Hal 9000

None, actually!

Municipal taxes are the worst, the renters who pay no property taxes get to vote for frivolous things that the home owners are forced to flip the bill for.

How is what he said considered "hate".

OK, I'm repeating the words of RBG (who is addressing Trump) when I say "Gotten away without turning over tax returns" then after a comma I address Hillary when I say "how about deleting top secret emails?". Good god, do any of actually know how to read proper written english? I'm also having this fight with BC Chick in another thread. How about just once saying "Oh OK, I thought you were saying something else?" Is that so hard?

Yeah, i know! And Hillary who deleted emails.

What assumptions have I jumped too? I think anybody, who blindly accepts that woman's story, or those talking about racist cops are clearly making assumptions - but not me? The only thing I've said for sure is that these people are weak of character, and that's not an assumption. But, what do you think happened?

If you're gonna try insulting me, at least make some sense.

Fair enough, but it doesn't change, or even dispute anything I've said.

Sure, I would question his character and that of the woman too, however, I never said he had it coming - yet! And, I don't know what exactly happened, I'm simply questioning the fact that others here (like BC chick) seem to be buying into the woman's story hook, line and sinker. I've merely suggested that from what we know, common sense scenarios would support the police officer.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/13/transgender-woman-arrested-voyeurism-target-changi/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork So, Target is now up to 4 or 5 cases of voyeuristic "women" taking pictures of young girls.

She does have her rights, but as a supreme court judge, she also has responsabilities. Trump says that her comments were embarrassing - true, they were also hypocritical. "He is a faker," she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. "He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that." What about Hillary? Is she not a "faker"? Does she have any consistency whatsoever?, Ego?, Gotten away without turning over tax returns, how about deleting top secret emails? And the press, has the press let Trump off the hook more than Hillary? No chance! Loretta Lynch avoided 74 questions about Hillary yesterday and barely a word from the press - in fact, this made bigger headlines. The left think she's some hero, I think she's just added to the lying and corruption that is the US democrat party.

Of course its a huge leap in logic to go from 'bad character" who smokes weed to attempted cop killer, thats why that leap has not been made - by anyone - holy fack! However, it's not a leap to believe that someone who repeatedly smokes weed and drinks with their kid in the car will lie - is it. Never mind the fact that this woman, his mother and sister all immediately ran to "gofundme" to bilk people out of their money. And, it's not a huge leap to believe that this police officer asked to see this dudes ID and the guy reached for the gun...that happened to conveniently be in his lap. What is a huge leap in logic is believing that the cop asked for ID and when the guy put his hand in his pocket got shot - even though their was a gun sitting right there - in plain view. Why would a cop ask for ID, when a gun is plainly in view? Either one of two things make sense; 1) The officer saw the gun and told the dude, not to reach for it or 2) the cop didn't see the gun, asked for ID then saw the guy reach for his gun. If you have a gun in the car - being either black or white, permit or not, you'd better not have it in your lap or on your seat when a cop approaches. Put the gun under the seat or somewhere out of sight and put your hands on the wheel - explain the permit with your hands in view and let the officer do his job. If this dude was innocently reaching for something in his pocket with a gun in his lap, he has to be the dumbest mofo ever.

I'll agree with this! WoW!

It's her right, but it's not really awesome though, it would be if there was any chance of risk, but this is Trump we're talking about. Look, Trump is white, male, old, rich, conservative, christian, capitalistic and a republican. He stands for protecting borders, supporting the military, supporting the police and dealing with radical Islam. Isn't it just so easy to trash the guy? You can't and wouldn't ever treat a woman, black, socialist or muslim the way he's been treated.

You're either intentionally misreading or just no too bright. I don't think you're dumb, I think you know the likeliest possibility is that he reached for his gun and like any good progressive, now you're misinterpreting to put pressure on me, you're deflecting - you're trolling. The period and the structure denotes two separate thoughts. You see, smoking weed with his kid in the car shows his character, the cops words, actions and demeanour along with fact that there was a gun on his seat lead me to suggest that he may have/ probably reached for his gun. To bring it right down to a 60 IQ - so that you get it, one issue - the weed video, shows what kind of people they are, that you're trusting in. The evidence, however small shows that it is more than possible that the dude grabbed for his gun. Why would he grab for his gun? Well, why would Michael Brown charge an armed cop? Because he was a dumb Fack POS! Why would the witness lie? Well, why would Dorian Johnson lie? Because they're also dumb fack POS's! The logic is; if the cop saw a gun and the guy was reaching for his wallet and NOT the gun, he'd still be alive. From listening to the cop, common sense says, he was reaching for the gun.

It would be quite the stretch, wouldn't it? But, then again, nobody made that connection - did they?

So yeah, we are supposed to buy into the woman's story full on - right? Anyone remember the name Dorian Johnson?

What does any of this have to do with trans sex people?

OK, we have a woman saying that he was reaching for his wallet and that he had a conceal permit, we have a cop frantically saying something about the dude reaching for it - presumably a gun. Now, as we find out he didn't have a conceal permit and there was a gun was in his lap. We also see video of him and his woman smoking weed with their kid in the car - which speaks to character. I'm not going to predict anything, but if it comes out that the guy robbing the store was in fact the guy that was shot, my surprise level will be pretty low. I feel we may be slipping down this whole Michael Brown "hands up - don't shoot" bullcrap slide.

He did have a gun that he was seen brandishing. And the second video shows him flipping the cop off of him, and word is that he went for his his gun - a gun that the one cop pulls out of his right pocket.

I don't know much about the dude in the car, but the guy in the red shirt (Sterling) deserved what he got.

Leviticus is old testament, it doesn't really apply to Christians.

Yeah, I think it was Marcus who brought vehicular collisions, bathtub deaths, deaths by own furniture and building fires into the fray. So uhmmm, yeah you're right.

I think what we're seeing here is the left attempting (successfully too) to redefine the term "terrorism". Pretty soon everything will be terrorism and therefore nothing will be terrorism.

Do you actually know what "terrorism" is?