WestCanMan

Maybe you guys saw different shows? Maybe the hosts don't write their copy, but they don't read like robots either. Watch Lisa LaFake do her eyerolls or her insinuating tones when she's talking, or her dismissive introductions to stories/videos which run contrary to her narrative. If she is playing a video of Trudeau talking about Duffygate, 3 years into it, it's all amped-up seriousness and "OOohh look at THIS! DUN dun dunnnnnnnn..... If she's playing a video of Scheer talking about SNC while new info is still coming out it's: [eyeroll] "the latest round of character assassination attempts...." I'm not even exaggerating in the least. She actually did use the words "character assassination" a few days back while talking about remarks regarding Trudeau by the Conservatives. Do you think that stupid bimbo ever used the words caracter assassination when Trudeau was talking about Harper or even random Canadians? Like the big bad construction workers invading people's towns, or the broad insult against Canadians in general who were somehow still deemed to be guilty of the hijab cutting attack even after it was determined to be a hoax?

The scary thing about all this is how CTV has Trudeau's back through all of this. They're like his Ministry of Propaganda. They aired a segment the other day about the importance of governmental regulation of social media and they mentioned SNC Lavalin when they were talking about fake news on the internet (CTV complaining about fake news lol). I'm not at all happy that they're equating the SNC Lavalin issue with fake news but anyone dumb enough to believe everything they see on CTV is beyond hope anyways. I should make an ad offering bridges for sale and run it on that channel.

What does real change look like? Would a Bernie Sanders-type government be any better? All that happens when you massively increase taxes is you demotivate people, and you end up with most of the money in the country flowing through the sticky fingers of the government. It's the exact opposite of what the SJW crowd is trying to accomplish. The way an SJW sees it is like this: The government grabs massive amounts of money from successful individuals & corporations and uses it to give them and their friends a boost to get through college. YAY! It taxes the life out of industries that burn fossil fuels. Yay! Wealthy businessmen like Buffet no longer have big gobs of cash YAY! Here's the reality: Warren Buffet is just as rich as ever, his businesses are just in foreign countries now and he keeps as much of his wealth offshore as he can. The Laffer curve shows how, when you tax people too much, they no longer have the incentive to work as hard. They work part time and turn their attention to getting on the government gravy train. In the real world, when you tax the top end too much the Captains of Industry move their wealth and their companies to foreign countries and good-paying jobs go away. The free university degree that you got is no big deal because if you get a good job and make alot of money you don't get to keep much of it... you're paying for other kids to go to college and to be on welfare. Foreign-country-Buffet gets even wealthier and the gap between rich and poor increases. The money that the government takes in inevitably goes to their friends' companies and the people in power get bigger kickbacks. Companies within countries that don't care about fossil fuels have a huge edge over your own tax-burdened companies. Your own companies die off. Like in Canada, for example. If I have a farm and I have 4 plots of land that each grow $300K worth of food, and I live in a socialist country, do I even bother to harvest it all? For an example: in a capitalist country the first $700K is expenses, $100K goes towards my mortgage and the last $400K is profit which i will get taxed on. In Sandersland my expenses will be much higher because the minimum wage is higher. I also have to pay a lot more into medicare, etc. So $800K is expenses, $100K is mortgage, and I have $300K profit, but now I get almost nothing for the last $100K. About $10K. So if I leave $100K worth of food to rot on the vines I almost make the exact same amount of money, plus I'll save about 1/12th on wages for harvesting. Now there's less food to go around, but my bottom line looks better. Just imagine a whole country where everyone knows that there's not much point in getting out of bed at 5 am to make a difference. They can sleep until noon and have almost exactly the same lifestyle. Pajamaland.

So, with one hand Trudeau is signing massive cheques (and piling onto our federal debt) to give aid to foreign countries to make himself look good, and with the other he's signing bills into law that protect SNC Lavalin so that they can get deferred prosecution and continue to stick it to foreign countries. I wonder if SNC Lavalin is winning bids for mega-projects in foreign countries that are being funded with money that our country gave to them. If Canada is giving away money just so that SNC Lavalin can get juicy overseas contracts then I have no doubt that those guys will find ways to grease Trudeau's palm, even if it's some kind of "deferred" payment plan. IE, SNC gets hundreds of millions of dollars worth of juicy contracts now and then when Trudeau is retired SNC will start paying him off with no ethics commissioner in sight.

Blah, blah, blah. What's the total membersip of all those groups put together? How many attacks have they all committed? You're tlking about a bunch of very small fringe groups from as far back as 100 years ago. Get a grip RC. I don't want to have to keep saying "new level of stupid" to everything you post.

I'm not even sure what you're talking about here, you must be replying to someone else. That's just a new level of stupid right there. So whacked. LMAO.

I don't have the burden of proof on this one RC, nice try. You guys do, and you're not coming through, as I've explained to you before. You guys are mischaracterizing the seriousness this issue.... exaggerating the magnitude of it in comparison with threats that we all know are far more imminent. We don't have airport security because of Pediga. We don't have cement barricades at Christmas Villages because of Neo Nazis. Etc, etc, etc. Security at mosques around the world isn't as big of an issue as security at churches and synagogues has been for quite some time.

What an idiotic comment. I have far better reason to call you a bigot. Every post that you make insinuates that white privilege is everywhere, whites are racist, police are racist, conservatives are racist, Canadians have unreasonably associated islam with terrorism, etc, etc, etc. All you do is divide, divide, divide and you rarely have a smidgeon of insight or productive/constructive dialogue.

In Trudeau's current term there were already two large-scale terrorist attacks here. How good of a job are they doing? They're doing a much better job down in the states now under Trump. Under Obama there were muslim terrorist attacks happening all the time. Fort Hood happened the day after Obama was elected. Then they had the Boston bombing, San Bernadino, Pulse night club, Chattanooga, the killings of police officers by BLMers, and the New Jersey/New York garbage can bombs that were a big, co-ordinated attack but luckily didn't kill anyone. The only major muslim terrorist attack on US soil since Trump took over was the truck attack in NYC (ban guns!) Granted, there were some Democrat-inspired attacks (ie attacks on Republican-majority crowds by non-muslims) like the baseball game attack that almsot killed Scalise, and two attacks at country music venues. The attack on the synagogue also fits into this category to some extent because of the support that the Dem party gives to Farrakan. But muslim attacks have slowed down now that the government there isn't afraid to call them what they are.

You're acting like the majority of people fall into the category of sub-groups who just happen to have the same party affiliation. If there's an islamic terrorist in this country that doesn't vote Liberal they have crap for brains. That doesn't make the majority of Liberal voters terrorists. I guess that might be a bad example because Trudeau actually does support terrorism in a large way, but the Conservatives don't support racism at all. I'll try and think of a better example next time.

After 1,400 years of islam being what it is, what's going to change it overnight, wise one?

That came out wrong. I was referring to right-wing terrorist being the #1 threat back when the extreme right-wingers (KKK) were openly affiliated with the Democrats.

Riiiight. After two years of Russian Collusion BS you still think they're a credible news source. Nuff said.

You’re quoting CNN? What did the weekly world news say about it? Or the enquirer? The FBI should take every threat seriously. But let’s not frame this like it’s the #1 threat, like it was back in the day when their affiliation with the Democrats was out in the open. The new black panthers are a threat too. BLM is a threat. Antifa is a bigger than any of the groups we’ve mentioned. The number 1 threat is still islamic terrorism.

OMG THE SKY IS FALLING! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_vests_movement Only Trudeau and his lackeys think that the yellow vests are a dangerous right-wing terrorist movement. They actually know it’s not true they’re just selling that because Trudeau doesn’t want protests here

Yup. I've seen quotes about "x number of pounds of pollution comes out of the tailpipe for every gallon of gas" but what they don't mention is that most of that is super-deadly C02 and H20. RUN FOR THE HILLS!

There's a group of people that I just can't stand anymore, and it's anyone who identifies as a Liberal/Democrat. They are utterly committed to lying and hiding the truth at every turn. Trudeau just-can't-give-a-straight-answer and his fans love him for it. The idiots who don't like Ray-Bold's tape, and are happy that Ayatollah Trudeau shut down the ethics commissioner & stopped JWR from answering questions about SNC in Parliament, is the exact same group of idiots who still think that Russian collusion still needs to be investigated. Which is it? Are investigations good or bad? In the Trump investigation people were arrested for things that happened 20 years ago and then offered reduced sentences for (obviously coerced) testimony against Trump and Canadians think that's good, but they think that taping someone secretly here is too much????????????? When I think about how stupid those people are I wanna pull out my hair. All kinds of people were secretly taped for info re: Trump. Hundreds. There were pre-dawn raids with doors kicked in and machine guns locked and loaded. Back to the wire taps - is a person in JWR's position not usually the type who would approve wire taps in the first place? If she thought that someone was crossing the line wasn't she the ultimate authority of that in this country? "Hyuk hyuk the things that happened to Trump and his associates were all perfectly fine, just don't secretly tape anyone in Canada to expose Trudeau's malfeasance because that's going WAYYYYY TOOOOOO FARRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!" Anyone who can't see a MONUMENTAL double-standard is just a huge, festering pile of idiot. The Lib/Dems took Goebbels saying about "tell a lie 1,000 times and it becomes the truth" and applied to literally everything. Perfect example: Beto O'Rourke just said "Global warming is 100% unanimous among climate scientists" the other day and no one at CNN even blinked. The most obvious and blatant lie ever told just went 100% unchallenged. I have a teeny bit more respect for the average lliberal fanboy than I do for Clifford Olson. Juuust a smidgeon.

Is Trudeau really a leader now, or is he exposed as a corporate lackey? He's killing Canadian jobs to satisfy foreign lobbyists and a couple of hereditary chiefs (who have no doubt been bought by foreign lobbyists), he's giving away far more money than we can afford just so that he personally looks good at the UN, he's onto his 5th ethics breech and he's already been found guilty once, he's shutting down investigations into his own malfeasance like he's Putin or the Ayatollah, he's firing people left and right who dare to stand up to him, and you're still a fawning sycophant of his??????? What would it take for you to finally give up on that loser?

Her "team" is Canada. That's why she's an independent now, and that's why Canadians like her.

That just shows the insane level of bias.

1) Michel Fourier pleaded guilty to receiving over $2.3M in payments from SNC in connection with SNC being rewarded a $125M contract to build 1 bridge. 2) Trudeau's government is awarding 1,000 times as much money in "infrastructure spending projects". 3) Trudeau created the deferred prosecution law that was SPECIFICALLY designed to keep SNC in the loop. 4) Trudeau and his cronies did everything in their power to protect SNC from prosecution, just so that they could get their hands in the federal coffers. How much did Trudeau stand to personally gain from this? Were his offshore accounts going to receive some of that SNC windfall cash? 5) Trudeau committed political suicide to keep from being investigated. He knows he is done as PM now, so what was it worth it for him to go this route? Is he worried that the results of an investigation would be far worse than just becoming the leader of the opposition?

You're right, it's not a crime to do what she did, but her tape isn't admissible in court as evidence either. I'm glad she did it. Even though it's not legally "evidence" it's proof to the public that she's telling the truth. Wernick shouldn't be saying things over the phone that are against the public interest.

That's a lie that just keeps getting propagated by leftists. The list of terrorist attacks is right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States I keep having to point this out here. I'm not sure who keeps putting that info out but it's ridiculous BS. Muslim terrorist attacks kill the most people in the US by a long shot, and attacks against people who would be considered to be on the "right" are the second deadliest terrorist attacks. I'm referring to the two attacks that happened at country music venues that ddn't even make that list. One was on college night at a country bar the other was in Vegas, 49 or 50 people died there. I don't doubt that it's the same in Europe but I haven't checked. Some people like to compile lists of "threats", that include threats over the phone, and call them terrorist attacks and they just assign the attacks to whomever they want. If a Synagogue gets vandalized by anyone it's considered a "right wing" terrorist attack. It could have been done by muslims or Democrat supporters but that makes no difference - it goes into the right wing file. Some of the attacks are Jussie Smollett type false flag "attacks", just to divide the country.

If lying is a sin you know damned well that you'll be there.

Hahaha. So funny. By what criteria do you think I'll make it there?