WestCanMan

How do you see the anti-DPA forces preventing pipelines? I don't follow.

CTV and CBC will do everything they can to make it fade away. CTV was already championing the cause of government regulation of social media to block "fake news" and they specifically mentioned SNC Lavalin in the fake news category. If Trudeau and the MSM got their way then Scheer & co. could talk about SNC in the HP all day and we would never hear a word of it.

Saying enough evidence is intentionally misleading. They didn't find any evidence of Trump's team colluding with the Russians. They found out that Russians were offering to get involved. That's completely different fyi. Hillary paid Russians (through a british spy) to create the fake dossier, she might have put them up to making those offers as well. She cheated at absolutely every other turn, it's certain that she would have done this if she thought of it. She has a lot of pull with the Russians ever since she helped them bu American Uranium. To this point, the only way person that is known to have put money into Russian hands to influence the outcome of the election was Hillary Clinton. If it was brought to light that Donald Trump secretly channelled money into a law firm that went out to a British ex-spy and then directly to some Russians to "gather" (create fake) intelligence on Hillary Clinton for the purpose of winning the election, then you would claim absolute victory on this issue. The whole Russian collusion thing has been BS from the get-go. Along with the help of CNN and MSNBC the fake investigation got Nancy Pelosi control of the house. That's your "win". Dems slimed their way into control of the house, just like they tried to slime their way into blocking a SCJ earlier.

Trudeau was at their beck and call. He still is. This is the hill for his political career to die on.

Yeah, just like she took her ball and went home when she was a kid. "I can't win because the other kids are [insert excuse here]". Owly, try and tell me that you think it's possible that some evidence of collusion exists and it has somehow managed to not get leaked........ I just need to see the words actually written down. There's not a snowball's chance in hell that a secret like that could stay buried in Washington, especially regarding Trump. The number of leaks from the Whitehouse is ridiculous. Even if someone just says that they heard something it comes out of CNN like "GOSPEL TRUTH FROM THE HILL TODAY! BASICALLY THE MOST RELIABLE SOURCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD SAW/HEARD SOMETHING TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!" I don't blame you for being sucked in by several high-profile members of the MSM saying the same things over and over (tell the same lie 1,000 times....) but if you notice a pattern forming, they're "wrong" all the time and they routinely lack the required amount of evidence to substantiate the claims they make.

Why would you just sit there and wait instead of doing a 1 second google if you don't know the answer? How is it even possible that you don't already know the answer? I know you won't answer that so I'll answer for you........ You don't want to acknowledge that it's true, so if the information isn't plunked down right there in front of you you'll just hope that it never surfaces. Now that the link is there you'll just ignore it and hope that everyone forgets about it. You're in full-blown denial.

Get a grip. That's not even a reply.

Here's something from the Ministry of Propaganda https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/snc-lavalin-trudeau-bribery-fraud-wilson-raybould-1.5020498

Trudeau is fighting for the Trans Mountain Pipeline like Bill Clinton is fighting to stay married to Hillary.

More utter BS. You have given up on telling the truth, if you ever did before. If there was evidence of collusion it wouldn't matter how many Republicans there are in the Senate. Schumer and Pelosi voted aginst Clinton's impeachment so they would probably vote against impeaching Trump too. LOL, not.

Pushing? He's going around saying that the oil sands will be phased out. He's scaring away investment like a shark swimming through a coral reef. There's not a soul in Alberta who thinks Trudeau has their back.

SNC lobbied the government, the DPA law was created. Can you name another reason why it was created then egghead?

I know exactly what I'm speaking about. If there's evidence of collusion, Trump will be impeached in a heartbeat. He will cease to have the power to pardon even a speeding ticket. I never said that a court would impeach him, I said that half the Dems were already speaking of impeaching him. Learn to read. FYI Hillary hasn't been seriously investigated for the server scandal, but that's not what I was referring to in that last post. Try to follow along. Hillary paid GPS Fusion to compile that "dossier" and the Russians came into play after she took over as the main financier of that operation. Russians played both sides against each other in order to sow discord. This whole investigation is playing right into their hand. What do you mean by when everything else fails? Where's the fail? Aside from every single one of your posts lol.

I get it that you personally feel like Trudeau is the be-all end-all, but it might be time to step back and take another look at Mr Sunny Ways. Have you ever heard that saying: "If you put a frog in hot water it will jump out but if you put it in cold water you can keep turning up the heat and the frog will stay there 'til it dies"? Well, if you just suddenly learned all there is to know about Trudeau up to this point would he still have your respect? At some point you need to place more value on your own loyalty, and just step away from a guy who has turned out to be a fraudster. JWR's issues are hers alone, but they're nowhere near as bad as Trudeau's. And the truth from her is as good as anyone's truth if she has the evidence to back her up, which apparently she does. Honestly, what makes her recordings unethical? She felt like she was being pressured to do the wrong thing, by people who had absolutely no right to pressure her. At this point do you feel like Trudeau put pressure on JWR to give SNC a DPA? Do you feel like it was Trudeau's place to do so? Why did his story change so much? Why is he so afraid to get to the bottom of this? Why would he create a law JUST TO GET A COMPANY LIKE SNC ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS WHEN THEY HAVE SO MANY SERIOUS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THEM in the first place? Trudeau pretends to care about 9,000 jobs (that was another lie of his) at SNC in Montreal, but he literally doesn't give a crap about 100,000 jobs in Alberta. And he's your guy? That's where your loyalties lie? This is your hill to die on? I hope that you come to your senses soon bruh because we need to get this guy out of power. This is the most critical vote in the history of our country, by far.

Such BS. If Trump was guilty he would have been impeached, no doubt about it. No pardon power, do not pass go, do not collect $200. Half the Dems were already pimping impeachment 1 year ago when the investigation was a year old with zero evidence. CNN and MSNBC played impeachmnet up like the next Michael Jordan. No one is deflecting anything. You're just sad bceuase your shiny little impeachment bauble is brokeded. Once again, if there was anything worth redacting it would have been leaked a long time ago. You're using the redaction excuse to just keep carrying on with your accusations. Van Jones knew over a year ago that Russian collusion was a big nothingburger. He still pimped it along with Adam Schiff, Mad Maxine, Hillary and all the clowns at MSNBC and CNN. You know one person who was a big accuser of Russian meddling who's suddenly sneaking off into the background? Hillary Clinton. The rat who put this ship to sea has quietly deserted it. And it's no wonder. She paid foreigners to create a pile of fake accusations and then used it to try to tip the election in her favour. She still has stooges out there pushing her garbage agenda even after they are well aware of all the other cheating that she did to get elected. It's just out there in the open that she sold two bogus deeds to bridges and people keep buying more from her every day. Truth is way stranger than fiction.

The FBI doesn't "exonerate" anyone. Judges exonerate. Trump used the wrong word, the same way that laymen misuse legal terminology all the time. The fact that he mistakenly used the word exonerate is not enough for you to hang your hat on. The fact is that the FBI, after two years, 2,800 subpoenas, interviewing 500 witnesses and executing 500 search warrants, didn't find enough evidence to bring criminal charges. They never produced any to this day. Rosenstein and Barr jointly reached that conclusion "without considering constitutional questions regarding bringing criminal charges against a sitting president". The Dems, and especially Schiff, were constantly saying that the evidence was already in. The Dems are famous for ignoring subpoenas, completely redacting documents that they hand in, etc. It's their turn to wait. ----spoiler alert---- There is no Santa There, now you can get some sleep Christmas Eve.

All this of the AG and DPP is neither here nor there. The fact is that Trudeau was flagrantly overstepping his bounds to exert pressure on the AG to use the DPA for SNC Lavalin. There's ample evidence of this now. Follow the trail of cookie crumbs: SNC lobbied for a DPA type of law to be created. Trudeau didn't just randomly come up with the idea for that law out of the blue, he created the DPA law almost specifically for SNC. His cronies were caught on tape pressuring Ray-Bold to use the DPA and saying that Trudeau wasn't going to let the issue go away. That's the crux of the issue, right there. Whether or not some sycophant AG or DPP comes along now and decides that the DPA law is applicable doesn't change the fact that Trudeau himself was trying to ram it down the AG's throat. He's not the Ayatollah. He's not the King. He was way out of his lane and he got caught.

Who are you to say that 4 pages aren't enough? How many different ways can you say "no evidence of collusion was found"? I love hearing a Dem apologist diss a lawyer after CNN and the Dems were fawning all over Avenatti for the last year. "My teenage client went to ten Brett Kavanaugh gang rape parties, she just couldn't get enough of them" lol. That's literally the dumbest story that I have ever heard in my life. I can't believe you guys fell for that - hook, line and sinker. Still in shock.

I don't need to read the report Owly. It has already been interpreted by the AG of the United States. I think he's more capable of interpreting it than anyone at CNN, or Adam Schiff, or a random internet poster who still for whatever reason believes things that come out of Schiff/Comey/McCabe/Brennan/Hillary's mouth. It's not like Barr can just outright lie about the report's contents, thinking that the truth will remain hidden evermore. With all the leaking that has already occurred do you think for even a second that he could just tuck it all under the rug now? Do you think that Adam Schiff wouldn't just blurt out some facts if he had any at his disposal? You're like a 35 year old still waiting up every year on Christmas Eve for Santa Claus to come down the chimney.

She was cleared of rigging the primaries against Bernie? She was cleared of cheating on the debate questions? Nope, she didn't even try to deny those allegations. FYI she wasn't "cleared" of her email scandal either, there was never a real investigation. There is ample evidence of a cover-up though. She was allowed to testify without going under oath, she was allowed to say "I can't remember, I bumped my head" over 100 times instead of answering any questions (the bump only affected her memory of her email scandal, it had no effect on her ability to talk about any other issue known to man during her election campaign), there was a secret tarmac meeting between her ex-Prez hubby and the AG at the time, key witnesses were never interviewed, etc, etc. Comey's own report even said that she was grossly negligent - the standard for felony mishandling of classified information - and then it was mysteriously changed to extremely careless or some such. Like I said the Dems are keen on investigating Republicans but they are determined to never allow any investigations into their own conduct. It's like the US is the Banana Republic of Hillary. The summary of the Mueller report was that there was no evidence of collusion despite the fact that overt offers of help were made to the Trump campaign. So he has been cleared, the Democrats and their tinfoil hat gang just refuse to accept the facts. Already out Owly. Nothing seems to get in your way lol. One more thing to add - I love how the Dems have the nerve to question Barr's professionalism after they never even batted an eye at the actions of Loretta "Tarmac" Lynch. Talk about a complete lack of credibility. Zeros, straight across the board.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fox-weighs-future-of-empire-actor-jussie-smollett-11555012247 Apparently there's still a chance that this guy gets to keep his job. IMO what he did was far worse than what Roseanne Barr did. Roseanne made a racist comment, Smollett tried to drum up serious racial hatred and divide the country. If Roseanne faked a hate crime against herself by blacks/Obama and sent the police on a week long wild goose chase would there be any question about whether she could keep her job?

Hillary's lying and cheating got Trump elected. If she wasn't acting like a Clinton, or a Democrat for that matter, then there wouldn't have been anything incriminating enough in her own emails to cost her the election. How her emails got into the public domain is anyone's guess. It could very easily have been a jilted Bernie Sanders supporter from inside the Dems' own IT department that leaked her emails. I don't have a serious complaint, I'm just pointing out how hypocritical & pathetic the Dems and their toadies are.

The Dems are completely apoplectic because AG Barr said that he wants to look into whether or not Trump's campaign was spied on. If you recall the Dems are the same US political party that's famous for saying that: -all criminal allegations need to be believed (well, they do if they're against Republicans but not Democrats) and -the Steele/Hillary/Fusion GPS dossier was enough evidence to warrant a 2 yr+ Russian collusion investigation to the tune of $20M or so. So, after looking through all the evidence (or lack thereof) from the Mueller investigation, Barr has reason to believe that an investigation into election spying is warranted. GASP!!!!!!!!! But he doesn't have enough evidence to start an investigation! He needs a self-corroborating dossier compiled by Russians and a discredited British spy to start a real investigation!!!! He can't even look into it!!!!!!! Who the hell does he think he is? The Attorney general?!?!?!?!?! Carved in stone: "If you're a Dem supporter - you're an idiot".

That's an entirely ignorant comment. The majority of Americans didn't want to be there, that's one of the main reasons why they "lost". The other is that the Vietnamese that wanted communism were more forceful than the ones that wanted democracy. America wasn't willing to kill the required amount of people to get their way. It's the same way in Afghanistan. The Taliban are willing to kill schoolgirls and anyone else who opposes their views. A lot of the population there is completely cowed and will not resist them. It's hard to win against a foe who can out-evil you to the extent that the Taliban can. Until you have the will to sink to their level you're at a huge disadvantage, but if you stoop to their level you lose more than just one shithole country. Iraq had a decent enough army, better than a 3rd world army by anyone reasonable estimate. American tanks rolled across Iraq at 60 miles per hour laying waste to everything in uniform. America can win wars, they just don't like the cost of policing for the next ten years.

For some reason you take an adversarial tone that's not necessary. It diminishes from the overall interest in what's otherwise a very informative post. Every country has it's pros and cons. I doubt that anyone who lives in Florida is interested in moving to Siberia to have a few extra rubles on hand lol. At the same time, Russia is in no danger of having an influx of immigrants break the bank. You win some, you lose some.