamas and Iran, like Omar, Tlaib and Jeffries. Furthermore, you all engage fact-shaming whenever other people try to tell the truth about islam: mohammed was an actual pedophile who married a child and had sex with her, he made pedophile laws which muslim countries still follow today, and he was such an extreme religious bigot that all the clans in Mecca voted for his exile - even ones that worshipped allah. As he grew more powerful, he even commit genocide by massacring all them men in a tribe that refused to join islam (600-900) and he forced their wives and children into slavery, which included the right for their owners to r4pe them. Bottom line: lots of you guys fully support Hamas and Iran, you refuse to condemn people who do, you support politicians who support them, and you regurgitate their propaganda and engage in the censorship of the truth regarding their religion.

Despite being maybe the furthest-left source in Canada, the Star actually did let this topic see the light of day. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/travis-dhanraj-aimed-to-reveal-editorial-imbalance-at-the-cbc-what-the-former-tv-host/article_7990e504-9b2f-44d7-a9b1-539509178691.html I get that we're not supposed to quote too much of an article, but I don't wanna editorialize/cherry pick and do splice-job smear article like the Star/CBC/CTV would do, so the full first 5 paragraphs are in this post. Travis Dhanraj wanted to make things crystal clear: politically, this was not about being left or right. He just wanted to show people how the sausage is made: in this case, at the CBC, where Dhanraj was a television host on “Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj,” until he resigned last year. He blamed a lack of editorial independence, and what he called “editorial imbalance.” Dhanraj has since spoken extensively about this on his podcast, “Can’t Be Censored,” and on Tuesday was invited to testify at the Standing Committee for Canadian Heritage, between laid-off B.C. newspaper workers who have created a start-up outside Vancouver, a representative for Quebec community radio stations, some newspaper association and union heads, and a hardline pro-Israel lobby group. But for conservatives, Dhanraj was the show. Dhanraj claimed he was blocked from booking guests on his show, up to and including Conservative Party of Canada Leader Pierre Poilievre, and especially conservatives. He said another show, “Power and Politics,” had given his show a list of guests not to book. He claimed discrimination, harassment, bullying, a toxic culture. So, the claim is right there in black and white. So where's the reporting? Where's the investigating? Shouldn't it be easy enough to dig up the truth and just say: "but a list of his interviewees includes [all of these people]"? On Twitter, conservatives went wild. It’s wasn’t just right-wing pretend news sites, or one of so many inflammatory or partisan right-wing online influencers, or conservative operatives. It wasn’t just right-wing columnists, or Albertan separation supporters, his fellow committee witnesses or anti-vaccine activists, or convoy enthusiasts. Or, for that matter, CPC MPs, including those on committee. So, what was the point of ^that part^? It sounds like something that one of the sandbox clowns from the alt-left circus here would say. Shouldn't people care when a former CBC comes out with evidence that CBC is so blatantly biased? This isn't something to be looked into, it's a chance for a Canadian newspaper to get snotty? Good f'ing grief. What a joke. We all knew that they were party of the uniparty, but it helps to have credible first-hand accounts and email evidence of the demise of our democracy. 5th paragraph below: Retweets included independent journalist Sam Cooper, anti-carbon tax academic Sylvain Charlebois (The Food Professor), protest videographer Caryma Sa’d, COVID skeptic Trish Wood, and a cast of thousands, and of course, some conservative columnists wrote columns. It was a blizzard based on blind acceptance: that Dhanraj’s testimony confirmed the CBC was biased against conservatives, that the CBC is a state broadcaster, that the CBC should be defunded. The rest if the article honestly still sounds like a robo-post. Pure drivel. WTF is wrong with this country?

QFT Says the "stupid cites spambot".

Why is CTV News not talking about this at all? I just searched their site and googled "CTV Dhanraj" and all that came back from both searches was the original article from 2025 when he resigned. CTV hasn't said a single word about this topic. If it's big news when "an anonymous source" quotes Trump, why isn't it news when a CBC employee says that CBC isn't a legitimate news station, and has evidence? Most likely scenario: CTV is staying silent for the same reason that the GOP and Dems aren't turning each other in for their Epstein Island excursions. The Dems and GOP go back and forth at each other like vicious wolves over the slightest, or even imaginary transgressions, but when it comes to Epstein island, they're all buds. Just like CTV and CBC on the topic of being LPoC propagandists.

The removal of the search feature here is the leftists' best friend. Stealin' it!

When they like the Hamas posts and regurgitate their propaganda and omit the same pertinent info from all of their messages it's not paranoia, eh? Do you like Hamas? And why?

If Biden was the one handling this war, it would be a forever war. He wouldn't even be done his initial round of drone strikes against children yet and half of America's air force would already be gone.

They don't trust the DEMS because so many DEMS are on the side of Hamas in this, and Hamas works for Iran. Sorry to break it to ya. Do you think Churchill was discussing D-Day plans with Nazis, Einstone?

Dumber than Trudeau and Carney? TBH, they're selling dollars for less than 5 cents each, but that's not dumb, because they're only selling taxpayer dollars. Not their own 😉 "Here's $2.5B, Zel. I'll throw the other half in there after I see $20M in the account" - Trudeau "Here's $2.5B, Zel. I'll throw the other half in there after Brookfield's deal is signed" - Carney Do you understand that you just called your own gov't a terrorist org?

When was the last time that the left4rds were right about something, eyeball? Did you hear any 'righties' screaming "You never cried loud enough about the dangers of covid or how safe and effective the jabs were"? If your cult leaders are so worried about global warming then why do they have mega yachts, private jets, and multiple mansions? Your average cult-leader has 2,000 times your carbon footprint. Probably way more. But they care, right eyeball? I bet they use the smiley-hugging-heart emoji a lot. *sigh* But flood-fires are only caused by global warming. Ask herbie. They're the them that knows

😂

Leftists are increasingly more and more against the US Gov't, against police, against ICE, against funding the DHS, against the current war, parroting Iranian propaganda, calling the war "illegal", and robo is even calling the US Gov't terrorists now. Robo's not even a fringe leftie - he's basically a mainstream guy from that side - so he's a fairly accurate barometer of the modern left4rd zeitgeist. Now, it's hard to tell if the robo-cult are taking the ayatollah's side because they hate Trump, or if they just don't see the ayatollah's regime as bad people. One thing's for certain though, the assertion that "Iran didn't pose an imminent threat to the US" is false because: they attacked hundreds of US bases in the ME while Biden was behind the Recumbent Desk they were amassing an enormous stockpile of better and better drones and missiles all the time we've seen even their current tech-lvl missiles break through US and Israeli defences now the cost between "Iran making cheap flying bombs" and "the US/Israel making detection and interception systems" capable take them out mid-flight puts Iran ahead by millions of dollars per interception. How far are they from making their missiles harder to detect, after the rockets are done? And from making missiles with enough range to hit the US using technology that they got from NoKo? And from building nukes? Can anyone really guarantee that they're not able to make them, or that NoKo or Pakistan wouldn't just give them nukes? Fact: Iranian proxies attacked US bases in the ME hundreds of times while Biden was president, and Biden didn't do anything in retaliation. So, from Trump's POV, if he did nothing now, and the friend of the ayatollah in the DNC won the next election or two, Iran could have been growing the nuclear program, upgrading their missile technology, and building drones until 2033 or 2037 without any interruptions. Just think about the capability that Iran has now, and what they could amass between now and 2033 or 2037, after one or two ayatollah-friendly Dem presidencies... Trump's decision to attack Iran was perfect. It is one of the smartest things that Trump ever did as president, and he has had a LOT of success as president. Anyways, my questions for lefties are: are you favouring the US or Iran right now? Is it like 100-0, 40-60, etc...? do you agree with robo, that the Americans are the terrorists now? for the ones that favour Iran: are you cheering for substantial American casualties, or just economic hardship and an overall loss, where the ayatollah's regime carries on and the US loses face? for the ones that favour America: are you hoping to see regime change, or just squeaking out a bare-bones win, where the ayatollah's regime carries on and Iranian citizens continue to live in a modern-day dark age? We are really at a time where we don't know which side most leftists are on, and clearly some are on the other side now. Can you tell us what "the best-case scenario" looks like, after this military phase has ended? I will answer for myself right now, but I don't speak for all conservatives: I want a total win for the US and for the Iranian people. Regime change, the whole works.

That's just layers of stupid on top of stupid. All conservatives sound like lawyers from a leftist POV, because we know how to use words with 6+ letters.

Now you have people who are mainstream democrats, like robo, echoing terrorist propaganda straight from the ayatollah, and calling the US terrorists. It's gettin' spicy.

So the US is a terrorist regime now, robo? Is that your final answer? What level of terrorism from Iran do you support? Did you like Oct 7th, or was it basically fair, from a Democrat POV?

Sounds like NYC.

Beave: You have TWELVE posts in this thread about "forgetting to take a hat off for a salute" and ZERO posts in TWO threads combined: one is about a CBC whistleblower telling a parliamentary committee that the CBC only allows LPoC MP's to be interviewed, one is about Mamdani's wife liking terrorist attacks. Both of those threads are about topics that are roughly 1,000 times more important than a hat-on salute. Why is it that you can't even say ONE WORD about topics that are far more important than this, but you can't stop talking about this? You're a RAGING sicko with TDS so bad that even Hillary looks sideways at you.

Why are you SOOOOOOOOO active in a thread about forgetting to take a hat off for a salute and not active at all in the thread about Mamdani's wife liking terrorist attacks where women and children were tortured and burned to death? I get it, he shoulda took his hat off. Is that worse than Mamdani's wife clicking "Like" on a video where children are spitting on the corpse of a naked woman in a trucK?