WestCanMan

They're both wrong John. But it's people of your ilk, who try to use the images of dead children to spark the next round of hate, who are responsible for those dead kids. Whats your best reason for the existence of terrorism John? Is it because Israel, like Pakistan, was given their own country in the 1940's? Is it because Israel didn't commit genocide against the Palestinians like the Pakistanis did against the Hindus, Sikhs, etc that were in Pakistan when the nation was formed? Would the world be a better place now if Israel did what Pakistan did, and just ethnically cleansed the area so that there were no "refugee camps"? If you can cease to be an extreme religious bigot then you can reconcile yourself with the existence of Israel. If you can reconcile yourself with the existence of Israel then you will cease to justify/support terrorism. If less people justify/support terrorism then there will be less Islamic State jihadis to kill, and less innocent civilians will get caught in the crossfire. You must have loved the fact that Trump stood up to Assad when he gassed those children, right? Just admit it, Trump is your hero.

So you know that you want Americans dead, you just can't say why. Wrong. You definitely favour one or two countries over and above America, you just lack the courage and conviction to name them. You know that it will be easy for people to understand your hatred and how misguided it is when they know that you stand for religious fanaticism, terrorism and death cults.

The guy who says "Trump is guilty until he proves himself innocent" is saying that other people are in denial. That's rich.

If I said "RC colluded with Peru" and I do a 2 year investigation but don't find proof of it, does that mean that you're still considered guilty, and that I can keep on making public accusations until you find a way to prove yourself innocent rc? Do you understand what it would take for Trump to prove that he didn't do a particular thing? He would literally have to provide a record of every single thing that he did and said over the course of an entire year. So he would have to have videotaped every second of his life. Do you get it? I could literally accuse you of anything, and if the burden of proof is on you to prove that you're innocent, then you're basically shit out of luck because proving that you didn't do something that no one has proof even happened, or a date when it might have happened, is actually impossible unless you've recorded your entire life. That's why they say "the burden of the proof is on the accuser". Do you get it RC? Just tell me that you understand this one simple concept. The FBI had two years to make their case. To find some evidence. They leaned heavily on people to force confessions from them, in a manner that's completely unbefitting a democracy. They did pre-dawn raids on white collar criminals with doors kicked in and automatic assault rifles locked and loaded. They issued thousands of subpoenas, they spied, they interviewed hundreds of people under oath, etc, etc. They didn't find any evidence that Trump colluded with Russians. Period. And they exhausted all possible avenues and gave up on it. They found that the Russians made overt offers of help and that Trump's team didn't take the bait. They learned that Hillary covertly paid a law firm which in turn paid Russians to provide "evidence" that would help her win an election. That's the only collusion they found. The Dems and their moronic followers have mastered the art of making vague accusations which can't be disproven, and acting as if the whole world has to act on their BS as if it's carved in stone. Dems: "A girl said that she was almost raped in an undisclosed location in an undisclosed year and KAVANAUGH CAN'T BE A SCJ!!!!!!!!!" Dems: "TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA! HE'S ON THE VERGE OF IMPEACHMENT!!!!!" then they switch to "OK, there's no evidence at all that he did it, can he prove he didn't do it??????? HA!!!!!!! GOT HIM!!!!!! UNLESS HE PROVIDES VIDEO EVIDENCE OF EVERY SECOND OF HIS LIFE IN 2016 IT'S PROOF THAT HE'S GUILTY!!!!!!!" How anyone could be stupid enough to drink stupidity from the Dems' firehose for years on end is beyond me.

Oooh. Burn. Let's compare Trump's lying to Trudeau's or Hillary's. Hell, he's an angel compared to CNN or MSNBC>

What particular US policy are you talking about? And when you come here to say "USA is bad", you need to let us know who you think is good, so that we know how seriously to take you.

RC you need to find something to believe is aside from yourself. I'm not saying that you need an imaginary friend, but you need to find some kind of a positive group to be a part of because your negative, hateful persona isn't good for anything or anyone. "The Satan party" is obviously fictitious, and no one said that a vote for such a party would not be an actual vote for Satan because no one ever said that he existed. If people vote UCP do you think they're voting for a guy/girl named "UCP" or are they voting for actual humans who are part of a political party named "UCP" Realitycheck? When you turn 18 are you going to vote for humans who are part of the Liberal Party or a guy named Liberal? Go work on your reading comprehension RC.

Who would make your "Top 5 Greatest Leaders Of All Time" list? Best American Presidents? Best Canadian PMs?

I think that he did it to make Trump, Republicans and white people look bad in order to stoke racial division. He's a 'Murica-hatin' Dem toady from the word go.

I don't expect an honest answer to any of those questions but that part of me that couldn't look away from a train wreck really wants to know.

The USA is less than 250 years old. There were massive cities all over the world 2,000 years before Columbus learned to swim. All of the countries they're in had a massive head start on the USA. Most of them still suck. Whose fault is that?

wrong

Classic NIMBY (not in my back yard) type. "It's imperative that we allow tens of thousands of those people to come into the country. Just as long as none of them are in my neighbourhood."

1)RC what do you actually believe in? 2)What do you think is the most solid form of governance? 3)Do you think slavery should be legal? 4)Is it ok to chop people's heads off if they say the wrong things in public? 5)If a girl decides that she doesn't want to marry the person that her parents want her to marry should they be allowed to kill her?

You're talking about denial? You make the guy who says "I'm not gay I just like the taste of sperm" look grounded in reality.

I'd vote for the Satan Party to get Trudeau out of power, and the Cons are the party that's in place to get the job done. NDP and Green are also non-options though. I was a union member for over ten years of my life and I've never been a NDPer. Theresa May is Canada's AOC lol. She's as dumb as a sac full of Trudeaus.

No, but it's hard to imagine anyone in Alberta voting for 4 more years of Notley. You'd have to have your head completely up inside your arse.

Too funny. I'd love to see Schumer/AOC/Pelosi's reaction to a tent city within a few blocks of one of their estates.

What was the point of putting that link there and then saying Kenney is a confessed racist? It doesn't say anything of the sort. It does however say idiotic things like: There were over 100,000 jobs lost and the global oil price crash had almost zero to do with it.

I can't stand that they keep talking about how "white racists" prefer the Conservatives and Republicans. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the Liberals and Democrats are the party of choice for every single terrorist and terrorist sympathizer in North America but CTV doesn't talk about that. The Lib/Dems are also the party of choice for all of the convicted pedophiles, drug dealers, human traffickers and slavers. Bimbos too. Honestly if you want to talk about the basket of people who would need 3 promotions just to rise to the level of deplorable it's Lib/Dem voters. AOC is the new LOL.

Is anyone else alarmed that Notley's NDP still won 24 seats? WTF were people thinking? We hate jobs?

That's just sick and disgusting.

Lol. That article is such crap even CTV wouldn't run it.

You need to see the Mueller report for yourself but you're selling us the story that the Russians hacked Hillary to help Trump with zero evidence. The FBI didn't get Hillary's servers until they were wiped clean. They didn't get the DNC servers at all. The DNC is saying that they were hacked by Russians and of course you believe them. Shocker. Trump was fine crowing about Hillary getting busted. I knew Hillary was a snake ever since her first interview after Bill confessed. She's a heartless, power-hungry douchebag. I believe that you think you have property to sell, but you can keep your little Golden Gate Bridge Owly.

I agree with basically every single thing that you said here. Part of the reason that I think Trudeau is against pipelines is that he helped create a system where there are a whole host of individuals or small, independent groups with the ability to unilaterally shut down an entire 2,000 mile long pipeline. Sure he talks casually about getting pipelines built, but at the same time he's telling the world that the oil sands will be phased out - and investors are fleeing like it's a house on fire. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/pipeline-controversy-pitting-hereditary-leaders-against-elected-band-councils-reveals-intricacies-of-b-c-indigenous-governance Just a few hereditary chiefs oppose a pipeline and that's that. Done like dinner. Can Queen Elizabeth shut down pipelines too? Can she block the government on any issue that she sees fit? It's no less ridiculous imo. Saudis can give one hereditary chief $100k and our oil is landlocked. Makes perfect sense.