Leaderboard

Trump's D.C. inauguration crowd looks to be much bigger than Biden's.

Congratulations to President Donald J. Trump for his unprecedented rise in U.S. politics and multiple challenges to the status quo. Now Canada can bitch about President Joe Biden.

Biden has tiny flags to pretend he is popular...and not the thief he is.

Online. Only 300 are allowed on-site. But I expect this sort of BS from Communists and their supporters.

You don't have to hate Trump to point out his obvious shortcomings as a human being. That said: he is the ONLY President in a very, very long time who had any real concern to the future of the USA. He just wasn't the best man to make his legitimate concerns work into policy and law. Bottom line: the swamp did not get drained and the alligator's puppets now run the entire country (into the ground).

There was absolutely no commonality between Trump and Harper. Harper was quiet, introspective, an introvert, really, thoughtful, a backroom sort of planner. He spent long, long hours at his desk, and even when he went home the messengers were active bringing documents back and forth between him and the PMO and PCO. Trump was a lazy, boastful narcissistic who cared about no one but himself, did almost no work, and was vastly ignorant about every facet of life outside New York city real estate. Comparing him to Harper is a huge insult to Harper.

The final word on a miserable excuse for a human being. Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, born to wealth, power, with the benefit of good looks and health, he led a golden life. yet never in history has a man with so much felt so sorry for himself. Spoiled rotten when young he came to believe he was special and owed everything and anything he wanted. When he didn't get it he sulked and whined and became sullen and angry. He developed the sulky attitude of a toddler and never lost it. He cared nothing for anyone but himself, had no empathy for others and the persona of a sociopath. He was a compulsive liar, taking credit for other men's accomplishments, unable to ever admit mistakes, refusing to take responsibility for anything. There is a saying which goes "To whom much is given, much is expected." Comes from the bible, a book he has never read. Trump certainly didn't follow that philosophy. Despite all the wealth he inherited he did little with it. Too lazy to get properly educated, too arrogant to listen to men who were, he blew his father's money and was only saved by a reality TV show and Russian investors for whom he laundered money and broke sanctions. A lifelong liar and sales guy was the perfect match for politics, especially with all the free publicity he garnered from the media looking at him with awe and amazement - a man so wealthy and so crude, so rich and so emotionally impoverished, a man who would say whatever would get a sale without caring who it offended. As president, he accomplished nothing. His laziness, however, at least kept him from destroying too much. He spent his days watching TV and tweeting, when he wasn't golfing. He attended no briefings, read no reports, chaired no meetings unless the TV cameras were there. When Covid19 arrived, he treated it like a PR exercise he thought he could lie about and make go away. He espoused a phony toughness (for a guy who had never been in a fight in his life) and disdained masks - though insisting everyone around him get repeatedly tested. His bravado caused his acolytes to do the same, and thousand of them died for it. He lied his way into office and lied his way out of it. Too small and vain to admit he lost he made up lies about a great fraud to rob him of the victory he deserved (as he felt he deserved everything), and got more people killed while further dividing his country. Always the victim, always the whiner, always so hard done by. Poor Donald. Poor poor Donald. He slithers out of town like a sullen dog who's been beaten, snarling at those behind him as he exits, tail between legs, angry at how unfair the world has been to him. Good riddance.

Love it. ^ It's America's fault Canadians are languishing in Commie prison camps.

KXL, vaccine doses, Meng extradition, and more socks.

Oddly, in your short time here, I find you to be the things you accuse others of.

Yes, but your PM is weak and has no balls. Chretien or Harper would have traded Meng for Michaels. China knows that Trudeau is very weak...because he is.

Lol. Their article was rife with disinformation and key omissions. It was garbage, just like I said that CNN is. YOU like it because you're a leftist, and for some reason leftists like rioting and racial division, so you're quite ok with CNN fabricating a false narrative which creates division and incites rioting. If you were the cop who got punched, had your taser stolen, had it shot at you, and the MSM was painting you as a racist bully and acting like the drunk driver who assaulted you was an innocent victim of racist violence you'd understand how atrocious CNN's reporting is. You are just a liar with no empathy so CNN's story is perfectly acceptable to you. That's disgusting.

What we need and what will happen is two very different subjects, unless the two party approach is both on the left, the right is not going to listen and the left is not going to entertain anything the right has to offer. So we are back to where we started. The issues that PIK bring up are not just some conspiracy theory, they are real threats, and sticking our heads in a hole is not going to solve the problem like the liberals are doing..

No one admits to watching CNN but just for shits and giggles, what 'news' do you get on your rabbit ears? Admittedly our Canadian news channels aren't much better than CNN, but at least they take a break from lying about politics to do 35 minutes of covid fear mongering every hour.

I've criticized China more on this site than anyone else here. Just because I don't buy your Qanon bullshit without supporting evidence doesn't mean I'm giving them a pass.

Tucker Carlson admitted in a court of law that anything he said, should be not be viewed literally, but rather an "exaggeration." The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' source: https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

You forgot to include Canada, Australia, New Zealand, nearly all of Europe, most countries in Asia, etc. A victory for Biden is a victory for first World democracy.

Do you have even the most minute clue how much stuff Canadian labs ship abroad to other government labs around the world every year? I'm not saying that the virus didn't come from a Chinese lab. China is capable of anything. I'm saying there's precious little evidence to indicate it did, and even less to indicate it was deliberate. I realize evidence isn't important to you Qanon types, but most of us make use of it.

Trump was certainly more effective than Trudeau. Trump engaged China on many levels, including IP theft, transshipments, dumping, and tariffs.

It was Trump's shortcomings that made him attractive. Not a career politician...unlike that snake, Joe Biden. Now we put-up...with Communism disguised as 'Social Democracy'. What many Trumpers think happened... 1. Things going well...economy on fire...China being put in its place. China very angry. 2. Democrats meet with the Reds in secret to make a plan. A good plague is what is needed. 3. Canada provides the needed bat pathogen samples. 4. The Red Chinese military builds the virus...and releases it. Perhaps not quite as they'd planed...but away she goes! Out into the world. 5. Trump blamed for virus. This despite not being a Democrat Governor... 6. Economy tanks mostly due to unreasonable lockdowns that are aimed to destroy the middle class. 7. Trump blamed for eclipses...and your cake falling in the oven. 8. Trump blamed for your ingrown toenail...and your sister's divorce. 9. Trump blamed for...did I forget something? 10. Democrats steal the election at 3 AM when nobody is bothering to watch. 11. The swamp refuses to look at any evidence of theft or wrongdoing. 12. Joe assumes his role as dictator of the USA. 13. Kamala awaits in the wings to complete the theft... Feel free to laugh...but millions BELIEVE that. Some of them are VERY angry. Feel free to continue laughing...it won't fix what's wrong.

Any of the Trump supporters here notice that Biden included them in his speech and never talked about himself? Probably not.

Ok @sharkmantime for you to become $100 poorer as you promised You can make the donation here under the name Sharkman-MLW or something like that https://ca.gofundme.com/f/9v4q2-justice-for-breonna-taylor?qid=d58b11b52f5c1b61f4a9c545a680fcee Once you’re done please let me know so I can check it out!

It's not rabid hatred. Nothing I said was untrue. All of it was repeatedly demonstrated. I judge politicians (usually badly) based on their behavior and performance. I don't get man-crushes on them and swoon every time they open their mouth.

Only Harper had balls...and he was too much of a Trump for the wilting Canadian flowers.

Sounds a lot like the departing POTUS.

JT is weak and stupid...a bad combination. The "rule of law" did not apply to SNC-Lavalin. Go away Trudeau....come back another day to beg the American president for things.

No, Canada should address its own oil and gas pipeline paralysis across provinces....going back decades. The Canadian "Michaels" would have been home long ago if Trudeau had any balls like Chretien or Harper.

Those are all things that Biden should address. Sans the Socks. The Meng extradition thing should be addressed ASAP, the US has put Canada in a very difficult spot and is dragging its feet while two Canadians languish in a Chinese prison.

1. My government doesn't own so much....corporate America does. Canadian corps also own many foreign subsidiaries. China has done the same. 2. Maybe Biden will ask for something in trade. 3. Banding together only occurs for narrow interests, not broad economic policy. Choosing China over Canada is not a very difficult decision for bean counters. 4. The Soviet Union no longer exists. NATO only serves to exaggerate the disparities between member nations and commensurate impact on NATO policies.

Trump has once again show what a douche bag he and his stripper wife is.

It is unrealistic for Canada to always rely on "allies" when it cannot contribute to the presumed collective with equal economic and military measure. Resentment is healthy on a national scale if it leads to more independent and "Canada first" policies. Instead, PM Trudeau is already begging Biden for things before he is even inaugurated. As stated before, Canada cannot expect relief from global economic competition because of geopolitical alliances. Too often Canada uses "allies" as an excuse for not competing, and remains overly dependent on one nation's economy (U.S.) despite recent "free trade" deals. If it comes down to picking Canada or China, what does Canada have to offer ?

Donald Trump has never reached out to Joe Biden. Never. Never even called him. Not even a phone call. What a prick. Good riddance.

....and, what's your point? Do you understand why some of us don't want communism? Do you have a clue beyond the written definition.....how it looks like in practice? You want a regime like China? Like, Venezuela?

Doesn't Canada have more cache with "allies" other than the United States when it comes to China policies ? Or is this just another acknowledgement that Canada in particular looks to the United States to do most of the heavy lifting, as usual ? To be clear, the EU and Asia are not interested in Canada's problems either.

One of the problems is that China is already so deep in our supply chain, there are a lot of necessary products that can only be bought from China. They have already killed vast swaths of the North American supply chain...and buried it under a pile of ever-more-expensive Chinese made replacements. I had to order some brass and bronze fittings for a project this week, and didn't matter WHERE on this continent I looked, they were all from Asia, mostly China (and no doubt the non-Chinese addresses are now Chinese owned).

1. Chinas actions need atleast a reaction, not just a few words in the media, because we think China holds all the cards, i get it they do hold most of the cards in regards to goods we consume. But thats still no reason to back down from china, or atleast show them some balls so to speak. Start finding other sources for imports, placing taxes on Chinese goods, restricting Chinese investment 2. Who is the left, Liberals, NDP, Green party, or more specific any thing not on the right side of the spectrum. 3. Yes , restricting does not mean stopping, it means diversifying the same products we import from different countries, so that when China does play hard ball we are not as exposed or vulnerable. Chinese investments have to be looked at very closely, or we will find ourselves in the same boat as Australia found itself, with very large chunks of Australia's major exports being owned by Chinese companies or Chinese government to which they are trying to reverse right now. 4. China has grown to massive size in regards to their economy, that even if the west decided to cut off china right now, it would be survivable, and China would still maintain it's place on the worlds stage. As they own a good chunk of the world. 5. Not just corporations , pension funds as well including the federal pension fund has hundreds of billions of dollars invested in main land china. Yes they generate profits, but here is the rub, most of those profits are going to China so it can continue buying up large chunks of the world, it feeds the Chinese military machine. So why do we see China as a threat and still continue to dump hundreds of billions into their economy... what is wrong with ours ? just saying it is after all Canada's pension plan... every country has production in China, once again why can we not entice these same companies to move production through incentives or tax breaks. 6. Everyone should atleast know about these concentration camps by now. forced labor camps, child labor, and when something is said or done, China shuts it down , or takes some form of punishing action. Canadians like their cheap shit way to much to make this an issue.... That is one of the problems Little bandwidth on all sides of the government really, and I'm very surprised the left has not hoisted this as one of their causes, like BLM campaign ....Whys is that ? Well the idea is being floated by the right, and the left will not get behind anything from the right., in my opinion. I think the only change we are going to see, if the people get behind it, stop buying Chinese crap and buy local, force Canadians companies to change up their business practices, but i do know one thing nothing will change if we don't do anything which it what it seems the liberals are doing.

Yes, the suit alleged that 4 states had unconstitutionally changed their election statutes. Constitutional issues are what the Supreme Court deals with. And your theory is that because the states' allegations dealt specifically with what they saw as a constitutional matter that means they were afraid to mention all the other incidents of outright voter fraud. Explain this one then. This is one of the cases that could not be expedited to be considered before the inauguration but are, as far as I know, still waiting in the Supreme Court's lineup. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-815/163621/20201211163936285_Petition Michigan .pdf I was reading a judge's decision on another case. I'm pretty sure I gave you a link to it once before. The lawyer's had proposed at least one allegation of outright fraud, but like you guys say, in this one particular case the judge didn't think the lawyers could prove it if he allowed the case to be considered. However the judge didn't dismiss the case on those grounds. He dismissed it on the grounds he didn't think the litigants bringing the case before him had standing. So in that case who was afraid to consider the allegations? The lawyers alleging voter fraud or the judge who didn't want to take the case? Here's my point then. There are multiple considerations as to why a case might be brought before a court and make allegations of voter irregularities. Whether or how irregularities are considered is multi-faceted. A blanket statement as to why or even if any lawyer will or won't allege outright voter fraud is hiding behind a generality. Or to put it another way, it's wrong.

I'd be surprised if the Dominion lawsuit makes it past the discovery phase. I suspect Dominion will withdraw once Lin Wood starts demanding to look through their logs, books and have forensic audits done on their machines. The cases that interest me are the ones still waiting to be seen in the Supreme court. They were filed. They weren't rejected. So what happens to them now? As to this theory no lawyer was willing to go in front of a judge to present allegations of wrong doing, show me how that works. Let's take the most well known one for example. Show me how Texas and the 18 states weren't alleging voting irregularities in the case they filed before the Supreme that was dismissed on grounds they didn't have standing. Because I'm pretty sure they did allege that. If they weren't alleging voting irregularities what were they alleging?

Yes Michael there is a huge party divide on this. Today the Cons are talking about being more firm with china, restricting them on investing in our resources or other projects, diversifying our imports / exports more, and condemning their human rights violations . The left do recognize the problem, as most government departments are reminding them constantly, but they have failed to do anything real that the public knows of , instead they are using the diplomatic approach with what looks like little success. China has been popping up on a lot of countries radars lately USA, India, Russia, Australia, Canada, European union along with other organizations such as NATO, 5 eyes, and many more and I'm not sure if the quite diplomatic approach is what is called for here. As for Justin being a communist, I'm not 100 sure what Justin is, He is a politician more interested in getting re elected and kicking problems down the road when he can. Canada as a nation wants China's money, and our industry are making it tough to change directions now. The free western world and it's need to seek out a profit where ever it may be, is responsible for creating china into this world power house, China has now reached a point where it would grow regardless of what the west does. Perhaps it is time we start taxing the shit out of these companies that have based their production there, or giving them incentives to move some place else. I'm surprised that there has not been more out of the left in regards to china's actions around the globe, it's human rights violations, sweat shops with child labor... instead of taking the Liberal approach and being quite about it, perhaps they should be fanning the flames and educate Canadians.

You say that with the secure knowledge that you are probably much too insignificant to be sued for libeling a company with no evidence whatsoever.

Dominion suing Powell for 1.3 billion. They have also sent letters of intent to Fox, Hannity, Dobbs, Bartiromo, Wood, Giuliani, Limbaugh, Newsmax, ONN and Epoch Times. Legal eagles say their case against Powell is pretty much a slam dunk. Dominion executive Eric Coomer who had to go into hiding because of death threats from Trump's crazy battalion is suing Powell, Giuliani, Newsmax, ONN and multiple other right wing agencies and commentators. Bout time these people were held accountable.

From Snopes

It's safe to say that yesterday put an end to this charade. Trump finally conceded that he's gone January 20th. Of course it was facing the threat of being forced to resign or being removed from office.

The problem is anyone who says that openly is accused of racism, which is as dangerous to your career today as accusations of blasphemy and heresy were to your life in medieval Europe (or in the Muslim world today). You'd be mobbed by the frenzied SJW types. And few want to subject themselves to that when keeping quiet is safer.

Phoney “emails” on a “hard drive” that Republican operatives claim to have but won’t allow anyone to examine in person .....only letting people see screenshots What about the fake email scandal from the last election, wasn’t Trump going to throw Hillary in jail for that? It’s been 4 years. What happened was it all bullshit or is your Dear Leader too incompetent to get the job done? Seems it could only be one or the other Meanwhile in the real world the real Russia investigation had some actual results

They haven't being confirmed at all. You are being misled by your alt-right blogs again. Why are you so gullible, over and over again? I'm beginning to think you spread misinformation on purpose.

I imagine if the Democrats came up with pictures of emails and wouldn't let anyone see or verify the originals, you would accept their veracity without question? I also imagine that's a question you would never answer.

Why would he need satire in what was supposed to be a medical briefing? Even if I was to concede he was being sarcastic, which I'm not, being sarcastic in a medical briefing is both unprofessional and irresponsible.

The thing about Trump is that he doesn't need to be seen through the filter of friendly or unfriendly media. He says things that people see. He said that internal use of disinfectant could be a treatment for COVID-19. He has a Twitter account that everyone can read. He lied later saying he was being sarcastic to a reporter, he wasn't. He was talking to one of his doctors. People can see him for who he is without it being filtered through the media.