Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/09/2023 in all areas

  1. January 6th wasn't an insurrection. It was Fed-surrection. A fed perpetrated " breach team set up a booby trap by pushing back the police, then hauling away the “restricted area” signage, the chain fencing, and the metal barricades—all while tens of thousands were still at the Trump rally. Without police present or “do not enter” signs prominently visible, people leaving Trump’s speech and arriving at the Capitol entrance would have no idea it was illegal to walk through the gate, or onto the lawn, or up to the Capitol steps. After all, this entire area is ordinarily open to the public. Instead, they heard friendly music and saw the main walkway to the Capitol grounds wide open. These unwitting Trump supporters had no idea they had just crossed an invisible tripwire that would later subject them to federal prosecution for trespassing. Moreover, the giant main component of Trump protesters would not arrive at this Capitol entrance until 50 minutes after the Breach Team opened up the walkway—Trump had 20 minutes left in his speech, and it took 30 minutes to walk to the Peace Monument. This giant component arrived at the entrance and saw hundreds of people already inside the Capitol grounds. They would no longer stage their protest back behind the fencing, because the Breach Team booby-trappers had already hauled most of it away before they got there. The giant component therefore walked all the way up to the Capitol building itself."
    2 points
  2. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kristi-noem-demands-answers-after-us-government-leaks-social-security-numbers-family Leftist loonies try to do damage to political opponents by releasing social security numbers.. leftist loons show once again how deranged they are
    1 point
  3. 1) Maybe learn to speak the language before you start making fun of other people's intelligence 2) Just because you're a CrakHo doesn't mean that you can't strive to be better. Maybe tone down the swearing a bit, hey?
    1 point
  4. YOU HAVE NOT POINTED TO ANY CRT TEXTBOOK. Stop LYING
    1 point
  5. You don't get to just say "straw man argument" without pointing to one. Everything I said was accurate. Leftards think that M Brown was a gentle giant who should never have been shot in a million years. That's you in a nutshell. All of a sudden, for one glorious day (when it was convenient), police lives mattered to you. You're such a (temporarily) great guy. Destroyed lol. I love how you destroy my arguments by saying "I can't do simple arithmetic, but...." OK, so one person brought a gun but he never showed it to anyone, and two other people may have brought guns, but at least one of those two was recovered at the guy's home and there's report of him brandishing it. I stand corrected - it wasn't "zero guns anywhere in the immediate area", it was just "zero guns known to have entered the capitol buildings, but one guy came really close and left his gun outside." Is that accurate enough for you? As far as I know your best example of someone 'carrying a gun' was "one single guy who dropped his gun outside". Is that correct? 1 gun was brought to the exterior of the building but not inside, one gun may have stayed in a guy's home when he travelled to DC, and there is one more gun charge related to the mostly peaceful protest, which may or may not have resulted in a gun being carried into the building. Is that accurate enough for you? I just gotta make sure before I comment any further, because I was under the impression that no guns entered the capitol buildings and that's a huge sticking point for you. Do you have evidence of even 1 gun going into the capitol building psycho? By your megadolt standards, does "Maybe 1 gun entered the capitol building" constitute "trying to violently overthrow the US gov't"? Is that your final answer? How many knives were there, Hodad? 3? FYI butter knives and 1" utility knives that are attached to people's keychains don't count, because no one has ever overthrown a large country with one of those, so don't try throwing out an inflated number like 6, ok genius? If your reply about the harrowing knife situation is anything like your reply about the shocking number of guns it will say something like this: "ONE GUY HAD AN ARMY KNIFE! He's in jail for three years!" and then when I read the accompanying article it will say "A Swiss Army Knife two inches long was recovered from Gerard Kraziboi's car a month later, and authorities believe that he might have wielded it seditiously [sic] in the vicinity of the capitol buildings, but there are no witnesses." In any event, I'd love for you to tell: how many guns were known to be taken into the buildings and onto the grounds, How many were brandished how many were used, even if just to pistol-whip someone how many knives are known to have gone into the buildings and onto the grounds how many were brandished How many were used and how many officers were injured by guns or knives in this massive attempt to "violently overthrow the US gov't and end democracy" 100? 10? Zero...? Is it zero Hodad? I'm gonna go ahead and guess that the attempt to "violently overthrow the US gov't and end democracy" resulted in zero knife attacks and zero gun attacks. How high the bar was set to arrive at the grand total of 60 weapons offences or whatever it is? Did pushing a barricade count? If someone swung their belt, was that a weapons charge? I'm assuming it was, but I don't wanna be wrong and get called a liar by the dumbest guy on the internet again. OK, I'll amend it for you, Mr sensitive: "How god-damned stupid does one have to be to believe that a handful of people tried to "violently overthrow the US gov't and end democracy without bringing a single gun into the building"?" Vice 28,000 people, "Armed to the teeth and ready for war", and they brought zero guns, 269 knives and less than hundred other items that you couldn't even rob a gas station with. How retarded does one have to be to quote that article? 28,000 people "Armed to the teeth and ready for war" would have enough weaponry to take over a small city, not just bluff their way through a few gas station robberies. And FYI, in a crowd of 28,000 people in the US on any given day, it's almost certain that 269 of them will have knives of some sort, and that's less than 1% of them. Just put the numbers into your calculator if you don't believe me. Click 269 and then the division sign, then type in 28,000 and hit the "=" sign.) And then this: OMG, it actually was a war. That's a perfect summary of your whole post in one 'word'. Your previous article said this: SO this guy who was trying to go on a killing spree didn't even bring a single gun into the building. Ho hum. What else ya got...? 50% of America's population tried to "violently overthrow the US gov't and end democracy"... remember? It was only comparable to Pear Harbour and 9/11... OMG, did the Japanese really have 267 knives at Pearl Harbour? I can't believe they didn't win the whole effin' war right there. In the end you provided on quote from one guy who didn't even bring his gun when he went in to kill a bunch of people who surrounded by armed cops with actual, loaded guns. BLM walked around chanting their intent to murder cops. Is that wore than 1 guy who almost had a gun, babbling after he was arrested? Here's the deal dude: Leftards like you supported violent riots that caused billions in damages, saw thousands of cops assaulted, thousands of cops injured, thousands of building burned down, thousands of buildings looted, and you never stopped cheering. Now you want to be taken seriously when you say things like "Armed to the teeth and ready for war" when referring to 28,000 people, less than 1% of whom were armed at all, and zero had guns. You call that "trying to violently overthrow the US gov't and end democracy". Honest to God dude, you're just really stupid and impossibly credulous and there's no other way to describe it. I don't know what ever gave you the impression that you have a high IQ, but I can only guess it was from beating your dog at Crazy 8's, or from your mom.
    1 point
  6. No. You've made assumptions that fit your bias... That's all. And you're too stupid or stubborn or both to recognize that.
    1 point
  7. So you heard ALLEGATIONS, but MISSED the EXPLANATIONS by election OFFICIALS. Mail in ballots have been routine in many states for YEARS. They were unwilling because the "evidence" was BULLSHIT, which Giuliani ADMITTED to the AZ Republican Speaker of the House Rusty Bowers. You've already admitted you don't care about the facts.
    1 point
  8. You do know ALL ^this "evidence" was rejected in 60+ court cases, don't you? When you have NO EVIDENCE of FRAUD, ALL YOU HAVE is the certified VOTE COUNT.
    1 point
  9. What did Trump mean when he said "if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore"? WE KNOW what HIS MOB BELIEVED he MEANT. You know, the mob about whom he said, "let them in, they're NOT here to HURT ME." Who do you believe they were there to hurt (besides Mike Pence)? LMAO
    1 point
  10. You watched "coverage" that proved the election was "warped"? LMAO Did you also watch coverage of elections officials explaining WHY that was BULLSHIT? Again, you're putting your FAITH in LIARS like Giuliani and Trump who MADE CLAIMS of voter fraud they COULD NOT PROVE IN COURT.
    1 point
  11. Well, here's fact for you: Somebody was objecting to my calling her being doxxed "an attack." I say Kristi feels her and her family are being Dox attacked. Would you like to know why? It's obvious. I don't now why I have to keep pointing out the obvious to you and yours. You imply it's because you believe you have superior "facts" but we never see them.
    1 point
  12. And all of those reporters and the Capitol security cameras were somehow faked into airing the Steven Spielberg footage.
    1 point
  13. I gave you the sources. RELIABLE sources. I PROVED that you are a LIAR. All you can do at this point is try to spin the LIE or change the subject. You look even more desperate and uneducated than usual.
    1 point
  14. I already gave you reliable sources proving that this goose stepping woke CRT is being taught in places other than law schools. I HAVE PROVEN THAT YOU ARE A LIAR.
    1 point
  15. There is no such thing as informed, if it involves the LIE that is critical race theory. And I just proved you are a LIAR, by PROVING that CRT is being taught in places other than Ivy League law schools at the Juris Doctorate level. YOU'VE BEEN PROVEN A LIAR. YOU'RE THE ILLITERATE ONE HERE, as well as a LIAR.
    1 point
  16. This is just another case where the left has been brain-trained to ignore the obvious. Like a used up, dementia ridden old politician who campaigned from his basement or when he did campaign, couldn't get enough supporters to fill a high school auditorium got more votes to be President than any other Presidential campaigner in the history of the country. If you haven't been trained to ignore the obvious you can believe that. If you haven't you can't. Of course the left launched this doxxing attack of high level Republicans. It's obvious.
    1 point
  17. Yes yes, I can always move on without commenting - sort of like could have here too right? ? Because their plans sucked. The 2021 Conservative environmental platform was a joke. There's no contradiction in disliking one option, and liking a stupider alternative even less. September was a long time ago. Since then Trudeau is up (don't know why), and PP is down, as evidenced by the Dec 19 poll. Again, it's earlier, and it's also showing the Tories are down (along with the Liberals). The NDP were the net winners in that poll. Just being angry doesn't get any any point across. F*CK TRUDEAU is inarticulate, incoherent anger - the equivalent of toddlers having tantrums. You don't engage with angry adult babies for the same reason you don't a toddler having a meltdown. It just leads to more and bigger problems down the road. We've had a front-row seat to this phenomenon in the US. The Constitution is irrelevant to this conversation, and it's silly to bring up. Of course I'm being judgemental. So what? What I'm mad about is the general (and thoroughly predictable) incompetence of the Trudeau Liberals, and their poor management of our finances. Unfortunately the current iteration of the CPC sucks all of the oxygen out of these topics, focusing instead on culture-war bullshit, as well as yoking and echoing the rage, ignorance and/or conspiracy theories of the dumbest part of their base. Hard pass. That's one of the more ridiculous things you've said here on this forum. We have far more in common than we don't. Sure, and getting rid of him should be a chip-shot for the Conservatives given his inarguably poor performance. Instead, the CPC chose a caustic mouthpiece and populist - the guy who'd best galvanize the opposition and turn away the middle-right voters the Party needs to actually form a government. It's possible he could still win, but PP's so unpalatable outside the base that you set the bar really low for Trudeau. This is massive thread-derailment at this point though. If we want to continue this conversation we probably need another thread for it.
    1 point
  18. No. What “kicked off” the rioting was the sitting President of the United States telling his supporters, without evidence, that the election had been “stolen,” and that his followers needed to march to the US Capitol to STOP THE STEAL. They marched to the Capitol peacefully and then erupted in violence. This thing was not “a few dozen people.” We all saw the videos. How could it be that a few dozen people caused 150 police officers to be hospitalized, leading to five officer deaths and several permanent disabilities? 36 or 48 people put 150 in the hospital? No, you are lying. Hundreds have been criminally charged and many have been convicted, although America’s Most Wanted remains at large.
    1 point
  19. Oh, I agree that there is STILL institutionalized racism in America. It'll be here as long as there is a Democrat Party. They are the ONLY racists in America. CRT is a lie and is itself racist. Anyone who believes it is a racist.
    1 point
  20. Who's been fired then? Somebody should be fired for a boner like that. So who's been fired? Nobody, you say? Best guess says that's because it wasn't inadvertent. The guy who could is most likely laughing and giving the guy who did high fives. He, she, zim or zer will get a raise soon.
    1 point
  21. Focus. Pay Attention to what I write: FACT: You do not know whether the person(s) responsible were “far left” or not.
    1 point
  22. It's strange to charge people for trespassing by entering a public space. Only lefty stasis would support that
    1 point
  23. The ones that actually engaged in violence, absolutely. And although Garland's crackerjack troop of storm-troopers have been able to locate and charge perps like little grandmothers that did little more than walk around snapping photos there are a number of individuals the new American version of the Stasi don't seem interested in. Ray Epps tops that list but there are number of other criminals who were actually committing crimes on camera Garland's finest could care less about. There's a great description on the pre-arranged strategy of how 9-11 was laid out HERE that starts about half way down the page: " The “Big Bang” moment that kicked off the riot was when a small “breach team” of just a few dozen people violently knocked over the first set of metal barricades between 12:50-12:53 p.m. They forced back the police, and therefore opened a clean walkway entrance to the crowd behind them. [clip} The tactical importance of this breached location is that it was the very first walkway entrance into the Capitol grounds that every Trump supporter would arrive at first as they walked from the Trump rally to the Capitol. The Breach Team had the amazing foresight to pry open the one walkway entrance that no one could avoid. [clip] The breach team thus set up a booby trap by pushing back the police, then hauling away the “restricted area” signage, the chain fencing, and the metal barricades—all while tens of thousands were still at the Trump rally. Without police present or “do not enter” signs prominently visible, people leaving Trump’s speech and arriving at the Capitol entrance would have no idea it was illegal to walk through the gate, or onto the lawn, or up to the Capitol steps. After all, this entire area is ordinarily open to the public. Instead, they heard friendly music and saw the main walkway to the Capitol grounds wide open. These unwitting Trump supporters had no idea they had just crossed an invisible tripwire that would later subject them to federal prosecution for trespassing. Moreover, the giant main component of Trump protesters would not arrive at this Capitol entrance until 50 minutes after the Breach Team opened up the walkway—Trump had 20 minutes left in his speech, and it took 30 minutes to walk to the Peace Monument. This giant component arrived at the entrance and saw hundreds of people already inside the Capitol grounds. They would no longer stage their protest back behind the fencing, because the Breach Team booby-trappers had already hauled most of it away before they got there. The giant component therefore walked all the way up to the Capitol building itself. As we described in more detail in our October 10 report, the Breach Team thus set up what may amount to the largest legal booby-trap in American history. Indeed, when the DOJ indicted Oath Keeper Jeremy Brown in September for “trespassing on restricted grounds” (18 US Code § 1752), the Justice Department explained that any January 6 protester who stepped foot within the red line below had committed a federal crime and could be kept in prison without bail until a criminal trial 12+ months away." The perps in what he's calling the "Breach Team" are all identifiable on video. You can see the videos and instructive graphics on the site. Any interested have at least one of the names from a separate incident the police attended the previous night. But authorities have shown no interest in identifying these perps or even looking for them. There's also the "Scaffold Commander" who was waiting atop a media scaffold at the end of the walkway the trump ralliers had been herded down. He was shouting pleas and commands to anybody within earshot to enter the capitol building. Garland has shown no interest in finding him. The FBI also is not interested or incapable of what should be an easy snag of the guy who supposedly planted a pipe bomb. It was supposedly discovered just before it was time to herd the Trumpers down the walkway thus insuring less of a police presence. Capitol police had to attend. But yeah the one's engaged in violence should be charged. Also the ones who actually set the chaos of Jan 6 up. And it wasn't Trump. A for real bipartisan committee might be necessary to get actual investigators looking for them.
    1 point
  24. Oh, sorry, I forgot. You live in a fantasy world and simply make up straw men, because straw arguments are the only thing you are fit to debate. And as is also entirely predictable, when your arguments are destroyed you fire up the insults, deployed with all the wit and grace of a pimply pre-teen. Of course you WERE lying. And again, you'd need stilts and a stepladder to get anywhere near me. Proof you were and ARE lying: "How stupid does one have to be to believe that a handful of people tried to "violently overthrow the US gov't without so much as a single gun or a knife"?" Did you think people wouldn't notice? lol. You're such a joke. Again, you're a fool if you think people are going to believe your lies and let them slide. I can only assume you don't have capacity for shame to be so brazenly dishonest. Vice “I don’t f*cking care that they have weapons,” Trump said angrily to Ornato. “They’re not here to hurt me. They can march to the Capitol from here.” Despite the president being “effin’ furious,” his staff didn’t listen to him and the magnetometers remained. In total, the Secret Service confiscated “42 canisters of pepper spray, 269 knives or blades, 18 brass knuckles, 18 tasers, 6 pieces of body armor, 3 gas masks, 30 batons or blunt instruments, and 17 miscellaneous items likes scissors, needles, or screwdrivers'' from the 28,000 people who went through the magnetometers to enter the protest grounds at the Ellipse. Many others refused to enter or hid their bags so they wouldn’t have their weapons confiscated. " Those are just the folks who were scanned and caught. Obviously the gun toters who we KNOW entered the capitol didn't submit to scanning. WestCanMan says: "Not a single gun or knife." --- Pathethc There are HOURS of footage of violent insurrection. Is it your assertion (bald-faced lie) that this wasn't a violent event? And there is zero question that there was an attempt to overthrow the government and democracy. It's the express intent of the Eastman plan, which Trump believed would be served by his mob of rubes. Ashli Babbitt (you could at least spell your hero's name correctly) may not have been carrying a gun, but there is zero question that she was at the vanguard of a violent mob on a mission to keep Trump in power after he lost the election. They were literally smashing through doors and windows to get at the legislators. Grow up yourself, liar. You are factually wrong. If you were mature and honest enough to simply acknowledge it and learn I wouldn't need to rub your nose in it, but you're neither of those things, so I'm dropping this gem here again:"How stupid does one have to be to believe that a handful of people tried to "violently overthrow the US gov't without so much as a single gun or a knife"?" Mazza had two guns, FYI. They weren't there to kill police officers. They were there to kill Pence, Pelosi and who knows how many others. He told as much to LEO after his arrest. I know you're bummed out that he didn't get to follow through, but I'm still going to call you out for the commited, if inept, defense of the indefensible. I literally laughed aloud when I read this. I gotta tell you, it hurts my feelings about as much as a "little person" telling me I'm the shortest man in the room. You're not Reason10 dumb, but you'd need 20 more IQ points to play in my league. Maybe tone it down a notch if you want to be taken seriously. After all... "How stupid does one have to be to believe that a handful of people tried to "violently overthrow the US gov't without so much as a single gun or a knife"?"?
    1 point
  25. It’s your fault for being wrong and not owning up to it. You wrote that the SSN’s were released by “Far left libbies in the Jan 6 Committee.” But the truth is that the SSN’s were not released by anyone in the Jan 7 Committee.
    0 points
  26. You do listen..... To a lot of unproven nonsense that you then push as if it were gospel. In your tiny mind "facts be damned".... It's comical. What's "obvious" to an id iot, is absurd to those who don't make "assumptions".
    -1 points
  27. So...what exactly is your argument here? Overall job numbers don't matter because you can trawl the news feeds looking for examples of companies that laid people off? As for companies doing tons of hiring in 2022, look at Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, Chase, Deloitte and more. It's pretty goofy to be pointing at individual company layoffs as signs of the apocalypse when the economy is adding more than they're losing, by wide margins. Fake news though, right? Government-friendly statistics.... ?
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...